Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Reality check

385 replies

Pratchet · 28/06/2018 06:54

It's shit but I think we have to be pragmatic. And disclaimer: the below does not refer to all trans people or all transadvocates.

Imagine how many pairs of TRA eyes are trawling every single post on Mumsnet about trans issues. There are the resources, the legal support and the tech experience there to build a civil case, or find the one post that tips over into breaching IPSO and Ofcom guidelines, that can lead to sanction, compensation or worse for MN.

They don't even need eyes. They can build algorithms that trawl mumsnet for them. They want that log of complaints or posts that will enable legal action, criminal action or any other official sanction. There is no lull or respite from this. Mumsnet is the only mass crossover media which enables conversation on this issue which is not trans-agenda driven. It's the only one left that promotes a feminist view. The drive to stop this conversation will not stop, or rest, ever.

And who will they complain to? They will be complaining to people who have had 'trans awareness training' and bodies which have extremely active awareness networks, looking for offensive material. Going back years, through the media, including the BBC and ITV at the highest levels, police, monitoring organisations, government, the civil service, about how vulnerable trans people are, about how oppressed trans people are. What are Mumsnet's chances of coming out the other side and being able to allow this conversation to go on?

We all know this, but it's actually real. It's not theoretical.

Don't do the TRAs' job for them. Please don't jump. Please don't throw yourselves in front of the train. This is David and Goliath, we are amateurs all, new to the field, up against an army of well-prepared professionals. But we can do this.

Here are some links.

www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/112500/dip-statement.pdf
www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/109711/consultation-diversity-inclusion-plan.pdf
www.allabouttrans.org.uk/about/media-interactions/
www.allabouttrans.org.uk/a-meet-up-with-the-independent-press-standards-organisation/
www.out-law.com/en/articles/2018/february/uk-to-review-laws-on-offensive-online-communications/
www.gov.uk/government/news/home-secretary-announces-new-national-online-hate-crime-hub

Reality check
OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
Pratchet · 28/06/2018 10:26

Yes, I won't lie. We don't have to lie and no one can make us lie.

OP posts:
arranfan · 28/06/2018 10:26

For non-engagement with some topics and questions, I think of Reni Eddo-Lodge and her, Why I’m No Longer Talking to White People About Race.

Guardian's Long Read discussion

AngryAttackKittens · 28/06/2018 10:23

I may be willing to refrain from saying certain things, but I am not willing to lie.

LangCleg · 28/06/2018 10:22

We all need to let off steam when being brigaded and goaded. But there are other places to do that.

LangCleg · 28/06/2018 10:21

With regard to moderating my language...

I'm perfectly happy to moderate my language in the sense that I'm not going to call people names or swear directly at them (never going to stop swearing generally, however. Swearing is cool and I will swear at anyone who says otherwise, ner), or use terms that are commonly understood to be slurs, such as t**y.

I'm not perfectly happy to moderate my language so that my speech is compelled. I will not use terms for people not of my sex that appropriate my sex, for example.

And I'm not perfectly happy to moderate my language so that my meaning is obscured. MN has an important consciousness-raising function for lurkers and for influencers and opinion formers reading. I want what I say to be clear.

Is there a way around all this? Unsure.

KittyKlaws · 28/06/2018 10:20

Is there somewhere that runs online courses in this kind of stuff (like the Freedom Programme is for recognising male pattern abuse)? Because I'd actually do that.

So would I - it would be beneficial.

LangCleg · 28/06/2018 10:17

Civil Rights activists had specific training to help them resist retaliating to provocation. We should take a tip from them.

Is there somewhere that runs online courses in this kind of stuff (like the Freedom Programme is for recognising male pattern abuse)? Because I'd actually do that.

WichBitchHarpyTerfThatsMe · 28/06/2018 10:08

Would the be Non Violent Resistance Training doctorcuntybollocks?

Pratchet · 28/06/2018 09:50

Upstart it's just an example of the level of access and influence GIRES had as long ago as 2009.

OP posts:
Pratchet · 28/06/2018 09:49

Hear hear. Bowl I think platform publisher thing is down to the level of curation. They're looking for any excuse for any legal or regulatory case though.

OP posts:
doctorcuntybollocks · 28/06/2018 09:48

Civil Rights activists had specific training to help them resist retaliating to provocation. We should take a tip from them.

FermatsTheorem · 28/06/2018 09:41

Yes to everything Bowl's just said.

Bowlofbabelfish · 28/06/2018 09:38

That makes sense!

I will moderate my language - I think I’m fairly restrained in my use of it anyway (tad sarcastic at times but that’s no crime) because I feel MN is important. I don’t want to have to moderate my language - there are a few things I’d like to say that I know would be against the rules so I won’t say them here.

For me it’s a case of finding a way of saying what I want to say in a way that can’t be used against MN. I value this space - I honestly believe MN has changed my life for the better in some ways. It was here I got parenting support when I was desperately sleep deprived with my first. It was here I had my eyes opened to a more rad fem perspective.

I am ANGRY that you’re being targeted like this. I’m sure there’s a lot of behind the scenes pressure and I don’t envy you finding a way through it. Please don’t capitulate to these people - you’re a beacon of critical thought, humour, support and feminism and we value that.

UpstartCrow · 28/06/2018 09:38

Basically it says 'we have lots of funding and everyone who matters has to listen to us'.

If only Women's Aid, Refuge and Rape Crisis had that kind of funding and clout.

SisyphusWasGenderCritical · 28/06/2018 09:31

Pratchet

I can't read the link in the OP, it's too small. Can you summarise what it says.

Will keep pushing that Gender Critical boulder up the hill, every day, so that lurkers can see

FireFartingDuck · 28/06/2018 09:30

I appreciate this thread. Nice to wake up to calm reason. Is this situation bloody ridiculous? Of course it is. That's why I have every sympathy with the women who have felt they couldn't stay because it was hugely distressing to be forced to comply with such strange language diktats.

But for those of us strong enough to stay, it is fairly imperative to play the game because the important thing is to keep this knowledge out there, to keep women aware that they are always always allowed to say no.
I was lonely and frightened until someone on Twitter mentioned the discussion on MN, so I came and had a look, and suddenly, I wasn't alone - there was a whole load of women pointing out that something sinister was going on, and more than sounding the alarm, they equipped me with the language I needed to puncture to growing lie bubbles around me.

My internet presence is fairly varied, and before I registered here, I attempted to make the GC case in other places too - and that dissemination of argument online and in real life is what will result from keeping this board active in a positive way.

Take a tip from the Christian church, if you will. In many places in the world, we are outlawed and banned. Do we stop? Of course not, we adjust our language and practice so that we can continue to get the word out. If you believe you are standing for the truth, you don't let the perceived gains by the liars hold you down.

Massivelyouting · 28/06/2018 09:19

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Pratchet · 28/06/2018 09:19

Thanks Kate.

OP posts:
Massivelyouting · 28/06/2018 09:15

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Bowlofbabelfish · 28/06/2018 09:14

Do MN count as a publisher or a platform in terms of content?

KateMumsnet · 28/06/2018 09:14

Pratchet - posts that are true and not bigoted wouldn't break TGs so we'd leave them up. Vexatious reporting is also specifically mentioned in our new guidelines over here.

Bespin · 28/06/2018 09:13

Pratchet that is very true biology is not bigotry. Its the bigotry That is.

Can I just address non members reporting posts, as this is a open forum. And it takes as long to join mums net as report a post then this seems a non issue unless you are talking about people who. Have already been banned by mumsnet then I can see a problem.

Also people posting threads that are designed to get a responce as is often stated you not need to respond you are all grown ups every post or thread does not need a responce as people say if no one responds then the thread sinks. If you do respond then it's your responsibility not the threads how you respond

ChickenMe · 28/06/2018 09:13

I doubt very much that the actual police are keeping an eye on things. That is scaremongering

If someone commits an offence then that's one thing but the police are busy they do not trawl MN looking for evidence of potential thought crimes

Massivelyouting · 28/06/2018 09:13

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.