Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Dear MNHQ, I didn't see all the problems kick off over poor Revjustabout...

1010 replies

georgimama · 20/01/2009 12:38

but I would be grateful if you could tell me that you have at least given serious consideration to banning the posters who were harrassing her.

Thank you.

OP posts:
tortoiseshellWasMusicaYearsAgo · 21/01/2009 10:23

(I mean chatted loads over the years)

tortoiseshellWasMusicaYearsAgo · 21/01/2009 10:23

Actually, with the clarification later on, yes. I've chatted to enid loads online, and I believe her that that is genuine. You of course are entitled to interpret it any way you like.

MauriceDancer · 21/01/2009 10:22

By MrEniddo on Tue 20-Jan-09 15:21:56
Dear Rev,

I am sorry for doubting that your family died in the Holocaust and that you are not a Rev. And that you are your dh.

Love,

Enid
x

By MrEniddo on Tue 20-Jan-09 16:46:21
Yes, if you must know, I thought about it and thought 'hmm if she really did have family in the holocaust that must have been quite upsetting'

so I apologised

IorekByrnison · 21/01/2009 10:20

Do us a favour, tortoise. Is that an apology you would have been happy to receive?

tortoiseshellWasMusicaYearsAgo · 21/01/2009 10:14

Sorry 16:46

tortoiseshellWasMusicaYearsAgo · 21/01/2009 10:13

Look at enid's post at 16:40 yesterday.

morningpaper · 21/01/2009 10:08

Justabout has posted here, FYI

MauriceDancer · 21/01/2009 10:08

bollocks, tortoisehell. enid knows how to apologise and that sure wasn't it.

MrsBrendaDyson · 21/01/2009 10:06

"she did it so i can do it" is a very childish argument

i would like to draw everyones attention to Firepiles excellent post.

the fact that kerrymum said something to PPH

has a whole lotta shit all to do with the honourable REV

and thats the issue isn't it

becuase if we are attacking modlies v non moldies, i have a whole world of 'by association' stuff that has nothing to do with anything that i could post

as i am sure do a lot of other people

tortoiseshellWasMusicaYearsAgo · 21/01/2009 10:06

enid has apologised for that. I know you don't think that was genuine, but I do, particularly reading the post afterwards where she said she had thought about it and decided to apologise.

MrsBrendaDyson · 21/01/2009 10:03

firepile, i don't know who you are, but i like you, and your use of the word 'obfuscate'

HighPriestessrutyofthe7Seas · 21/01/2009 10:03

Bereavement was not off limits on the Israel thread, it was the very topic of the attack on rev.

tortoiseshellWasMusicaYearsAgo · 21/01/2009 10:01

What I mean is it's a cheap point against something that is a personal sadness, bereavement should be off limits I think within an argument.

morningpaper · 21/01/2009 10:01

Yes tortoise, at times there has been lack of sensitivity on both sides

Firepile · 21/01/2009 10:01

And tell me - was Judge Flounce publicly accused of "making up" family dying in the Holocaust?

Let's not forget the way in which these posters' "concerns" about potential trollery were couched, shall we?

morningpaper · 21/01/2009 10:00
tortoiseshellWasMusicaYearsAgo · 21/01/2009 09:59

mp - whatever the phrasing, it's very insensitive to bring it into the argument at all. Shouldn't have been mentioned at all.

morningpaper · 21/01/2009 09:57

Wartybosoms: Kerrymum did NOT accuse PPH of lying about it. She said something along the lines of 'We have no evidence that your father has died but we aren't attacking that' after PPH had accused Justabout of lying about who she was. It is really daft to keep making up stories about KM and pretending that something happened that didn't happen.

HighPriestessrutyofthe7Seas · 21/01/2009 09:57

KM said she didn't do that, but if she did, it was wrong. I thought she was [rather cack handedly] trying to show that you can accuse anyone of anything which is unfair without good grounds. It was not the right thing to do, but how that justifies the personal attacks on rev I'm not quite sure.

BrianOBrain · 21/01/2009 09:57

[sniggers at some of the funny names having a very serious discussion]

Firepile · 21/01/2009 09:57

"ruty - From my recollections, PPH had also suffered a personal tragedy but that didn't stop a mumsnetter from accusing her of lying about it to gain sympathy [hmmm]

"Neither side can claim a moral high ground in this matter."

No, sorry, don't get it - what has a disputed spat between PPH and another poster got to do with the Rev?

This is just a "look at the shiny thing" tactic to obfuscate the unacceptable behaviour of three formerly prolific posters with an axe to grind. And who have yet to lodge an apology that looks sincere.

DrWilfSellAndNotJustAnHonorary · 21/01/2009 09:55

'Neither side'?

This kind of inflammatory language is really not helping, warty.

We're talking about particular individuals who have behaved very badly. This is not 'sides'. In any case, the argument that one person/group of people are claiming the moral highground is ridiculous, and that equally bad behaviour from someone else justifies other bad behaviour is even more ridiculous.

Bullying is bullying.

VinegarTits · 21/01/2009 09:55

Oh i get it, so becuase someone else accused PPH of lying on a completely seperate occasion, that means PHH was justified in accusing someone else of being a troll

Is that what your saying?

Personally i cant see why that has anything to do with

wartybosoms · 21/01/2009 09:51

ruty - From my recollections, PPH had also suffered a personal tragedy but that didn't stop a mumsnetter from accusing her of lying about it to gain sympathy [hmmm]

Neither side can claim a moral high ground in this matter.

wartybosoms · 21/01/2009 09:47

I was around for the JF thing too and there were definitely direct accusations on the board.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.