Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

is there a moldies part three?

1015 replies

Tortington · 03/01/2009 15:31

just wondering, as i can't find it.

OP posts:
Tortington · 05/01/2009 13:51

no fuck 'em

i have the measure of them now.

OP posts:
Tiggiwinkle · 05/01/2009 13:51

Custardo-you are right and I agree with you completely.

Lucyjones-have you not read FA's posts explaining why she did the search? What do you not understand?

Anyway, I think it was completely in order to use a quote to display the irony of this whole sorry debacle.

It occurs to my reading this thread...apart from the few self-proclaimed moldies, we do not have a clue who they are. Perhaps the people coming onto these threads criticizing posts by mumsnetters gives us some kind of clue?

georgimama · 05/01/2009 13:50

There's a weirdo bloke who posts a lot on the daily telegraph site called IIRC Ignatious Jack or something like that, he has a very similar posting style to DaddyJ. Strange line breaks just the same and a weirdly detached style of writing.

DaddyJ, are you Ignatious Jack?

LucyJones · 05/01/2009 13:50

Fio -iirc a lot of the Moldies were against that

LucyJones · 05/01/2009 13:49

Custardo- your case seems more personal though
Have you contacted the people that stayed at your house, smoked your fags etc and asked them what on earth they thought they were up to?

FioFio · 05/01/2009 13:49

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

Tortington · 05/01/2009 13:47

as was seeting up a secret elitist forum.

and she conceded that our opinions can change - it required but, a little firther reading.

OP posts:
duchesse · 05/01/2009 13:47

It just smacks of the sort of behaviour you'd expect from primary school children to me. Deeply immature and uninteresting.

LucyJones · 05/01/2009 13:42

I think it's quite clear that GeraldineMumsnet was posting in response to FA's seeking out of Twiglett's posts tbh
I agree with Frog, it was quite a shocking thing to do!

Tortington · 05/01/2009 13:37

"Because having this separate forum for veteran Mumsnetters is actually not a bad idea at all.
If it's done right."

yes is fucking does. let there not be the seven circles of hell
the inner sanctum, or any other better, bigger, more famous up their own arse egotist elitist tosspots -

work together? to create a two tier mumsnet, those of a certain eloguence, or if your a close friend of someone who is a moldy, can get into this inner sanctum

its not like graduating university.

they aren't the best

they are a bunch of people who went offto set up a secret elitist forum - deliberatly

the same people came met my family slept at my house, accepted my dh as a chauffer, smoked my fags and ate my food. the same people told me highly sensitive personal information about their family members

so what- the - fuck - am - i - not - getting - here?

does a certain style, class, of person do this ...regularly... is it becuase i am a northern monkey that i thought any of these things constituted more than a user name on a website

eh?

work together? you have to be out of your mind.

work together to have a public school and a private school or mumsnet

are you shitting me

its disgusting the whole thing is utterly revolting.

OP posts:
Blu · 05/01/2009 13:29

"as well as digging deep during the long, barbarically dull food and drink sequences."

Sorry, that undermines your whole premise here: "I think gender in this context is a red herring."

ABudafulSightWereHappyTonight · 05/01/2009 13:21

Wow DaddyJ - you really are trying to stir things up aren't you?

Threadworm · 05/01/2009 12:37

Daddyj what an odd idea. Why on earth would MNHQ and the moldies want to work together? It's just a spin-off site. They've gone. Nothing to do with MNHQ now and why should it be?

And the comparison with something serious like Gaza/Israel is pretty distasteful.

FioFio · 05/01/2009 12:31

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

grumpybritches · 05/01/2009 12:31

FWIW I read 'betrayal' as a more general thing than posting on an alternative forum.

Wll done DJ for trying to raise this discussion up a little...

Flightattendant7 · 05/01/2009 12:28
Flightattendant7 · 05/01/2009 12:28

I don't know what you are on about daddyJ but you are not talking about flight as in me are you.

Tiggiwinkle · 05/01/2009 12:27

A bit of childish footstamping going on there methinks fio.

DaddyJ · 05/01/2009 12:24

And one last post, I promise

If this thread has really run its course then we can also add leadership
to the list of themes.
More candidly, abject failure of leadership in a conflict situation.

Ironically, there is currently a News thread putting forward the premise
that more female input could be the answer to the troubles in the Middle East.

I think gender in this context is a red herring.

The real issue is when leaders only think in terms of fight or flight.
It's FIGHT between the Israelis and Hamas and
it appears to be FLIGHT between MNHQ and the Moldies.

Neither approach is likely to lead to a lasting peace
let alone encourage both groups to collectively pursue common goals.

What is needed is bold, imaginative leadership
that prides itself on its ability to reconcile dilemmas,
to think the unthinkable and seek it against the odds.

What would be the unthinkable in our situation?
MNHQ and the Moldies working together.
Because having this separate forum for veteran Mumsnetters is actually not a bad idea at all.
If it's done right.

Victory is there to be snatched from the jaws of defeat
but, as in the Middle East, the leadership does not appear to be up to the task.

FioFio · 05/01/2009 12:24

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

Flightattendant7 · 05/01/2009 12:20

Lol

you are sounding like Scottishmummy only in English.

she's a poet you know.

DaddyJ · 05/01/2009 12:18

lol blu
If this thing leads to more fathers joining MN,
it has all been worth it.

Incidentally, having battled my way through at least 4000 of the 7500 posts
I would feel sorry for anyone looking for a gory mummy fight.

This story is far more complex, far more adult in the true sense of the word.
There are no quick thrills, no sex nor violence.
A lot happens off-board, many posts and whole threads have been deleted
so close attention and reading between the lines is required
as well as digging deep during the long, barbarically dull food and drink sequences.
High-brow literature never gives up its secrets easily.

The narrative that emerges is steeped in classic themes of mankind.
On the one hand you have betrayal. Betrayal of individuals, betrayal of an utopian ethos (Egalite!).
This is counterbalanced by a powerful yearning for paradise lost.
Ideals, principles and egos clash, group dynamics appear irresistible.

No wonder this is such a gripping yarn!
Particularly as the characters are all perfectly likeable, caring mothers.
No phantomime villains here.

There. One for Private Eye's Pseuds Corner

TheFloozyInTheJacuzzi · 04/01/2009 23:57

LOL Custardo! Yesterday someone I know on MN replied to a poster calling her "honey" and I was a bit shocked that she did, seeing as she wasn't a "hun" type till I noticed that the poster she was talking to had "honey" in her MN name!

FairLadyRantALot · 04/01/2009 23:55

lol

Tortington · 04/01/2009 23:54

oh dear, vibes - thats 10 hun points for you

OP posts:
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread