HemmingGate: To ban or not to ban, that is the question MNHQ

From what I understand, MNHQ have said they are suspending his account until HE gets in touch with THEM.

I have a horrible feeling he won't come back as he knows he will get very little purchase here now, there are simply too many of us who are on to him and his followers.

Therefore he is going to sow his horrible seeds on net mums more and more.

O god, I think I am going to have to dig out my log in details.

Carpe that's brilliant! Plus you now have triple digit number of followers

She might be interested! Due to internet confidentiality issues cross all kinds of boundaries. He might be in the stink in the US for more of his 'helping'.

Carpe, that is great, if someone with followers in the thousands follows you.

This incident WILL fade away, hopefully the ICO thing will work. But we need to monitor everything he says and does, and work on that. Its a long term strategy.

TeamHoldPoliticiansAccountableForTheirActions

YAY!!!! Happy to be part of this team

BeyondtheLimits

I don't think they will ever correct that mistake and for a reason.. People don't recall the 'correct' version but they are reminded of that case as "Child snatched from womb etc etc"

Can someone start a general 'innocent' thread on net mums, linking to one of the newspaper articles and asking 'o what do you think of this then?' I did join ages ago but can't remember my log in. Would be better if someone with established posting history could do it.

I have just sent this email to the Information Commissioner and copied it to my local MP Duncan Hames who is Lib Dem. I want to know from Mr Hames what the Lib Dem party think of the actions of JH.

To whom it may concern.

I am sending this email because I believe that Mr John Hemming MP should be investigated for his misuse of confidential data.

Please see below a copy of the email I sent to Essex County Council on 15th December 2013.

I have also been assisted by the comments in this blog concerning data protection issues

2040infolawblog.com/2013/12/31/keeping-mum/

regards
sp

I went looking for the OBE thread on Netmums the other day. I felt queasy from all the pink & had to leave before I found it!

I don't have an account but maybe I could mess about with the screen colour settings on my computer & brave the sparkliness if necessary... I'm not very eloquent though so I'd need someone else to tell me what to post!

I can't go on netmums, there's something about moving emoticons and glitter that makes my brain slide out of my ears.

Just used my first hash tag. Very exciting.

Anyone got a nethuns account that they can post a link to it on? As he points out he is still giving his "advice" on there...

Mine was sadly banned after the OBE thread the other day

swsn news

I wonder if there is a syndrome like shortman syndrome, but based on looking really rather repulsive....just looked at the BF article, and that combined with others lacks in that area....

From the article about Brendan Fleming taking on the case:
"Brendan Fleming Solicitors said it would “fight tooth and nail” to reunite the mother with her child"

Yes, that would be the mother who doesn't have care of her older children, not least because they are reported to have been traumatised by seeing her when in the full grip of a manic episode. So on the basis that, even if the English court orders were set aside, the Italian authorities might well decide that it is unsafe for the baby to be with her mother, and given that BF doesn't practise in Italy, I wonder how he plans to achieve that?

One thing, that perhaps someone with a bit more knowledge on the original italian case could comment on, both these articles seem to have gone with the original "evil ss steal baby by cs" explanation, which could do with being corrected. Otherwise he perhaps looks like the good man fighting against evil ss and getting banned for disagreeing with the women on mn, who must therefore be on the side of evil ss. IYSWIM? After all, he was arguing knowing that the original version was incorrect.

Ahh, now hq have commented, perhaps its worth putting a link to the bham article in "in the news"? :)

Yes. When I first read it said no-one from hq was available to comment and it ended with the naughty step hilarity.
for hq.

I can see 4 comments - so there were more? I wonder what happened to them.

Good work, TeamHoldPoliticiansAccountableForTheirActions

(we may need a snappier name )