Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Any chance of a review of the FWR moderation rules in light of Maya Forstater's success in court please?

915 replies

ViperAtTheGatesOfDawn · 10/06/2021 13:02

The belief that transwomen are men and that transmen are women has been accepted as a legitimate and protected belief, yet we are not able to state this on Mumsnet under the current rules.

It has become increasingly difficult to discuss feminist issues on the dedicated feminism boards as a result of the moderation rules.

In light of Maya's success in court, and that 'gender critical' beliefs are considered protected under the Equality Act, would it be possible for the FWR sex/gender mod rules to be re-visited please?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
WarriorN · 11/06/2021 12:42

Feminism is about the female sex and the sex / gender roles we have as a result.

It makes no sense to separate them.

Helleofabore · 11/06/2021 12:41

@JustineMumsnet

As others have stated, this is indeed separating feminism from the biggest fight for women's rights so far this century.

Does this mean that any thread started in the general feminism chat that your team feel should not be there will be booted into the new section? As has recently happened with one of the AIBU topics?

ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 11/06/2021 12:41

@JustineMumsnet

We could just call the topic women's/trans rights I suppose...
How about two boards, GC feminism and lib fems?

I think that would give everyone somewhere to post?

inever · 11/06/2021 12:39

@CardinalLolzy

I also think separating sex and gender debate from general feminism is good

I just can't see how it's workable. When we're talking about feminism, by definition we are talking about sex and/or gender.

I also think separating sex and gender debate from general feminism is good but should still be under the Feminism board because it's part of feminism issues, just not the whole of it.

This is the whole paragraph. You'll see we agree sort of. It is part of feminism, just isn't all of it. If it's still under the feminism board, I don't see the issue with it being a sub topic so it doesn't overshadow everything else about feminism.

Sophoclesthefox · 11/06/2021 12:38

Hmmm. I’m trying to figure out how that would work in practice.

Given that even FGM can’t be discussed without someone flat footing in and calling Hibo Wadere transphobic, what are the feminist topics that can be guaranteed never to touch on the gender vs sex debate?

I think it’s intrinsic. And I have to say, that the voices calling for feminism chat to be different have always had the option to be the change they want to see in the world, and make the threads that they want. If that hasn’t happened, it’s on them, isn’t it?

I think the topic of sex based rights will always float to the surface, no matter what you call the board, because the users here are worried about their sex based rights. It’s never been about trans. It’s about women.

MarshaBradyo · 11/06/2021 12:36

I’m pretty sure many would just post in feminism chat btw

As feminism is central to the issue

ViperAtTheGatesOfDawn · 11/06/2021 12:36

@JustineMumsnet

We could just call the topic women's/trans rights I suppose...
Is that a joke?
OP posts:
TinselAngel · 11/06/2021 12:35

@JustineMumsnet

We could just call the topic women's/trans rights I suppose...
Well, Trans Widows threads aren't about trans rights. We get enough of that elsewhere.
Vanishun · 11/06/2021 12:35

So you'd want:

Feminism chat

Feminism chat (no discussion of sex or gender)

... I don't think this avoids the problems you might think it would.

MarshaBradyo · 11/06/2021 12:35

Ok that sounds better if all in FWR

I’d keep the sex and gender topic one over the other you just suggested

Also as long as people can post in either as they wish

WarriorN · 11/06/2021 12:35

There's no feminist who isn't critical of gender stereotypes and gender roles, and experiences difficulties in life as a direct result of her sex.

I've said a few times I don't subscribe to gender critical feminism as a new breed of feminism, as feminism is critical of gender and the impact of the male sex on the female sex in society by default.

Will threads get banned or moved if the conversation moves over to sex and gender in feminism chat?

TinselAngel · 11/06/2021 12:34

Anyone is free to post in either topic.

But if we start threads in the wrong one they will be moved, presumably?

JustineMumsnet · 11/06/2021 12:33

We could just call the topic women's/trans rights I suppose...

JustineMumsnet · 11/06/2021 12:32

@SunnyintheSun

Eh? As a feminist I’m interested in ALL feminist issues, not just the sex/gender debate. Why would you separate them out? And how would that work for what is such a central issue to many other topics?
To be clear (sorry I probably wasn't very) we're not proposing hiving anyone off according to their beliefs - anyone can post anywhere - what we're suggesting is having 2 topics within FWR:

Sex and gender discussion
Feminism chat

This is so that people who don't want to see/engage with the debate about women's/ trans rights can avoid it but still discuss feminist issues of which there are many. Anyone is free to post in either topic.

ViperAtTheGatesOfDawn · 11/06/2021 12:31

I would be very interested to hear a definition of feminism that does not have sex and gender at its core.

OP posts:
CardinalLolzy · 11/06/2021 12:28

I also think separating sex and gender debate from general feminism is good

I just can't see how it's workable. When we're talking about feminism, by definition we are talking about sex and/or gender.

ViperAtTheGatesOfDawn · 11/06/2021 12:27

I am struggling to understand some of your logic here, Justine.

Sex and gender are fundamental to feminism. They can't be separated, either theoretically or pragmatically, so I can't see how dividing the boards in such a way would work in any practical way.

As I said upthread:

It is fundamentally unfair that posters who believe in gender as identity are able to assert that men can become women, whilst posters who believe in gender as an oppressive hierarchy are unable to assert that men cannot become women.

OP posts:
inever · 11/06/2021 12:26

I think this is a well-balanced view and I agree @JustineMumsnet. I also think separating sex and gender debate from general feminism is good but should still be under the Feminism board because it's part of feminism issues, just not the whole of it.

I don't think MNHQ can please everyone as on one side they're called Woke and on the other side, they're called Right-wing bigots and a hate site.

Personally, I'm happy with the court ruling because biological facts really should be upheld. Everyone deserves their views respected including GC feminists. It's been mind boggling how it's taken a court case to accept this.

ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 11/06/2021 12:24

I don't understand this decision either. Surely if you want to tidy, better to lump all the current topics into one topic. Splitting off sex/gender which is the whole basis for feminism seems like a very odd thing to do.

Thelnebriati · 11/06/2021 12:24

What aspects of feminism dont relate to 'sex and gender'?

OvaHere · 11/06/2021 12:24

@SirSamuelVimes

No no no to a separate sex and gender topic. That's like saying "this isn't really feminism".
I think that's the point.
SirSamuelVimes · 11/06/2021 12:23

No no no to a separate sex and gender topic. That's like saying "this isn't really feminism".

TinselAngel · 11/06/2021 12:22

It's difficult enough to get the voices of trans widows heard in Feminism currently without us being put into a new "Sex and Gender" silo.

dragoncheeselady · 11/06/2021 12:21

@TinselAngel

This feels like we're being punished for Maya's judgement rather than it giving us any benefit here.
I entirely agree with Tinsel. This seems to be a punishment and a way of ignoring the judgement. Sex and Gender are key topics of feminism and moving them to another section is wrong
CardinalLolzy · 11/06/2021 12:20

Didn't tag @JustineMumsnet in my two posts but I meant to!