Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Suella Braverman thread 2

354 replies

AdamRyan · 06/04/2023 08:52

As we filled up thread one eith our battling over whether it's feminist or racist to support Suella Braverman's weekend statements, I thought another would be good.

Here's some of what she said:

"What's clear is what we've seen is a practice whereby vulnerable white English girls, sometimes who are in care, sometimes in challenging circumstances, being pursued and raped and drugged and harmed by gangs of British Pakistani men who've worked in child abuse rings or networks. We've seen institutions and state agencies, whether it's social workers, teachers, the police turn a blind eye to these signs of abuse out of political correctness, out of fear of being called racist, out of fear of being called bigoted. And as a result, thousands, we are not talking small numbers, we are talking large numbers, thousands of children have had their childhoods robbed and devastated. And there are many of these perpetrators still running wild, behaving in this way. And it's now down to the authorities to track these perpetrators down, without fear or favour, relentlessly and bring them to justice"

Sunak has since rowed back on this and the Home Offices own research suggests there is not enough quality research to say any particular ethnicity is disproportionately involved in "grooming gangs"

OP posts:
Thread gallery
29
EndlessTea · 06/04/2023 09:14

Since you created a new thread…

I wasn’t able to post about the fact certain people, such as yourself OP, are so hell-bent on defending their ethical model from the intrusion of reality, that it leads to double-standards and real world harms (such as men being treated as belonging to a sacred caste so their victims never get justice).

In this article it discusses how ‘Prevent’ has been rigged to defend this ethical model, to go after non-existent far right bogeymen, instead of protecting the public by going after those who actually present a danger to us.

"Challenging extremist ideology should not be limited to proscribed organisations but should also cover domestic extremists operating below the terrorism threshold who can create an environment conducive to terrorism," he said.
He also said there had been a "double standard", with the definition of extremist Islamist ideology too narrow and the approach to the extreme right-wing too broad, drawing in mainstream, "mildly controversial" commentary.

https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/uk-counter-terrorism-strategy-needs-refocus-islamism-review-2023-02-08/

AdamRyan · 06/04/2023 08:58

I transcribed that myself from her Sky News interview so it doesn't come from an article? You can copy some context if you think it's useful.

OP posts:
Whaeanui · 06/04/2023 08:57

You’re so fucking disingenuous. Copy the first part of her article.

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread