Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Search by poster gone?

111 replies

PurpleDaisies · 04/04/2020 15:44

Just tried to find an old post of mine and spotted the search by poster option has gone.

Is this a mistake?

Search by poster gone?
OP posts:
Roussette · 09/04/2020 10:06

@pleasepleasepleasehelp oh do give over.

I've explained why I like to be able to search for myself yet you have us all labelled as stalkers.

Forget the 'threads I started' nonsense.

Do you actually know how that works?

It is of no use whatsoever when you are looking back for a recipe you typed out to someone 4 years ago on a thread about cooking that you didn't start.

No sure you're au fait with how this all works TBH.

PurpleDaisies · 09/04/2020 09:51

I am SUSPICIOUS about ANYONE that CAPITALISES certain WORDS.

This function was available, regardless of your views on it, and had now gone. It’s perfectly legitimate to want it back. It’s not for you to police people’s intentions.

And you don't need it to look for any threads of your OWN threads. They are in your 'threads I started' FGS.

It wasn’t a thread I was looking for. It was one post. I hadn’t started the thread. That’s right there in my opening post.

OP posts:
pleasepleasepleasehelp · 09/04/2020 09:45

As I said, there is very rarely a reason to NEED to search for a poster.

When you post on a thread, it goes into your 'threads I'm watching.'

If you don't post on it/don't want to post on it, you can click 'watch this thread.'

So you can ALWAYS return to any particular thread, very easily.

In the vast majority of cases, people looking through a poster's posting history is not doing it with good intentions. Indeed, they will almost always be doing it for nefarious reasons.

I am very suspicious of ANYONE who is desperate to have the 'search for a poster' function restored. Especially the ones saying 'I may as well not BE here if I can't look at peoples posting history.' I mean WTAF? Confused

Trying to catch people out, and looking for something to throw in their face to make yourself look clever, is the reason for snooping though a poster's search history in the VAST MAJORITY of cases. (Probably at least 95% of them actually.)

As has been said before, many people will have consistencies in various threads, because many people don't want to be recognised.

And you don't need it to look for any threads of your OWN threads. They are in your 'threads I started' FGS.

DramaAlpaca · 08/04/2020 20:08

Justine has further clarified about AS on her post about MN Premium in this section in a post at 19.45 (sorry can't link)

It's made clear there that MN don't intend AS to be a Premium feature.

CalleighDoodle · 08/04/2020 19:02

They probably fabricated Coronavirus to make us more reliant on Mumsnet and thus more likely to pay

On our chinese phones no less

SoupDragon · 08/04/2020 18:59

They probably fabricated Coronavirus to make us more reliant on Mumsnet and thus more likely to pay.

Bringringbring12 · 08/04/2020 18:57

No but I reckon the message will come soon enough.

Search functionality. Not exactly the most complex coding required and yet not been around for days. I suspect to demonstrate that people like this feature and perhaps more prepared to pay for mumsnet premium. No chance here!

PurpleDaisies · 08/04/2020 17:12

But clear now only if pay

Is it? I haven’t seen anything saying that.

OP posts:
SoupDragon · 08/04/2020 17:10

No.

Bringringbring12 · 08/04/2020 16:55

Don’t you think a bit of a coincidence?!

DramaAlpaca · 08/04/2020 16:45

Bringring I didn't get that impression from what Justine said at all.

SoupDragon · 08/04/2020 16:44

But clear now only if pay

What makes you think that?

Bringringbring12 · 08/04/2020 16:35

Anyone feeling misled that mumsnet said that there was a blip with search function and that would be up soon

But clear now only if pay

SoupDragon · 08/04/2020 16:32

What was wrong with this bit of AS anyway?

DramaAlpaca · 08/04/2020 16:01

Me too, Purple. I do love a bit of rabid stalking Wink

BovaryX · 08/04/2020 16:01

Thanks Drama

PurpleDaisies · 08/04/2020 16:00

I will continue to wait to start rabid stalking and I am glad that it will continue to be free.

OP posts:
DramaAlpaca · 08/04/2020 16:00

I didn't get the impression that it'll be a premium feature only. Hope not, anyway.

PurpleDaisies · 08/04/2020 16:00

Thanks drama, I haven’t been following that thread.

OP posts:
DramaAlpaca · 08/04/2020 15:59

PurpleDaisies and BovaryX see Justine's thread about MN Premium in Site Stuff today. She replied to my question asking about this saying they briefly rolled out a fix today but it wasn't quite right and that it shouldn't be too long now. Hopefully!

MashedSpud · 08/04/2020 15:57

Is it going to become a premium feature only?

MouthBreathingRage · 08/04/2020 15:57

I would take a small bet that it's being made a Premium Feature and we'll have to pay to have it back. Can we have confirmation?

BovaryX · 08/04/2020 15:51

I agree that the loss of this feature and the timing of its loss is unfortunate. When will it be restored?

PurpleDaisies · 08/04/2020 15:47

Any progress? I thought I saw it back earlier but seems to have gone again.

OP posts:
CalleighDoodle · 07/04/2020 23:43

While we are here, can anyone tell me how to get op’s post back highlighted? The highlight has gone.

Also, i think AS is important. When someone says theyve been married for a happy 8 years and want to go to counselling with their dh who has from nowhere done something awful, the AS almost always shows the dh was a knob. If we didn't have AS people would say it is a one off, forgive, be kind. Whats going on with his mental health. With AS people can say, he is abusive. He has been testing your boundaries. Run. Background makes a difference.