Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

If you (still) feel the need to discuss Moldies [part 2]

1008 replies

YetMoreTech · 31/12/2008 11:29

This thread is a continuation of this one. That one had become too big for its own boots the system to handle.

OP posts:
drpumpkinbread · 02/01/2009 17:54

why can't all the mouldies clear off for good.

FairLadyRantALot · 02/01/2009 17:41

I suppose so.....must say I totally don't get the whole flouncers corner thing, lol

hercules1 · 02/01/2009 17:37

Just done a quick end of thread lurk- dont go piffle.

Biscuits4cheese · 02/01/2009 17:32

Leaving is leaving.
Flouncing is announcing that you will leave (the actual leaving part is often optional i've noticed) and expecting to gain some kind of reaction to this announcement.

TotalChaos · 02/01/2009 17:32

Piffle - I think that there are relatively few people who have strong views on the Moldies saga - maybe just hide this thread, and post on other stuff (would imagine you would have a strong interest in the Gaza/Israel discussions).

whitenoise · 02/01/2009 17:30

i thought flouncing was starting a thread to announce you were leaving to get maximum attention before actually leaving iyswim

FairLadyRantALot · 02/01/2009 17:29

I thought flouncing is the same as leaving....???

I didn't realise you oculd actually de-reg....thought you would just well, stop coming to the place, and that is that....

whitenoise · 02/01/2009 17:01

there is a different between flouncing and leaving though - isn't there?

Flightattendant7 · 02/01/2009 16:51

Piffle, just because you dereg doesn;t mean they delete all your past contributions.

They will still be there for all to see.

Lulumama · 02/01/2009 16:43

i would also be sorry to see you go piffle

LIZS · 02/01/2009 16:41

agree Roisin. There is little point in directing inflammatory remarks at anyone individually, among either camp, least of all those who have taken the opportunity to discuss it openly.

Quattrocento · 02/01/2009 16:41

Oh not another .... I don't think this thread should be in site stuff, I think it should be in Flouncer's Corner.

I'd love to say I'd miss you Piffle but the truth is that we've not really talked before (I don't think).

Sorry if this place is not serving your needs any longer.

roisin · 02/01/2009 16:36

I would be very sad Piffle if you, or anyone else in a similar position, felt it was time to de-reg.
I know I've learned a lot from you in the past and wish you and your family all the best for the future, whether or not that future includes mumsnet of moldies or anything else.
R

Piffle · 02/01/2009 16:33

I did not set Moldies up
I was invited saw some lasses there who had left MN-one who is helping me through a specific confidential health issue.
I have never voted/vetoed nor seen that in action.

I did mean earlier that which bonds us also drives us apart but ultimately because of the shared experiences it should bring the site together again.

I said the reason I come back is to reply to comments I disagree with- I am not posting on this thread alone btw
Excuse me for veering off my writ and making a post not relating to refuting of incorrect allegations.

You have a very unpleasant superior and sarcastic tone Smilley.
I'll be considering de regging later as this site is offering nothing positive for me any longer.
This is a shame as it means the info about my DD's rare condition will not be found bysomeone whomight need it and all my post and ante natal stuff will be lost.
I've been here for 6.5 years but I guess it's time to move on.

Quattrocento · 02/01/2009 15:35

Piffle, I have no idea why you and other moldies are filled with an urge to 'set the record straight' because this is one record which simply can't be set straight.

You might be able to correct one or two misconceptions about how moldies arose, but you are not going to be able to fix the core issues which are that (a) moldies has been set up (b) it has followed a deliberate policy of not being open (c) a small number of mners feel aggrieved for not being invited and (d) a rather larger number question the ethics of recruiting for mouldies on mn.

So why bother? Why not just let the fuss die down?

Ponders · 02/01/2009 13:04

"Doesn't mumsnet have copyright of the names we chose"

What, like piffle? ROFL

cupsoftea · 02/01/2009 12:58

Doesn't mumsnet have copyright of the names we chose & what we post? Some small quotes can be used freely but not extensive copying. Wonder how Moldies get round that? Wonder if they are posting in their mumsnet names? Could be argued that it is just a word/s or whatever but the context of use is also important.

cupsoftea · 02/01/2009 12:55

You also make sense flightattendant.

cupsoftea · 02/01/2009 12:53

Agree with you daftpunk - & in genetics new blood helps solid growth.

Biscuits4cheese · 02/01/2009 12:23

And what about the swinging??
I mean that does seem a little far fetched but the way it was explained to me (vividly), I'm fairly convinced.

SmilleysPeople · 02/01/2009 12:17

Well your post hasn't really corrected untruths has it Piffle?

It's just more comment and opinion.

Flihgtattendant · 02/01/2009 12:07

I am enjoying this rumour mill

sarah293 · 02/01/2009 12:06

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

Biscuits4cheese · 02/01/2009 12:04

So, am i right in thinking that there is a 'Dark Arts' element to Moldeys?
That's what I heard anyway.

ClausImWorthIt · 02/01/2009 11:51

'Cleave' is an interesting choice of words Piffle. As well as meaning adhering it also means to split apart. The origin of the word 'cleaver'. Also the orgin of the word 'cloven' as in cloven hoof - another satanical reference.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread