Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

Is it time to start paying for MN membership?

218 replies

SDTGisAnEvilWolefGenius · 24/10/2013 10:13

In the wake of everything that happened last night, I have been trying to think of ways to keep the goady fuckers and MRAs from repeatedly rejoining MN after being banned, just so that they can cause trouble and upset, particularly on boards like Relationships and Feminism.

If we were paying even a fairly nominal amount - say a tenner - per year for our MN membership, I don't think that is an amount that would put off people who wanted to join the site for the right reasons, but it would mean that joining, being a goady fucker, getting banned and then rejoining to cause more trouble, multiple times would get very expensive very quickly - and this might put off the trolls and goady fuckers.

Or are there other ways that we can think of that MNHQ can keep the goady fuckers off the site? Could they change the rules to say that joining just to goad people on sensitive boards is a banning offence?

OP posts:
SoupDragon · 29/10/2013 07:52

Noooooo... Not at all.

[gulp]

LtAllHallowsEve · 29/10/2013 07:43

Are you worried it would say "SoupDragon 15thousandeleventybillion posts"?

Grin
SoupDragon · 29/10/2013 07:26

A post count? Hell no!

LtAllHallowsEve · 29/10/2013 07:22

If not 'Member since 2012' what about a 'posts' count? or would people start banging on about 'Royalty' again?

SoupDragon · 29/10/2013 06:59

I don't think it is the right way to go at all. Whilst RTB was unnecessarily vicious and rude, it is true that charging excludes people who need support. If you set the fee at the level necessary to deter trolls, you make it impossible for some people to access the support.

IMO, you can't deter trolls, you just need to deal with them properly which means us reporting them.

octopusinastringbag · 29/10/2013 06:52

OP i agree that it's not a stupid idea either.
Jokingly, what was that quote about me defending your right to be wrong? :)
There does need to be a solution so good one for thinking of a potential one.

octopusinastringbag · 29/10/2013 06:51

strumpet it's what they have in my son's class, bad behaviour means they move down the zone board, get to red three times and they go to the head teacher for a little chat. Probably not a naice little chat.

valiumredhead · 28/10/2013 17:36

And it wasn't a 'stupid' idea, it's not one I agree with but that DOES NOT make it stupid.

TheGrandPooBah · 28/10/2013 17:32

OP, good on you for suggesting a solution. I don't agree with your suggestion.

However, you're absolutely right - it's entirely possible to debate the subject without resorting to spite. Please don't feel down because of some people's inability to do this. Unfortunately it's a bit of a failing in these forums that some people forget basic good manners.

valiumredhead · 28/10/2013 17:32

OP, it's good to discuss ideas, I'm glad you postedSmile

SDTGisAnEvilWolefGenius · 28/10/2013 17:30

Thanks everyone.

OP posts:
SDTGisAnEvilWolefGenius · 28/10/2013 17:29

Thanks, Pacific. I don't have a problem with the fact that the majority think this is not a good idea - even with those calling it a stupid idea (and I therefore owe an apology to ilovebabytv who got caught up in my hurt response to RTB, and shouldn't have).

I think MN is an amazing place, and all I was trying to do was to find a way to prevent the trolls from causing so much pain, upset and trouble on here. I am beginning to wish I hadn't bothered.

RedToothBrush - perhaps in future discussions you could consider the sporting metaphor, and play the ball not the player.

OP posts:
Strumpetron · 28/10/2013 17:28

octopusinastringbag I iz a bit fick, what's the zone board? Grin

STD that reply you received was very fucking harsh and you didn't deserve it. GOD FORBID anyone makes a suggestion these days Hmm Dont let it bother you

ButThereAgain · 28/10/2013 17:23

Don't feel bad STD. I totally didn't understand the level of vituperativeness in RTB's posts (especially when she also stressed the need for calm discussion, respect for other forum users, and acknowledgement of their intelligence). It seemed that she could have made all the same points without any harshness at all.

octopusinastringbag · 28/10/2013 17:22

Strumpet, go down the zone board right now Shock

Grin
PacificDogwood · 28/10/2013 17:18

Aw, SDTG, don't let it get to you.

I totally understood where you were coming from x.

SDTGisAnEvilWolefGenius · 28/10/2013 17:12

PS - RTB congratulations - you have reduced me to tears. Fucking good job.

OP posts:
SDTGisAnEvilWolefGenius · 28/10/2013 17:10

Gosh - thanks RedToothBrush and ilovebabytv. You do know it is possible to discuss a suggestion without resorting to being so nasty (particularly RTB).

As it happens, I had already accepted that my original suggestion was wrong, but that there were other good ideas on this thread which did merit consideration.

But hey - don't let that stand in the way of you giving me a good kicking.

OP posts:
ilovebabytv · 28/10/2013 16:40

This is stupid idea. Really the answer is to ignore and report . I find the best way to wind up a goader is to totally ignore them. They will maybe keep writing goady messages but it just makes them look desperate and stupid imo. I dont think its particularly hard to ignore a few words on screen from a random stranger. Perhaps this would be when a hide poster function, for threads or whole site, would be helpful for those who feel they are unable to ignore.

Darkesteyes · 28/10/2013 16:30

A previous poster makes a good point. Those on low incomes and financially abusive relationships wouldnt be able to pay.

trish5000 · 27/10/2013 22:24

Good post I think.
I am beginning to wonder what job you do, or what hobbies you have!

I quite agree with you about ignoring. Sadly though, there are always going to be people who respond on a site this size. And particularly as it can be hours before headquarters arrive. Though that should improve wiht the overnight moderators.

Hadnt thought about the pride bit. That is probably undoubtedly true.

I am always surprised quite how internet savvy trolls are.

I didnt understand the paragraph after the pride paragraph.

RedToothBrush · 27/10/2013 22:06

I have seem world class trolling, thats very very true. Some which has caused an enormous amount of distress to individuals, including personal threats, tracking down people in RL, contacting employers or relatives and have ultimately involved the police becoming involved.

There are two types of particularly problematic individual.

I long ago came to the conclusion, that you can't stop some one who becomes somewhat obsessed with a 'cause' on the internet. The more you try and 'silence them', the more they come back at you and feel like they are vindicated in what they believe because you are trying to 'silence them'. The more they start to believe that THEY are the victim and their actions are completely justifable. They don't want to have the debate, because their minds are totally made up in the first place.

Nor can you stop the muppet who doesn't comprehend that their actions on the internet have negative impact on humans. They just see the internet as a dehumanised zone where there are no consequences and as long as its funny and they are getting a reaction its fair game. They have little or no comprehension of empathy and for situations outside their narrow world of experience. Its all a playground and a joke to them. Hence why trolls, tend to be kids or have some sort of a lack of understanding of responsibility for their own actions.

The only way to deal with situations with either, is to take a step back.

Present your argument. Back it up with logic and examples and THEN LEAVE IT. Don't invest the emotion with either. Accept that you will never change some people's minds and that actually its not your job to change their mind. You have to let them change their own mind and have the space and freedom to do this.

People's pride tends to be the biggest thing that prevents them from changing their mind. They would rather argue that Black was White than admit that they might be in the wrong and you told them so. They would rather think of you as some sort of joke rather than accept that they could be really hurting someone.

Instead my best suggestion would be for MN regulars to come up with some sort of action plan to deal with stuff like this. There is strength in numbers and strength in supporting over individuals you know to be regulars or can easily identify as vulnerable namechangers.

You look at what you CAN control. Thats how YOU react. As individuals and as a group.

I appreciate just how difficult it can be at times, - EVERYONE gets over involved somedays -, but the real strength of the internet and indeed this forum, is precisely the thing that makes it vulnerable to attack from difficult individuals.

Its freedom and its anonymity.

trish5000 · 27/10/2013 21:34

Most people, myself included are still at the start of learning how trolls operate.
You sound like you have a lot more knowledge than most posters about the subject. So just impart it, in the intellectual calm way Wink

RedToothBrush · 27/10/2013 21:25

If you think I'm being rude, fine.

But I am staggered by the shortsightedness on display here. And actually, being deliberately goady on this thread, might actually illustrate the entire point.

I might suggest that this shortsightedness part of the problem too. Trying to close down controversial debates and opinions. You can't. All it does is heighten the emotional responses, rather than the rational ones. The very point of trolling...

Yes. Sometimes there are sick individuals out to deliberately cause offense, but you need to learn how to identify and deal with in a way that doesn't actually make the situation worse.

There are regulars here who can and should help others when this occurs, by pointing this out and by dealing with the 'people in the right' by calming them, reassuring them and helping them - to try and reduce their emotional kneejerk reactions. You don't tackle the intruder - you look after the victim. You direct your attention to them not the person seeking the attention.

In short: The regs look after anyone who is getting distressed rather than using their energy to start a fight with the troublemaker.

If you really must engage with the troll, you do so in an intellectual way, a calm way and a way that neutralises their attacks. You blind with examples and you blind with rational responses in the face of crap. You make them look even more stupid than they are. You do not get emotionally involved. If you can't do that, you stop talking to them immediately, and focus on talking to those people who aren't doing it.

Learn what the point of trolling is and the methods they use to wind people up, and you can start to deal with it in a productive way.

Basically, I take the attitude that the OP hasn't got much of a clue or understanding of trolling and thats as much of a problem as the actual trolling itself.

Instead she thinks she thinks the problem 'must be eliminated' by banning it somehow.

Trouble is, you can sit on the beach and scream for the tide to stop, but it never will. You could just get a wetsuit and ride the waves on a surf board and have fun with your other surfer mates though...

SPsTombRaidingWithCliff · 27/10/2013 21:02

I wouldn't pay. I'd just go cold turkey or nick the phone of someone who as paid and is reading on the bus.

Phone theft would go up Grin

Swipe left for the next trending thread