Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Can we have a topic where name changing is not allowed?

881 replies

WorraLiberty · 29/12/2015 15:21

Lots of people feel the 'atmosphere' has been somewhat lost, due to MN becoming so big and so many people name changing for dubious reasons.

So how about a new topic where name changing is not allowed?

So to post in that section, you choose a different name (much like in Mumsnet local). But you have to stick to that name only.

That way, in that section at least, there would be less arses/goady fuckers/Billy bullshitters and drama llamas, hiding behind name changes.

People will become 'regulars' again (in that section at least) and when you go there to chat, you'll at least 'recognise' other people.

OK I'm sure there are 1 million reasons why this is a stupid idea/impossible to set up, but can anyone think of them? Grin

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
M48294Y · 31/12/2015 20:07

I'm just trying to think - have HQ ever made a big change like this at the request of their users?

I'm thinking not, but stand to be corrected. I suppose they did finally allow a Sex Topic.

But they won't do anything about AIBU (despite numerous threads where they say they are listening), they won't do anything about those fucking irritating drop down pictures, they won't allow people to select "no pages" in Customise.

Do they listen, do they care?

Sparklingbrook · 31/12/2015 19:58

I think Jane needs to not post so much if I'm honest.

MrsHathaway · 31/12/2015 19:57

Well, let's think about a limit to ncs.

Let's imagine a poster with two children, a cat, and a health issue.

She chats "anonymously" as JaneAusten, and variously as the year goes along as JaneAustensEasterBunny, JaneAustensCorpse and JaneAustenKissingSanta.

She asks in secondary education about admissions as JaneSmith because her DC1's circumstances are slightly identifiable.

She posts in primary education as JaneJones because her DC2's difficulties are identifiable.

She posts as HyperthyroidJane on the health boards while she is considering a private referral.

The site suffers a data breach and she cautiously abandons a couple of nicknames in favour of new ones.

That's ten, completely harmlessly and legitimately, from an uncomplicated poster. Which would you have poor old Jane do without?

Christinayangstwistedsista · 31/12/2015 18:50

Most of the time I just gawp in disbelief

Sparklingbrook · 31/12/2015 18:39

People use MN for different things. I don't use it to moan about the rellies or overshare details of personal relationships etc. So namechanging isn't really a consideration.

DixieNormas · 31/12/2015 18:35

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

EduCated · 31/12/2015 18:31

I have various name changes. I try to keep superfluous chatty stuff all under one name, other names for anything vaguely identifying. Therefore would use chatty name if there was a non name-change section. Wouldn't affect posting elsewhere at all.

SagaNorensLeatherTrousers · 31/12/2015 18:24

Thanks, why. I'm just trying to wrap my head around MN being one of the only forums that allows multiple NCing and why that is, so was curious to know the opinion of someone who quite likes that function. Nothing to do with the Non-NC section we're hoping asking for.

Sparklingbrook · 31/12/2015 18:15

I did get a bit flamed once for admitting that though. Sad

Christinayangstwistedsista · 31/12/2015 18:12

Exactly, if I don't want people to know something I just wouldn't post it

Sparklingbrook · 31/12/2015 18:10

I got myself in a right tangle Christina. I also feel that for me if i thought 'I need to namechange to post this' I would know not to post it. It's a good reminder.

Caprinihahahaha · 31/12/2015 18:10

Fwiw I have no problem with posters wanting to name change.

I do have a slight issue with the few that seem to object to one area where it is not allowed.

Christinayangstwistedsista · 31/12/2015 18:08

I couldn't keep up with name changes and would probably get myself in a mess, quite happy with one name

whychangeagain · 31/12/2015 18:06

Because as I previously said I'd rather have the choice to name change from thread to thread. A special non name changing section of MN wouldn't be my thing but I've no objection at all to it. I only posted on this thread because I'd been reading the whole thread and posters had mentioned not understanding why other posters might want the ability to name change numerous times.

magimedi · 31/12/2015 17:49

But if you only used one other name, why & only used that for your husband's job & nothing else surely no one would know anything else about you?

whychangeagain · 31/12/2015 17:35

Yes, I think it would. Obviously I wouldn't join in threads that I would have previously namechanged for, if for example I was allowed three different usernames I'd be thinking "is this thread worth using a namechange for?" Obviously I could just use the same alternate name for each thread that I feel requires an extra level of confidentiality but I still would feel a bit nervy.

It would just give me an extra reason not to use MN, probably no great loss but it would cut me off from a website I've used very regularly and I've enjoyed and if I can't use MN how will everyone know how right I always am Wink

SagaNorensLeatherTrousers · 31/12/2015 16:57

Can I ask whychange, would it put you off MN if you weren't able to use the NC function? Or if you could only have 1 or 2 NC's?

whychangeagain · 31/12/2015 16:33

I change my username to a different one when I am on a thread that specifically talks about my husbands job, each thread I namechange. It wouldn't happen very often, maybe 6/7 times a year. I have a username that I use on all other threads that I've never changed (7/8 years).

Threads that I use different names on usually are posted in Chat, AIBU. He doesn't have that intriguing a job Grin, its just that due to where I live and various other family considerations I'd rather namechange each time.

WorraLiberty · 31/12/2015 10:29

I can't see all the emojis but I really don't care Blush

I've a feeling that if HQ decided on allowing name changing for only a handful of topics, they'd be inundated with people complaining and pleading.

OP posts:
SagaNorensLeatherTrousers · 31/12/2015 10:05

That's a really good idea, magi.

I was thinking about why MN allow unlimited NC'es last night. (Yes, I was actually pondering over this!) And I really couldn't think of a good reason why it's unlimited. I can understand one, maybe two, with special permission going beyond that...but why unlimited?

OddSocksHighHeels · 31/12/2015 09:47

That's not a bad idea magi

magimedi · 31/12/2015 08:53

Don't hold your breath, *Saga!

I woke up with the idea that maybe we have got this all wrong & there should be only one special place where you can name change! Wouldn't that be much easier?

Or only allow name change in relationships, health & SN?

SagaNorensLeatherTrousers · 31/12/2015 08:43

Wonder if we'll get some sort of reply today?

StillStayingClassySanDiego · 30/12/2015 23:13

That's ok Queen .

I do like a martini glass, me!

Queenbean · 30/12/2015 23:08

Sorry StillStaying! I, unreasonably, went off to real life for a bit and lost track of the thread.

I bow to your emoji greatness Grin