"This is not something I would necessarily support, although I am fully against self id."
You misunderstand, then. The GRA 2004 is pure self-ID, and was from the moment of inception. The purpose of the GRA is the political erasure of sex, via people applying for falsified birth certificates with the wrong sex on them.
Read Robert Wintemute's latest piece for confirmation: <a class="break-all" href="https://archive.ph/2022.12.03-214321/www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/12/02/scottish-parliament-should-leave-gender-recognition-act/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://archive.ph/2022.12.03-214321/www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/12/02/scottish-parliament-should-leave-gender-recognition-act/
He writes "In 2004, the UK Parliament passed (for Scotland and the rest of the UK) a very generous Gender Recognition Act, the first in the world (at the national level) to allow a change of legal sex without any physical changes to the transgender person’s body."
All people have to do is tell a panel they feel like they were born in the wrong body, wait a couple of years, and they have "gender recognition" status conferred on them with a fake birth certificate. And we know that that legal status is not even needed for someone like "Sally Ann" Dixon on "Karen White" to access women's spaces.
You say "There is a very very small number of trans people who need to transition because of their gender dysphoria and I believe they should be supported in this. That is a very small fraction of trans people today and would hardly have an impact on womans spaces."
Not so, I'm afraid. While "5,000 transsexuals" were used as the rationale for passing the GRA, there are now as many as half-a-million people manifesting their metaphysical belief in transgenderism, in the UK. The number of fake birth certificates is a state secret (!). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/721642/GEO-LGBT-factsheet.pdf
As for "needing to transition," that has nothing to do with the GRA which - as I demonstrate above - does not require people to do anything to their bodies. People who get these body modifications don't have to go through the legal gender recognition procedure either, to access opposite sex spaces, so it rather begs the question 'what is the GRA on the rolls for?'
"I do not think it should be made easy for young girls or middle aged men to get a grc. Young girls often transition due to peer pressure and the fact its a current trend, and middle aged men - well major red flag."
I agree with you. It should not be made easier for anyone to get a birth certificate with there wrong sex on it, especially in the middle of a corporate-driven social contagion of people denying their sexed bodies.
"But to repeal I think is cruel." Why? People who believe in transgenderism to the extent of seeking body modifications don't need to get a fake birth certificate for the purpose of equal marriage or pensions, since the Equality Act 2010 now provides those. What's "cruel" about not making any exceptions to the sensible rule that society does not issue fake birth certificates?
"Better that we provide decent mental health services to understand the reasons for wanting to transition."
I could not agree more with this! Why do people reject their sexed body? Paraphilias in men? Fear and anxiety in girls? Autism? Abuse? One thing I'm sure of is that colluding in someone's rejection of their sexed reality is cruel, not kind. Would we "affirm" that anorexics are fat and need to take diet pills?