Why have you deleted a thread?

This was thread one I am now quite keen to find out why the continuation thread was deleted.

Oh, MNHQ, I do think this was a mistake. Please consider reinstating the thread (with an amended title, if you must).

Have you read the first thread? It's worth doing so, imo, not least to read how Spero has been threatened for challenging those banging the forced-adoption drum.

Not for the first time, either. An MP (who was subsequently banned by MNHQ), outed her in the national press a couple of years ago, because she challenged the bilge he was spouting on here and elsewhere.

I recently started a thread saying "where is x thread"? As I wanted to post on it and ouldnt find it. Iirc someone kindly pointed me to it. Then it was deleted as a taat!

I do think the context is necessary here, and that deletion was so fast that I wonder whether HQ could have had time to gather the context by reading the latter half of the first thread? I'm sure that sometimes there are so many reports coming in that a quick desicion has to be made as there is no time for anything else, but this is a very valuable discussion and it would be good to be able to continue it. Or read along as others with more knowledge continue it, for lurkers on it like me!

Evidently the conspiracy goes very deep and MNHQ are involved

So why was the continuation thread deleted. The deletion message doesn't make sense. Firstly it said that it was a TAAT. Well other posters seem quite clear it wasn't, it was a continuation of a previously full thread.
Secondly you say it was goady, but the people on the thread saw it as heated debate.

There are plenty of nasty and clearly goady threads on MN that seem to be allowed to stay.

Shame if the only treads that get to stay are the quirky and banal. MN needs to also be a place for serious, yes and sometimes heated discussion or why bother.

You are of course entitled to run your site any way you wish.

But it is a shame that I am simply deleted as 'goady' in all the circumstances of the discussion that preceded this.

Your site will be all the poorer if you will not permit genuine, albeit heated debate.

But so long as you can get clicks for your penis beakers, I don't suppose you care that much.

O and btw - you want to delete me? Please just do it without the patronising message. Thanks.

I suspected HQ might alter the title to make it clear it was part 2 rather than TAAT. I was surprised it was deleted instead.