Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

Announcement re deletion of Wig and Robe/Judge Flounce threads

871 replies

carrie (mumsnet) · 13/01/2005 13:15

Dear mumsnetters,

We are now able to shed a bit more light as to what actually occurred re the Wig and Robe/Judge Flounce episode. We are pretty sure (having received a confession of as much) that, as some of you suspected, W&R/JF was a non-lawyer masquerading as a QC. Given this knowledge we have deleted the relevant postings and banned the user from the site.

If nothing else the whole business is a salutary reminder that you can never be completely sure that folks are who they say they are and neither should you necessarily completely trust the advice, especially "professional" advice, posted on mumsnet.

As a result of some concerns raised by you we are looking into making parts of the site, the swaps and weight loss clubs for example, something that operates via mumsnet HQ so that people's addresses are not being circulated. If anyone has any other suggestions then please [email protected] or post them here and we promise to consider them.

We?d also remind folks that when organising meet ups you should take the same precautions you would when meeting anyone from the net - make sure you meet in a public place and that others know where you are going.

Having said all that, it would be a shame if this relatively rare occurrence of someone pretending to be someone they are not changed the warm, supportive, welcoming and caring atmosphere on mumsnet - and we're confident that you won't let it!

Thanks for all the supportive and helpful emails we've received from so many of you.

Carrie, Rachel and Justine

OP posts:
NameChangingMancMidlander · 13/01/2005 13:37

I don't want to take the moral high ground, Coddy. I'm merely stating my opinion, like you. I have no problem with accepting that you were all right in your suspicions.

CarrieG · 13/01/2005 13:37

The ISP address could be banned. More or less impossible to prevent someone re-registering on a different pc, tho'.

lowcalCOD · 13/01/2005 13:37

they sent lou around to her house and confiscted her mouse?

Poshpaws · 13/01/2005 13:37

Also agree with that comment, TC , but will admit that she/he was duping (it has transpired) some very vulnerable people, esp those suffering DV.

And with that, I shall depart...this thread, anyway

aloha · 13/01/2005 13:36

And she WAS absurdly & obviously ignorant about the law....but as people have said, it was taboo to say this. It's NOT nasty to say that someone who is pretending to be a QC is a fraud and a troll when they are!

nailpolish · 13/01/2005 13:36

how can that be done soupdragon?

NameChangingMancMidlander · 13/01/2005 13:36

Possibly with a little more tact and a few less insults ? I know that W&R was very rude, offensive & aggressive to her accusers but that doesn't mean that they should react the same.

NameChangingMancMidlander · 13/01/2005 13:36

Possibly with a little more tact and a few less insults ? I know that W&R was very rude, offensive & aggressive to her accusers but that doesn't mean that they should react the same.

SoupDragon · 13/01/2005 13:35

I think the banning is nore thorough than simply an email address.

munnzieb · 13/01/2005 13:35

I did support her, but I didn't know any better and missed the 2 week xmas period when everyhting seems to have kicked off.

ThomCat · 13/01/2005 13:35

How sad more than anything though. to put that much effort into pretending to be someone you're not. i feel pity more than anything else.

lowcalCOD · 13/01/2005 13:34

look face it you were all taken in
dont somehow take the moral high ground!

nailpolish · 13/01/2005 13:34

anyone can get a new e mail and new name and come back

Poshpaws · 13/01/2005 13:34

Agreed, NCMM.

elliott · 13/01/2005 13:34

SW my guess is yes. I think its also odds on that it was a he and that the mn sleuths uncovered his identity. Bet the CBT is also a scam.

SoupDragon · 13/01/2005 13:33

NCMM, how should they have handled it? Anyone who dared to doubt her or contradict her was shouted down by W&Rs supporters.

lowcalCOD · 13/01/2005 13:33

think she has probably burned her bridges there
she was very aggressive!

NameChangingMancMidlander · 13/01/2005 13:33

I agree, coppertop.

munnzieb · 13/01/2005 13:32

but could she not come back here under a diff name/email? do we still have to stay alert on this front or just take all advise with a pinch of salt?

lowcalCOD · 13/01/2005 13:32

grrr
am walking away

Demented · 13/01/2005 13:32

Nowt as queer as folk!

Why bother? Weird???

coppertop · 13/01/2005 13:32

It's sad that JF wasn't who he/she said they were but I don't regret giving them the benefit of the doubt.

NameChangingMancMidlander · 13/01/2005 13:31

Sorry, grammar and english are both crap on that post, but I guess I'm saying that right or not those people who made some of the more comments could have handled it better.

lowcalCOD · 13/01/2005 13:30

thansk elliott

NameChangingMancMidlander · 13/01/2005 13:30

Everyone had a right to question JF's professional credibility, but I still think that it wasn't handled in the best way by those who knew her to be a fraud.