Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

What is this ‘You might also like’ clutter?

790 replies

PalatineHill · 15/11/2022 14:07

Hi MNHQ. Please just take it out. Or let me opt out of it? It looks a mess.

If here’s something that I might also like to read, I’ll find it by using the search function.
These suggestions are just encouraging the posting of the same points on multiple similar threads, and that will discourage healthy normal thread death.

It’s really distracting to look at visually, I really liked the uncluttered ‘clean’ MN format compared to other forums.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
23
DrinkFeckArseGirls · 25/11/2022 11:33

I find the feature anxiety inducing. You click on one thread about energy bills and then are confronted by several others. People start to believe it’s all doom and gloom - depressing. Just perpetuating misery when so many people are already anxious and feeling low.

MadelineUsher · 25/11/2022 10:33

Can't manage an edit function, however.

BIWI · 25/11/2022 09:27

I'm guessing @Whinge that a) they've paid a lot of money for someone to develop the feature for them and b) it will somehow be driving revenue for them

Whinge · 25/11/2022 06:32

YetAnotherBeckyMumsnet · 24/11/2022 16:53

Hello everyone - just to be absolutely clear - we haven’t taken threads older than 30 days out of Active - we’ve enabled individual users to apply this setting to their account.

So far only a very very small number of users have done this. We would definitely want long running support threads to be visible to as many people as possible - so we’ll keep an eye on this number, and the number of views these threads are getting, and if there’s a drop off, we’ll look at this again.

Thank you.

@YetAnotherBeckyMumsnet

Can I just ask what may seem like a daft question. But why are MNHQ going to the effort of adding additional features, monitoring threads and making all these tweaks when the vast majority of users just want the similar threads feature removed? Confused

00100001 · 24/11/2022 22:55

Sparklingbrook · 24/11/2022 22:46

I know! It was better than Penis Beaker IMO.

It was funny how the thread morphed into Badgers eating ice creams.... classic

Sparklingbrook · 24/11/2022 22:46

00100001 · 24/11/2022 22:40

But it was an instant classic!

I know! It was better than Penis Beaker IMO.

00100001 · 24/11/2022 22:40

Sparklingbrook · 24/11/2022 20:14

Aww no @00100001 your thread did not warrant inclusion in the end. Sad

But it was an instant classic!

BobBobBobbing · 24/11/2022 20:15

Another voice in support of OYBBK's well made points. I tend to navigate through active/trending. I've found some fab threads (weather and preppers) which I now check regularly. But I'd never have found them if it hadn't been for active/trending in the first place.

Sparklingbrook · 24/11/2022 20:14

Aww no @00100001 your thread did not warrant inclusion in the end. Sad

MistletoeMouse · 24/11/2022 20:13

00100001 · 24/11/2022 19:55

Yes you can!

I just did. Instant classic.

Seems like an oversight? Awks

Amazing how quickly that got deleted. Bet it would have been a belter, too!

<slopes off disappointed as I'd just been about to post a witty reply>

Skinnermarink · 24/11/2022 20:05

Nah I definitely don’t think you could always just start your own thread in classics- they get sent there. Or did. Seems like another cock up if you ask me.

Sparklingbrook · 24/11/2022 20:05

BertieBotts · 24/11/2022 19:52

I guess you always have been able to, it's just a normal topic, just one that had a specific purpose.

So rather then being accused of 'aiming for Classics' it's probably best to just stick it in there to start with.

Sparklingbrook · 24/11/2022 20:03

00100001 · 24/11/2022 19:55

Yes you can!

I just did. Instant classic.

Seems like an oversight? Awks

I love your Classics thread. I might have to have one too.

00100001 · 24/11/2022 19:55

Yes you can!

I just did. Instant classic.

Seems like an oversight? Awks

BertieBotts · 24/11/2022 19:52

I guess you always have been able to, it's just a normal topic, just one that had a specific purpose.

Sparklingbrook · 24/11/2022 19:34

Can you just start a thread in Classics? I had no idea.

00100001 · 24/11/2022 19:29

Skinnermarink · 24/11/2022 18:31

Hey Mumsnet, Is this the kind of thing that ends up in Classics now? I thought it had to be nominated and out there by @MNHQ.

Fucking hell...

Skinnermarink · 24/11/2022 18:31

Hey Mumsnet, Is this the kind of thing that ends up in Classics now? I thought it had to be nominated and out there by @MNHQ.

What is this ‘You might also like’ clutter?
meditrina · 24/11/2022 18:07

OhYouBadBadKitten · 24/11/2022 17:54

To add to my previous response, how will you keep an eye on the number of views those threads are getting @YetAnotherBeckyMumsnet ? Will this be added to someone's work load? The numbers would probably drift down slowly at first, until there is less traffic on the threads and then this would accelerate as engagement dropped off and the threads became less visible on active.

Also @YetAnotherBeckyMumsnet what data sets have you established as representing the number of views and number of posts on long-running threads?

What criteria did you use to identify long-running threads?

OhYouBadBadKitten · 24/11/2022 17:54

To add to my previous response, how will you keep an eye on the number of views those threads are getting @YetAnotherBeckyMumsnet ? Will this be added to someone's work load? The numbers would probably drift down slowly at first, until there is less traffic on the threads and then this would accelerate as engagement dropped off and the threads became less visible on active.

OhYouBadBadKitten · 24/11/2022 16:59

@YetAnotherBeckyMumsnet youve not addressed the issue of trending. We understand what you've done with active, we are saying that this could become a bad idea. I don't feel that you've listened to our concerns over this.

SirChenjins · 24/11/2022 16:57

Probably because - like me - they didn’t know about this setting until now?

YetAnotherBeckyMumsnet · 24/11/2022 16:53

Hello everyone - just to be absolutely clear - we haven’t taken threads older than 30 days out of Active - we’ve enabled individual users to apply this setting to their account.

So far only a very very small number of users have done this. We would definitely want long running support threads to be visible to as many people as possible - so we’ll keep an eye on this number, and the number of views these threads are getting, and if there’s a drop off, we’ll look at this again.

Thank you.

hoochyhag · 24/11/2022 15:21

Gosh, another one here really concerned about @OhYouBadBadKitten 's excellent weather threads disappearing if MN HQ decide to hide old threads.

I know you have concerns about zombie threads, but, DH has MS and without her precise up to date warm weather warnings he would have been more ill than he was last summer.

Also, for years I have relied on her hard work keeping us up to date with severe weather and explaining things so beautifully. I live in a remote Yorkshire village and often bbc and met office warnings are not as accurate as her forecasts.

Bear this in mind when making your decisions.

lostinwales · 24/11/2022 15:19

Here to add my voice in backing to OYBBK, the change to the long running threads definitely seems out of character of this site. I've been better informed than our local authority and able to protect my family because of it due to OYBBKs long running weather threads, seems like a big shame not to make these threads visible to the maximum numbers of site users so they can do the same.

Also HATE the 'you might like this' or whatever function but do keep trying new things MNHQ we appreciate the effort I promise Grin🚲Grin

Swipe left for the next trending thread