Seeing a hidden section

It’s great to see MNHQ can respond so rapidly when they want to. When will you respond to the numerous very lengthy threads discussing how to respond to your proposal (midway through a long thread about a different subject) to do this? And the numerous and also becoming lengthy threads in response to it being implemented without any announcement? @LilyMumsnet

Yeah I wonder why too strawb.

quaggars I'm referring specifically to a MNHQ discussion thread that the OP is referencing with the "finally splitting" comment and the stated opinion of the people posting on it. If you're not familiar with it then obviously you won't know what I mean.

I'm not hear for the doghouse or baby names topics, but funnily enough I manage to scroll on by without even hiding them tbh.

I wonder why some people struggle to do this 🤔 any ideas on that?

I thought "everyone" wanted that topic split so they could happily use the one they comfortable with?

A lot of posters have the board hidden though, and not everyone posts in the feminism section.
The OP presumably falls into the having the board hidden category and isn't a poster on there, seeing as that's what they posted about.
You say "everyone" like everyone on MN is here for the feminism boards when it's clear some aren't.

Ah, glad to know Mumsnet can respond to certain people but not answer the questions we've posed on the naming of the new split boards, I reported my own post ages to go to ask for elaboration but I guess it won't be forthcoming.

I thought "everyone" wanted that topic split so they could happily use the one they comfortable with?
Lots of ppl, me included, suggested that the fundamentally intertwined content would be so hard to gauge which was the right board, that splitting it would be confusing and pointless, (and open to abuse from bad-faith disrupters)?

Gosh.