Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Dear MNHQ, I didn't see all the problems kick off over poor Revjustabout...

1010 replies

georgimama · 20/01/2009 12:38

but I would be grateful if you could tell me that you have at least given serious consideration to banning the posters who were harrassing her.

Thank you.

OP posts:
soapbox · 20/01/2009 17:04

Arf - so the anti-moldies have got their own gathering ground where they co-ordinate their anti-moldie postings - oh the hypocrisy!

morningpaper · 20/01/2009 17:04

YES A DEACON IS A REVEREND

(and this music part is BORING)

wannaBe · 20/01/2009 17:03

no. that's a group set up by those who were upset at not being invited to join moldies. Another invitation only group, set up by the posters who were upset at some posters starting an invitation only group.

FioFio · 20/01/2009 17:03

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

onebatmother · 20/01/2009 17:02

I think it's a jokey anti, fuckit.

fuckitgoblin · 20/01/2009 17:02

oops sorry! got excited by the violinists on bbc1

fuckitgoblin · 20/01/2009 17:01

can someone answer me please?
I found www.facebook.com/event.php?sid=5432e7425e81dba49cb0e17ef8af87db&eid=60865520860 this. Is this mouldies? Or is it anti

fuckitgoblin · 20/01/2009 17:01

can someone answer me please?
I found www.facebook.com/event.php?sid=5432e7425e81dba49cb0e17ef8af87db&eid=60865520860 this. Is this mouldies? Or is it anti

tortoiseshellWasMusicaYearsAgo · 20/01/2009 17:00

It should also matter to MNHQ, given the issues about who is responsible for text published on the internet.

onebatmother · 20/01/2009 16:59

"I did actually join the thread to criticise a boycott of Israeli produce, not to have a go at the Rev.

then her dh called someone a bitch.
and things got heated."

Sorry Enid, that's just not true. Her dh didn't just come on and out of nowhere, call someone a bitch. He did so because the unpleasant and entirely unprovoked attack on his wife was already well underway.

MarmadukeScarlet · 20/01/2009 16:56

I'm sure this will also be deleted, but I, in no way accused anyone of harrassing or stalking anyone else.

But as my, rather polite, post has now been deleted I'm sure those wishing to could assume that I did.

Oh, the irony

TheFallenMadonna · 20/01/2009 16:55

So it would matter to the CofE perhaps. Perhaps. But to posters? Meh.

VinegarTits · 20/01/2009 16:55

But you called the Rev a liar before her DH came into it (the reason why he did, because she was under attack) so you cant blame him for that, why did you disbelieve her in the first place?

tortoiseshellWasMusicaYearsAgo · 20/01/2009 16:55

And like I said further down, but was ignored, in a way she should be glad to be challenged - it means that we can all be a bit more secure that if someone 'borrowed' our identity and then posted, JudgeFlounce style, there's a good chance it would be unmasked. Simply because people do keep their eyes open.

wannaBe · 20/01/2009 16:55

This is getting ridiculous. Just because the three posters in question post on moldies does not make all other moldies guilty by association.

If someone is murdered in your town does that make you complicit because you live there?

If someone posts a nasty post on mn (and there are some nasty posters on mn) does that make you a part of it? Even if you've had nothing to do with it?

The three posters in question should not have posted the things they did.

But people are using this as an excuse to bash moldies again and that is equally out of order.

FriarKewcumber · 20/01/2009 16:54

I didn't follow the threa however it was interesting that all (arguably) offensive posts by Rev and MrRev were deleted at their own request and they agreed they were uncalled for. No such self-awareness from the other relevant posters.

tortoiseshellWasMusicaYearsAgo · 20/01/2009 16:53

FallenMadonna - yes it would, because it would mean she was peddling thoughts under the umbrella of the CE, as their representative.

Would be a bit like someone going onto Babyworld and saying 'I run MN, we give away free fruitshoots.' Possibly.

Monkeytrousers · 20/01/2009 16:53

Oh dear. Really?

TotalChaos · 20/01/2009 16:52

Personally I'm more interested in what he achieves after the inauguration than the ceremony.

Fio - ta - here's your fiver for that nice comment.

Pag - hope the club goes well.

Ledodgy · 20/01/2009 16:52

.

MrEniddo · 20/01/2009 16:51

ahem. I did actually join the thread to criticise a boycott of Israeli produce, not to have a go at the Rev.

then her dh called someone a bitch.

and things got heated.

TheFallenMadonna · 20/01/2009 16:51

I'm utterly perplexed by the whole thing.

Would it matter if she weren't a Rev? Do we need disclaimers at the top of the Religion etc board as well as Employment and Health?

I think we should have one at the top of the education boards too. I sometimes actually give advice (which is I think more than justabout has done) based on my experience as a teacher. Now of course I may not be a teacher.

Blimey.

Poor response from MNHQ I think. And aren't deacons Revs?

Piffle · 20/01/2009 16:51

ahh the anti moldie cavalry
And you accuse the Moldies of producing a gang
I'm off as this is no longer about Rev. Whom I like immensely.

TheDevilWearsPrimark · 20/01/2009 16:50

HISTORY BEING FUCKING MADE

VinegarTits · 20/01/2009 16:50

Speaks volumes that Eniddo, you didnt even have a valid reason not to believe the Rev is a Rev, you just felt like attacking her, plain nasty.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread