Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

MNHQ

Test - pls ignore

139 replies

NikitaTech · 17/03/2008 11:52

1234567890

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
claricebean · 23/04/2008 19:08

Ah threadworm, I couldn't let your 'not things are buggered' post go without saying I had tears of laughter running down my face. Excellent

TrinityTheProgressingRhino · 23/04/2008 18:54

NIKITA
what are you testing??

PenelopePitstops · 23/04/2008 18:50

whoa this thread is messing with my head, not sure why i read the whole thing!!

sagacious · 23/04/2008 10:59

Is this some parallel universe thing?

MNHQ
NikitaTech · 23/04/2008 10:49

Testing ..ples ignore

OP posts:
Threadworm · 18/03/2008 12:36

??

MNHQ
AbbyMumsnet · 18/03/2008 10:53

Sorry - not quite sure what you are going on about, is this still playing up? Search seems to be working - just found your posts - but you do have to give it about fifteen minutes or so between posting and trying to find said post.

Threadworm · 18/03/2008 06:50

By the way, Nikita old fruit, everything is not fine: I posted my last message and it showed at the head of the thread, and then twenty minutes later when i went bacvk into active convos it was not there. I had to repost it.

Threadworm · 18/03/2008 06:37

Yes, they are testing us. It is a social experiment to measure the precise depth of chatroom users' inanity.

MarsLady · 18/03/2008 00:02

So has Nikita completed the test yet? Or maybe our posting is the test?

Perhaps it's MNHQ's initiation ceremony???????

PeggyMitchell · 17/03/2008 21:11

Testing

LynetteScavo · 17/03/2008 18:26

I'm pretty sure it's B

LynetteScavo · 17/03/2008 18:26

I thought Tech was a boy. See how sexist I am!

Threadworm · 17/03/2008 18:20

Shame really. I was starting to like the idea that posting a thread of random numbers and asking us to ignore it was the geek version of attention-seeking trolling.

SlightlyMadSimnelCake · 17/03/2008 18:14

Arrrhhh that is a new addition.

I take it it was c) then...

TheWiltedRose · 17/03/2008 18:12

has nobody noticed then that she does have the mnhq bit its just at the end instead of her name!?

SlightlyMadSimnelCake · 17/03/2008 18:08

I have just had a respnse form "yetmoretech" on my thread about issues.

It uses official language - but again isn't actually sanctioned by the "from MNHQ"

Curioser and curioser.

TrinityTheProgressingRhino · 17/03/2008 18:07

I'm guessing at a)

SlightlyMadSimnelCake · 17/03/2008 18:06

We have a few possibilities here

a) Nikita is part of the new MNHQ team but is only an apprentice so doesn't have official "MNHQ authority (i.e. isn't allowed to use the big red delete button). After all Abbymumsnet did tell me she would refer a prob I had to the MN team.

b) NIkitatech - Please don't post this is a test is some regular trolling to see how quick we can get to 1000 posts on a "please ignore me thread"

c)Nikitatech is Techs new assistant and MNHQ have forgotten to give him/her the official (MNHQ) stamp.

TrinityTheProgressingRhino · 17/03/2008 18:03

lol

whooooooops

captainmummy · 17/03/2008 18:03

why doesn't 'he shave her HMHQ?'

TrinityTheProgressingRhino · 17/03/2008 18:02

no nikita is a girl but why doesn't hs ehave her MNHQ bit

and I mean before you stole it

SlightlyMadSimnelCake · 17/03/2008 18:01

Have we....does that mean that Tech has a boyfriend in hiding then?!?!?!?

captainmummy · 17/03/2008 18:00

haven't we decided Nikitas a male?

SlightlyMadSimnelCake · 17/03/2008 17:57

Has our loverly Tech got a girlfriend hiding in his shed??????