Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Potential change alert: should we make bolding, underlining, links and smileys easier? And what of spellcheck?

111 replies

Tech · 14/07/2010 17:23

Hello all, Following on from the recent discussions on bolding, underlining, links etc, we are thinking of changing the "add a message" box on talk to have a small toolbar above it, a bit like in a word processor. This would have buttons for bold, underline and strikeout that you could use instead of typing ^, * and its mates. The smileys would also be on buttons, and we'd include a link button. If you wanted to add a link you could just click the button and paste in the URL from the other page. You'd see the effects on the text as you were entering it, kind of like a live preview.

Depending how we implement it, it may also support a spelling checker. We'd add a custom dictionary so it recognized mumsnet-isms and didn't complain about them.

So, if we did that, would you like it, love it, hate it? We'd keep the ability to use the manual codes in the text - partly because if you are on a mobile device you might not have the buttons and might have no other option.

So whaddaya reckon? Welcome enhancement or latest regrettable step in an inexorable process of disintegration?

Ta, Tech

OP posts:
maryz · 14/07/2010 19:52

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Quality · 14/07/2010 19:42

No, definately no editing after posting, would make trolling a nightmare, and no coloured typing! WTF would you need colours?

netbook · 14/07/2010 19:33

rather than making changes to the main site which most posters are happy with (there's a spell checker in chrome already) Can't we have the mobile app that has been talked about for months and months please?

Even a text only version would make life easier . There much be good portion of us that use mn on a mobile device of one sort or another.

Please???????

Tech · 14/07/2010 19:07

Hi, just to clarify, there's no suggestion we'll allow editing after posting. I think different text colours are off the menu as well. We are really only looking at the things you can do now, but making them a bit easier.

OP posts:
bunjies · 14/07/2010 19:01

Yep, good idea. I use another forum that has them and it is much easier to use.

TrillianAstra · 14/07/2010 18:52

Editing is BAD. No editing after posting. No no no.

HotSprocket · 14/07/2010 18:52

Sounds better.

Would the spellchecker be annoying about typing usernames though? I suppose it's probably not done enough to be that bad.

RustyBear · 14/07/2010 18:48

Retiredgoth - my iPhone/iPad don't autocorrect fucking - presumably I've used it often enough for my phone to recognise it!

It also changed 'WTD' to 'WTF'.

Oh, and Boden becomes 'bodensee' for me, not Biden.

JackieNo · 14/07/2010 18:44

Yes to bold, underline etc. Don't care about spellcheck. I still do links the old way , and would still like to be able to type the smileys too.

BeenBeta · 14/07/2010 18:43

YES!

Absolutley. This site is brilliant many ways but technically it is light years behind other forums in terms of spell check, editing after a post is made, range of smileys available, etc.

I dont want jazy colours etc but making a post a bit more like word processing would be great.

Any chance we could have avatars too so we have a pictoral identity?

maryz · 14/07/2010 18:42

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Quality · 14/07/2010 18:39

Sounds like a good idea, am normally on mobile so definately stay with both ways too.

YunoYurbubson · 14/07/2010 18:38

Yes please!

SanctiMoanyArse · 14/07/2010 18:37

I think i'd find it very helpful

Though no no no to coloured typing

2shoes · 14/07/2010 18:27

sounds good to me

catinthehat2 · 14/07/2010 18:15

Good idea, when will it start?

Tortoise · 14/07/2010 18:03

Sounds great.
Have spell checker on browser so not desperate for that.

SpawnChorus · 14/07/2010 18:00

Will it involve any "downtime"? Because if you're planning on stealing any of my MN minutes to implement this then NO.

GreatGooglyMoogly · 14/07/2010 17:59

Brilliant idea - much easier!

chocolatefroggie · 14/07/2010 17:57

sounds great!

Tech · 14/07/2010 17:55

Just a quick tip for the iphoners, if you want to stop it suggesting words. Try typing number 5 then move your cursor behind it, so that as you type "Boden" it looks like b5 then bo5, bod5, bode5 etc.

The 5 flummoxes the auto-correct thing - it can't figure out what word you could be typing - and it stops suggesting words. Keep typing your whole message suggestion free, and when you've done just delete the 5 at the end. It doesn't have to be 5. Uncommon letter combos like zc will work as well.

By the by, if we did spellcheck it wouldn't be autocorrect, more like wavy lines under words to warn you of a spelling anomaly.

OP posts:
ViveLaFrak · 14/07/2010 17:54

Hmmmm.

I don't like change. MN is simple. Don't make buttons complicated.

Or maybe have an option so you don't get them in classic view?

Fimbo · 14/07/2010 17:52

I still do links the old fashioned way

TrillianAstra · 14/07/2010 17:50

As long as the current ways still work you can set up an easy way to link for wimps and we experts can keen typing away.

JJ · 14/07/2010 17:47

Good lord, a visual editor? What next? A mobile friendly version? Oh wait, yes, that is next isn't it?

It's a slippery slope though.

Swipe left for the next trending thread