Please or to access all these features

Add post

Watch this thread

Save thread

Start a new thread

Unflip thread

Hide thread

My feed

Active Unanswered threads

Getting started FAQ's

Unanswered threads Acronyms Talk guidelines

Hide shortcut buttons

Talk

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Unflip

1 2 3

Original poster

Vanishing posts on the Jess Phillips thread

57 replies

Mner2000 · 21/01/2020 11:00

Numerous posters (here) have noted that their posts were removed from the Jess Phillips thread before and after the event (here) and there being nothing noted on the thread itself that there is no accompanying deletion message on the thread itself.

The Daily Mail clearly has a screen grab of StealthPolarBear on 20/01/2020 13:31.17 that is no longer on the thread - without an accompanying thread deletion message like is normally there.

Is mumsnet against free speech and rigorous debate? Politicians must robustly account for their actions where their policies affect so many. If they cannot do this on a Mumsnet forum, how will they manage in parliament?

Self ID is not single issue - it affects every area of national and regional policy. Maybe if Jess had been able to see a better range of comments, it would help her understand this better and if she had seen the number of comments, it would help her see just how many people are concerned about the real impacts of policy change on such a large level. She says herself that some of the issues raised on the thread were not ones she had come across on the doors but yet we are not allowed to ask them here. This would have been the ideal opportunity to raise awareness of the many, many issues involved.

There must be a better way to arrange these webchats than just deleting people's comments and concerns without trace. What about grouping the questions by topic.

OP posts:

Ereshkigalangcleg · 25/01/2020 15:23

Because I have to wade through a sea of transphobic bullshit to find the answer to my question and it's exhausting

Oh dear. So sorry you have to deal with other people's "exhausting" opinions about protecting women's rights.

WelshMoth · 25/01/2020 14:35

Because I have to wade through a sea of transphobic bullshit to find the answer to my question and it's exhausting, even if I try not to read it in detail. If I open a thread - any thread - and see that it's the same old echo chamber I'm just not interested in being part of it.

It's quite clear that you've not done much wading peachgreen if transphobia is your conclusion. This isn't a single issue, it DOES have huge safeguarding concerns that need addressing and we would like an acknowledgment of this.

Every single poster here would encourage you to report transphobia. Questioning this narrative isn't bigotry, shining a light on it's implications for women and children AND trans people isn't transphobia. If you'd "waded" through the thread (and indeed the FWR board), you'd see that for yourself.

Jux · 25/01/2020 14:27

peachgreen: Because I have to wade through a sea of transphobic bullshit to find the answer to my question and it's exhausting, even if I try not to read it in detail. If I open a thread - any thread - and see that it's the same old echo chamber I'm just not interested in being part of it./2

You can just open the thread, search for your name and you will go straight to the posting box. When the webchat's done, you can do exactly that again and it will take you straight to your answer (if your question's been picked up and answered).

It is good to have all sides of a question/issue discussed/asked, so please do.

LangClegsInSpace · 25/01/2020 10:26

Yes, yes, I know, there's no transphobia here, report it if you see it, blah blah.

Well, yes.

You don't need to 'wade through' anything to find the answers, though. If you click on 'Webchat AT A GLANCE' you get a list of just the questions the guest has responded to, together with their answers.

Vanishing posts on the Jess Phillips thread

peachgreen · 25/01/2020 01:18

Yes, yes, I know, there's no transphobia here, report it if you see it, blah blah.

LangClegsInSpace · 24/01/2020 23:48

I don't understand why some posters are put off participating in webchats just because there are lots of questions on a particular topic.

What stops you from posting your own questions to make the webchat more balanced? It's not as if your views will even be challenged on a webchat thread. You don't even need to read the other questions, you can just read the OP and then post your question.

DioneTheDiabolist · 24/01/2020 22:36

You are not a lone voice Peachgreen. Plenty of other Mnetters are put off as well. As are guests. This is not the first time this issue has come up. I'm glad MNHQ did something this time.

LangClegsInSpace · 24/01/2020 20:36

Thank you for responding Rowan.

The problem is that politicians have never properly engaged with these questions. That's why they keep being asked, by increasing numbers of people, increasingly insistently.

The soundbite used to be a simple 'TWAW'. It's now 'TWAW and women only spaces are important too'. That's progress of a sort but it's still a soundbite, and an even more confusing one. It's just lip service so they can claim to have 'listened to both sides' when they really, really haven't.

Until politicians properly address the multitude of issues for women and children's rights, safety and wellbeing, that are caused by the TRA agenda, then we will keep asking these questions. How can we not? And if we think they have not heard us we will ask again, and we will use every available platform.

This particular webchat brought everything sharply into focus because of JP's extensive work with the Women & Equalities Committee and because of her recent comments on the spousal exit clause. There were far more strong, thoughtful questions about sex and gender that we could have asked Jess Phillips than most other politicians.

Yet there was only a three hour window to ask any of these questions. As a result, an extremely pertinent question about the way Jess Phillips and the Labour Party have behaved towards WPUK had to be substituted out in order to ask another extremely pertinent question about her recent comments on the spousal exit clause. I wanted both those questions asked.

I think you closed that window too quickly. I also think moderation methods are not the best way to go about solving this particular problem.

As an experiment, how about posting to announce the webchat but not opening the comments for 48 hours? That would give everybody time to find out it's happening and think about and discuss what they want to ask.

It wouldn't solve everything but I think it might help.

Original poster

Mner2000 · 23/01/2020 19:52

Lang cleg vs Jess Phillips would be awesome

OP posts:

ragged · 23/01/2020 17:59

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Jux · 23/01/2020 17:50

Why would someone worth their salt think they were on a hiding to nothing? I would have thought they'd pride themselves on braving (and maybe surviving) "some of the fiercest questioning a politician can face in public" and if they're scared then they're not good enough, surely?

I wonder if LangCleg would go into political interviewing. I think I'd pay to watch that

Original poster

Mner2000 · 23/01/2020 17:39

Thanks for responding. I am sure balancing all the different needs etc is very difficult. But why were repetitive questions on brexit ok but not repeated questions on women’s rights?

OP posts:

Cohle · 23/01/2020 17:34

I'm not sure the way this was handled is entirely fair to posters who might face strikes etc for unknowingly repeating a question, but I do think it's good that such Q&A's are not entirely derailed by trans issues.

peachgreen · 23/01/2020 17:31

I can only speak for myself but nothing puts me off submitting a question to, or reading the answers from, a webchat than seeing swathes and swathes of questions about trans issues. I might be a lone voice on this thread but I appreciate how MN moderated this. I also think there aren't many other places that would allow users to directly ask guests such challenging questions on this issue.

Lordfrontpaw · 23/01/2020 16:25

I don’t think repetitive questions (it really only demonstrates the questions people really wanted to ask - and we don’t always have time to read through a thread to make sure someone else hasn’t asked it/or keep up with the threat to see if it’s been answered) put people off (although I find the ‘what biscuits do you like’ a bit off putting), and were those deleted for repeating a Q given a ‘strike’?

Why not ask for posters to submit questions beforehand, select a number based on frequency and importance, then ‘host’ the guest online and feed through the questions like an interview?

You could maybe add a thumbs up/thumbs down on the answer for people to vote on the answer?

MNHQ

RowanMumsnet · 23/01/2020 16:13

Hello

Sorry it's taken us a while to respond.

We've been holding webchats on MN for over ten years now and they've become a really valuable way of allowing MNers to interact directly with powerful people and voice their concerns. But along with that we think we have a couple of responsibilities: to all Mumsnet users, giving an equal opportunity for every MNer to post about the issue that really matters to her (it is usually a 'her') even if she's the only one facing it; and to the politicians, who are our guests and who aren't obligated to give us their time and face what several political journalists have cited as being some of the fiercest questioning a politician can face in public.

We thought long and hard about deleting those posts and particularly about using the button that disappears them without trace but the truth is that all the polite requests, evident deletions and emails to users that we had tried previously had just not worked, and the situation was beginning to feel implacably hostile.

For us it came down to two factors: that we knew other MNers were being put off from posting on webchats entirely, and that we were finding politicians more and more reluctant to engage. The evidence that our current approach has in our own terms been successful lies in the really broad range of strong, thoughtful questions on the thread (as some users in FWR have acknowledged) and in the increased willingness of some other politicians to line up webchats.

We take the point that there are lots of sub-headings to this issue and setting a false and slightly arbitrary limit on posts about this feels fairly suboptimal from our point of view but it's the best mechanism we've come up with so far to allow the issue to be addressed and answered by guests without other users being put off from taking part and guests feeling they're on a complete hiding to nothing.

Original poster

Mner2000 · 23/01/2020 11:30

LangClegsinspace I tweeted Jess to let her know and directed her to the other thread. She didn't respond but it was in amongst her decision to withdraw from the leadership...

OP posts:

Original poster

Mner2000 · 23/01/2020 11:11

Is there no answer to our concerns MNHQ? No platitudes? Free speech and holding our elected ministers to account is ok in principle but not on webchats or concerning self-ID?

OP posts:

LangClegsInSpace · 22/01/2020 23:13

As JP was on the Women's and Equalities committee, and as she said herself that she realised that the trans position made more sense, then she - of all people - could have explained in simple steps how she came to take that position.

Perhaps now that she's not part of a power grab in Labour, she could do that now.

Yes. The only reason I was interested in this webchat is because of the Women & Equalities Committee stuff. I don't really care who wins the Labour leadership, they won't be electable for at least a decade anyway. For now they just need to elect a grown up who can supervise the salvage operation.

Maybe we should write to her.

Original poster

Mner2000 · 22/01/2020 21:58

Indeed. And odd that they have not responded to this yet. I reported it earlier today to make sure they hadn’t forgotten and still no answer. Do you think they are hoping we will go away?

OP posts:

Jux · 22/01/2020 19:28

I wonder if JP said something to MNHQ which has made them give up on FWR completely? They are just waiting for us to die naturally now...... I just find the timing between this and Lang's banning interesting.

Jux · 22/01/2020 18:38

Perhaps now that she's not part of a power grab in Labour, she could do that now. Of course, as a result of the censoring she won't know how badly it's needed.

And yes, lots of Brexit questions allowed. I imagine she thought that BJ could be held responsible for that if she was 'harangued' over it.

StealthPolarBear · 22/01/2020 17:03

I'm agreeing with you! They left plenty of brexit questions up despite them all being on one topic. Ours were deleted for all being on one topic.

OldCrone · 22/01/2020 13:42

Other questions that all came under a broad umbrella heading such as 'brexit' we all allowed to stand. Women's rights were the exception. I'd love to know why.

Women's rights were an important issue to ask Jess Phillips about since she was on the Women and Equalities committee and has commented publicly on the issues that we were asking about, such as the so-called "spousal veto" in the GRA.

We wanted to ask these questions because she has taken such an active role in this attack on women's rights.

StealthPolarBear · 22/01/2020 13:01

Agree. Other questions that all came under a broad umbrella heading such as 'brexit' we all allowed to stand. Women's rights were the exception. I'd love to know why.

Unflip

1 2 3