Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Can MNHQ set up a new discussion category called Feminism: sex & gender discussion (inclusive, non-GC)

867 replies

PlanetLuna · 04/04/2023 14:59

MN, will you please create a talk group/category of Feminism: sex & gender discussion (inclusive, non-GC)?

MN appears to currently have only 2 feminism categories:
Feminism: chat
Feminism: sex & gender discussions

But the Feminism: sex & gender category on MN is predominantly GC, with its emphasis on trans exclusion ideology. Feminists who do not subscribe to those beliefs are often unwelcome and treated with derision and hostility in discussions. Certainly not always as some GC posters do enjoy open, intellectual discussions but often enough that engagement can be toxic & intimidating all around.

It is almost impossible for non-GC feminists to find inclusive/non-GC feminist discussions, and we have to wade through unpleasant (for us) GC threads while attempting to do so.

GC feminism dominates on UK parenting sites in particular. However, inclusive/non-GC feminism is extremely popular around the world (especially in places like the US, NZ, and AU) and in the UK among younger feminists and those who do not see trans rights as a threat to women & girls’ safety. Many UK feminists are non-GC but may feel silenced on MN.

The addition of another category will help open up and improve MN discussions while reducing the toxicity and hostility that many feminists on both sides experience in discussions.

So I propose the following feminism discussion categories:
Feminism: chat (general)
Feminism: sex & gender discussions (GC)
Feminism: sex & gender discussion (inclusive, non-GC)

@MNHQ

OP posts:
Thread gallery
27
RedToothBrush · 08/04/2023 14:31

The question about how many women and children are acceptable collateral never gets answered.

I think Ben Bradshaw MP has a good line on this:
https://twitter.com/Docstockk/status/1644681029750251521

Its along the lines of 'thousands of women are the victims of male violence every year, so the danger to women won't actually increase that much'.

https://twitter.com/Docstockk/status/1644681029750251521

nilsmousehammer · 07/04/2023 21:28

Hepwo · 07/04/2023 19:29

Christine Burns claims a lot of ownership of the incomprehensible fudge trans people believe the Equality Act 2010 provides them. They genuinely believe that they negotiated agreement that sex meant their choice and not actual sex. Even the single sex exemptions are meant to include both sexes if that's what they choose.

They believe that they created an absolute definitive law.

I don't think they were on the same page as the legislators at the time but they do, and have gone on to do what we have seen, generate a hostile environment for any woman disagreeing with them. Look at how nasty Burns and fans are on Twitter about women who don't consent to these male dominated rules.

Burns et al are of the generation that did consider themselves in charge of what women were permitted. We are now supposed to believe that the structure put in place by this sexist generation is progressive and modern.

That makes me laugh the loudest frankly. I will not be taking advice on anything from these antediluvians.

EHRC seems to be of the same opinion thankfully: that sexist generation belongs to a time gone by, time to close the door on them and say go well.

Very interesting analysis, and yes. That paternalism is very much visible in the 'old guard' who were instrumental in manoeuvering this into place.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 07/04/2023 20:06

Hepwo · 07/04/2023 19:29

Christine Burns claims a lot of ownership of the incomprehensible fudge trans people believe the Equality Act 2010 provides them. They genuinely believe that they negotiated agreement that sex meant their choice and not actual sex. Even the single sex exemptions are meant to include both sexes if that's what they choose.

They believe that they created an absolute definitive law.

I don't think they were on the same page as the legislators at the time but they do, and have gone on to do what we have seen, generate a hostile environment for any woman disagreeing with them. Look at how nasty Burns and fans are on Twitter about women who don't consent to these male dominated rules.

Burns et al are of the generation that did consider themselves in charge of what women were permitted. We are now supposed to believe that the structure put in place by this sexist generation is progressive and modern.

That makes me laugh the loudest frankly. I will not be taking advice on anything from these antediluvians.

EHRC seems to be of the same opinion thankfully: that sexist generation belongs to a time gone by, time to close the door on them and say go well.

That's such a good point Hepwo.

Bullyingmales with a patronising attitude towards women (often found in the law, education, politics, the media) determined that women will comply their regressive demands.

Hepwo · 07/04/2023 19:29

Christine Burns claims a lot of ownership of the incomprehensible fudge trans people believe the Equality Act 2010 provides them. They genuinely believe that they negotiated agreement that sex meant their choice and not actual sex. Even the single sex exemptions are meant to include both sexes if that's what they choose.

They believe that they created an absolute definitive law.

I don't think they were on the same page as the legislators at the time but they do, and have gone on to do what we have seen, generate a hostile environment for any woman disagreeing with them. Look at how nasty Burns and fans are on Twitter about women who don't consent to these male dominated rules.

Burns et al are of the generation that did consider themselves in charge of what women were permitted. We are now supposed to believe that the structure put in place by this sexist generation is progressive and modern.

That makes me laugh the loudest frankly. I will not be taking advice on anything from these antediluvians.

EHRC seems to be of the same opinion thankfully: that sexist generation belongs to a time gone by, time to close the door on them and say go well.

MavisMcMinty · 07/04/2023 18:05

MrsOvertonsWindow · 07/04/2023 17:47

Despite the batshit opening post, this thread has produced some amazing, insightful women centred posts. Thank you all for turning a nasty ignorant thread into a celebration of the best of feminist, women centred thought and writing. Flowers Flowers

Yes, well said, hadn’t thought of it like that!

MrsOvertonsWindow · 07/04/2023 17:47

Despite the batshit opening post, this thread has produced some amazing, insightful women centred posts. Thank you all for turning a nasty ignorant thread into a celebration of the best of feminist, women centred thought and writing. Flowers Flowers

haXXor · 07/04/2023 17:39

How benefits from putting women into this bind?

That should start "Who benefits".

haXXor · 07/04/2023 17:37

I think the issue about fertility is that all girls and women assume they can reproduce (until they can't)

Yes, and we fear unwanted pregnancy because of that. We fear vaginal rape because of that.

Instead of feeling that him going to prison will ensure he will be unable to harm anyone for a while, a victim has to decide on which women to condemn.

This made my blood run cold. I hadn't seen it before, but it's glaringly obvious now that I've seen it written down. How benefits from putting women into this bind? Sexually-abusive males do: claim to identify as trans, carry out a rape, your victim won't report to protect female prisoners, get off scot-free.

On one thread a couple of years back, a woman disclosed she'd faced that exact quandary after a trans-identifying male raped her.

She'd finally chosen not to report it to the police, for that exact reason.

That this has already happened made me cry.

I also completely understand her reasoning. At least his future victims outside of a prison have some chance to run away, because they aren't literally locked up with him. At least his future victims outside of a prison have the liberty to get STI tests and pregnancy tests and abortions at a time of their choosing and without having to disclose a rape to the screws (or anyone else) to get these essential medical treatments.

nilsmousehammer · 07/04/2023 16:24

Male people of TQ+ identities requiring to access female only spaces and services are a threat to female people having female only spaces and services, and female people are being excluded as a result. Female people need female only spaces. That some male people do not like this is not a reason for male people to control female people's boundaries.

Some of those male people are in addition a physical risk to those female people, with a number so far being convicted of using their access to those spaces to sexually offend and injure women. You know some of the names as well as women here do. Isla Bryson. Karen White. Katie Dolotowski. Those male people have then gone on to demand access to more female people within prisons.

THAT is not defendable position unless you believe that male people are valuable in ways that female people are not.

Notatmine · 07/04/2023 15:57

Nor do I see trans women as a threat to cis women and girls
You have to be able to substantiate why allowing men to be treated as literally women, does not pose a threat to women and girls. You can't just assert it as a belief. It needs to be substantiated. Especially when common sense, lived experience and the entire world wide history of men's violence to women would suggest that allowing this does cause a threat.

And that is why you need to be able to debate and discuss with those who disagree. Its literally the only way that exists to distinguish bad ideas and good ideas. Its the only way to hone your own thinking to a strong, coherent and defendable position.

Empowermenomore · 07/04/2023 15:43

Haven’t read all posts.

OP seems to make same wrong assumption that defending women rights is anti-trans.

If what OP wants is not debate as infer from the word ‘discussion’ in the title, but applauding cloned views club. Maybe it would be better to open a Cis allies-ship branch on the LGbT+ board.

For me feminism centres women, not the self ID of others.

howdoesatoastermaketoast · 07/04/2023 12:32

@NeighbourhoodWatchPotholeDivision

I agree with all the posters saying this - "Outstanding post. I agree with every word." in various wording.

It seems to me at times there is so much wrong it is quite hard to know what to be most outraged about. For me it is all linked to women's right to set there own boundaries and to say no to men.

A incarcerated man's feeling that he is entitled to a woman cellmate if he feels that that would suit him better does not automatically trump a incarcerated woman's feeling that she is entitled to a single sex prison.

A heterosexual man's feeling that he is entitled to a choose to date homosexual women if he feels that that would suit him better does not automatically trump the fact that women have a right to define their own sexual boundaries.

Same concept and attitudes we're fighting different manifestations - But yeah Keep prisons single sex - jesus talk about rights I wasn't expecting us to have to fight for again.

EmotionalSupportHyena · 07/04/2023 12:08

RosaBonheur · 07/04/2023 12:01

Did you mean liberal or inclusive "feminists"?

I suspect RTB just missed off a ‘Non’ at the very beginning!

So

“Non gender critical 'feminists' are fighting for equal pay for women when that includes any man self identifying as a women”

^^

RosaBonheur · 07/04/2023 12:01

RedToothBrush · 07/04/2023 11:23

Gender critical 'feminists' are fighting for equal pay for women when that includes any man self identifying as a women and the inability to see a pay gap because data doesn't record biological sex, this allowing unscrupulous multinationals to exploit females and reinstate and reinforce the glass ceiling.

They are fighting for the right of women to be sexually assaulted or raped in prisons by convicted sex offenders.

They are fighting for the rights of women to be leered at in changing rooms by males who think that women prance whilst exercising and have girly giggling chats because they've forgotten their tampons.

They are fighting for the right to queue past urinals for a reduced number of cubicles.

I do think the question of what they are campaigning for is very relevant if they believe that gender replaces sex...

Did you mean liberal or inclusive "feminists"?

OneMorePlant · 07/04/2023 12:01

It is funny how they constantly look like morons describing what they think feminism is. Like you said, I'm a second wave feminist and also gen x which means it's in my genes to be anti-establishment which is always anti-women. So there is no way in hell that I could possibly support gender ideology.

They like to cry that they are the most marginalised but marginalised people don't get corperate sponsorships, their flags painted all over and laws and policies that override other people's rights.

Helleofabore · 07/04/2023 11:38

I must admit that I am not very educated in feminist theory. However yesterday on an AIBU thread a male rights activist showed their hand by posting this:

”Second wave had it (broadly) right. Third wave went off track. The backlash and ensuing GC movement is dominated by rabid, ill-informed and hate-filled rhetoric.”

I thought this was great at highlighting just how ridiculous these men’s rights activists are. Completely oblivious to the second wave feminists who are those he was denouncing as rabid, ill-informed and hate-filled.

This person was telling us all about what they believed equality was and how far women have yet to achieve it while telling us off for recognising the source of female oppression- their biology.

It really was a gloriously incoherent mess.

People who don’t understand what underpins women fighting for having sex prioritised when it matters, like to reduce it to a narrow focus, when we are saying ‘no…. It impacts on most aspects of our lives!!! And fuck off, we can tackle fighting for all those things while still fighting to keep sex prioritised where it matters’.

RedToothBrush · 07/04/2023 11:23

Gender critical 'feminists' are fighting for equal pay for women when that includes any man self identifying as a women and the inability to see a pay gap because data doesn't record biological sex, this allowing unscrupulous multinationals to exploit females and reinstate and reinforce the glass ceiling.

They are fighting for the right of women to be sexually assaulted or raped in prisons by convicted sex offenders.

They are fighting for the rights of women to be leered at in changing rooms by males who think that women prance whilst exercising and have girly giggling chats because they've forgotten their tampons.

They are fighting for the right to queue past urinals for a reduced number of cubicles.

I do think the question of what they are campaigning for is very relevant if they believe that gender replaces sex...

BlueHeelers · 07/04/2023 11:10

Yes, and that of course is true only if gender based.

Sorry, no. I don't think you understand the fundamental critique of any strand of feminist thought or activism. The thinking/activism centres on the analysis of gender roles and stereotypes, and understands that sex (biological & unchanging) and gender (historically and culturally specific, changing) are linked but NOT THE SAME.

"Gender" refers to the set of socially conditioned/imposed roles and stereotypes which map onto (shifting, mutable) concepts of femininity and masculinity.

Femininity and masculinity (mutable) are, in turn, mapped onto biological sex (immutable). Feminist thought & activism aims to make space between sex and gender to allow women (and men, actually) to pursue liberated lives which are not wholly determined by their sex, and their sex difference [from men].

It's a long-standing central tenet of any feminist thought: Mary Wollstonecraft realised this, as did Harriet Taylor & John Stuart Mill. Taylor & Mill are particularly good on conditioning of women into socially imposed roles which were oppressive and violent.

nilsmousehammer · 07/04/2023 10:44

NeighbourhoodWatchPotholeDivision · 07/04/2023 00:08

Good evening. I've been catching up on this thread. I appreciate the following post is going to hark back to posts maybe a dozen pages back, but that's life.

There has been some lofty, idealistic phrasing about dealing with crime committed by males who don't identify as trans first.

So what does that look like, in terms of policy? By how much must male violence against women and girls be reduced before violence by trans-identifying offenders in historically single-sex spaces becomes worthy of preventing? Whatever your figure, what is the gameplan for eliminating that percentage of violence against women and girls?

What is the timescale for this?

Currently, women are being abused by male offenders in prison. How long do they have to wait before they are worth the effort of protecting? When you do your mental arithmetic, take into account that these rapes and sexual assaults are some of the simplest to prevent. All you have to do is separate prisons by sex again!

It can be done with the stroke of a pen.

Would you be willing to listen to the testimony of a woman currently locked in a building with a convicted rapist, and tell her that you don't think her physical and psychological welfare is worth the effort of moving those males into the male estate?

Incidentally, have you ever in your life said that bullying in school shouldn't be addressed until we've eliminated malaria, or anything like that?

At this point in a thread, some person self-identifying as a cleverclogs usually makes a fool of themselves by asking whether I ever cared about prison welfare before this issue came to the fore. Often in a highly patronising tone, with the clear expectation that they're going to trigger some kind of Damascene moment for me in which I'll realise that female prisoners don't matter.

Tonight, for the sake of my own bloody blood pressure, I'm going to pre-empt that. The answer is yes. In fact, I have cared about prison welfare since I was seven years old. Why seven? Because that was the first time my mother ever told me in any detail what her time in prison had been like. In the following years, I discovered that other adults I valued deeply, both female and male, had also served prison sentences. I do hope that's good enough for you.

I don't particularly need flower emojis, but donations to Keep Prisons Single Sex are always nice. Wink

For those who have the emotional perspicacity of a dead sheep, this longheld knowledge means that I have always been aware than incarcerated and formerly incarcerated people are... people! (Although my mother didn't believe that this applied to sex offenders and she brought me up to have no sympathy whatsoever. Grin)

Every single person in there is someone's daughter or son. The adults in my life wanted better for me than the lives they'd had, and they seem to have succeeded (unless I get arrested and imprisoned for calling men, men, at any rate!) but none of us know what the future holds for our own daughters and granddaughters.

Are you happy to turn a blind eye to your granddaughter being sexually assaulted in prison? Mine? The daughter of your sister's best friend?

What lies at the root of this lack of empathy for women? Is it people feeling guilty at saying no to particular subset of male prisoners. Why? The general public doesn't normally have any problem saying no to male prisoners asking for better food, more investment in educational facilities, and so on.

I can say, totally guilt-free, "I don't think you should be housed in the female estate. If you are in danger in the male estate, then separate units should be established for the use of trans-identifying male prisoners, in the male estate."

To be fair, I'd fear for my physical safety if I said it to someone like Karen White (who was placed in a women's prison with a mother and baby unit after being charged for raping a woman on a locked psychiatric ward. He injured her so badly she will never be able.to have children) or Tiffany Scott (Scotland's most violent male prisoner) but I wouldn't feel a drop of guilt. I'd feel a lot of guilt at ushering either of them into a room with another woman and locking the door though. And so I should!

Is it instinctive fear of violent reprisal that means you fear saying no to these prisoners when they demand to be in the women's estate? Do you realise you are using other women as your shield against these scary males? How can you feel comfortable with that?

I could never say to a woman, "I am going to let you get raped, in order to stop this man getting angry with me because he's terrifying".

extract from Keep Prisons Single Sex

“Being in prison with male prisoners, you always feel on edge. You know something could happen at any time. We know they are not women. They are physically threatening and aggressive. I was sexually assaulted and I am not the only woman who has been. They haven’t had surgery and they expose themselves. One of them had been told he couldn’t shower at the same time as us women. He made a formal complaint and said this was a breach of his human rights. So now he is allowed to shower with us. And because he now has that right, the other males have that right too. There’s only a shower curtain between us. He moves the curtain so we can all see his penis when he is washing himself or shaving his legs. This is disgusting and I think it is disgusting that the prison allows this.

We can’t complain about anything. They are very well protected and it feels like our rights as women just don’t count. We have to call them ‘she’ and ‘her’ and have to use their female names. If we don’t, we are punished and lose our enhanced prisoner or D-Category status. It is horrible to do that to women.

I am very upset that I lost my legal case. I can’t understand how anyone can say that imprisoning males alongside women is the right thing to do. The prisoner who attacked me was convicted of the most serious sexual offences against girls and still has his penis. How can the government say that putting him in prison with women is the right thing to do? It’s not. I am out of prison now. But I think about all the other women still in prison who have to live with these males. This is dangerous, disgusting and wrong.”

Outstanding post. I agree with every word.

If a person (or an entire political party) believes that female people should not expect equality or safety if it makes some male people sad then really, you have to question this belief they hold that female people are not as human or important as male ones.

On a binary, biological sex based basis.

And whether you are happy yourself or for your daughter to accept this subhuman, second class human status as a walking resource for male humans. Without right to refuse.

In 2023.

FFS.

Brefugee · 07/04/2023 09:21

The question about how many women and children are acceptable collateral never gets answered.

it's a very interesting question. Well, the non-existent answer is interesting. Because on the one hand we know there are figures relating to this "collateral damage" (victims of male violence) but nobody on the TRA side of the fence will commit to how high they don't mind that figure being. On the other hand based on MINISCULE numbers of murders (again, as i always say: any number of murders is too many) of trans women is "genocid". So perhaps we should reverse the question: how many murders of trans women are acceptable before we do something? (again: answer is none, as opposed to "answer came there none")

excellent post there by @NeighbourhoodWatchPotholeDivision - i have only known one woman who went to prison, Holloway as there was no army prison for women. Your insight is valuable. Shocking.

But we don't ever have had to engage with the plight of women prisoners, ever, to see and talk about and rail against trans women being incarcerated with them. Because what we have - most of us feminists anyway - been talking about since the dawn of time is the position of women in society. So whether that is princesses being forced to marry some kingly cousin in a different country to consolidate power bases, to women being chucked out of the steel mills after the war, having kept up steel production in dangerous conditions, so the men could "have their jobs back", to the gender pay gap: our interest is that all women are treated with dignity and fairly.

BenCoopersSupportWren · 07/04/2023 08:01

NeighbourhoodWatchPotholeDivision · 07/04/2023 00:08

Good evening. I've been catching up on this thread. I appreciate the following post is going to hark back to posts maybe a dozen pages back, but that's life.

There has been some lofty, idealistic phrasing about dealing with crime committed by males who don't identify as trans first.

So what does that look like, in terms of policy? By how much must male violence against women and girls be reduced before violence by trans-identifying offenders in historically single-sex spaces becomes worthy of preventing? Whatever your figure, what is the gameplan for eliminating that percentage of violence against women and girls?

What is the timescale for this?

Currently, women are being abused by male offenders in prison. How long do they have to wait before they are worth the effort of protecting? When you do your mental arithmetic, take into account that these rapes and sexual assaults are some of the simplest to prevent. All you have to do is separate prisons by sex again!

It can be done with the stroke of a pen.

Would you be willing to listen to the testimony of a woman currently locked in a building with a convicted rapist, and tell her that you don't think her physical and psychological welfare is worth the effort of moving those males into the male estate?

Incidentally, have you ever in your life said that bullying in school shouldn't be addressed until we've eliminated malaria, or anything like that?

At this point in a thread, some person self-identifying as a cleverclogs usually makes a fool of themselves by asking whether I ever cared about prison welfare before this issue came to the fore. Often in a highly patronising tone, with the clear expectation that they're going to trigger some kind of Damascene moment for me in which I'll realise that female prisoners don't matter.

Tonight, for the sake of my own bloody blood pressure, I'm going to pre-empt that. The answer is yes. In fact, I have cared about prison welfare since I was seven years old. Why seven? Because that was the first time my mother ever told me in any detail what her time in prison had been like. In the following years, I discovered that other adults I valued deeply, both female and male, had also served prison sentences. I do hope that's good enough for you.

I don't particularly need flower emojis, but donations to Keep Prisons Single Sex are always nice. Wink

For those who have the emotional perspicacity of a dead sheep, this longheld knowledge means that I have always been aware than incarcerated and formerly incarcerated people are... people! (Although my mother didn't believe that this applied to sex offenders and she brought me up to have no sympathy whatsoever. Grin)

Every single person in there is someone's daughter or son. The adults in my life wanted better for me than the lives they'd had, and they seem to have succeeded (unless I get arrested and imprisoned for calling men, men, at any rate!) but none of us know what the future holds for our own daughters and granddaughters.

Are you happy to turn a blind eye to your granddaughter being sexually assaulted in prison? Mine? The daughter of your sister's best friend?

What lies at the root of this lack of empathy for women? Is it people feeling guilty at saying no to particular subset of male prisoners. Why? The general public doesn't normally have any problem saying no to male prisoners asking for better food, more investment in educational facilities, and so on.

I can say, totally guilt-free, "I don't think you should be housed in the female estate. If you are in danger in the male estate, then separate units should be established for the use of trans-identifying male prisoners, in the male estate."

To be fair, I'd fear for my physical safety if I said it to someone like Karen White (who was placed in a women's prison with a mother and baby unit after being charged for raping a woman on a locked psychiatric ward. He injured her so badly she will never be able.to have children) or Tiffany Scott (Scotland's most violent male prisoner) but I wouldn't feel a drop of guilt. I'd feel a lot of guilt at ushering either of them into a room with another woman and locking the door though. And so I should!

Is it instinctive fear of violent reprisal that means you fear saying no to these prisoners when they demand to be in the women's estate? Do you realise you are using other women as your shield against these scary males? How can you feel comfortable with that?

I could never say to a woman, "I am going to let you get raped, in order to stop this man getting angry with me because he's terrifying".

extract from Keep Prisons Single Sex

“Being in prison with male prisoners, you always feel on edge. You know something could happen at any time. We know they are not women. They are physically threatening and aggressive. I was sexually assaulted and I am not the only woman who has been. They haven’t had surgery and they expose themselves. One of them had been told he couldn’t shower at the same time as us women. He made a formal complaint and said this was a breach of his human rights. So now he is allowed to shower with us. And because he now has that right, the other males have that right too. There’s only a shower curtain between us. He moves the curtain so we can all see his penis when he is washing himself or shaving his legs. This is disgusting and I think it is disgusting that the prison allows this.

We can’t complain about anything. They are very well protected and it feels like our rights as women just don’t count. We have to call them ‘she’ and ‘her’ and have to use their female names. If we don’t, we are punished and lose our enhanced prisoner or D-Category status. It is horrible to do that to women.

I am very upset that I lost my legal case. I can’t understand how anyone can say that imprisoning males alongside women is the right thing to do. The prisoner who attacked me was convicted of the most serious sexual offences against girls and still has his penis. How can the government say that putting him in prison with women is the right thing to do? It’s not. I am out of prison now. But I think about all the other women still in prison who have to live with these males. This is dangerous, disgusting and wrong.”

<applauds every word>

DialSquare · 07/04/2023 07:54

Very powerful post NeighbourhoodWatchPotholeDivision.
I too have visited family members in prison over the years. All of them now dead as a result of their lifestyle. I think posters like the OP must have lived a very privileged life if they can not see what this ideology will do to vulnerable women and girls if there is no pushback against it.

And Helle is right. They should be ashamed.

Helleofabore · 07/04/2023 06:54

NeighbourhoodWatchPotholeDivision · 07/04/2023 00:08

Good evening. I've been catching up on this thread. I appreciate the following post is going to hark back to posts maybe a dozen pages back, but that's life.

There has been some lofty, idealistic phrasing about dealing with crime committed by males who don't identify as trans first.

So what does that look like, in terms of policy? By how much must male violence against women and girls be reduced before violence by trans-identifying offenders in historically single-sex spaces becomes worthy of preventing? Whatever your figure, what is the gameplan for eliminating that percentage of violence against women and girls?

What is the timescale for this?

Currently, women are being abused by male offenders in prison. How long do they have to wait before they are worth the effort of protecting? When you do your mental arithmetic, take into account that these rapes and sexual assaults are some of the simplest to prevent. All you have to do is separate prisons by sex again!

It can be done with the stroke of a pen.

Would you be willing to listen to the testimony of a woman currently locked in a building with a convicted rapist, and tell her that you don't think her physical and psychological welfare is worth the effort of moving those males into the male estate?

Incidentally, have you ever in your life said that bullying in school shouldn't be addressed until we've eliminated malaria, or anything like that?

At this point in a thread, some person self-identifying as a cleverclogs usually makes a fool of themselves by asking whether I ever cared about prison welfare before this issue came to the fore. Often in a highly patronising tone, with the clear expectation that they're going to trigger some kind of Damascene moment for me in which I'll realise that female prisoners don't matter.

Tonight, for the sake of my own bloody blood pressure, I'm going to pre-empt that. The answer is yes. In fact, I have cared about prison welfare since I was seven years old. Why seven? Because that was the first time my mother ever told me in any detail what her time in prison had been like. In the following years, I discovered that other adults I valued deeply, both female and male, had also served prison sentences. I do hope that's good enough for you.

I don't particularly need flower emojis, but donations to Keep Prisons Single Sex are always nice. Wink

For those who have the emotional perspicacity of a dead sheep, this longheld knowledge means that I have always been aware than incarcerated and formerly incarcerated people are... people! (Although my mother didn't believe that this applied to sex offenders and she brought me up to have no sympathy whatsoever. Grin)

Every single person in there is someone's daughter or son. The adults in my life wanted better for me than the lives they'd had, and they seem to have succeeded (unless I get arrested and imprisoned for calling men, men, at any rate!) but none of us know what the future holds for our own daughters and granddaughters.

Are you happy to turn a blind eye to your granddaughter being sexually assaulted in prison? Mine? The daughter of your sister's best friend?

What lies at the root of this lack of empathy for women? Is it people feeling guilty at saying no to particular subset of male prisoners. Why? The general public doesn't normally have any problem saying no to male prisoners asking for better food, more investment in educational facilities, and so on.

I can say, totally guilt-free, "I don't think you should be housed in the female estate. If you are in danger in the male estate, then separate units should be established for the use of trans-identifying male prisoners, in the male estate."

To be fair, I'd fear for my physical safety if I said it to someone like Karen White (who was placed in a women's prison with a mother and baby unit after being charged for raping a woman on a locked psychiatric ward. He injured her so badly she will never be able.to have children) or Tiffany Scott (Scotland's most violent male prisoner) but I wouldn't feel a drop of guilt. I'd feel a lot of guilt at ushering either of them into a room with another woman and locking the door though. And so I should!

Is it instinctive fear of violent reprisal that means you fear saying no to these prisoners when they demand to be in the women's estate? Do you realise you are using other women as your shield against these scary males? How can you feel comfortable with that?

I could never say to a woman, "I am going to let you get raped, in order to stop this man getting angry with me because he's terrifying".

extract from Keep Prisons Single Sex

“Being in prison with male prisoners, you always feel on edge. You know something could happen at any time. We know they are not women. They are physically threatening and aggressive. I was sexually assaulted and I am not the only woman who has been. They haven’t had surgery and they expose themselves. One of them had been told he couldn’t shower at the same time as us women. He made a formal complaint and said this was a breach of his human rights. So now he is allowed to shower with us. And because he now has that right, the other males have that right too. There’s only a shower curtain between us. He moves the curtain so we can all see his penis when he is washing himself or shaving his legs. This is disgusting and I think it is disgusting that the prison allows this.

We can’t complain about anything. They are very well protected and it feels like our rights as women just don’t count. We have to call them ‘she’ and ‘her’ and have to use their female names. If we don’t, we are punished and lose our enhanced prisoner or D-Category status. It is horrible to do that to women.

I am very upset that I lost my legal case. I can’t understand how anyone can say that imprisoning males alongside women is the right thing to do. The prisoner who attacked me was convicted of the most serious sexual offences against girls and still has his penis. How can the government say that putting him in prison with women is the right thing to do? It’s not. I am out of prison now. But I think about all the other women still in prison who have to live with these males. This is dangerous, disgusting and wrong.”

Thank you.

The question about how many women and children are acceptable collateral never gets answered. Yet those kind of posts keep coming back every thread. I often wonder if those who make them ever think about it and realise their fuckwittery really has gone too far and they realise that it is them who should be ashamed.

Happylittlechicken · 07/04/2023 06:38

FuckeryOmbudsman · 07/04/2023 06:26

Yes, and that of course is true only if gender based.

Or you are deliberately, not just silencing, but actually erasing, all non-GC feminists.

Serious question. How can you be a feminist and not critical of the gender stereotypes which have oppressed women for centuries? What does a non GC feminist believe women should be fighting against?

the gender pay gap is due to gender so if you’re a non GC feminist are you actually in favour of that? The fact fewer women are in positions of power in companies is because gender norms have held girls back. If you are not critical of gender, do you actually think this is a good thing? Gender is responsible for girls and boys having poor mental health due to demands that they follow gender stereotypes even if they don’t want to. A lot of the children coming out as “trans” state they do not feel like a girl or a boy, but when questioned it seems it is because they do not like the things gender stereotypes tell them they must do. If you’re not critical of gender, do you actually believe a boy who likes dolls and makeup is not a boy. If you believe in gender stereotypes anyone who likes dolls and makeup Is a girl so he must be a girl right? Not a boy who likes dolls.

FuckeryOmbudsman · 07/04/2023 06:26

BlueHeelers · 07/04/2023 05:26

One is that I have known many strands of feminism, sometimes in conflict with each other. But all share the one fundamental thing that defines feminism: they are all about women and women’s rights

This is very true, @Ofcourseshecan - we’d all be more accurate if we referred to “feminisms”. Twas always thus.

But any feminism centres women and women’s rights. Some go so far as to fight for women’s liberation.

Yes, and that of course is true only if gender based.

Or you are deliberately, not just silencing, but actually erasing, all non-GC feminists.