Shelter report about overcrowding: need your thoughts asap please!

top breaking news I've seen on the BBC website is that the corby families have won their legal battle over birth defects caused by the clearing up the closed down Steel works.

Woohoo.

'and don't think david camerons lot will be much different.'

not forgetting that labour did nothing to reverse Thatcher's policy of selling off council/social housing stock.

i have also heard of a 13 YO BOY who had to share the bed with his DYING mother in a bedsit

i mean its adequate isn't it?

and not a word about alternative accomodation mentioned in a year

its just pants for one of the richest ountries in the world to have an acceptable policy of children using the kitchen to sleep in and one toilet for MORE than ten people

i personally know of a family with 9 people in a small small 3 bed house - most of these are teenagers - full adults by all purposes - sharing one bathroom and kitchen facilities.

the teenager boys are sleeping in the living room on a cheap blow up matress that deflates - the eldest also has back problems.

this is two families. one family came to live with the other after running from a death threat.

the existing children have been displaced - and THEIR HEALTH needs are NOT TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION when applying for the second family to be re-housed.

are you following me?

so the second family moves in

this causes health detriments to the first family

that is not taken into consideration by any process

Breaking news GeraldineMN?! Where?!

On the other hand we couldn't have afforded a house if there hadn't been ex council houses on the market. Though we paid market value, it does make me a little sick to see how much profit the right-to-buyers made on the place.

JoesMummy I didn't realise that. IMO no child should have to share a bedroom with any adult who is not their parent or sibling.

it all comes down to thatcher selling off the council houses in the 70's and 80's and making it a good thing. it wasn't a good thing and has led to the social housing stock being much smaller.

and don't think david camerons lot will be much different.

'Does that mean in theory you can have 10 people in a house but only one loo?! '

Yep, it certainly does.

Most councils count living rooms as sleeping space.

I recently took part in a survey our HA put out regarding the points system and the overcrowding definitions.

The problem I have with changing a lot of these definitions is that it doesn't solve the root of the problem: which is not enough social housing to rent and not enough security in the private rental market.

In our area, a lot of people starting putting their houses on to let as they couldn't sell them for the price they wanted in the recession. Then a bunch of dodgy families went to letting agencies and rented them and became problematic.

Now the letting agencies are charging £75/person application fees before they'll even tell you if a landlord is willing to take DSS, or children or pets.

pink on one side and blue on the other.

we have a smallish 3 bed house. luckily we have two boys so they will be able to share when ds2 grows out of the boxroom which really is the size of a box!

we won't be having any more children as we can't afford to buy a bigger house.

perhaps if more people took this approach then over crowding wouldn't be a problem?

you hear of people having more children despite not having enough space and then being outraged when they can't be rehoused.

we live in a small counrty where housing is at a premium-that's just the way it is.

i'd much rather have an extra bathroom than an extra bedroom!!

I am concerned that it is ok for kitchen spaces to be considered appropriate places for people to sleep. That seems quite dangerous.

I was also shocked that if a child is under 10 then they can be expected to share a room with someone of the opposite sex regardless of their age (eg 27 year old uncle could be sharing a room with 9 year old neice and that wouldn't be thought of as overcrowding).

I don't think there can be rules about private accommodation as it is down to the individual to choose suitable accommodation for thier family - but I do think there should be more council stock so people who need a council property can get one.

I do think the amount of living space separate from sleeping space should be taken into account, which would unfortunately make it more complicated. But I think 3 or 4 same sex children/teens can happily share a room, provided there is adequate space in the rest of the house for them to get some space and privacy from each other, do homework, etc. The amount of separate bathroom facilities should also be taken into account.

All mumsnetters know that you put up pink floral bunting in a girl's room and blue nautical bunting in a boy's room. What sort of bunting do you put in a room that's shared by both sexes? Eh? This is why it's inadvisable to share.

I guess this only counts if you rent!

I have my own 2 bedroomed house with me and one and a half children!

Dd shares with me at the moment, but I'm looking at putting her in with my Ds who will be 11 in less than a fortnight. The room is a small double, but houses the hot water tank, airing cupboard and the boiler so there isn't that much space.

I am not in a position to sell up and move house and even if I do go back to work in January, it will take me quite a few years before I'll be able to consider it and that's if the market doesn't rise again or if I moved to a poorer area(I'm in a low ~ middle area atm).

I don't know that I could do what you are doing Tiffany, you sound very organised.

I guess this only counts if you rent!

I have my own 2 bedroomed house with me and one and a half children!

Dd shares with me at the moment, but I'm looking at putting her in with my Ds who will be 11 in less than a fortnight. The room is a small double, but houses the hot water tank, airing cupboard and the boiler so there isn't that much space.

I am not in a position to sell up and move house and even if I do go back to work in January, it will take me quite a few years before I'll be able to consider it and that's if the market doesn't rise again or if I moved to a poorer area(I'm in a low ~ middle area atm).

I don't know that I could do what you are doing Tiffany, you sound very organised.

I am suprised that Shelter doesn't seem to have a minimum toilet to person ratio on there. Does that mean in theory you can have 10 people in a house but only one loo?! I'm not saying everyone needs an en-suite, but hygiene must be affected.

I have a small 3 bedroom HA house.
DD1 6 and DD2 5 share which is ok but only just room for 2 beds plus draws in their room so no space to play.

DS1 12 and DS2 9 have their own rooms and i sleep on a sofa bed downstairs.

I think we need a bigger space but HA say we are in a big enough property.

God knows what it would be like if i had a DP/DH!

I think 8 is the oldest i would want different genders to share a room.

You could make the point that schools now require more homework and coursework from children without regard to their access to space to carry out these tasks.

I suppose it depends what we are saying - is this an absolute minimum limit for hygeine etc, or an ideal minimum level which we accept cannot always be met, but should aim for?

Ilove - guideline in report says 10, which agree is a bit late these days

puberty seems to occur earlier,so feel girls and boys need separate rooms at about 8-9. not sure what guidelines here are on that though

Overall it depends on the individual kids, but I would probably make 8 or 9 the cutoff for mixed-sex bedrooms these days - gives a couple of years before puberty onset for girls, and this seems to be when boys start in with the rude jokes (just from observing nephews). Puberty does seem to be arriving earlier now - whether it's diet or chemical exposure triggering, 9 seems to be the new 11.

Does that make any sense at all?