Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Original poster

I'm clearly banned.

303 replies

DollyHaze · 20/08/2012 21:01

Shame, I haven't received an email from MNHQ explaining why.

I started a test thread, and now cannot respond.

This also happened 4 weeks ago, and HQ still haven't replied to my original email.

Wonder if this will be posted?

Very weird MNHQ and bad form. Why not just tell me what I've done and do the decent thing and give me a chance to respond?

OP posts:
DanyTargaryen · 20/08/2012 22:01

I think coming on to a thread with the sole intention of ruffling a few feathers is bad form, myself, Scottishmummy

scottishmummy · 20/08/2012 21:58

well yes.get the rubber neckers askin o'er what you say?
bit of is it isn't it deletion,conspiracy
weird and bad form is speculating with mn masses,who don't know more than op

SchrodingersMew · 20/08/2012 21:56

I suppose but I meant if it was just made up. Would that not be considered trolling?

LookBehindYou · 20/08/2012 21:56

Aren't all of these threads to get attention?

SchrodingersMew · 20/08/2012 21:55

Yep, was having a dizzy moment there I think.

VV curious about this thread, if it was someone just trying to get attention would MNHQ not have deleted it? Confused

scottishmummy · 20/08/2012 21:54

so address technical query mnhq
rather than speculate is I banned
no one here can definitively say yes or no

LookBehindYou · 20/08/2012 21:54

Yes well done scottishmummy.
I think you're taking this a tad seriously.

DanyTargaryen · 20/08/2012 21:53

Fishing for what? She may be genuinely having a technical hitch with MN, and instantly you show contempt and suspicion? Bad form there tbh methinks!

PicklesThePottyMouthedParrot · 20/08/2012 21:53

This thread has gawn all confusing!

scottishmummy · 20/08/2012 21:51

clearly not banned
def fishing though
think shed know if she were v notorious or contentious

LookBehindYou · 20/08/2012 21:51

No I was talking about giraffes as in not tigers. Not referring to a poster.
All clear now? Confused

BlackberryIce · 20/08/2012 21:51

So what has the op done wrong?

DanyTargaryen · 20/08/2012 21:50

scottishmummy, indeed a bit harsh. ?

whenyouseeitwaveorcheer · 20/08/2012 21:49

The secret service does not comment on procedure.

According to google search.

LookBehindYou · 20/08/2012 21:49

A bit harsh scottishmummy.

scottishmummy · 20/08/2012 21:48

if your banned,off you trot then
but i doubt your that interesting

DanyTargaryen · 20/08/2012 21:48

I'm sorry MNHQ, how is that helpful to OP? I'm guessing you have PM'd her now or similar.

SchrodingersMew · 20/08/2012 21:47

Confused That's what I posted.

LookBehindYou · 20/08/2012 21:46

Oh, you meant giraffes, not giraffes

giraffesCantGoBackToSchool · 20/08/2012 21:45
Grin

Yeah it is me I AM the secret service.

Did I ever tell you about my great aunt who was in the SAS?

PicklesThePottyMouthedParrot · 20/08/2012 21:45

Ahaaaa! Thank you. Grin

StealthPolarBear · 20/08/2012 21:44

Why is Olivia being facetious on this thread? Who is the OP? I don't get it!

SchrodingersMew · 20/08/2012 21:44

Because she posted "something" in place of it.

LookBehindYou · 20/08/2012 21:44

Why giraffes?

Confused
IamtheZombie · 20/08/2012 21:44

The Secret Service Does Not Comment On Procedure.