Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Why are you making fun of someone's appearance with your logo change

490 replies

Reasonableadjustments · 06/05/2023 06:50

Can I ask why you've changed the logo to be big ears to poke fun at King Charles?

I'm not a royalist but I don't think making fun of someone like this for their appearance is really fair.

OP posts:
DejaVoodoo · 06/05/2023 08:55

Satire is dead, killed off by squealing accusations of bullying of the most privileged, those with Orwell's boot stamping on our human faces - for ever

Satire is about mocking ideas, policies and human foolishness; it is not about mocking a person's appearance. Just so's you know.

Quoronation · 06/05/2023 08:55

Let ears be ears

Jonei · 06/05/2023 08:54

Alltheprettyseahorses · 06/05/2023 08:49

I genuinely didn't know there were so many po-faced professionally offended people in the world. Charles Windsor is known for his ears as an immediate identifying feature in political cartoons etc. World leaders and politicians past and present are always lampooned in this way, as they should be - Johnson, May, Blair, Sunak, Major, Thatcher and Elizabeth Windsor, Biden, Merkel, Trump, Macron et al. Satire is dead, killed off by squealing accusations of bullying of the most privileged, those with Orwell's boot stamping on our human faces - for ever. Never have do many grips been so desperately needed.

Yep.

BishyBarnyBee · 06/05/2023 08:54

Absolutely agree. Bullying about physical characteristics is not OK.

Quoronation · 06/05/2023 08:53

Alltheprettyseahorses · 06/05/2023 08:49

I genuinely didn't know there were so many po-faced professionally offended people in the world. Charles Windsor is known for his ears as an immediate identifying feature in political cartoons etc. World leaders and politicians past and present are always lampooned in this way, as they should be - Johnson, May, Blair, Sunak, Major, Thatcher and Elizabeth Windsor, Biden, Merkel, Trump, Macron et al. Satire is dead, killed off by squealing accusations of bullying of the most privileged, those with Orwell's boot stamping on our human faces - for ever. Never have do many grips been so desperately needed.

I don't think it's fair to lampoon someone for their facial features, they haven't chosen those.

MayBeeJuneSoon · 06/05/2023 08:52

@Alltheprettyseahorses fucking hell

Nasty piece aren't you!?

Exhausteddog · 06/05/2023 08:51

GoodChat · 06/05/2023 07:54

Just change it back to the normal logo if you can't be nice.

Exactly.
If it was impossible to come up with a logo change without a derogatory aspect,
(spoiler it wasn't- the crown would have been fine) then don't have one.
I doubt anyone would have noticed or cared if they hadnt changed it!

Alltheprettyseahorses · 06/05/2023 08:49

I genuinely didn't know there were so many po-faced professionally offended people in the world. Charles Windsor is known for his ears as an immediate identifying feature in political cartoons etc. World leaders and politicians past and present are always lampooned in this way, as they should be - Johnson, May, Blair, Sunak, Major, Thatcher and Elizabeth Windsor, Biden, Merkel, Trump, Macron et al. Satire is dead, killed off by squealing accusations of bullying of the most privileged, those with Orwell's boot stamping on our human faces - for ever. Never have do many grips been so desperately needed.

Ginnybaby · 06/05/2023 08:48

I think thr key thing here is it’s deliberate, the ears are bigger than the crown.

Igmum · 06/05/2023 08:41

Agree. I'm not a Royalist but this is in bad taste. Come on @MNHQ

MayBeeJuneSoon · 06/05/2023 08:41

Who are the advertisers who pay the wages?

Theunamedcat · 06/05/2023 08:40

Still no response?

Zero fucks given by mumsnet HQ

TreeByLeaf · 06/05/2023 08:38

That’s embarrassingly awful @mnhq.

MayBeeJuneSoon · 06/05/2023 08:37

Yes.....how would there advertisers feel?

Maybe a few emails?

MayBeeJuneSoon · 06/05/2023 08:37

DancingWithTheMoonlitKnight · 06/05/2023 08:11

I din't give a single fuck about Charlie.

Erm so why are you wasting your time, which I assume is precious....on a thread solely about him?

SirChenjins · 06/05/2023 08:36

I’ve just noticed this - bloody hell. Totally inappropriate. Since when has it been OK to mock someone’s appearance?

Why has this not been removed given all the negative feedback? Is it linked to sponsorship or some other financial deal?

ChazNWave · 06/05/2023 08:34

Yeah, not super. A misfire from MNHQ. They do need to revert the logo and an apology wouldn't hurt.

Disappointing.

Tina221 · 06/05/2023 08:33

Brrrrrrrrrrrr · 06/05/2023 08:25

Wow I’ve only just noticed that horrible new temporary logo. Whoever thought that was ever a good idea isn’t a believer in the ‘spirit of MN’.

MNHQ you need to change it back asap, would you allow a thread mocking someone’s appearance to stay up after so many complaints?

This

Such a horrible logo.

Spudlet · 06/05/2023 08:28

I’m a quasi-Republican - like the clothes and bling, hate the unearned privilege, not sure I’d trust any government to replace them with something sensible. I don’t have any strong liking for Charlie-boy. But ffs, the man can’t help his ears! And speaking as someone who was bullied at school for my appearance - ‘hilarious’ jokes like this hurt. And no, he won’t see it. But others will.

At least I guess we know now where school bullies go to work when they grow up. Mumsnet.

Butitsnotfunnyisititsserious · 06/05/2023 08:27

Reasonableadjustments · 06/05/2023 08:24

How can any disabled person trust mumsnet now when they report ableism, after this?

Well this is it. Posters saying how funny it is, wouldn't be laughing if it was taking the piss out of someone missing a limb, in a wheelchair, obese etc. By keeping this logo, it's showing it's okay to take the piss out of someone's appearance.

Ginnybaby · 06/05/2023 08:27

The issue mnhq now have is the night watch can’t delete rhe threads, more will just pop up, and this is likely going to hit the media, about how the users were offended about mnhq talking the piss out of someone’s physical features

overall this is a lose lose. I’m sure there will be a statement saying no offence was meant, we will remove the ears, etc as soon as whomever can do that gets out their pit.

CurrentHun · 06/05/2023 08:26

I think it says something horrible about this site. Physical meanness is horrible. Why pick on it? And what next, someone’s big nose, flat chest, cankles?

herbygarden · 06/05/2023 08:26

Please remove @MNHQ this is so inappropriate and in such bad taste!

Brrrrrrrrrrrr · 06/05/2023 08:25

Wow I’ve only just noticed that horrible new temporary logo. Whoever thought that was ever a good idea isn’t a believer in the ‘spirit of MN’.

MNHQ you need to change it back asap, would you allow a thread mocking someone’s appearance to stay up after so many complaints?

RightyThen · 06/05/2023 08:25

MNHQ so hypocritical it’s ridiculous. I’ve been using the site less and less due to their policing and ‘not in the spirit of the site’ business constantly. Than this openly mocking someone based on appearance.

MNHQ - do better

Swipe left for the next trending thread