Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Can MNHQ set up a new discussion category called Feminism: sex & gender discussion (inclusive, non-GC)

867 replies

PlanetLuna · 04/04/2023 14:59

MN, will you please create a talk group/category of Feminism: sex & gender discussion (inclusive, non-GC)?

MN appears to currently have only 2 feminism categories:
Feminism: chat
Feminism: sex & gender discussions

But the Feminism: sex & gender category on MN is predominantly GC, with its emphasis on trans exclusion ideology. Feminists who do not subscribe to those beliefs are often unwelcome and treated with derision and hostility in discussions. Certainly not always as some GC posters do enjoy open, intellectual discussions but often enough that engagement can be toxic & intimidating all around.

It is almost impossible for non-GC feminists to find inclusive/non-GC feminist discussions, and we have to wade through unpleasant (for us) GC threads while attempting to do so.

GC feminism dominates on UK parenting sites in particular. However, inclusive/non-GC feminism is extremely popular around the world (especially in places like the US, NZ, and AU) and in the UK among younger feminists and those who do not see trans rights as a threat to women & girls’ safety. Many UK feminists are non-GC but may feel silenced on MN.

The addition of another category will help open up and improve MN discussions while reducing the toxicity and hostility that many feminists on both sides experience in discussions.

So I propose the following feminism discussion categories:
Feminism: chat (general)
Feminism: sex & gender discussions (GC)
Feminism: sex & gender discussion (inclusive, non-GC)

@MNHQ

OP posts:
Thread gallery
27
onegirlandherdog · 04/04/2023 17:52

Labraradabrador · 04/04/2023 17:45

Just wanted to say I totally get it OP. I was so confused by all the GC nonsense categorised as ‘feminism’ - I have a VERY different understanding of feminism, and my brand of feminism has a different set of priorities (employment and economic equality above bathroom politics). I also find the tone of GC crowd to be incredibly offensive in many instances. I’m sorry you have had so many unpleasant comments. At this point I have given up on discussing this topic on mumsnet - let them shout at each other.

Me too! lifelong, active feminist in her 50s here. Appalled by what I've been witnessing these last couple of years. Plus, LGBTQ spaces have always been the safest and most feminist spaces for me - not just physically safe from sexual harassment, but safe to be myself and I've always felt welcome - in the past and now. Not going to forget that that.

nilsmousehammer · 04/04/2023 17:52

Yes the whole 'those horrible women are driving hundreds of thousands of women off MN' line was the one used to get HQ to create the chat thread. There it is. HQ created it. It's not being used for much, go and use it.

Although I think to ask women not to 'derail' anti-women conversations is a bit strange, and I doubt you would accept the idea that FWR should never be 'derailed' with other views or posts such as yours?

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 04/04/2023 17:51

Since I hid AIBU (best decision ever by the way), sex and gender threads often show up in my little trending box. It’s a busy board

Giggorata · 04/04/2023 17:51

That sounds horribly familiar…

StellaAndCrow · 04/04/2023 17:51

I guess it's another way of trying to force "no debate", maybe?

You can have discussions anywhere, but is what you're wanting somewhere that particular views are not allowed?

Giggorata · 04/04/2023 17:50

I fail to see how wanting to retain women's rights, spaces and definition is “derailing”

RoseslnTheHospital · 04/04/2023 17:50

@ConstanceOcean you say "Most MNers will not even come into the feminist board for this reason." But how do you know that at all? You can't possibly. Sure, plenty of vocal posters will say how much they hate this section but you can't possibly say that most MNers wont even come into the feminist board at all.

Helleofabore · 04/04/2023 17:50

stayathomer · 04/04/2023 17:42

Helleofabore
Agreed. (Shakes hand👍)

Done!

StellaAndCrow · 04/04/2023 17:49

OP, you have literally the EXACT WHOLE OF THE REST OF MUMSNET for the type of discussions you want.
Sorry for shouting, but FFS!

The split of the feminism board happened while I was still only lurking, but I heard about it. This one board is the ONLY place on mumsnet that we're allowed to discuss how we don't think gender stereotypes are helpful or meaningful.

Florissante · 04/04/2023 17:49

ConstanceOcean · 04/04/2023 17:46

I don’t use Twitter so I can’t comment on that but every single time I have posted on the feminist board I have been shot down by the majority.

You and other posters say my views are similar to the majority of posters on here but my experience is the complete opposite which I find very frustrating because you can’t have a discussion if posters just shut you straight down.
Most MNers will not even come into the feminist board for this reason.

Of course it’s not every poster but it’s enough to stop people like me posting any more and I believe it’s the reason why the OP wants a thread where things can actually be discussed and not just silence you.

tl;dr: I want an echo chamber where no one will disagree with me.

Eyerollcentral · 04/04/2023 17:49

PlanetLuna · 04/04/2023 17:44

Hi @JoodyBlue
Thanks for your response.

I would expect and hope for a reasoned discussion.

I would hope that anyone engaging on those topics would do so with the understanding that some feminists simply do not agree with GC feminism and do not want those conversations derailed.

Hmmmm what does this actually mean? Not mentioning you don’t believe you can have a cock and balls and be a woman?

bigbabycooker · 04/04/2023 17:49

@Labraradabrador

But there is a board for discussions about equal pay! It's the general feminist chat one. That's exactly what it is there for and most people would engage with it very willingly

ZIEVAR · 04/04/2023 17:48

Haven't a clue what the first post means. God, I hate accronyms! But, I will read it again and try to understand it.

RealityFan · 04/04/2023 17:48

Labraradabrador · 04/04/2023 17:45

Just wanted to say I totally get it OP. I was so confused by all the GC nonsense categorised as ‘feminism’ - I have a VERY different understanding of feminism, and my brand of feminism has a different set of priorities (employment and economic equality above bathroom politics). I also find the tone of GC crowd to be incredibly offensive in many instances. I’m sorry you have had so many unpleasant comments. At this point I have given up on discussing this topic on mumsnet - let them shout at each other.

You won't get any disrespectful comments from me. But you'll have to argue your cause, and promise to keep arguing it.

Self-imposed isolation from the GCs is not the way forward.

TheShellBeach · 04/04/2023 17:48

ArabellaScott · 04/04/2023 17:40

there is the 'mush' board, too.

Yes, WTF is that all about?
OP - Give Mush a try. You might find it a good fit.

Bamboux · 04/04/2023 17:48

Labraradabrador · 04/04/2023 17:45

Just wanted to say I totally get it OP. I was so confused by all the GC nonsense categorised as ‘feminism’ - I have a VERY different understanding of feminism, and my brand of feminism has a different set of priorities (employment and economic equality above bathroom politics). I also find the tone of GC crowd to be incredibly offensive in many instances. I’m sorry you have had so many unpleasant comments. At this point I have given up on discussing this topic on mumsnet - let them shout at each other.

Do you not realise that when males can take over women's sport, take prizes, scholarships and places on schemes intended to benefit women and address gender inequality, and be promoted 'as women' in a way that superficially readdresses the gender balance within their organisation, that you have taken away all of the tools that were created to enable women to participate in employment and gain economic equality?

Don't you understand that if you take away the possibility of accurately identifying who is and is not a woman, you have fatally destroyed all possibility of making employment and society more equitable?

Happylittlechicken · 04/04/2023 17:47

So @PlanetLuna if you don’t believe women are oppressed because of their sex, as you state males can be women too, what does your inclusive feminism look like? Who is it supporting and lifting up? What aspects of feminism are not about sex and gender? Women are oppressed because of their sex and gender is the tool used to oppress them. So how can you have any kind of feminism without discussing sex and or gender….?

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 04/04/2023 17:47

Labraradabrador · 04/04/2023 17:45

Just wanted to say I totally get it OP. I was so confused by all the GC nonsense categorised as ‘feminism’ - I have a VERY different understanding of feminism, and my brand of feminism has a different set of priorities (employment and economic equality above bathroom politics). I also find the tone of GC crowd to be incredibly offensive in many instances. I’m sorry you have had so many unpleasant comments. At this point I have given up on discussing this topic on mumsnet - let them shout at each other.

may I suggest that you start threads about these topics on feminism chat?

IwantToRetire · 04/04/2023 17:46

The Women's Rest Room will be open for cakes and recipes, but as no licence, only tea and coffee will be available.

Jokes and jibes are accepted as payment.

A safe space to recuperate and be reinvigorated so as to continue to ignore the relentless finger wagging that it isn't very nice that women get loud and assertive when fighting for their rights.

ConstanceOcean · 04/04/2023 17:46

RedemptiveThursday · 04/04/2023 17:22

Your views are actually exactly the same as most GC feminists. You're a bog standard TERF. If you announced that you care about changing rooms and toilets and sports on Twitter then you would be loudly denounced as a transphobe.

Which is largely the problem here. Views that are, in fact, entirely moderate have been smeared as being extreme and discriminatory.

The other part of the problem is that you have completely bought into that (mis)characterization. There's an obvious disconnect between your view of yourself as a Good Person (and who doesn't want to see themselves as a Good Person), and the fact that Good People don't hold extreme and discriminatory views. So you've resolved that by inventing a fictional divide between the Good TERFs and the Bad TERFs. When actually they are one and the moderate same.

I don’t use Twitter so I can’t comment on that but every single time I have posted on the feminist board I have been shot down by the majority.

You and other posters say my views are similar to the majority of posters on here but my experience is the complete opposite which I find very frustrating because you can’t have a discussion if posters just shut you straight down.
Most MNers will not even come into the feminist board for this reason.

Of course it’s not every poster but it’s enough to stop people like me posting any more and I believe it’s the reason why the OP wants a thread where things can actually be discussed and not just silence you.

SwordToFlamethrower · 04/04/2023 17:46

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

ResisterRex · 04/04/2023 17:45

Crikeyisthatthetime · 04/04/2023 17:41

Hold on, why restrict this idea to the feminist forum? Can't we create a new category in Style and beauty for people who aren't interested in bags? I'd like to post about fashion and stuff without ever having to encounter handbags, shoulder bags or (urgh) totes. And maybe one that doesn't mention clothes, for days when getting dressed is a challenge.
Oh, and a gardening subsection that doesn't include South facing gardens. Mine is North facing, and the many mentions of sun loving plants can all be a bit too much.

Good idea. People who don't like crate training should have a separate board in the doghouse, for example.

Incidentally, I wouldn't expect the suggestion of a separate board over there on the many and varied and utterly fictitious gender identities of dogs would go over too well, or attract a lot of traffic.

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 04/04/2023 17:45

PlanetLuna · 04/04/2023 17:44

Hi @JoodyBlue
Thanks for your response.

I would expect and hope for a reasoned discussion.

I would hope that anyone engaging on those topics would do so with the understanding that some feminists simply do not agree with GC feminism and do not want those conversations derailed.

“Derailed”

(challenged)

Labraradabrador · 04/04/2023 17:45

Just wanted to say I totally get it OP. I was so confused by all the GC nonsense categorised as ‘feminism’ - I have a VERY different understanding of feminism, and my brand of feminism has a different set of priorities (employment and economic equality above bathroom politics). I also find the tone of GC crowd to be incredibly offensive in many instances. I’m sorry you have had so many unpleasant comments. At this point I have given up on discussing this topic on mumsnet - let them shout at each other.

OvaHere · 04/04/2023 17:44

PlanetLuna · 04/04/2023 16:48

I’d like to see discussions about gender that don’t devolve into derisory demands of “what is a woman” .

Some possible topics I’m interested in are:

Why gender inclusive language matters
The narrative that lesbians are inherently anti-trans is completely false per Just Like Us survey
feminism & neoliberalism
Discussions of whether the anti-gender movement aligns in many cases with the white suprematist movement.

That kind of thing.

You can post those topics on any relevant board on Mumsnet or even your own section should they give you one. What you can't do is restrict who responds.

So wherever you post it you will get pushback and counter arguments. As someone else pointed out this isn't Twitter and you can't restrict replies from anyone who disagrees.

If you genuinely only want to talk with people who agree with you on sites that will ban any hint of dissent on your behalf then the wider internet is your oyster.