Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

If all you moaning minnies had just ignored and .....

217 replies

AnyFucker · 29/09/2009 20:03

kept your outraged and offended fingers away from the complaint button, all this silly sweary name shenanigans would have been tomorrows chip-paper by now.........

As it is, there is now going to be ream after ream of this daft arguing about fuck-all

it could rival Moldie-Gate you know, and that is not a ^good6 thing

OP posts:
Tortington · 29/09/2009 23:37

i dunno AF what are you reading ?

if its good - then yes

if its bad - then - no you misunderstand me

i agree with your 'double standards' post

AnyFucker · 29/09/2009 23:35

custy, am I reading you right ?

but you see, the point is, its not ok to accept AnyFucker as a name (and you all have, for rather a long time ) but not others that are equally sweary

in a whole year and more, only one person has expressed concern about it, somehow it went under the radar

another current thread is about banning (tongue-in-cheek, hopefully ) those who use "mummy" or "mama" in their name, but then people started saying oh, but Mamazon, that is OK, and LucyMama, that is Ok too, because you like 'em (and whats not to like...)

double standards innit, oh, and hypocritical too

OP posts:
DreamsInBinary · 29/09/2009 23:33

Agreed Aitch, we should be sticking to the topic in hand. I fail to see how criticising AnyFucker's name for no longer amusing you sticks to that.

AitchTwoToTangOh · 29/09/2009 23:33

lol anyfucker. you wouldn't be attempting to censor me would you?

i think you're taking offence at something i haven't written, tbh.

Tortington · 29/09/2009 23:32

ut lots of names aren't clever - in fact most names aren't clever.

the most offensive IMO, even more so than cuntwhacker are those that put numbers somewhere in their name becuase the name was taken and they lack the imagination to think of another.

but what AF did was be noticed. oh was she instantly noticed! there are posters that have been here for years and years without that recognition.

AitchTwoToTangOh · 29/09/2009 23:31

i'd agree with you were it not for the fact that anyfucker is the OP here, custy. and yes, i was a bit shocked that the name wasn't challenged as well. i've always thought 'yuck' and kinda skipped past the posts, tbh, but not 'yuck' enough to complain, iykwim? until cuntwhacker and then this OP, now i think they're all up for discussion.

AnyFucker · 29/09/2009 23:28

Aitch, you really need to pay attention to your posting style

Your high-handed approach gives out rather unsubtle messages, consciously or not, only you can answer that

If PT (or anyone else) expressed such a subjective opinion on any matter, I wouldn't "correct" them

And I do agree, my name was never meant to be clever i the first place, but I defend my right to use it on an open, adult forum

OP posts:
Tortington · 29/09/2009 23:26

i feel for AF and QOFE being kinda dragged into this argument.

was shocked to see AFs name and even more shocked that it wasn't challenged ( that i saw)
but she's practically an institution.

however must agree that i dont see a diff between cuntwhacker and anyfucker as user names.

much as i like the posts of AF - and i really really do.

what i am not saying is that af should change her name.

but it leaves me in a confused state regarding this argument. as i have already posted that there needs to be a 'line' to adhere to.

so i don't really know. I am wondering whether it's a case of nepotism or ...net-otism with my own thoughts regarding AF. IYSWIM and therefore wondering further about the argument.

AitchTwoToTangOh · 29/09/2009 23:26

my list is just names that aren't clever and contain the words fuck or cunt, given that it's the topic in hand, dreams. no point in making this something it isn't. like a debate about censorship, for example, when all mnhq did was remind people about an existing site guideline.

AitchTwoToTangOh · 29/09/2009 23:24

actually, i think i remember when the anyfucker name came about, it was something to do with 'i don't know any fucker', wasn't it, on one of those 'mners you love' threads or something? and you name changed to make that joke?

so that's funny. but not a year later.

DreamsInBinary · 29/09/2009 23:23

If we're going to start listing all names that aren't clever, Aitch, we may be here a long time.

QuintessentialShadow · 29/09/2009 23:21

Bed.

bye bye.

You are all so lovely. I farking love you all.

AitchTwoToTangOh · 29/09/2009 23:20

oh god, anyfucker, don't be such a moaning minnie i didn't say anything about your intelligence, i said that your NAME isn't clever, in response to another post.

it's not clever, is it? nor is queenoffuckingeverything and certainly not cuntwhacker, you surely must agree? i mean, mine's not clever either, so if PT had told me it was i'd have corrected her.

QuintessentialShadow · 29/09/2009 23:20

NOT that Anyfucker would ever sound stupid and obtuse, she is possibly one of the most reasonable posters who makes the MOST of sense most of the time.

pedals horribly

QuintessentialShadow · 29/09/2009 23:19

yeah, what I actually said, was that those names were inspired. I guess it means the same.

AitchTwoToTangOh · 29/09/2009 23:18

oh yes, QS, sorry, i've just checked and it was PinkTulips who said that they were clever names.

AnyFucker · 29/09/2009 23:17

I know DreamsInBinary, with the thinly-veiled inference that the person behind the name "has no great intelligence" either

but it does seem like sometimes if you put your head above the parapet, some posters delight in aiming some kicks at it

nice, eh

I'm glad I made someone's day, anyway

OP posts:
QuintessentialShadow · 29/09/2009 23:16

I am SO gonna regret postin in the morning

QuintessentialShadow · 29/09/2009 23:16

By morningpaper on Tue 29-Sep-09 22:34:26
AnyFucker is one of those funny-for-a-thread-or-two names

What's the big deal? Why not just change your name if people find it offensive? What are you campaigning FOR exactly? Edgy humour?
By halfcut on Tue 29-Sep-09 22:32:41

Amen to that.

Aitch, I see you address me further down, erm, I am not even ON this thread. Till now. And now I have had Chardonnay, tsk tsk, I will for sure not make sense.

But you know, as the day has wore on, You are actually right. The more I think about it, and the more wine I drink, then anyfucker and queenoffucking, is as crass as the others. They WERE fun at the time, but in the light of this day, they pretty much come under the same heading.

And exactly WHY would anyone campaign for the right to sound stupid and obtuse on the interweb. Beats me. Most of us struggle to sound clever and erudite, if how we come across ever crosses our minds.

I shall just go and ponder the lushiousness of captain jack sparrow. That is all my mind can comprehend right now

AitchTwoToTangOh · 29/09/2009 23:10

what?

AnyFucker · 29/09/2009 23:08

Aitch, it was established on another thread that cuntwhacking had no associations with bumsex

just FYI

OP posts:
DreamsInBinary · 29/09/2009 23:06

So has this turned into a thread slagging off poster's names because they are not funny or intelligent enough for you?

AitchTwoToTangOh · 29/09/2009 23:00

i don't think that anyfucker is a clever name, is it, QS? it's just a bit sweary and stupid, surely? not that i'm complaining about it, for the record, but i just don't think there's any great intelligence behind it.

queenoffuckingeverything, likewise, is briefly amusing and wouldn't be much diluted by a slight change.

for me, cuntwhacker just takes the whole 'ooooh, bumsex, aren't we HILARIOUS?' embarrassment up a couple of notches, tbh. it's so cringey.

DreamsInBinary · 29/09/2009 22:55

morningpaper - "Why not just change your name if people find it offensive?"

Really? Does it matter what the poster is (or isn't) campaigining for?

It's her/their chosen name. It has nothing to do with you.

VulpusinaWilfsuit · 29/09/2009 22:53

the offence COMMA

Swipe left for the next trending thread