Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Can we have a new rule, please, that UserName987654321987654321 has to

135 replies

Maryz · 09/06/2016 13:04

namechange before they post a new thread.

Because I'm getting confused. There are so many people with UserName in their UserName that I'm in danger of being extremely rude to one of them mixing them up and thinking a new one is an old one or a previously banned one.

I am old and confused.

I think they have to take the name allocated to them when they register, for some reason, but could they not be auto-sked to namechange before posting? Pretty please.

OP posts:
WorraLiberty · 19/06/2016 13:47

I think the user/number thing is the worst idea MNHQ have ever had.

Normally when people are moaning about new updates, like 'trending', the emojis, the social media buttons, the new typeface etc, I genuinely find myself thinking "Meh, it's not that bad".

But this is ridiculous and I now don't want to interact with anyone who has user/number as their NN.

No-one can remember the numbers anyway so they might just as well have given all newbies the name Bob, because they all look the same.

bloodyteenagers · 19/06/2016 13:36

The user### today on the two threads are the same person. There's more than one. Think I have reported 4? All different user### but all the same person. The latest id user #### is using has said they keep rejoining.
The system clearly isn't working.
I am with others and not engaging with any user#### not worth it.

Maryz · 19/06/2016 13:35

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Catzpyjamas · 19/06/2016 13:24

It is getting worse. I've never reported so many threads as I have in the last hour. All from user########

AugustaFinkNottle · 19/06/2016 13:11

There are so many trolls jumping onto this bandwagon, I would suggest you suspend the lot and tell them they must re-register with proper usernames.

Catzpyjamas · 19/06/2016 12:48

Agreed. Please stop the user#########
I get them confused and so many of them are GFs (or maybe it's all the same one) that I am just not posting on any threads with a user### on it just now.

AugustaFinkNottle · 19/06/2016 12:47

I'm properly cross now that Maryz is getting publicly slagged off because someone at MN can't read her post properly.

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/2665289-TO-THINK-THAT-MNHQ-HAVE-SPECTACULARLY-MISSED-THE-FUCKING-POINT?msgid=61797529#61797529

BeyondTellsEveryoneRealFacts · 19/06/2016 12:46

I think the deletion was a mistake, in an attempt to react quicker following complaints. Stupid, but not malicious.

Groovee · 19/06/2016 12:45

The deletion of today's post shows that something needs to be done MNHQ!

BeyondTellsEveryoneRealFacts · 19/06/2016 12:45

I'm with maryz, i will henceforth be ignoring (except to report) any poster whose name is user###.

If we all completely blank them, perhaps mnhq will consider scrapping the idea?

RaeSkywalker · 19/06/2016 12:44

I cannot believe that the thread Maryz started got deleted. Is it now the case that any thread with a userxxxx troll on will be treated as if the OP is not 'genuine' also? It had the potential to be a hugely valuable thread, I am very upset that it has been removed for no reason whatsoever.

AugustaFinkNottle · 19/06/2016 12:41

OK, I've now found out which thread that was. Wasn't it you who started it, Maryz? The deletion message was really offensive, as there was nothing wrong with OP's intentions. I don't see why it had to go. MN only needed to delete the idiot troll's messages.

AugustaFinkNottle · 19/06/2016 12:37

Which thread was that?

ElsaAintAsColdAsMe · 19/06/2016 12:37

Thanks her there isn't much that shocks me anymore but that certainly caught me off guard.

Emochild · 19/06/2016 12:35

Even the deletion message on that thread says op started it not with the best of intentions

There was sod all wrong with the thread
It's important that parents if children with SEN can share this stuff without having the response we were subject to

Sort it out MNHQ

HerRoyalFattyness · 19/06/2016 12:34

elsa Flowers I'm sorry you had to read that. There are some complete fuckwits in this world.

ElsaAintAsColdAsMe · 19/06/2016 12:32

That deletion message needs to be changed. Op was fine, some troll was being a cunt to me, it wasn't the ops fault at all.

HerRoyalFattyness · 19/06/2016 12:31

Ffs goady

HerRoyalFattyness · 19/06/2016 12:30

Why has the thread been deleted? It wasn't the OP being a goody fuckers!

HerRoyalFattyness · 19/06/2016 12:28

I'm fucking angry at that thread. I don't have a child with SN (although I suspect myself and DS1 have aspergers, but they are just suspicions) I was reading as a lot of those things have been said about children I know.

Maryz · 19/06/2016 12:24

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

fastdaytears · 18/06/2016 20:14

Was the PBP who we were all happy to see the back of (user...ending 881 I think and off to her island) able to re-register due to the user... thing or was that just an unhappy co-incidence?

RebeccaMumsnet · 18/06/2016 17:36

Hi all,

We do require email verification. We removed the 'set up a user name' to speed up the process. We have asked folks to pick a new user and we have edited the confirmation mail to include this.

We are looking into alternatives and we'll know more next week.

Sorry this is taking a while but we are discussing it and haven't forgotten.

DetestableHerytike · 18/06/2016 08:58

Another voice for change if system.

If the Two word thing didn't work, what about a random word then numbers. So apple1234 then banana1234 then carrot1234 and so on. Then round again with a different word. At least there would be something to type!

HerRoyalFattyness · 17/06/2016 20:30

maryz you may stand. Just remember I like to be addressed as "her maj" Grin (not really. Fatty will do)