This Morning want a couple of Mumsnetters to appear with Carrie and Justine next week... anyone fancy it?

is it even worth asking what the fuckity fuck is going on ?

This is all pretty embarassing and to think that the researchers from This Morning are (very probably) reading it too just makes me cringe

I am sure those researchers don't know whether to laugh or cry. At the very least they must be rather confused.

fwiw, if i did have a secret list of all moldy members, i would never ever ever list it on mumsnet.

bad form, v. bad form

www2, how dare you post details of me on this site without my permission.

bad form.

you "don't see the problem" with anything do you?

maybe you need help

yep . me and toddlers struggle with 'blackcurrants'.

I only ever get blackcurrants as part of home delivery order now. It reduces the chances of being kicked out ofthe supermarket

A friend of mine's child couldn't say Blackcurrant so asked for BlackCunt to drink once. She taught him to ask for juice pretty quickly.

blackcunts is my usual phrase. Apparently

If you watch Eastenders then woe is you indeed

'you are a bunch of fucking twats' would work for me.

Or twunts.

Btw, what do you lecture in?

We say 'cunts'

LOL! Oh what a sense of humour you have! I'm sure you'll fit right in here!

Or, actually, what about 'You are all a bunch of arseholes' - is that more the sort of thing that would make me accepted?

" you will also have seen that I post about lunchboxes Eastenders and mushroom risotto."

Oh woe is you!

(sorry, couldn't resist! )

But it's a closed group Maurice, so by joining and then posting the members someone has been a bit sneaky, no?
Just as would be if someone joined any group that was meant to be private and then linked it all.

Group is def closed. You have to ask to join, plus no-one can see wall posts (as they have not been linked -yet?-) .

If you just search DoM on facebook, I think that you would get just a small pic, no info whatsoever. The link to the memebr's page is a private link

Pagwatch if you have seen me post you will also have seen that I post about lunchboxes Eastenders and mushroom risotto. I am not 'woe is me' about Mumsnet. If anything I am 'woe is you'.

Hmm, I've been off for a good few weeks too. I could change but I've had this name for years so don't really want to.
I thought your posts on the Rev thread were very good btw.

dunno, i've been trying to limit my MN time rhubs, and having a new name is good cos i don't get so involved in convos iykwim? when i get more time i'll change back probably.

On the Mumsnet fb site I mean, not the others.

no, they don't say who their mumsnet names are.

But many people don't realise that Aitch. Foolish yes, but fb shouldn't have public default settings.

Do you want to be called Aitch still or not?

if you can link to the members list of a closed group (assuming that the person who started it - whoever that was... - has checked the settings), then that would be a serious hole in the programming.

Do they say who their Mumsnet names are?

I agree that people should be more careful with fb. I found my 10yr old niece on there, or rather she found me, and I was horrified to see her friends included men from Armenia and such places - her privacy settings were default and so everyone could see her posing in a shoulderless dress, in the bath with her younger brother, etc.

I don't think kids should be on there at all.

they can't legislate for where their names will be seen or discussed, from the minute they join FB. no point whinging about it. you even have to register that you DON'T want to be listed on google, for goodness sakes. it's not a private medium.

Posie, I don't think I've ever seen the actual members page of the MN group linked on here. That would be against the whole 'closed group' thing then wouldn't it?

Not you Aitch, you muppet.
'KerryMum1' and whoever 'wickedwitchofwestlife' is.