Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Miscarriage guidelines - fabulous - but...

165 replies

hunkermunker · 24/06/2008 14:59

mumsnet.com/miscarriagecodeofpractice.html

..will you be putting together some breastfeeding support ones?

OP posts:
FAQ · 24/06/2008 19:07

sorry Tinker - I disagree - not all women are fortunate enough to be able to express enough milk to feed their DC while they're at work.

Also even if you do read the tin it's not very clear that the amounts/frequency age/weight are only a rough estimate. I have met women who were wondering either why their DC wasn't finishing any of their bottles, or on the opposite side worried that their DC was always hungry and always finished all their bottles - because they thought that those amounts were what they "should" be having.......

The packet also doesn't tell you things such as - some babies will drink a bit of their bottle, have a short break (often several minutes) and then finish their bottle. While others down it in one go like it's the last bottle they're ever going to have

TinkerbellesMum · 24/06/2008 18:46

Yes, there are countries who have that breastfeeding rate. The 2% though does include children with problems that prevent them from feeding, which is why I always say less than 2% of women don't produce enough milk.

I'm not paid by the NHS and there are 12 of us to cover the Heart of Birmingham area so spending time covering bottles takes us away from women who need breastfeeding support. I'm sure if the need arose that it wouldn't be "read the packet it tells everything you need to know", we have been told to explain what to do, following the packet and our boss will also refer back to the HV.

I have never been tied to the sink, it has nothing to do with how you feed a child.

Aitch · 24/06/2008 18:26

not htread, sorry, topic.

Aitch · 24/06/2008 18:26

justine have you seen the suggestion to change the miscarrieage bearavement thread to a pregnancy loss one or pg loss/bereavement one? seems more inclusive.

JustineMumsnet · 24/06/2008 18:24

We definitely plan to put some breastfeeding support/advice on the site over the next few months - and we'll be giving you a shout for help with that (especially you HM!)
When we've done that we should definitely see if we can get it promoted in hospitals etc. Good idea.

FAQ · 24/06/2008 18:16

"make sure they're following the packet" - lol sorry that does rather make me smile, I rather wish it was easy as that.

To me (having both BF and FF) that's like saying "just put the baby on the breast" (and expecting all to be well)

"BF support was better then there wouldn't be the need to teach women about bottlefeeding."

But some women want to bottlefeed, or when they go back to work find that they're unable to express enough EBM so choose to give FF.

Mind you I suppose if we went back to teh day when the woman was automatically tied to the sink then there would be no need to worry about that

Aitch · 24/06/2008 18:15

and there is very little info on the side of the pack, and what there is is impractical and sends women off in the direction of less safe methods.

Aitch · 24/06/2008 18:14

i SO tire of that 2% figure tbh. although of course i've also heard 5% bandied about. is there actual proper research to back it up?

TinkerbellesMum · 24/06/2008 18:10

Considering that less than 2% of women genuinely can't (IE they don't have the milk) if BF support was better then there wouldn't be the need to teach women about bottlefeeding. Breastfeeding is not a "no brainer" clearly or more women would do it and less would say they didn't have enough milk. It takes far more education to help someone breastfeed than it does to show them how to bottlefeed. After all, the instructions come on the side of the packet, last time I checked there wasn't anything written on the side of my boob!

I've been taught on my peer supporters course to give support to women who want to give a bottle and to make sure they are following the packet.

SirDigbyChickenCaesar · 24/06/2008 18:07

FAQ - re: Failure to thrive

I truly truly don't believe that doctors these day know that much about BF babies. They are so used FF babies and how they put on weight that they say that some BF babies are FTT when they aren't.

just another reason why we need more education and support for BF.

littlelapin · 24/06/2008 18:05

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

TinkerbellesMum · 24/06/2008 18:04

Just want to say, before I read the rest of this thread.

YAY!!!! THANK YOU for including Antiphospholipid Syndrome in there!

lulumama · 24/06/2008 18:02

fair enough FAQ i am not doubting you or disputing what you are saying.

lulumama · 24/06/2008 18:01

it is called 'breastfeeding matters' by maureen minchin

lots of interesting stuff about the politics of breastfeeding too

TinkerbellesMum · 24/06/2008 17:58

Just want to say, before I read the rest of this thread.

YAY!!!! THANK YOU for including Antiphospholipid Syndrome in there!

FAQ · 24/06/2008 17:44

lulu - we were using one formula he was ok - several weeks later we tried to switch to a different one - he SCREAMED, became constipated and started refusing his bottles as well as generally being awful to look after.

24hrs later we switched back - and he was like a different child.

We had a similar experience when switching DS2 and 3 from Gold to White - I don't believe for one minute that both of them "suddenly" stopped being so unsettled between feeds out of pure co-incidence.

And DS2 refused a bottle of Cow and Gate when I'd run out and was at a friends house and that was what she had!! (his usually bottles and teats - and yes he was hungry(.

Anyhow- I have to go, I've done NOTHING this afternoon - and my new man is going to be here in 4hrs.............

hunkermunker · 24/06/2008 17:37

I'm not 100% sure I do know where you stand on bf support, FAQ - ff support, yep, tick

OP posts:
hunkermunker · 24/06/2008 17:37

Thank you, Lulu.

OP posts:
lulumama · 24/06/2008 17:35

hunker , just finished very good book written by someone australian about breastfeeding, cannot remember the name and it is upstairs, and i cannot be arssed to go and look !! but i shall post the title for you. it is very interesting.

hunkermunker · 24/06/2008 17:33

There's not much difference in the fat/carb/protein composition of the different milks. I'd be interested to know what the differences actually are - guess what? The manufacturers won't tell you.

Won't tell you.

I'm horrified by that, tbh - women feed their babies the same thing, day in, day out, for the formative months of their life and it's done on a best guess from a scientist somewhere and they won't tell you why they decided that it was a good plan to add eg fish oil.

OP posts:
lulumama · 24/06/2008 17:33

some babies might be unsettled and pooey and windy anyway, FAQ, regardless of the formula

i really doubt that the milk per se is to blame. really i do. yes, that was your experience, but DS3 might have been like that anyway.

which is away from teh main point .

the issue is that we know, simplistically, breast is best, but don;t necessarily make the correlation that formula is not as good or worse... and that closer to breastmilk is not hte same as breastmilk as breastmilk is the best thing to give

we are not allowed to say taht as it makes formula feeding parents feel bad or guilty

there is so much emotion attached to how you feed your baby, and it took me a loooooong time to come to terms with having not breastfed

FAQ · 24/06/2008 17:29

ahhh now Hunker we've been down this path of discussion many times over the last (?) years and you know where I stand

sh*t just seen the time - Murray is about to start playing, the house is a tip, and I need to go to the shop yet to get some beans for dinner

hunkermunker · 24/06/2008 17:29

I think the pressure on pg women to breastfeed is because it's the best thing for their babies and for them (in almost all cases - and I know it's not that simple). The transfer of breastmilk, if you take away all the emotive stuff, ought to be the baseline way to feed babies - put baldly, feeding any other way increases risk of various things (illnesses, etc) for babies and also for mothers.

Therefore the health service has a vested interest in getting women to do it - unfortunately they don't always employ people who give much of a toss as long as they can have another cup of tea Quite Soon. It's very easy to make a pregnant woman believe breast is best, it's very easy not to help her make that a reality once the baby's born.

OP posts:
FAQ · 24/06/2008 17:27

"ah well no, faq. official advice (this may even be on the side of the pack) is NEVER to use a micro cos of hotspots. fookin' health and safety."

WHAT!! You mean they inventor of microwaves didn't invent them to warm the milk up quicker............damn got that rather wrong didn't I .

Hunker I don't think I've read a formula tub the writing is too sodding small

Lulu - but you limit the number of different brands (yes cut out the toddler and night time milks by all means - complete waste of money) and you risk leaving some FF babies with milk that really doesn't agree with them (as I found with Aptimil and DS3)

hunkermunker · 24/06/2008 17:25

FAQ, do you accept there's a need for better breastfeeding support? And just answer that, please, without a "but there needs to be better bottlefeeding support" paragraph

And yes, B&J lovely, thanks

OP posts: