Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

is there a moldies part three?

1015 replies

Tortington · 03/01/2009 15:31

just wondering, as i can't find it.

OP posts:
Prufrock · 06/01/2009 16:46

It's not an inference but a fact that both Rhubs and Custy have had some major rucks with other posters on here. And some of those posters happened, randomly to be on Moldies before R&C. And because nobody wanted to make a value judgement on who was right and wrong in those rucks, the ones who were there first had to take precedence. Not perfect, but the best solution that could be thought of at the time.

MoreSpamThanGlam · 06/01/2009 16:45

Err...sorry, if i organised something for a load of other women and met up with them on a regular basis and then they left me out I think thats spiteful and yes...utterly bitchy.

And it makes it sound like Custy and Rhubard have shagged someones husband.

If so - then the husbands obviously were not happy were they?!

SinkingontheTitanic · 06/01/2009 16:45

I have never shagged anyone's husband btw. To stay within the pub and golf club analogy, all I have ever done is once say something a little insensitive to Algernon and I apologised in private to Algernon and my apology was (on the face of it) accepted. I may have disagreed with other members of the golf club, but not on a scale to warrant being blackballed from the golf club and I strongly refute any suggestion that any offence I caused was on a par with shagging someone's spouse. Jeez!

Thomcat · 06/01/2009 16:45

If Custy, or anyone else, had lots of run-ins with people on moldies, if she did, then why on earth would she be invited to join? And why then would anyone think we'll tell her it exists but we won't be inviting her?

hullygully · 06/01/2009 16:45

WHAT DID THEY DO?

TWINSETinapeartree · 06/01/2009 16:44

MNHQ I really do not want to see private boards or rooms and would leave i such a thing was created, they would become covens of bitchfestness.

Mumsnet is a fabulous place and part of that is because everyone is as good as their last post, I have spoken to , taken advice from and met up with all sorts of people some of whom I would gravitated to naturally if I had met them in RL and some I would never have crossed paths with. Mumsnet's strength is the fact it is nothing like the moldies group and nor should it want to be? Why should we change what we have, which is quite fab, to chase after a group of people who have made it quite clear they would rather be somewhere else. Or conversly a group of people who like to post in both places so a second private elitist place would be of no interest.

badassmarthafocker · 06/01/2009 16:44

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

eekareindeer · 06/01/2009 16:43

Rhubarb - I don't understand this what you've said here:

"Yes true, but some of them were rl friends, such as eekareinder to me and for custy, well she set up lots of local meet-ups and thought many of those were friends as she saw them so often".

Am hoping you are not getting me confused with one of your RL friends?

I am not a moldie. I have been wholly scathing of the whole concept from the start and if I had been invited I would have turned the invite down. And I'm quite proud of that fact.

I did wonder why I hadn't had "the call" as I am more than passing acquaintances with one of the founders in RL. But we have occastionally talked about Mumsnet, as you do, and she knows I am not a prolific poster or that heavily involved in Mumsnet life.
I guess I prefer to think I didn't get an invite because she knows I would have replied "You what? are you kidding?" rather than anything lacking in my personality.

So I thought the same might apply to you and Custy.

Thats all.

CoteDAzur · 06/01/2009 16:41

Prufrock - So Custy & Rhubarb's big crime was to talk/post about other MNers?

("In fact, he's so hurt by all of it that he starts flirting with every golf club members wife, but still can't understand why anyone would possibly have a problem with him, because that's just how he is.")

hullygully · 06/01/2009 16:41

Come on, out with it. What DID they do? They can't have been worse than Cod?

SinkingontheTitanic · 06/01/2009 16:40

So I shagged someone's husband once did I? I sure wish I could remember it!

Thomcat · 06/01/2009 16:40

And can I repeat to Rhubarb - So I'm not invited to join golf club but am told about it and told I won't be invited. Is that supposed to make me feel better than not being invited and finding out about it anyway?

BecauseImWorthIt · 06/01/2009 16:39

It was an interesting post, Prufrock - the inference that Rhubarb or Custy (or other non-Moldies) have done something unpleasant is not a nice one.

hullygully · 06/01/2009 16:38

I also heard that Bob, Steve and Algy were troilists, although they said they were looking for their balls.

Thomcat · 06/01/2009 16:37

Moldies en mass are not 'utter bitches' for leaving out custy, sorry, but no. If custy set up meetings then she did it becasue she wanted to. She shouldn't be asked to join any / all splinter groups becasue she set up meets.

JustinExcelsisMumsnet · 06/01/2009 16:37

Oh Balls! Prufrock that was a damm good post - and one v hard not to reply to but surely we've reached the nineteenth hole by now?

BecauseImWorthIt · 06/01/2009 16:37
hullygully · 06/01/2009 16:36

I never liked that Algernon, his wife was a right goer, though.

BecauseImWorthIt · 06/01/2009 16:36

HNY, Justine - and all at MNHQ.

One thing in this that never occurred to me was how hurt you must all have been to hear people complaining that MN wasn't 'like it used to be'.

Anyhoo. In the spirit of MN, can I suggest - as I did so valiantly on the last thread - that when this one gets to 1000 that we let it rest? That gives us all about another 100 or so posts to say any last thoughts, and then we can skip into the future all holding hands?

Rhubarb · 06/01/2009 16:36

Understood Justine - but just to briefly answer Prufrock's post.

You say Bob shagged Algernon's missus - if that is an analogy that means that we did something unspeakable to hurt other Mumsnetters, which is a horrible thing to say.

Truly it is.

There I leave it.

stillstanding · 06/01/2009 16:35

Prufrock, when you read your analogy do you think it makes things clearer or easier to understand? Because I read it and think your golf club is even worse than Rhubarb's ...

Thomcat · 06/01/2009 16:34

So I'm not invited to join golf club but am told about it and told I won't be invited. Is that supposed to make me feel better than not being invited and finding out about it anyway?

JustinExcelsisMumsnet · 06/01/2009 16:31

Just got back from a week off during which barely a Moldie thought flitted through my head - bliss - and see that there is still some rumbling going on.

First a couple of responses.
eekareindeer - my reference to Moldies wasn't deliberate, it was a mistake (quite a big one in restrospect) as I've posted a few times, but heck I can't make you believe me if you're of a mind not to - I'm sorry about that.

DaddyJ this is not (and never has been as far as I can see) a fight between MNHQ and Moldies, and certainly not between me and Twiglett. But you've, rightly I think, asked for our thoughts, so here they are again:

It is our fervent wish for everyone to move on. We can't see any further purpose in prolonged scab-picking - the only result will be further recrimination and further hurt.

MNHQ's position remains:

  1. We bear absolutely no ill-will towards any Moldies members (all of whom are welcome on/back to Mumsnet at any time should they wish to post).
  1. We absolutely understand why the Moldies wanted a private group. We also understand that not everyone's motive for being there is the same - for some it was privacy, for some intimacy, for some just a straight desire to get their Old Mumsnet back. We also understand that some of the members (though not all) had left MN anyway again for lots of different reasons - all of which are completely understandable/ valid etc. We have never ever taken umbrage at folks leaving. We genuinely have no wish to keep anyone here who doesn't want to be here - the opposite in fact because if folks aren't happy at being here they generally post accordingly! We have never taken umbrage at folks leaving. MN is there to make people's lives easier - how could we?
  1. We absolutely understand why those who were hurt to find out about Moldies were feeling hurt. We're sorry that being a Mumsnetter led to that - it's not what we're here for.
  1. We would like to try private groups a la facebook some time later this year as we believe it might have been a solution that could have avoided some of that hurt. We've actually been thinking about it since the SN group was formed a few years ago but haven't really have sufficient tech available to do it. I do think private groups, but crucially with the scrutiny of a public board, where folks can voice complaints, might be the answer (then again they might not be right for MN but worth a try we think).
  1. We agree with those who have said that, on balance, MN has been a happier place since a small group of established members found somewhere else to post instead of/ or in addition to Mumsnet. From a MNHQ point of view it was pretty demoralising seeing post after post saying things ain't what they used to be, and can't have been any fun for newbies either.

Mumsnet was formed with the express intention of allowing parents to help each other by pooling knowledge, experience, support and friendship. The continuation of this discussion is really not helping anyone in our humble opinion and so therefore is against the spirit of the site.

However, we don't tend to delete things simply because we don't want to see them posted. So, roughly three weeks and 1000s upon 1000s of posts into this, how about we try and let it slip off active conversations? It takes a few of us to sit on our hands and grit our teeth rather than make our points, which is doggone hard, we know.

So long as it's on active conversations it will continue to bubble away and flare up occasionally - and surely there's not a lot more to be said that hasn't been said already? I know that's never stopped us in the past (baby pasta anyone?) but in this case it would be nice if it did.

Happy New Year to all!

Prufrock · 06/01/2009 16:30

I'm a moldie, so another you can probably put on your list of people who you have talked to who aren't friends anymore Rhubs. I am sorry that you and Custy feel hurt by moldie behaviour, but want to reassure you (even though I doubt you will believe me) that hurt was not intended. Mumsnet oldies who had complained that the site wasn't like it used to be (which I don't think anyone can deny even without having to make a value judgement on which was better) had been told on more than one occasion to fuck off and start our own site instead of complaining here, so we did. Well actually, Twig happened upon the already set up GF refuge forum, and e-mailed the people who had been on it and people who where on a facebook conversation at the time - it was random, and grew organically.

So whilst I do see the point of your analogy, I'd like to amend and extend it slightly. How about:

You have a group of friends, some members of that group have been in there from the beginning and they decide they don't really like some of the new group members. So one day a few of them happen to bump into each other in the private, members-only golf club. They decide it's a nicer place than the pub, and gradually mention to a few of their mates from the pub that they are now members of the golf club and they should join to. Then they realise that if they each invite too many people from the pub, the golf club will get too busy and they won't be able to play a round, so they start discussing (on a names only basis) who they would each like to invite. Bob's name is mentioned, as is Fred's and Steve's. Fred is popular and is mates with a lot of the golf club set so he gets in no problem, nobody really knows who Steve is so they say we'd rather not have him, and Algernon (an existing member) privately lets the person compiling the numbers know that he would have to leave if Bob was invited because Bob had shagged his wife. So Bob isn't invited. Other people express surprise that Bob's not there, but are told that there's a personal issue and that if Bob comes, Algernon leaves, and decide that even though Bob's a good guy, so is Algernon, and he was here first.

But they also think that they quite like the landlord of the pub and don't want to steal all his business, and let him know that they like him, but his pub's changed, and he agrees it has, but he quite likes it, especially the extra takings, but come back for a chat whenever you feel like it. They also don't want to upset Bob, especially as some of them still like him, and you never really know exactly what goes on in relationships, and Algy's wife might have had a good reason to shag around, so they decide to keep it secret.

This carries on.

Then one day the pub finds out about the golf club. The friends are hurt. Some of pub group start telling Bob that they reckon he was discussed behind his back and wasn't good enough to join the club. He doesn't know which of his friends thought this, so not only is he hurt, he's also mistrustful of those he considered friends. He ignores the fact that he slept with Algy's wife so some people might indeed have a legitimate issue with him. In fact, he's so hurt by all of it that he starts flirting with every golf club members wife, but still can't understand why anyone would possibly have a problem with him, because that's just how he is. Other people in the pub, lots of whom didn't like the stuck up old regulars anyway, weigh in to win up the situation more, and the golfers feel like they can't come back, which is a shame, because the beer was bloody good,

Rhubarb · 06/01/2009 16:30

One true thing though, we would have declined.

Sorry but I do have to make that clear! reindeer is right about that bit, we wouldn't belong to such a group.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread