Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Our comments, in MN books, who owns our collective wisdom?

258 replies

Wotzy · 28/01/2009 22:28

Who owns our comments?

We can request them to be removed from this forum, but not in print. In posting we give consent for them to be on MN on the web, but does that extend to publication in a book.

I am not looking for a fight, it is a serious question, who owns the copyright to our words, if they are in publication? Was there consent to have our collective words printed in a book?

OP posts:
FioFio · 29/01/2009 16:41

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

OhBling · 29/01/2009 16:40

"But I think the idea that Justine is funding her Florida villa and 6 kids at prviate school by selling us out is a bit far from reality."

It's not selling you out. You could talk too loudly on the train and a journalist over hear you and write, "overheard on train by woman with young daughter: ..."

onebatmother · 29/01/2009 16:40

nonononono! That's Morally Wrong!

Wankingguideauthor · 29/01/2009 16:39

No beards. But plenty of those in the new MN educational children's programme "In the Night Ladygarden"

onebatmother · 29/01/2009 16:39

and if that doesn't make the round-up I'll eat that beard

onebatmother · 29/01/2009 16:38

yes, gash is very bad. It came out worse than I'd intended - I was actually thinking about the Gashlycrumb Tinies

But do I really bandy cunt with aplomb - I had no idea!

KerryMumbles · 29/01/2009 16:37

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Swedes · 29/01/2009 16:37

The Joy of Swearing?

QS · 29/01/2009 16:37

Or indeed "The Mumsnet dos, dont's and doodas of Bumsex"

onebatmother · 29/01/2009 16:36

Are the instructional photographs are the ones where you were wearing the beard?

Leeza2 · 29/01/2009 16:36

puleeeese expat's recent guide was quite enuff

Swedes · 29/01/2009 16:36

Gawd, gash is a horrible word.

Wankingguideauthor · 29/01/2009 16:34

Yes indeed. Are you happy to pose for the instructional photographs?

Swedes · 29/01/2009 16:34

I have to tell you that even in real life Onebat uses the word cunt with a certain aplomb.

onebatmother · 29/01/2009 16:32

LOLOL!

My FULL name? The Lady Professor Euphemia Tracy Gash?

Habbibu · 29/01/2009 16:32

And the Mumsnet Guide to late-medieval English medicine...

Swedes · 29/01/2009 16:31
onebatmother · 29/01/2009 16:31

lol at Habb's covering all the bases.

Wankingguideauthor · 29/01/2009 16:31

Not to worry, onebatm, I have used your real name only rather than your posting name.

AmIOdetteOrOdile · 29/01/2009 16:30

So the MN guides are like the Grumpy Old Women books then? I can see there is a correlation.

LadyMuck · 29/01/2009 16:29

Whilst I obviously wish this adventure every success, I thought that the last experience with books seemed to be on the lines that it drummed up some new members and covered the publishing costs, but it wasn't a huge money-spinner. Now obviously they have MP on board, and frankly, even if her writing style didn't appeal, the irony of MP's efforts beating SWMNBN in the list of bestsellers could itself persuade me to part company with cash, so it might be different. But I think the idea that Justine is funding her Florida villa and 6 kids at prviate school by selling us out is a bit far from reality.

Habbibu · 29/01/2009 16:28
KerryMumbles · 29/01/2009 16:27

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

KerryMumbles · 29/01/2009 16:27

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

wotzy · 29/01/2009 16:26

You see without knowing stinkymonkey' experience, you just know that it will be different for different mn'ers and should take that as a consideration. The copyright should be more transparent in the joining, which is my point.

I would be mortified if I gave a bereavement post for instance, to find it used later in a book. Even without my name or a daft user name next to it. I'd know it was 'out there' for all eternity as Stinkymonkey says. If you can't see that, then there is no point trying to explain it further.

OP posts: