Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Safeguarding girls and protecting women post Jimmy Saville & #metoo

544 replies

SpareRibFem · 09/07/2018 10:59

I don't understand, there was a lot of hand wringing after the revelations about Jimmy Saville became widely accepted. #metoo there was more handwringing about the need to listen to women when they are telling you something that makes you uncomfortable.

Saville was allowed to get away with what he didn't because he created an aura of fear and people would afraid of the backlash if they spoke up. Those that did suffered.

We were promised something like that could never happen again...

And yet now despite many women and girls saying they feel afraid and uncomfortable sharing single sex spaces with someone with a penis weren't told we're bigoted and verbally abused for saying that. Our employers are contacted and told we're bigots, we're doxxed.

And organisations like girl guides are going still further in saying it must be kept a secret when girls are being forced to sleep and change with a male bodied teen with a penis (& teen levels of hormones) and I'm not even allowed to identify what sex that male bodied teen with a penis is on a public forum

Girl Guides are taking that approach despite the knowledge that abusers use secrecy and shame to their advantage.

Just like with Saville anyone who excesses concerns is shouted down and accused of being the person in the wrong by the powerful. There is a culture of fear now. Celebrity voices in particular (thinking people like Munroe Bergdorf, Stephen Fry and long list of others) are given more weight to shout down women's concerns. Male bodied people feelings are paramount despite almost all sexual abusers being male bodied (and most of the tiny tiny number of female bodied sexual abusers working with and being in thrall to a male bodied abuser)

Did we as a society learn nothing from Saville & the multitude of other abuse scandals that women and children/girls should be listened to, that celebrities voices help hide abusers, that telling girls to keep secrets from their parents about the presence of penises in their bedrooms and changing rooms and showing them they will be blamed and abused if they transgress and tell someone creates an environment where abuse can flourish.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
Angryresister · 05/04/2019 23:25

Thank you ROwantrees for continuing to show why we should all be on our guard and not allow this to ever happen again. I don't see adequate official responses however. Glad I am no longer on the front line though but Flowers for those that are.

JustAnotherWoman · 05/04/2019 22:43

Thanks ROwantrees I wouldn't want to be one of the NSPCCs trustees when the inevitable inquiry happens. This and other threads will give lie to the defence that nobody was sounding the alarm.

R0wantrees · 05/04/2019 20:47

Further to concerns raised last August on MN with regards NSPCC's failure to consider Safeguarding concerns with regards advice given about accomodating wishes of children/parents of children questioning their gender identity.
See current thread discussing NSPCC Twitter incorrect advice about school single sex facilities:
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3551084-The-NSPCC-arent-right-about-this-are-they

R0wantrees · 26/03/2019 14:02

from thread,
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3425816-Can-we-talk-about-Lisa-Muggeridge?pg=3

woman19 wrote:
Saw this article today and thought of what Lisa Muggeridge had alluded to.

Looked for her You tube lectures, and can't find them.

But she was and is on the money.

The Guardian reported last November that experts warned vulnerable children were being “treated like cattle” and moved around care homes in England and Wales, with councils routinely inviting companies to compete for the contracts through an online bidding process

A Guardian investigation discovered evidence of councils putting the personal details of children in online adverts, including information about previous sexual abuse and gang involvement, while inviting bids from private companies for their care

www.theguardian.com/society/2019/mar/26/record-number-of-children-missing-from-care-in-uk

JustAnotherWoman · 22/02/2019 09:24

I find it disheartening, does this mean as a society the majority will keep accepting a forceful group as being above suspicion and give them access to children without safeguarding and demonise those that flag concerns ?
I wonder what the next grouping of males to be regarded as above suspicion will be when this group loses their protective coating?
The reputations of good priests (and there were and still are many) are all tarnished by association with the pedophiles that infiltrated the church and by the Catholic Church not acting.

R0wantrees · 21/02/2019 15:00

current thread discussing Dr Julia Long's question about child exploitation to Munore Bergdorf at a recent event and the subsequent attempts to silence concerns.

OP HappyDappy wrote,
"Julia Long was asked to leave the venue, after asking MB if it was normal that an 11yr old child dancing in front of adults, has money thrown at them by grown men. This was at Transmission & was deemed an offensive question....video footage on twitter of the incident.....worth a watch, sorry I can’t link to it but hope someone else can."

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jd4UCemsC6s&feature=youtu.be&app=desktop

LangCleg's comment:
"How did the scandal of TV entertainers grooming and exploiting children get so bad before anything was done?

How did the scandal of Catholic priests grooming and exploiting children get so bad before anything was done?

How did the scandal of on-street gangs grooming and exploiting children get so bad before anything was done?

Because if you create a sacred caste of any group and silence anyone asking questions about individuals on behalf of the sacred caste, abusers will see, infiltrate, and groom and exploit children. That''s how.

It's just tangential to me that the current group above criticism is extremist transactivism. I couldn't give a shit which group is ignoring the safeguarding of children - TV entertainers, Catholic priests, transactivists - it's all the same to me.

I will not be told I cannot point out safeguarding failures when I see them. "

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3512177-Julia-Long-asking-Munro-Bergdorf-about-child-exploitation

Object! article detailing Safeguarding issues by HANNAH HARRISON
concludes:
"The fabrication of the 'transgender' child (or the child ‘Drag Queen’) is similar to the creation of the child 'sex worker'. These misleading labels are placed on ordinary children in order to disguise and excuse the exploitation of these children in the fulfillment of an adult agenda – in both cases, to cater to the sexual interests of adult men.

The 'trans rights' movement reframes the removal of children's safeguarding as granting children 'freedom of expression'. This is similar to paedophiles advocating for the 'sexual rights of children'. In both cases, the proponents of these movements are actually interested in promoting men's 'sexual rights'."

www.objectnow.org/news/2019/1/15/trans-kids-paedophilia-in-drag?

R0wantrees · 21/01/2019 15:50

(Francis Crook CEO Howard League)

"The Howard League runs a free and confidential legal advice line for children and young people in custody. During the three-year period covered by the review, the charity received more than 50 calls in respect of about 40 children in Medway and made a number of safeguarding referrals.

Frances Crook, Chief Executive of the Howard League for Penal Reform, said: “No one who watched the Panorama documentary on Medway will ever forget its most distressing scenes. Today’s report reveals in yet more detail the harmful culture that has festered there for decades.

“The Howard League opposed the creation of secure training centres in the 1990s and warned that children would be damaged and hurt in these institutions. For many years independent inspectors’ findings have underlined that this is a failed model of detention. After more than 20 years of children being mistreated and their life chances damaged, it is time to put an end to this.

“The government has plans to convert it into a ‘secure school’, but a renaming exercise is not going to deal with the fundamental toxicity of this institution. Medway must close and it must close now.”

howardleague.org/news/howard-league-responds-to-serious-case-review-in-relation-to-incidents-at-medway-secure-training-centre/

Medway Safeguarding
Children Board
Serious Case Review
‘Learning for organisations arising
from incidents at Medway Secure
Training Centre’

www.mscb.org.uk/pdf/MSCB%20-%20Medway%20STC%20Overview%20Report%20-%20Final%20Version.pdf

Safeguarding girls and protecting women post Jimmy Saville & #metoo
R0wantrees · 19/01/2019 19:57

'Home Office reducing support for internally trafficked children despite surge in UK victims
Exclusive: More child victims of modern slavery at risk of falling back into exploitation after government announces specialised one-to-one support will be scaled back'

by May Bulman
www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/child-trafficking-victims-home-office-modern-slavery-reduce-support-victims-surge-a8731321.html

SpareRibFem · 17/01/2019 18:29

And still nothing changes Sad

OP posts:
R0wantrees · 17/01/2019 17:19

BBC
'Child abuse detectives had 'cynical disdain' for accusers'
(extract)
Two police officers scuppered a series of child abuse investigations through a combination of laziness and a "cynical disdain" for the accusers, a court heard.

Essex Police Det Cons Sharon Patterson, 49, and Lee Pollard, 47, are accused of three counts misconduct in public office between 2011 and 2014.

The Old Bailey was told the couple forged documents, concealed evidence and misrepresented investigations.

Both defendants deny the charges.

The allegations against the officers, who live together in Colchester, came to light when performance reviews were carried out into the child abuse investigation team in which they worked in.

Prosecutor Alexandra Healy QC told the jury: "The effect was that allegations of child sex offences were not properly investigated; the motivation appears to have been a combination of laziness, self-preservation and a cynical disdain for complainants in child abuse investigations."

Their conduct was "beyond incompetence" and not down to a "lack of resources" or "insufficient investigative manpower", she said. (continues)
www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-essex-46905297

R0wantrees · 17/01/2019 13:46

'Oxfam failed to address sexual misconduct and bullying, finds review
Independent commission says charity lacked robust safeguarding policies and was inconsistent in dealing with complaints'

(extract)
A damning interim review has highlighted Oxfam’s failure to tackle an environment at the charity that allowed sexual misconduct and bullying to go unchecked.

The report, produced by an independent commission, warned that no uniform system exists for dealing with complaints and said there are “drastic inconsistencies” in the way safeguarding issues are handled across the 90-plus countries in which Oxfam International operates.

The review added that multiple staff across different Oxfam offices believe bullying is pervasive, and highlighted concerns about a lack of confidentiality in investigation processes.

Guardian Today: the headlines, the analysis, the debate - sent direct to you
Read more
“At the heart of this issue is how power is managed and trust is earned and kept. The risks associated with reporting allegations of sexual exploitation and abuse are often high,” the report said." (continues)
www.theguardian.com/global-development/2019/jan/17/oxfam-failed-to-address-sexual-misconduct-and-bullying-finds-review

thread:
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3481825-Another-report-identifies-Safeguarding-failures-Guardian-Oxfam-failed-to-address-sexual-misconduct-and-bullying

SunsetBeetch · 14/01/2019 13:41

Another awful revelation from the past. This man died from an Aids rated illness. I really hope he didn't infect ny of the boys he abused.

Note that a charity worker contacted the police several times.

www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/policeman-blocked-probe-rotherham-style-13849657.amp?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=sharebar&__twitter_impression=true

R0wantrees · 14/01/2019 12:29

Systemic failures to understand Safeguarding identified in the Veritas enquiry commissioned by The Green Party following revelations of David Challenor's convictions for serious sexual assault of a child.

The role and capability of David Challenor's child, Aimee Challenor (prominant party officer and influential member of Stonewall) also highlighted as a serious concern:

From the full report:

"From our conversations with her, it is clear that Aimee Challenor did not demonstrate a clear understanding of safeguarding and still does not see the safeguarding issues that this case gave rise to."

For example:

6.62. We asked Aimee whether she considered there were safeguarding issues arising from her father’s involvement with the party. She told us: “There wouldn’t have been safeguarding. He had no personal access to members or members’ data".

www.docdroid.net/9or0q0H/final-verita-report-january-2019-1.pdf#page=44

The report also highlighted a key urgent Safeguarding requirement which should be applied in all political parties, charities & organisations

Recommendation R4
The Green Party should urgently review its safeguarding policy and procedures to strengthen its approach to raising awareness and improving processes for reporting safeguarding concerns and risks to people outside the party.

Safeguarding risks are particularly acute in unstructured environments where interactions with vulnerable people are unregulated, unlike environmentssuch as schools where interactions are carefully managed. Political parties and election campaigns are just this sort of unstructured environment.

”Comment As we have noted, prioritising the safety of children and vulnerable people is anindividual responsibility ofevery member of society.

threads:
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3477761-Andrew-Gilligan-Times-Green-high-flyer-Aimee-Challenor-hid-father-s-rape-charges-David-Challenor-A-paedophile-rapist-posed-a-major-safeguarding-risk-for-almost-two-years

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3474311-Veritas-report-due-tomorrow-Thursday-at-midday-re-Aimee-Challenor

R0wantrees · 08/01/2019 10:18

Current thread,
OP timetostepup wrote:
"A bunch of people who claim to be "non offending" paedophiles have joined twitter recently. They're openly tweeting about being paedophiles. They call themselves MAPs (Minor Attracted Persons) or NOMAPS. Their bios contain info such as the age of children they're attracted to.

I've reported some of them using Twitter's link for reporting Child Sexual Exploitation but I'm not sure if that's the right place as there's no evidence of any child being involved, also I reported them 3 days ago but the accounts are still up and I haven't had anything more than a confirmation - and I don't have a lot faith in twitter at the moment tbh.

They're claiming they're not a threat because they control their urge to offend. But we've been here before haven't we - this is just like PIE.

What should we do? Who can we report this to? Would the police be interested? Are they breaking the law?

Should we mass report Twitter on this?

I've attached an example, to find the others use the hashtags MAP or NOMAP or search for "MAP community".

What's the best way to deal with this?"
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/a3467841-How-to-report-paedophiles-on-Twitter

embedded link to Twitter: help.twitter.com/forms/cse

For UK see CEOP reporting and guidance:
'Are you worried about online sexual abuse or the way someone has been communicating with you online?
Make a report to one of CEOP's Child Protection Advisors'
www.ceop.police.uk/safety-centre/

R0wantrees · 30/12/2018 13:50

Report & Transcript of Mermaids Charity training session for teachers identifies Safeguarding issues.

Times article by Janice Turner:
www.thetimes.co.uk/article/trans-ideologists-are-spreading-cod-science-m8n0pdbq3?shareToken=3be0ee97d24e2ed7368c913e8c7ee466

thread (link to transcripts p10)
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3454658-recording-of-mermaids-training?pg=10

R0wantrees · 06/12/2018 10:13

On consent:

Guardian article today, 'Quarter of adults think marital sex without consent is not rape, UK survey finds
Campaigners say findings show large proportion of potential jurors are unclear about rape'

(extract)
"Potential jurors hold “alarming” views about sexual violence, a major report into attitudes towards rape has revealed.

A survey commissioned by the End Violence Against Women Coalition found that a third of people in the UK think it isn’t usually rape if a woman is pressured into having sex but there is no physical violence.

Almost a quarter of the 4,000 people questioned in the Attitudes to Sexual Consent survey carried out by Yougov believed sex without consent in long-term relationships was usually not rape. Laws against rape in marriage have been in place since 1991.

The results came as Jeremy Corbyn warned that the country was facing a “rape crisis”, and as MPs welcomed a survivor of Rotherham’s child exploitation scandal to the Commons.

The report revealed a stark generational gap in attitudes – with more than a third of over-65s believing that in most cases sex without consent with your wife or partner was not rape, compared with just 16% of 16- to 24-year-olds.

This was a concern, the report said, because “many of the cases being reported to the police are younger women who have a clear view of consent, which may not be shared by many of the people who make up juries”.

Rachel Krys, the co-director of the End Violence Against Women Coalition, said that while the #MeToo movement had shone a light on the scale of sexual violence and encouraged more women to report rape, society and the criminal justice system was failing in its response.

The case for keeping juries in rape trials
Read more
“These figures are alarming because they show that a huge proportion of UK adults – who make up juries in rape trials – are still very unclear about what rape is,” she said." (continues)

www.theguardian.com/society/2018/dec/06/quarter-of-adults-think-marital-sex-without-consent-is-not-uk-survey-finds

The law which enabled rape within marriage to be prosecuted informed the laws & policies with regards 'consent' which are at the heart of Safeguarding. Prior to 1991 (less than 30 years ago) prosecuting rape within marriage was not possible

R0wantrees · 21/11/2018 10:42

Guardian, 'Why do we separate the mother and child victims of domestic abuse?'
Louise Tickle
(extract)
"It is a grotesque indictment of the child protection system that women are blamed for failing their children, not supported
Domestic abuse hurts children, whether they are the direct target, or find themselves witness to warfare in their home. The latest government figures show that half of all children assessed as needing social services support are in that plight through domestic abuse – and when social workers feel a child is no longer safe at home, they can be removed into the care system.

This means being taken away from their mothers – typically the victim in all this. But she’s not usually the one being violent. Most often, it’s the children’s father or stepfather who is. As rates of reported domestic abuse soar – incidents sufficiently serious to be recorded by police as crimes rose 5% between 2016 and 2017, according to the Office for National Statistics – it’s estimated by the charity Safe Lives that 130,000 children live in households with “high‑risk” domestic abuse. So why are victims investigated by social services, rather than the perpetrators who cause such physical and mental harm?

Too often victims’ experience is a grotesque indictment of the child protection system that is failing both women and children. A clinical psychologist tells me of one mother who survived a shockingly violent relationship despite getting little support from any service that might have been expected to help. Instead of support and concern for her safety, she lost her children to adoption. In an extraordinary twist, this woman now has a criminal conviction for failing to protect her children, while her abuser remains free. And while the police are seeing more cases of domestic violence, charging rates have dropped. Removing children from their mother – often breaking up sibling groups in the process – by blaming that terrified victim for “failing to protect”s is the ultimate in victim-blaming. It has unpleasant and deeply sexist echoes of the way women are regularly told to change their behaviour, clothes and where they walk so they don’t get raped.

We will never effectively protect children if we view the prevention of harm from domestic abuse as the victim’s job: it fails to put the responsibility in the right place – with the perpetrator. We know that domestic abusers regularly break non-molestation orders with virtual impunity. And so the logic of children’s services is fatally flawed: when even the courts cannot restrain a violent criminal, what hope has any victim? How can a woman be required to pack up with the kids and leave home when the refuge and support services to provide a safe haven for mothers and their children no longer exist in so many areas of the country?" (continues)
www.theguardian.com/society/2018/nov/20/separate-mother-child-victims-domestic-abuse

R0wantrees · 16/11/2018 07:01

'At-risk children 'left to fend for themselves' after service cuts
Funding for early intervention reduced by more than a quarter in five years, charity says'
(extract)
"Thousands of children at risk of abuse and neglect are being left to fend for themselves because of substantial cuts to family support services over the past five years, a charity has warned.

Action for Children said its analysis of official figures published on Thursday showed council budgets for early help services designed to prevent families falling into crisis had shrunk by £743m – more than a quarter – over the past five years.

The cut includes a £450m reduction in Sure Start children’s centre budgets alone, which fell by 42% between 2013-14 and 2018-19.

Over the same period, spending on child protection and children in care rose by £597m (10%), which local authorities have said is a reflection of rapidly growing demand for emergency interventions driven by rising poverty levels and welfare cuts.

Imran Hussain, the director of policy and campaigns at Action for Children, said: “We know from our own work that without the safety net of well-funded early help services like children’s centres, thousands of children at risk of abuse, neglect or domestic violence are being left to fend for themselves until problems spiral out of control." (continues)
www.theguardian.com/society/2018/sep/27/at-risk-children-left-fend-for-themselves-after-cuts-services

R0wantrees · 07/11/2018 10:50

TIMES INVESTIGATION by Paul Morgan-Bentley,

'Gagging clauses: Chris Grayling silenced justice charities'
(extract)
"After Chris Grayling oversaw a £3 billion overhaul of the probation system in 2015, his reforms were condemned as a failure.

Prison inspectors found that changes introduced when he was justice secretary resulted in criminals being released without anywhere to live and without staff assessing “significant risks” to their partners and children.

Dame Glenys Stacey, chief inspector of probation, said the overhaul meant there was “no real prospect” of preventing prisoners from returning to crime.

The findings prompted criticism from campaigners, politicians and probation staff. Some of the key charities working with former prisoners, however, have appeared to be unconcerned.

Change, Grow, Live (CGL) is one of the largest charities in Britain, with an income of almost £200 million a year. It works on prisoner rehabilitation and has published 71 news updates on its website since June 2017, when Dame Glenys’s report was released, but none mention the probation crisis.

The charity has also published 9,800 tweets but referred to Mr Grayling only three times and only to promote announcements he had made.

As The Times reveals today, CGL is one of at least 40 charities that have been gagged by government contracts.

Four years ago the organisation formed a partnership with St Giles Trust, another charity, and Ingeus UK, a private company, to manage Mr Grayling’s reformed probation service across the Midlands. Their Reducing Reoffending Partnership (RRP) was chosen to run two of 21 new community rehabilitation companies that were handed responsibility for overseeing all but the most serious offenders.

RRP’s contracts, which were worth £379.4 million, stated that the group must provide the services while “having regard to the standing and reputation” of the justice secretary. It also had to agree not to do anything that would “attract adverse publicity” to Mr Grayling, damage his reputation or harm the confidence of the public in him. Under the Ministry of Justice’s (MoJ) probation reforms, all contractors and subcontractors had to agree the same terms for seven years from February 2015. Analysis by The Times has found that at least 29 charities are affected.

Charities appear to have adhered to the terms of their deals to varying degrees. Last year the justice select committee held an inquiry into the new probation system and found it to be a “mess” that was unlikely ever to work" (continues)

www.thetimes.co.uk/article/4ad3a7b8-e20f-11e8-9838-efa7e96cbe2b

BeUpStanding · 07/11/2018 00:29

Can I just say how important this thread is for recording all these safeguarding failures all in one place. Thanks R0wantrees, Red, and anyone else who contributes.

Brew and Cake for you all

R0wantrees · 06/11/2018 21:53

denisovich I'm not sure you've read the thread which is a collation of the various failures/ failings of child protection and safeguarding frameworks in the UK.

today's Times article: 'Misogyny is a gateway belief, justifying abuse' Heather Brooke

concludes:
"Let’s be clear: it’s not the law on hate speech that is at issue here, it’s the addition of misogyny. This is a challenge to patriarchy itself, an ideology and political system that divides society into two groups: adult men and everyone else, where everyone else is of lesser value.

To reduce misogyny to mere wolf-whistling is exactly the kind of minimisation and rationalisation we’ve seen in attempts to reduce the MeToo revelations of serious sexual assault, even rape, to “knee touching”, or devastating sexual harassment in the workplace to “banter”.

Misogyny is the gateway belief justifying domination, entitlement and, in too many cases, abuse and violence. Anyone claiming they are in favour of law and order needs to take misogyny seriously. Turning a blind eye to the systemic abuse of women is not making anyone safer.

For too long women have been victims of a most virulent form of hate. It is only in the past few years that crimes against women and children have been talked about and taken seriously. Action and accountability against perpetrators is still a rarity. Sara Thornton and Cressida Dick are on the wrong side of history if they think they can tackle violent crime without taking misogyny seriously."

www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/comment/misogyny-is-a-gateway-belief-justifying-abuse-ghdpmvzs5

is discussed on this thread:
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3414658-Times-article-Misogyny-is-a-gateway-belief-justifying-abuse-Heather-Brooke

denisovich · 06/11/2018 21:00

Metoo has done a lot of good, but it's pretty much off the rails at the moment.

This article describes it pretty well: www.sortalexout.com/writing/even-if-metoo

R0wantrees · 06/11/2018 17:16

"An inquiry into the funding and provision of children’s services has been launched as local authorities struggle to cope with the impact of rising demand combined with funding cuts.
The real-terms spending on local children’s services fell by 7% between 2010/11 and 2016/17 due to cuts for discretionary services. This was despite a 3.2% increase in spending on statutory children’s services during the same period.

On top of this, local authorities have had to cope with significant increases in demand. The National Audit Office calculated that the number of looked-after children grew by 10.9% during this six year period.

The Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee has launched a new inquiry into funding and provision of local authorities’ children’s services."
www.localgov.co.uk/Inquiry-into-the-funding-of-childrens-services-launched/46333

R0wantrees · 06/11/2018 17:12

BBC: 'Children's services: What do we know about the children most in need?'
(extract)
"A steep rise in vulnerable children needing protection over the past 10 years is pushing council children's services in England into crisis, suggests research to be published tomorrow.

There has been a substantial increase in calls from the public and professionals worried about a child, according to a study for the Association of Directors of Children's Services.

The number of investigations where a child is believed to be at risk of significant harm has also more than doubled.

Over the past year, almost 2.4m people contacted children's services because they were worried about a child - a 78% increase on 10 years ago, while serious investigations over concerns of significant harm are up from just under 77,000 in 2008 to almost 200,000 last year - a rise of 159%.

Council leaders have warned they will have to overspend their budgets to meet demand, though the government says extra money was announced for children's services in the Budget and it is working with councils to ease the pressures and improve children's lives. (continues)

Summary points:

  1. A considerable increase in demand
The past decade has seen pressure increase across the board in the child protection system - the number of calls from people concerned about a child has nearly doubled.
  1. Domestic violence is behind nearly half the cases
In nearly half of the cases, where social workers carry out an assessment, domestic violence is a factor. The next most common issue is mental health problems.
  1. Funding has dropped since 2010...
Throughout the era of austerity, while councils have made cuts elsewhere, they maintain they have tried to protect spending on children's services.

But once inflation is taken into account, the money available to protect children has still fallen significantly. That combined with increasing demand and more complex cases has led to councils overspending their budget for children's services.

  1. ...but the number of social workers has increased
Finding and keeping front-line staff in this high-pressure world is a constant issue for local authorities.

The most up-to-date figures show a slight increase in the number of social workers but a third will have been with their current local authority for less that two years and 15% will change jobs during the year.

  1. Children in care have increased by a quarter
Most children that social workers are involved with will remain with their families but the numbers removed from their home and taken into local authority care have risen by 24% in a decade.
  1. Most children in care are older
Most children in the care system are older, with the largest single group aged between 10 and 15.
  1. There is a North-South divide...
There is something of a North-South divide when it comes to the number of children looked after by councils.
  1. ...and there are divides within communities
Talk to social workers and many will say they are seeing families facing real financial hardship, with austerity and welfare cuts playing their part in pushing people into crisis.

That's reflected by research that found children living in the poorest areas were at least 10 times more likely to be taken into care than those in the most affluent parts of the country. It is a pattern that is repeated across all the nations of the UK.

  1. Most children are with foster parents...
Nearly three-quarters of children being looked after by councils live with foster parents, which costs local authorities about £1.7bn a year .

Since the 1960s, government policy has moved away from residential children's homes.

  1. ...and children are likely to return to families Almost a third of the more than 31,000 children who left care in 2017 returned to their families.

About 14% were adopted, after spending an average of two years in care.

  1. Children often face difficulties after care About a quarter of children who cease to be looked after when they reach their 18th birthdays continue to live with their foster parents but the future for many care leavers is difficult. Of the 18- to 21-year-olds who stayed in touch with councils, 40% were not in education, training or employment.

www.bbc.com/news/education-46049154

nuanced discussion now on Radio 4 PM