Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Will MNHQ consider installing a 'Hide Poster' function?

180 replies

Get0rf · 02/01/2012 19:04

This has been raised a couple of times, just wondering if MNHQ had any plans to make this an option.

Would be nice to hide the couple of Mners who genuinely get me riled up.

OP posts:
OliviaMumsnet · 02/01/2012 22:38

NB anyone being a real gobshite ought to be reported anyhoo

Get0rf · 02/01/2012 22:36

I hate the thought of off-site calling to arms and all that shite.

I have no idea re narnia gate, thank christ.

OP posts:
scottishmummy · 02/01/2012 22:36

well it's hypothetical given mnhq saying no

BrikSchittHaus · 02/01/2012 22:36

because posters would be able to hide you without you knowing. it just seems really snidey and nasty imo

But surely, we do that with the numpties anyway? I certainly don't waste my energy challenging the nonsense, however I would prefer not to be subjected to it.

90% of this site is amazing, fun and so supportive, tis the 10% I would want to filter.

I think it would be especially useful on the quite painful and personal support threads where you get apologists for rape or abuse, and they just destroy the poster who is asking for help. Or dickhead misogynists derailing the feminism threads, that way the individual has the right to read or ignore.

ps yep am partial to a bit of fforde, the man is very witty. Took me ages to cotton on to Braxton Hicks! Smile

JustHecate · 02/01/2012 22:35

Grin I'd be paranoid Grin I already bloody hate those stupid 'I hate an MNer but I'm not going to tell you who, but I will hint, here's the hints' threads, with everyone going oh yes, I know who you mean, I hate them too. Oh I don't know, pm me...

Always think it's me.

A Hide Poster function would finish me off Grin [sad bastard emoticon]

ThePathanKhansWitch · 02/01/2012 22:35

Yes could you have hide poster please Olivia? And could you let me know who's hid me Grin.

Mutt · 02/01/2012 22:35

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Get0rf · 02/01/2012 22:35

No, Mutt, funnily enough I can cope with a bit of disagreement Hmm

The tone of your posts is pretty argumentative - have a read back. If you disagree, fair enough

Thanks Olivia, I supoose it would be techincally a nightmare (not that I know fuck all about it), especially in light of the namechanging.

OP posts:
scottishmummy · 02/01/2012 22:34

there would be who have you hidden threads,and nippiness
instead of who's your face mn it would be who have you hidden?

LeninGrad · 02/01/2012 22:34

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

rubyrubyruby · 02/01/2012 22:34

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

OracleInaCoracle · 02/01/2012 22:33

because there are plenty of mn "groups" offboard (on twatter/fb etc) and often a "call to arms" will be made to back up your mates. imagine that type of mentality with a hide poster option? a while back there was a furore over a group in OTBT bitching about other posters, safe in the knowledge that they were hidden. and something simillar happened a few years back (narnia-gate) it is naive to think that it wouldnt happen, because it has and would lead to lots of "I hate " threads and encourage sock-puppetry.

Get0rf · 02/01/2012 22:33

Who would be paranoid though? Dp you really think that would happen?

Fair point custy though re inclusiveness.

OP posts:
Mutt · 02/01/2012 22:33

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

MaryZed · 02/01/2012 22:32

I think there is a much more important problem than people feeling left out (though I accept that is a problem).

The real difficult is that if someone is such a gobshite that all regular posters hide them, then all their posts will go unchallenged.

So thread will go like:

OP: AIBU to be upset that my son was called a retard?

Gobshite: YABU, retard is a completely inoffensive word, and he probably is retarded anyway

Everyone else: Natter, natter, ignore gobshite.

OP becomes very upset that no-one has contradicted gobshite, and goes off crying.

I don't see how this can be ok.

Get0rf · 02/01/2012 22:32

It would also be useful when there are certain acts of trolling. Feminisnt board had a lot of particuarly nasty trolls last summer, which took ages to be deleted, it would have been rather useful for people to have just hidden the rape jokes, frankly.

OP posts:
OliviaMumsnet · 02/01/2012 22:31

I am not officially here (day off and all that) but I can say it's highly unlikely.
IIRC (which I may not ) from previous requests the reasons for this are:
Primarily it's not really in the spirit of the site
but also it's technically challenging.
HTH
HNY
Grin

JustHecate · 02/01/2012 22:31

I think you'd still be able to work out what they'd said anyway!

You'd read posts by other people with their name in - so you'd know it's them.

It'd be like listening to one half of a phone conversation - you can get the gist.

And then there's the paranoia. Every time someone didn't reply to you - have they hidden you? do they hate you?

Or even just wondering how many people have hidden you and you don't know about it.

I think it'd feel awful.

Get0rf · 02/01/2012 22:30

I would probably respond Mutt, if your posts on this thread weren't so tiresome. You seem needlessly agressive tbh. This is a perfectly simple request and debate about a function which has been discussed before. Just because you don't agree with it doesn't mean you need to be quite so shirty.

OP posts:
scottishmummy · 02/01/2012 22:28

you need mn to intervene because someone irks you
oh grow up,it reeks of please miss she's annoying me weally weally
you need your own strategies not a mn function button

LoremIpsum · 02/01/2012 22:26

Lissielou, I've never seen that happen though. Why the assumption that it would be used in that way here?

Mutt · 02/01/2012 22:26

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

OracleInaCoracle · 02/01/2012 22:26

but to hijack, thursday next fan? Grin

OracleInaCoracle · 02/01/2012 22:25

You wouldn't be obligated to hide a poster, so how exactly would it affect you and your user experience

because posters would be able to hide you without you knowing. it just seems really snidey and nasty imo

BrikSchittHaus · 02/01/2012 22:24

but surely Mutt, the whole point is that it's optional!

You wouldn't be obligated to hide a poster, so how exactly would it affect you and your user experience?

As clearly stated, it is a widely used function elsewhere, and providing it is implemented in an intelligent way, I can't see the concern.

We don't all read all the posts anyway, there are definitely posters who write drivel that I mentally blank - given the choice I would grey them out such is their propensity to spout nonsense and dish out god awful advice.

Besides, there are a lot more people who read threads, will no-one think of the lurkers?

Surely, like the hide a thread option, it enhances the experience for those who choose to utilise it and everyone else can ignores it.

I'm sure that MNHQ have the ability to trial the function in a fast moving part of the site - say AIBU, and then see how it pans out from there.

So - lovely MNHQ, may we have a trial please?

Grin