Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

Announcement re deletion of Wig and Robe/Judge Flounce threads

871 replies

carrie (mumsnet) · 13/01/2005 13:15

Dear mumsnetters,

We are now able to shed a bit more light as to what actually occurred re the Wig and Robe/Judge Flounce episode. We are pretty sure (having received a confession of as much) that, as some of you suspected, W&R/JF was a non-lawyer masquerading as a QC. Given this knowledge we have deleted the relevant postings and banned the user from the site.

If nothing else the whole business is a salutary reminder that you can never be completely sure that folks are who they say they are and neither should you necessarily completely trust the advice, especially "professional" advice, posted on mumsnet.

As a result of some concerns raised by you we are looking into making parts of the site, the swaps and weight loss clubs for example, something that operates via mumsnet HQ so that people's addresses are not being circulated. If anyone has any other suggestions then please [email protected] or post them here and we promise to consider them.

We?d also remind folks that when organising meet ups you should take the same precautions you would when meeting anyone from the net - make sure you meet in a public place and that others know where you are going.

Having said all that, it would be a shame if this relatively rare occurrence of someone pretending to be someone they are not changed the warm, supportive, welcoming and caring atmosphere on mumsnet - and we're confident that you won't let it!

Thanks for all the supportive and helpful emails we've received from so many of you.

Carrie, Rachel and Justine

OP posts:
FineFigureFio · 13/01/2005 15:02

the info on the thread was enough to trace that a Jane lives with the Stephen that was being talked about

noddyholder · 13/01/2005 15:02

how do you know all this?As far as I see no one can know who they are

moondog · 13/01/2005 15:01

Well Stephen is on that 'Knowhere' forum, going on about how shaggable the girls are in Rothwell or somewhere in rather misogynistic tones. (Mind you, he seems to be referring to living there some years earlier.)

I'll never get ANYTHING useful done today now...

anorak · 13/01/2005 15:01

I know fio, it's not funny, I feel quite uneasy about it all.

How do you know for sure though? JF might have got those pics from somewhere else.

FineFigureFio · 13/01/2005 15:01

she might be his sister or mother but she has the same surname

Tinker · 13/01/2005 15:00

Fio - how do you know? Really I mean. Other than info given hee.

noddyholder · 13/01/2005 15:00

But if the person was impersonating Jane then the person in the pic could be anyone It is not Jane as Jane is the poor Qc in Wales who knows nothing of this

FineFigureFio · 13/01/2005 14:59

no she does actually live with him!
i am not joking or lieing, she does

anorak · 13/01/2005 14:58
  • horrible thought isn't it fio!!
FineFigureFio · 13/01/2005 14:56

JANE LIVES WITH HIM

anorak · 13/01/2005 14:55

So if the poster was actually Stephen, then who was that in the picture?

I hope the real Jane is not living with him not knowing about all this

FineFigureFio · 13/01/2005 14:53

MN can delete my post if they like but...

Has mieow had a computer of W&R? If so has she had the hard drive checked?

You do realise Jane lives with Stephen dont you?

spacedonkey · 13/01/2005 14:39

ah well he had me fooled, mind you I never read the legal "advice"

sobernow · 13/01/2005 14:39

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

jampots · 13/01/2005 14:35

the post has now been deleted but if you search under archived messages for "wank" and author "wigandrobe" you'll see it

aloha · 13/01/2005 14:35

Blimey, I missed that one too! Man, definitely. Urgh.

DillyDally · 13/01/2005 14:35

Shazza stone did it in the dodgy film where she lives in a block of flats with a peeping tom

batters · 13/01/2005 14:35

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

FineFigureFio · 13/01/2005 14:35

So who is jane?

WigWamBam · 13/01/2005 14:33

jampots! I think more people would have sussed her as a man if they'd seen that!

iota · 13/01/2005 14:32

jampots - I missed that one - wish I hadn't - would it have made me suspcious I wonder

Bunglie · 13/01/2005 14:32

Jampots! I missed that thankfully!

jampots · 13/01/2005 14:30

I initially thought W&R was a man when she made the comment about "preferring to wank in her bedroom instead of the bathroom" as for the life of me I couldnt see why a woman would need to wank in the bathroom.

CarrieG · 13/01/2005 14:26

hear hear blu

Blu · 13/01/2005 14:25

I agree with Tentunturq re the bereavement thread, and had thought the same thing about strategy. It's very very easy to want to believe the best of people, and give them the benefit of the doubt - and the intensity of the net can be very emotional sometimes. A really good warning about how young people can be misled. I honestly don't think anyone should be kicking themselves - listening generously is an important virtue - but I think that we should also allow sceptical voices the same freedom as supporting voices. Then MN will flourish as gloriously s it always has done.