Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Sophie Beresiner - The Times - Baby Born from Surrogate Mother

57 replies

OhHolyJesus · 26/05/2020 10:04

Sophie writes about the birth of the baby girl she had through surrogacy. I've been reading her column as my interest in surrogacy has grown and whilst the paper gave space to Rebecca's story, the surrogate mother, I want to remember the women who went before her, both in terms of egg donors and pregnancy attempts. I hope they are all well and not suffering in any way, wherever they are.

I thought this an odd comment:

"I, for some mad reason, kick into vanity mode and set about styling my hair and worrying that I didn’t choose the right outfit. It was difficult because it had some strict requirements: it had to be comfortable, be openable at the front for skin-to-skin contact, be cheap in case it gets birth-goo on it, be amazing because I need to make a good very first impression. The best first impression there ever was. No pressure."

And this, from Rebecca:

"Sophie makes me sound like a perfect angel in the column, which I’m really not; I’m just normal. And I’m so happy I could give her story a happy ending. I’m not sure I’m ready to use the word proud out loud yet, but I’m working on it."

I wonder at Rebecca's motivation, underneath all the usual "I want to help" stuff.

At a time of a global pandemic and immense pressure on the NHS, including maternity services, a room was made available for Sophie to stay with the baby overnight, away from Rebecca.

Sophie clearly adores Rebecca so I wonder how much she paid her and whether, as the newborn cloud descends whether they will stay in touch and whether Sophie will be hiring Rebecca again for her reproductive services in the future.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
HarrietSpying · 26/10/2023 17:15

She is unbearable.

Ozgirl75 · 26/10/2023 09:58

I don’t know anyone who has had a baby through a surrogate but I know lots who have had IVF and every one of them feels that level of guilt over feeling that some bits are difficult because it was something so desperately wanted. So I can understand her feeling like that - she’s a normal mum feeling normal mum stuff.

But the whole “she has a special place in our heart” because of the surrogacy is just bizarre. As if the rest of us conceiving naturally are just like “yeah he’s not special because I just shagged and ta da”. It’s a regular thing with difficult conceptions and I do understand why (even my close friend felt like this and said it when her SIL got pregnant while she was pregnant “she couldn’t let me have this time for ME even though I’ve been through so much to get here”), but it’s basically wrong.

I guess she’s got to write about something and now she’s just a mum of two, there’s not much more to say! Although I would prefer to hear about her relationship with the surrogates, whether her daughters have been told who they are etc.

OhHolyJesus · 02/06/2020 17:07

Sorry Dozer what I meant was the process of reform is in full swing, rather than being considered, the public consultation is closed and the first steps towards reform are being made, so in full swing as in, in progress.

The responses are being reviewed, as Fanny notes but it's on the Law Commission's 13th programme of reform and not something that's a vague possibility. It is happening whether we like it or not!

OP posts:
FannyCann · 02/06/2020 14:31

Recommendations also include lifting the current ban on advertising services in relation to surrogacy and a minimum age of 18 to be a surrogate mother.

My own 18 year old DD attended a consultation event with me. She commented that although she was legally an adult she felt she was still vulnerable and deserving of protection from exploitation.
With payments of up to £60k many gap year students being targeted by advertisements on Facebook and other SM could well feel tempted to fund university by having a surrogate baby.
Is that the amazing career trajectory we want for our daughters?
To be a breeder?

FannyCann · 02/06/2020 14:26

Remember the recommendations include erasing the rights of birth mothers by making commissioning parents he legal parents of the baby at birth. This is in direct contravention of the recommendations of the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the sale and sexual exploitation of children.

www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Children/Pages/Surrogacy.aspx

FannyCann · 02/06/2020 14:22

Here is a copy of an email I received from the Law Commission in March for you Dozer.

An ongoing consultation with plans to formulate final policy to recommend to government.
I sincerely hope government will not uncritically accept the recommendations.

We are getting in touch because you responded to the Law Commission of England and Wales and the Scottish Law Commission consultation on Building Families Through Surrogacy: A New Law. We are writing to give you an update on the project.

We had a large response to our consultation and are very grateful for the extent to which a wide range of stakeholders have engaged with us on these important issues. We are analysing those responses carefully and continuing to engage with stakeholders about the views they have expressed. We are also carefully monitoring the evolving case law around parenthood and birth registration.

After we have completed our analysis we will move to formulating final policy and finalising the detail of the scheme that we will recommend to Government. We will also be working with Parliamentary drafters to produce a bill. In light of the extent of stakeholder interest and the evolving case law, we anticipate that the project will run longer than previously planned, until early 2022.

Thank you for your interest in the project. Please refer to the project websites for the latest information and updates:
https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/surrogacy//_
https://www.scotlawcom.gov.uk/law-reform/law-reform-projects/joint-projects/surrogacy//_

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to get in touch.

Law Commission - Comisiwn y Gyfraith
Property, Family and Trusts Law Team
Tîm Cyfraith Eiddo, Teulu ac Ymddiriedolaethau
1st Floor, Tower, Post Point 1.53, 52 Queen Anne’s Gate, London SW1H 9AG
(access via 102 Petty France)
Web: www.lawcom.gov.ukk_

Dozer · 02/06/2020 14:09

Don’t think legal changes are “in full swing”? There’s been some consultation, but has govt announced any intent to change the current regulations?

OhHolyJesus · 02/06/2020 11:06

Here is an old BBC Podcast from 2014, which shows how much surrogacy has changed as law reform is now in full swing.

www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/b04dqrt1

One surrogate mother Amanda, didn't want her own kids at all, used her egg and chose a gay couple, based on looks and education with height being key as they are "more successful"! She chose two men as wouldn't have a problem with another woman. Having had two kids for that couple, then third for different couple was child was downs so foetus was aborted.

Another surrogate mother, Sarah ended up working at COTS. She speaks about the lack of background checks for members applying to be members/commissioning parents and regulation in general and an Indian couple who talk about the money and payment (they were so broke through the process they live in his father's attic with two kids), the wife refers to the surrogate mother as a "womb carrier".

An interesting objective piece from the BBC which I'm not sure we would see now...worth 27 mins of listening.

OP posts:
Dozer · 02/06/2020 10:34

Sure, there are some women willing to donate eggs and/or gestate and give birth to a baby for a friend or family member.

Personally I would never do either, for anyone, due to the health risks, and associated risks for me and my family, and (with egg donation or “traditional” surrogacy) the potential future feelings of the DC.

Ozgirl75 · 02/06/2020 09:43

To give an opposite view, I have never been a surrogate and before I had my own children I could never have imagined it. However, my closest friend of 20 years went through a heartbreaking journey of miscarriages, ivf etc and I did offer that if she couldn’t have her own child then I would carry one for her because I just knew the total love I had for my children, and wanted her to have that too.

I also knew we would always be close, I would be “part of the story”, I knew she would be an amazing mum.

It didn’t come to this as she successfully carried her own twin girls but I would have done this for her, in the knowledge that that baby would have been so loved by her family.

FannyCann · 30/05/2020 13:23

What's the point in even having laws if they'll sign off £60K?
That would be a massive inducement for a lot of people.
I can't find it now as I'm on my phone but within the consultation research they quote they mention that whilst some people carefully enumerated every expense to present to the judge others just gave the total figure labelled "expenses".
Just like our politicians used to do.
Shocking arrogance at knowing the law doesn't apply to them and not even making an effort to enter into the spirit of it.

OhHolyJesus · 30/05/2020 12:33

That's the one Dozer the Telegraph reported "reasonable expenses" of up to £60k.

It seems that judges don't mind commissioning parents (and lets face it they are paying and commissioning a service so I call them as such) breaking the law as long as the baby goes to a good home and having money helps to solidify that idea.

My pregnancy didn't cost £600 let alone £60k. The Law Commission break down areas or categories of what is a "reasonable expense" but anyone can play fast and loose with that.

OP posts:
Dozer · 30/05/2020 10:59

Wasn’t there a survey about UK surrogate women and costs, think that even here where the law has thus far sought to avoid commercial egg sale and surrogacy the average “costs” were something like £18k. Will check that.

OhHolyJesus · 30/05/2020 08:31

Those were in my initial thoughts too Dozer

I thought of the baby being taken away from the only home she has known and of a Rebecca who I hope heals well and easy and goes back to her family with her expectations being fulfilled.

I also thought of how their relationship might continue as Sophie and husband go into newborn fog and whether Rebecca would ever hear from them again.

I also wondered how much she was paid...

OP posts:
Dozer · 30/05/2020 07:35

My main thought when reading the latest column was that I hope that Rebecca makes a fast and full recovery from the pregnancy and birth and has no lasting problems.

Dozer · 30/05/2020 07:26

I dislike these columns too. Sophie’s strong bias, while perhaps understandable, was dominant. As far as I’m aware there have been no “balancing” stories on surrogacy in The Times.

Sad but unsurprising that there has been so little research, particularly on the women donating eggs or going through pregnancy and birth.

This is an extract from a blog from a US surrogacy site, “Donor Concierge” about the couple.

“Their roadblocks were everything from unsucessful donor egg cycles in Russia and having to find a new donor in the US, to being matched with a surrogate candidate who already had 6 children (a candidate who would never have been presented to a Donor Concierge client). These were just some of the issues Sophie and ‘Mr. B’ experienced, leaving them with a huge financial deficit, and a general distaste for the fertility industry here in the US”

Reminded me that the negative content in the columns was solely about Sophie and her H, eg costs, poor service from the private companies, failures etc. Nothing showed much consideration for others, or the ethics of what they chose to do.

Michelleoftheresistance · 29/05/2020 17:43

I am actually shocked at how the baby and her right to be with the one person she needs more than any other in the world is ignored, air brushed away.

This.

The child is a 'thing'. Mindless, emotionless, a blank slate, the prize, the purchased item, only requiring competent care that can be provided by any adult, doesn't matter which. Because if you start down the line of the child is a person, being removed instantly without consent or necessity from the one person they are bonded to in order that the commissioning parents get their joy and delight of parenting experience, or acknowledge that babies are born with attachments programmed in and that rupturing that attachment has a price, it starts to look very grim very fast.

TheProdigalKittensReturn · 29/05/2020 10:53

I just don't understand how adoption can be going in one direction (increased recognition that there's inevitably going to be trauma for the child, contact allowed later on if the child wants it, a general sense that this is not a problem free option) and surrogacy in entirely the opposite direction (wonderful for those who commissioned the child, no discussion at all about what the impact on the child might be, birth mother either disappeared or framed as delighted with the whole thing). How can anyone believe both types of framing at once?

StatementKnickers · 29/05/2020 10:27

I stopped reading this awful column a long time ago. Selfish, whiny and boring, to say nothing of the many ethical issues around surrogacy. I hope very much that now she has finally obtained a baby, the column will be replaced with something more interesting.

OhHolyJesus · 29/05/2020 10:25

@JoeExoticsEyebrowRing

The study was posted on this thread by PlanDeRaccordement (who I think works for COTS?!)

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/3908979-To-feel-sorry-for-these-babies

"“We examined a variety of main outcomes for the surrogate mothers, children and intended mothers, including obstetric outcome, relationship between surrogate mother and intended couple, surrogate's experiences after relinquishing the child, preterm birth, low birthweight, birth defects, perinatal mortality, child psychological development, parent–child relationship, and disclosure to the child.

The search returned 1795 articles of which 55 met the inclusion criteria

At the age of 10 years there were no major psychological differences between children born after surrogacy and children born after other types of assisted reproductive technology (ART) or after natural conception. “

This is the Study:

Surrogacy: outcomes for surrogate mothers, children and the resulting families—a systematic review
Viveca Söderström-Anttila, Ulla-Britt Wennerholm, Anne Loft, Anja Pinborg, Kristiina Aittomäki, Liv Bente Romundstad, Christina Bergh
Human Reproduction Update, Volume 22, Issue 2, March/April 2016, Pages 260–276, doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv046

BreastedBoobily pointed out:

there were only five studies which reported on the health outcomes for surrogate mothers. Given the prevalence of surrogacy this isn't exactly a wealth of evidence.

even in the evidence they accept in the study, a fair amount of it is classed as 'low quality' and some of it is 'very low quality', so I don't think it's correct to say that the comments regarding the lack of quality is related to the studies that were excluded. The disclaimer is completely relevant to the results.

the evidence related to the psychological impact on the surrogate mothers is 'sparse' and comprises 'non-representative samples, lack of control groups, and ambiguous comparisons with test norms'. Add to that the lack of considerations for cross border surrogacy where financial motives are likely to be more prevalent than purely altruistic surrogacy (which can change outcomes) and it's evident there isn't a clear picture at all.

the strength of the paper is noted as being the 'comprehensive appraisal of the literature' but the weakness is the 'lack of high quality studies'. You can review the available studies as much and as accurately as you want but the accuracy of the paper is only going to be as accurate as its source material, which is recognised as being weak.

The thread is interesting and worth a read but it's long and I posted a few media articles on the Ukraine story here and how it's also happening in Georgia.
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/3910223-Babies-stranded-in-Ukraine?pg=8

OP posts:
lucymaudmonty · 29/05/2020 10:01

Sorry for typos

Gay not hay

No idea about despoiling

lucymaudmonty · 29/05/2020 10:01

Thank you for this thread, it is fascinating and helping me to unlock why I feel so uncomfortable about the idea of surrogacy. I have an acquaintance who is hay and he and his husband used an American surrogate. He says they are just like any other couple despoiling with a newborn. But like a pp said, how can that be? He has no idea of the experiences mothers and newborns have. For me so much of that experience was bound up in the physical side of it, it was a very visceral, physical thing. I felt like I had become an animal. I made animal noises during labour. As well as breastfeeding my kids I used to nuzzle them like a cat would, it was involuntary, I couldn’t control it. I had some perceptual disturbances like hearing crying etc and I even hallucinated a few times. I’d also wake up in the middle of the night and think I’d lost the baby and be looking for him under the duvet. When he was in the cot next to the bed. And that was my experience of becoming a parent. I don't know how anyone becoming a parent through surrogacy can compare it.

JoeExoticsEyebrowRing · 29/05/2020 09:51

Just getting on a work call Joe will dig out the link posted by someone else in another thread a bit later.

Thanks 👍