Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Word of advice to MNHQ #2

866 replies

BackieJerkhart · 25/08/2017 18:29

New thread

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
Maudlinmaud · 25/08/2017 19:30

Cheers faith I'm on reddit with the same username but haven't looked recently. I guess that means I'm also persona non grata.

BackieJerkhart · 25/08/2017 19:29
OP posts:
User843022 · 25/08/2017 19:29

'Rubbish. It's a complete bitchfest'
I can't find anything about mn or cockroaches on there, am I thick or is it very hard to navigate?

QueenMortificado · 25/08/2017 19:29

It's a bit more free speechy than here but it's no worse than AIBU. Better really because no one's being snidey or shitty, they are just saying it right to your face (screen?).

In many instances it's not saying anything to someone's face. It's gossiping about certain posters who aren't even on the threads.

PandorasXbox · 25/08/2017 19:29

How are they saying it to your face when you're not there to defend yourself?

Circumlocutor · 25/08/2017 19:28

'I was always under the impression that it was extremely bad form to bring arguments across forums? Has that changed ?'

Probably not for you and me...

And it does seem a bad form to do that. Petulant even.

BackieJerkhart · 25/08/2017 19:28

oddfish I think your suggestion is much better than current system.

OP posts:
QueenMortificado · 25/08/2017 19:27

Queen the Reddit threads are not brutal well not unless you're a snowflake.

What crap. Naming posters then picking them apart in the bitchiest of ways.

NormaDesmondsEyebrows · 25/08/2017 19:27

It's not a bitchfest. It's a bit more free speechy than here but it's no worse than AIBU. Better really because no one's being snidey or shitty, they are just saying it right to your face (screen?).

It's more like it used to be here when moderation was much lighter and you called a cunt out on a thread instead of reporting. It's much more honest.

BoreOfWhabylon · 25/08/2017 19:25

Very good post, BrainSaysNo. Room on that fence for my arse too?

I've always liked Stratters but I didn't find the cockroach thing funny. And a member of MNHQ was named on the thread (not by stratters)

FaithHopeCharityDesperation · 25/08/2017 19:25

Genuinely not sure what's gone down here in the last 24 hours.

Maudlinmaud, a précis:

MNHQ likened some (troublesome) posters to shoplifters in Boots (the shop, not the shoe), then someone Stratters Wink posted a pic of Milton the cockroach on Reddit & said it was MNHQ complaints dept.
Justine not happy, shoplifters not happy.

An interesting side note is that, as everyone knows, only cockroaches & Grifter bikes are able to withstand a nuclear holocaust, so MN should emerge unscathed when the dust settles on this.

PandorasXbox · 25/08/2017 19:23

Queen the Reddit threads are not brutal well not unless you're a snowflake.

Rubbish. It's a complete bitchfest.

oddfish · 25/08/2017 19:22

Reddit has to be read from the bottom up and across. Confused. I've given it a go but I've decided to stay here instead.

I think Mumsnet needs to re-think it's punishments. Banning from posting on certain areas for example, might work. Or a 2,4,6 or 8 week ban system. A permanent ban just means they re-register under a new name and there's no incentive to change behaviour.

PandorasXbox · 25/08/2017 19:22

My guess is that Stratters has been banned for stuff she's said on Reddit about HQ because she has the same name over there. When I looked a few weeks ago the other posters had different usernames to here. They'd probably be banned too if their names were the ones they have here.

Lynnm63 · 25/08/2017 19:21

Queen the Reddit threads are not brutal well not unless you're a snowflake.
I think it's dreadful that Stratters can be banned from this site for posting an innocuous photo on another site. Personally I think Justine has tried to use this faux outrage at a cockroach photo to draw attention away from the fact that HQ have not addressed ever their failings regarding David. HQ are very much 'move along, nothing to see here' rather than addressing problems. Much easier to ban. I guess we are interefering with Justine's aim to sell the site for shedloads of dosh.

AuntieStella · 25/08/2017 19:20

I must open all the wrong threads. Because I don't remember Stratters being a difficult or rude poster

SoNouveau · 25/08/2017 19:17

I was always under the impression that it was extremely bad form to bring arguments across forums? Has that changed ?

We need little arrows to give us karma points, not 'like' buttons.
I'll give you a karma point for that ^^ post SNF.

AnnMeredithPerkins · 25/08/2017 19:17

I missed it all too

PacificDogwod · 25/08/2017 19:17

Reddit hurts my eyes and my brain.

FightClub as some kind of insane asylum is a great idea.

Banning stratters not so much Hmm

Maudlinmaud · 25/08/2017 19:13

Genuinely not sure what's gone down here in the last 24 hours. Some sort of a squabble over an insect Confused and stratters has been ejected?

I like stratters Sad

SoNouveau · 25/08/2017 19:11

Penisbeaker was embarrassing.

Anyway, I like Milton, is he gender fluid?
[head tilt]

BrainSaysNo · 25/08/2017 19:11

With regards to reddit, there are 2 subsections on there around MN, one just a group of people who are looking for the old style MN and re creating that, and one with posters wanting to discuss trolls/frustrations with MN.
The latter has had some brutal posts by odd posters (but they on the whole are pulled up by others on there), I am no wall flower and the odd comments has Shock me Grin.
However the trolls section on the whole it is a group of people speaking as they may to their mates down the pub, with no rules around what they want to say.
I think at the moment its raw for some people, who are mourning the loss of their community.
On the flip side I think the MN team do take constructive feedback, but there are times I think they take some shit that if I was an employer who had a duty to safeguard them I would have something to say to the consumer.
MN is a massive site, there is no way all the people all the time are going to be happy with decisions etc, I suppose its weighing up if on the whole it suits you and if it doesn't anymore, its a waste of our energy arguing?
Looks like I have a fence truly up my arse, as I can genuinely see both sides.

DixieNormas · 25/08/2017 19:11

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

BackieJerkhart · 25/08/2017 19:10

So is that why they have banned her? Confused because she has had as many complaints about her as a troll?

I suppose we aren't entitled to any clarification on the reason for banning from HQ? Not that they were shy about divulging her history of being reported.

OP posts:
NormaDesmondsEyebrows · 25/08/2017 19:10

Another thing that makes me a bit Hmm is how MNHQ are forever saying they've never changed their policy on trolling.

Have a look at Classics! Tbh I think that's half the problem. You used to be able to post a funny thread that would become full of posters 'getting it' and taking the piss, mucho jocularity. Now you'd risk a ban for either starting or taking the piss on a thread like that.

Meanwhile the many 'live updates as I discover my husband's second family with a Russian transvestite' trolls run amok.