Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Mumsnet goes to the European Parliament: your thoughts?

127 replies

KateMumsnet · 03/03/2011 13:25

To mark the centenary of International Women's Day, Mumsnet has been invited to the EU Parliament for a rummage about. So we're off to Strasbourg, in a (possibly doomed) attempt to figure out what impact, if any, this labyrinthine institution has had on the equality of women here in the UK.

We'll be sitting in on a special IWD parliamentary session, where MEPs will be discussing what's been achieved to date to further women's equality across Europe, and debating what the next steps should be. The gender pay gap, the vexed issue of maternity leave, the lack of female decision-makers in business and politics, and the grim figures for female poverty across the EU are all on the agenda.

We'll be frantically trying to make sense of it all as the day unfolds; and with a bit of luck and a following wind we'll collar a couple of MEPs and policy bods along the way to answer your questions, and feed back your views.

So, whether you're entirely au fait with the EU's inner workings, or your heart sinks at the very thought of it, do post your questions, observations, gripes or suggestions here, and we'll try our best to get to the bottom of it all.

OP posts:
KateMumsnet · 08/03/2011 15:13

Right then, it all got a bit more lively after introductions from the authors of the two IWD reports. LOTS of MEPs got up to make very short speeches ? they each get between 1 and 2 mins ? there?s a giant clock counting down to tell them how long they?ve got left, so they panic and speed up dramatically at the end, with the poor translators squeaking to keep up. Not sure what happens if they go over ? a big klaxon?

Most MEPs welcomed the reports - a few said they couldn?t support any moves towards quotas for the boards of listed companies but on the whole reception was positive and sedate.

It all went a bit off-piste when Godfrey Bloom, who?s on the Women?s Rights and Gender Equality Committee for UKIP (notwithstanding his well-rehearsed views in this area), harangued parliament for making ?a dog?s breakfast? of things, repeating his point that UK small businesses would have to be ?stark staring mad to employ a young woman? if the Pregnant Worker?s Directive passes into law (not on the agenda today). On boardroom quotas (?what kind of madness is this?!?) he claimed that no-one would believe that women had got their jobs on merit ? an entirely defensible position only slightly undermined by his roaring that ?none of you have done a real job in your lives or you would UNDERSTAND.? [blinks]

Mass raising of blue cards (how MEPs signal that they want to disagree). Eva Britt Svenson, who?s Chair of the committee, responded that it?s not stark staring mad to want parental leave, and the Nordic countries which go all out for this also have the highest rate of female employment with consequent benefit to their economies (the EU is committed to 75% employability to support an aging population)

Bloom (booming): ?I?m not INTERESTED in your country or others, only in mine! Draconian laws won?t help employment! I wish you would come into the real world ? hands up who?s had a real job!?

This was followed by a sea of blue cards: Edite Estrela (Vice Chair of the commiteee) said that the UK?s problem was that it had weak maternity pay provision, and that 33 weeks of it were little more than symbolic.

Bloom (really quite heated): ?Our problem is that we have given up self-government! THAT?s our problem!?

Estrela: I thank Mr Bloom for his opinions - they are widespread, although those who hold them tend on the whole to keep quiet about it. I want to ask him: are children the children of women only, or of fathers too?

Bloom: Children are the responsibility of their parents and no-one else. Someone shouldn?t have to take responsibility for his neighbour's children. The more personal responsibility we have in the EU and round the world the better the world would be in my view.

And with that, the Member left the Chamber. The Europeans must have been rather taken aback - and that was before a BNP member appeared to compare the resolutions to a Trotskyist plot to persuade people that they were being discriminated against, and decried the fact that the word ?discrimination? had become the ultimate evil.. Hmm

It's all go here.

OP posts:
DamnYouAutocorrect · 08/03/2011 14:06

Any news? Or has Kate been eaten by a Eurocrat?

LeninGrad · 08/03/2011 13:35

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LeninGrad · 08/03/2011 12:03

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

slim22 · 08/03/2011 11:51

BIWI,latin!
my poor y2 child hates me atm.
we are native french speakers so I am naturally constantly driving him absolutely mad with greek and latin etymology.
Ah good old times!

KateMumsnet · 08/03/2011 09:43

Right, after only 30 minutes wandering hopefully through identical corridors, I?ve just found the press gallery in the Chamber (basically a gigantic hollow wooden ball at the centre of the main building.) They?re debating a report on the Institutions? administrative budget and I?m listening via headphones to a simultaneous translation, which in itself is a rather dislocating experience, particularly since I currently have NO IDEA who the various members speaking are or which country they represent.

So far it is very sedate, though one MEP (not British) did just harangue the chair in heavily-accented English over the creation of 50 new posts which ?pay more than the British Prime Minister earns?. She peaked with a bizarrely British tabloid-style declamation: ?STOP this rip-off!!!?. Perhaps she was reading from a speech prepared by the British members of her Euro-sceptic group? It was most odd, though not as odd as the Danish official who told me, while processing my accreditation, that she once bought a black cab in Birmingham on a whim, and drove it back to Denmark.

It?s all a bit boggling so far to be honest.

OP posts:
BecauseImWorthIt · 08/03/2011 09:33

I did three languages when I was at school - French O and A level, German and Latin O levels.

But these days, unless you're at private school (I assume), the option to do one language is limited, and doing two is very rare.

I think it's such a shame.

Heathcliffscathy · 08/03/2011 09:29

I'll have one. I have two european languages plus english.

get us a job while you're there kate would you be a dear?

x

BecauseImWorthIt · 08/03/2011 08:36

Well I'd be amazed if any of our school children would stand a chance. How many of them do even one foreign language now, never mind two?

Hope it goes well today, Kate.

sakura · 08/03/2011 01:59

Like the description of the parliament Grin

I remember trying to apply for an internship but they were all unpaid, so I understood then that you had to have pretty well-off parents to get your foot in the door.

KateMumsnet · 07/03/2011 23:37

One quick observation before I hit the sack - the lovely press officer who's trying to ensure I don't end up in the laundry corridor instead of the Chamber tomorrow pointed out how few of the officials here are British - as the number of schoolchildren studying a European language has declined, so has the number of UK graduates applying for these (pretty fantastic) jobs. Two European languages is a minimum. Thoughts?

OP posts:
KateMumsnet · 07/03/2011 23:17

OK, l'Europe - je suis arrivée! And at only 9 train-hours door-to-door, the continent really is just a hop and a skip away Wink.

So. Strasbourg itself is very pretty. For a comprehensive picture of the European Parliament building, imagine the Telford HQ of a medium-sized conglomerate, scale up x 1000, add a bajillion corridors, walkways and mezzanines, multiply by Heathrow, subtract fresh air and you'll be in the ballpark.

At 9pm the place was still a hive of activity - the entire Parliament shuttles to Strasbourg from Brussels once a month for a plenary session, which today started at 5pm and looked to go on well into the night. Disappointingly all the Eurocrats I've met so far have faces, and couldn't be more friendly and helpful. They are like us Shock (but cheerful and urbane Grin)

Tomorrow I'll be in the Chamber listening to the International Women's Day debates on the 2010 report on Equality Between Men and Women, and on the feminisation of poverty - and then at a smaller discussion about how to increase the numbers of women in positions of influence. With luck I'll also be talking to a policy bod from the Women's Rights and Gender Equality Committee, to get a sense of past achievements and future challenges - so speak now or forever hold your peas if you've got points to make or questions to ask.

OP posts:
MmeLindt · 07/03/2011 13:51

"Minister für Frauen und Gedöns" :o

BecauseImWorthIt · 07/03/2011 13:49

What a brilliant job title!

MmeLindt · 07/03/2011 13:33

That is very interesting, Kate.

BIWI
That German is Swiss, btw.

Although there was Kanzler Schröder who referred to Renate Schmitt, the then head of the Family Ministry as "Minister for Women and other Kerfuffle" so the Germans are not much better.

BecauseImWorthIt · 07/03/2011 09:49

Not only did I not know who my MEP was, having looked at that list I was Shock to realise that I'd never even heard of any of them. Regardless of which party they are members of.

Anything that encourages any government to start thinking about 'parenting' and issue of childcare as a societal one, as opposed to one that only women are responsible for can only be a good thing. It's so frustrating to see it constantly written out as a problem for women. Wills and StillSquiffy's posts are a shocking example of this.

And as for the German banker - cockney rhyming slang never seemed more appropriate.

I'm interested, however, why legoverlil seems to think that MN are taking the devil's shilling? Should we not get involved in such important issues?

KateMumsnet · 06/03/2011 22:14

Good point Leningrad. If 'parent' were a protected characteristic, there wouldn't seem a logical argument against expanding that to 'caring' - anyone?

Also perhaps of interest: thought I should check out how much UK legislation comes from the EU, since it seems to be a heavily-disputed point .

UKIP leader Nigel Farage, in his hugely-enjoyable MN webchat, claimed it was 74%; his more exuberant colleague Daniel Hannan puts it at 84%. David Cameron, before he became PM, reckoned that the figure was nearer 50%.

At the other end of the scale, the House of Commons Library, which is politically neutral, came up with a figure of 9.1%. Which seems rather low.

The problem is that there?s no accepted base standard. UKIP appears to have got its figures from an analysis by the German govt, which has a very different legislative system from the UK. Cameron was talking about both laws and regulations which affect UK businesses; the House of Commons Library considered only ?statutory instruments? - legislation from the EU which passes into UK law by default, without being put before parliament; (although since statutory instruments make up the bulk of all UK legislation, not only the EU-driven stuff, that's potentially not unreasonable). In May 2009, a report by the British Chamber of Commerce found that the EU accounted for around 20 per cent of regulatory legislation in Britain in 2008-09.

Soooo. EU-UK legislative relationship status: It?s Complicated.

This page gives a snapshot of what other EU states reckon the percentage of their national legislation is EU-derived: 6.3 percent according to the Swedish parliament, 12 percent according to the Finnish parliament. The Lithuanians say it's between 12% and 19%.

And the House of Commons Library recently put out a much more comprehensive study of the percentage of UK laws that originate from the EU, and they now reckon on approximately 15%.

Enjoy Wink!

OP posts:
Forster · 06/03/2011 20:43

Kate that is fantastic Smile. I have been involved in this issue for years, and despite the state of the current law and various lobbying by NGO's etc over the current problems the situation for a considerable number of women is dreadful. Many loose their careers/promotions following the advent of children/childbearing years. Current proposals to extend rights of mothers IMHO will paradoxically worsen the situation for mothers as they will be seen as even more as a liability by some employers - though there are some employers who have excellent practice. However realistically I despair of the situation ever improving for the vast majority. If anyone can change this Mumsnet can.

LeninGrad · 06/03/2011 20:30

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

KateMumsnet · 06/03/2011 20:16

I think that's decided by their party MmeLindt - but I'll find out. I agree it seems rather, um, counterintuitive that Godfrey Bloom is on the WRGE committee

Forster I think that's a really interesting proposal and not one which I've heard before. I'll try and explore further when I'm there. Thanks.

OP posts:
Forster · 06/03/2011 20:07

We live in changing times for women, increasing by necssity both parents are more economically active and thus more of parenting is shared than it was in the mid Seventies when the Sex Discrimination Act came into force. However, there is very little protection for men who want to work flexibly and this tends to entrench the position for women and thus the issues mothers and women of childbearing age face in the labour market. Some employers see mothers as a problem and many employers still discriminate against mothers or women of childbearing age.

Were 'parenting' a protected characteristic in the same way as say gender, sexuality, race, age etc.. then IMO this would help to promote equality, it would also simplify the legal position for both mothers and fathers.

MmeLindt · 06/03/2011 17:53

Oh, there is another question then. Who decides which MEP is on which committee? Does anyone know?

Having Godfrey Bloom on the committee for Women's Rights and Equality is like Anger Management Training, led by John Prescott.

JulesJules · 06/03/2011 16:39

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

tribpot · 06/03/2011 16:09

Not only is Godfrey Bloom one of my MEPs but he sits on the committee for Women's Rights and Gender Equality. According to this. I assume he sits on the committee to argue they are bad things?

LindsayWagner · 06/03/2011 15:24

Gosh MmeLindt. It's almost as if he doesn't want women to have a right to equal access to employment, isn't it? Wink