Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Dear MNHQ, I didn't see all the problems kick off over poor Revjustabout...

1010 replies

georgimama · 20/01/2009 12:38

but I would be grateful if you could tell me that you have at least given serious consideration to banning the posters who were harrassing her.

Thank you.

OP posts:
KerryTheMNExpertonEverything · 20/01/2009 21:23

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

KerryTheMNExpertonEverything · 20/01/2009 21:23

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

HerIllustriousEminenceOnebat · 20/01/2009 21:23

Ach, Zophable. Zat is nussing more zan my own vish-vulvillment, my dear.

Aitch · 20/01/2009 21:22

funnily enough, foxy, the only person on here whose job we know for definite IS the rev, cos MNHQ have seen her credentials.

and she's the one being told to change her name...

BlueBumedFly · 20/01/2009 21:22

Justa (Rev) - I am so sorry that you had to go through that hideous thread. You have commented on some of my threads before I have found you to be caring, sincere and kind.

I am very upset that there are people like this on MN when there are also lots of very sad and worried people who truly need help who may be put off posting because of some idiots.

Please keep going, I will make sure I look out for you in the future.

As for the name change:
"What's in a name? That which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet."

DetectiveInspectorLittleBella · 20/01/2009 21:22

My work is hush hush

RiaParkinson · 20/01/2009 21:21

I dont know if others feel like this but i think it is a wee bit like an all girls school and the teacher telling someone to change their skirt style becasue the big bullish popular girl has teased her over it...

kind of ' 'I know its awful of Susan but you know what she is like - lets keep the peace'

HerIllustriousEminenceOnebat · 20/01/2009 21:20

x-post with Jute.

Heathcliffscathy · 20/01/2009 21:20

pmsl littlebella.

are you flying squad?

onebat are you a psychoanalyst?

i'm getting excited now.

foxinsocks · 20/01/2009 21:20

what a weird thing

if someone hasn't pointed out already, can I point out that the cod on this thead isn't cod (although probably obvious to those who realise codthemag can spell ;-)).

how very odd this all is

Thing is, no-one really knows who anyone is on here. I am, of course, a fox but I think you already knew that.

HerIllustriousEminenceOnebat · 20/01/2009 21:18

For example.

If I were a qualified psychoanalytic psychotherapist I would have monthly sessions with a supervisory psychotherapist to talk through issues which might affect me, arising from the things that I would hear in the course of my practise.

Were I to be posting online, as an individual with acknowledged professional expertise,both I and my professional body would definitely want a disinterested observer to oversee my online life in a general way. They would not, obviously, be standing over my shoulder as I posted - but they would expect to be informed of anything which went beyond the most anodyne advice.

And in any freaking case, I've never seen the Rev give out advice or speak from a posit of authority.

DetectiveInspectorLittleBella · 20/01/2009 21:18

I had no idea rev was a rev until Enid and PPH came on and started telling her she wasn't.

Heathcliffscathy · 20/01/2009 21:18

swedes thing is everyone knows rev is a rev. she leads the reluctant worshippers threads and makes no attempt to hide what she does for a living. so how does it protect her?

BennyAndJoon · 20/01/2009 21:18

I am a humanist, and I understand that a rev on here would be posting in a personal capacity.

There are semi official MN people, they have MNHQ after their name.

Morning paper does a round up

Carm does receipts

if there was any doubt that justabout was a MN OFFICIAL surely the fact we didn't have prayer of the day in the weekly round up would have cleared that up.

jeeze

oops

Threadworm · 20/01/2009 21:17

The more I think about it the more annoyed I am with MNHQ on this matter. Requesting Rev to change her name does seem to imply (without cause) that she brought the bullying on herself.

There are other poster names with job titles in them (scienceteacher a good example). Rev's posts have been interesting and suppportive and have not overstepped the position of one MNer giving advice to another, equal, MNer. Others have given 'expert' advice much more vociferously.

She was bullied on more than one thread by posters who disliked her lack of regard for moldies and who (presumably) disliked the high-profile and popularity she has, which used to be the preserve of now-superannuated MNers.

Hardly anyone (if indeed anyone at all other than the aggressive trollhunter posters) has objected to her name, and yet MNHQ's response is to ask her to change it. I really hope MNHQ will rethink this.

Swedes · 20/01/2009 21:16

Is it possible that MNHQ are advising Justabout to drop the rev from her name because they are trying to help her protect her real life identity in future? I feel certain that Justabout would only agree if she truly agreed.

Heathcliffscathy · 20/01/2009 21:16

jute are you a moldie?

i'm asking because it would be one thing if rev had come to your notice because of some interest in religious postings on mn...that would be in some way relevant.

how she came to yours isn't really relevant to this is it? in that her 'claim to expertise through choice of name' only really applies to her posts on religious subjects doesn't it?

jute · 20/01/2009 21:16

onebat- yes I know how counselling works (and supervision), I know nothing about the clergy other than being at the receiving end of some rather full on recruitment attempts. I assumed it was a novel way to meet the masses. I'm afraid I am rather cynical when it comes to the christian church in particular.

Had I realised that it was a counselling type supervision then of course I wouldn't have made the mistake.

WinkyWinkola · 20/01/2009 21:16

"winky! MrEniddo accused her of making up the fact that she had relatives in the Holocaust. For which she later apologised.

That's pretty much a personal attack doncha think?"

Of course it is a personal attack. I didn't see this though.

jabberwocky · 20/01/2009 21:14

I missed all of this and have now spent way too much time linking threads and reading up on it. Too bad about all of the nasty comments

And now I have a question. Is the moldies site actually a private part of the MN site? I thought it was just a group who privately set up a forum on their own. Seems a bit odd if it's really an invitation only part of MN

jute · 20/01/2009 21:14

er no -very big leap there sophable. Nothing bothered me. I just noticed what she said about her supervision because I thought it was strange. I did think she meant that she was on MN with supervision (to put this in some context someone has repeatedly tried to recruit me to their church over the last 2 years).

I found out today that I misunderstood the nature of her supervision.

Aitch · 20/01/2009 21:14

exactly, ruty. this is all bollocks tbh, the posters concerned were WRONG, they should apologise. and the rev shouldn't change her name unless she wants to.

HerIllustriousEminenceOnebat · 20/01/2009 21:13

Jute:What made me think? The things she said about the Sindie- about how she was worried because her supervisor knew her MN name and how she talked to him about her mn posts. I don't remember the exact words, but I thought it was odd.

Have you any idea about how the modern church/psychotherapy/counselling profession works?

This is very common and is intended to protect the individual concerned as much as those to whom she speaks.

WilfSell · 20/01/2009 21:13

winky! MrEniddo accused her of making up the fact that she had relatives in the Holocaust. For which she later apologised.

That's pretty much a personal attack doncha think?

morningpaper · 20/01/2009 21:13

she is lying low

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.