Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think some weekly shops contain far too many snacks?and this is not grocery shopping!?

531 replies

Upsetbetty · 17/08/2026 10:59

AIBU to think that the amount of processed snacks people buy in their grocery shopping is getting ridiculous? Watching people share their grocery shop on instagram etc and I can’t see what meals they can even make as it’s all snacks?? And then they say oh grocery shopping is so expensive!Do people really do this? I don’t buy any biscuits, fizzy drinks (18-20 pack slabs) or crisps as a part of me weekly family shop. I buy the meat, veg and pantry items. That is my weekly shopping. I buy one packet of oat bars for my DCs lunches. If my dc want a snack they have fruit, yogurt, homemade flapjacks etc.

OP posts:
OonaStubbs · 26/08/2026 08:10

Why do some people get so angry about the thought of junk food being banned? We already have restrictions on what can and cannot be sold as food.

Blued0t · 26/08/2026 07:27

CandiedPrincess · 25/08/2026 16:05

And obesity isn’t just caused by eating UPFs…

Ok well research shows a strong link between eating ultra-processed foods and a higher risk of both cancer and heart disease which are massive drains on the NHS so 🤷‍♀️

mulberrymilk · 26/08/2026 03:43

Toenailz · 25/08/2026 22:11

And nothing helps some types of chronic illness regardless, or other illnesses/diseases. The suffering is suffering is suffering is suffering.

The level of that suffering vs if they had other illnesses on top, would have to measured on a case by case basis.

Are you unaware that there are many illnesses that will kill the patient before a bad diet does, too?

Imagine perhaps telling a terminally ill cancer patient, just as an example, who has been given a timeline: 'oh well, having a shit diet and eating what you want to eat now in what time you have left is REALLY going to help, isn't it?'. I imagine they'll eat what the fuck they want, and quite rightly so.

Live your life, other people will live theirs. People who concern themselves with other peoples personal choices are a fucking bore. And tend to be rather narcissistic. Shove your diet down your own throat, not other peoples.

Speaking of being rather narcissistic, it is great to meet the only person on the planet who has ever had experience of chronic, painful, longterm, and incurable illness!

Leaving aside my own personal experience with such - which triggered my interest in the role of diet in improving the gut microbiome, and hence enhancing the function of the immune system, and increasing serotonin, the vast bulk of which is manufactured by the gut microbiome, and other helpful healing and uplifting neurotransmitters and other substances like BDNF - I lost my first friend to brain cancer when in primary school.

She was not the last to die too young. I have probably attended more funerals of friends than you have had hot (healthy) dinners.

My point was that getting fatty liver disease and type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome and all the consequences of that, etc etc, does not enhance one's life experience at any time - and it is obviously not helpful for anyone suffering any from any form of chronic illness to pile insult onto injury, healthwise.

The extreme rage in your response, and the energy behind the insults you felt the need to hurl at me for pointing that fact out, is another factor that is not helpful. Being on the receiving end of that is also not helpful to me.

As you seem committed to ignoring health advice - it's not mine, or "my diet", it is the health advice of the WHO, the CDC, Harvard Medical School, you name it - then you will continue to reap what you sow, I guess.

mulberrymilk · 26/08/2026 01:03

Shove your diet down your own throat, not other peoples.

That's lovely.

Toenailz · 25/08/2026 22:11

mulberrymilk · 23/08/2026 23:34

Nothing helps improve a serious chronic illness like courting another half dozen of them through downplaying the role of UPFs and diet in general creating serious chronic illnesses that are lifestyle related - like fatty liver, type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, dementia, etc etc etc etc.

And nothing helps some types of chronic illness regardless, or other illnesses/diseases. The suffering is suffering is suffering is suffering.

The level of that suffering vs if they had other illnesses on top, would have to measured on a case by case basis.

Are you unaware that there are many illnesses that will kill the patient before a bad diet does, too?

Imagine perhaps telling a terminally ill cancer patient, just as an example, who has been given a timeline: 'oh well, having a shit diet and eating what you want to eat now in what time you have left is REALLY going to help, isn't it?'. I imagine they'll eat what the fuck they want, and quite rightly so.

Live your life, other people will live theirs. People who concern themselves with other peoples personal choices are a fucking bore. And tend to be rather narcissistic. Shove your diet down your own throat, not other peoples.

BleedinglyObvious · 25/08/2026 21:27

CandiedPrincess · 25/08/2026 16:05

And obesity isn’t just caused by eating UPFs…

UPFs are often food that are moreish, so one would be more likely to overindulge.

CandiedPrincess · 25/08/2026 16:05

Blued0t · 24/08/2026 22:14

It shouldn’t be as obesity is one of the biggest drains on the NHS but UPFs don’t just cause obesity…

And obesity isn’t just caused by eating UPFs…

Blued0t · 24/08/2026 22:14

CandiedPrincess · 24/08/2026 19:39

If we're going to go down that road...there's a very long list of things our taxes fund for that I am disgruntled with. Obesity is further down the list than most.

It shouldn’t be as obesity is one of the biggest drains on the NHS but UPFs don’t just cause obesity…

mulberrymilk · 24/08/2026 21:49

ThatBliddyWoman · 24/08/2026 19:05

I do agree overall but it just wouldn't work. People would start making it illegally for one. And then there's people like me who have one day off every 3 weeks or so(I low carb/high protein most of the time as I am always at the gym) who deserve some 'junk' now and again. Noting inverted commas, is there a full definition of junk food? I know there is of UPFs. But really what is 'junk'? Is UPF junk but other things junk too? Sugar and fat aren't UPFs on their own nor are all foods heavy in them. Lard isn't a UPF but wouldn't be banned if we banned UPFs. Lard isn't even a junk food on its own IMO (although I am vegan so obviously do wish it didn't even exist).

Ultra-processed foods are full of fat and sugar in proportions designed to make you eat more of them and crave them; they are modified and moulded and go through multiple industrial processes that cannot be replicated in a home kitchen. They are full of man-made ingedients unavailable to the home cook - like emulsifiers, preservatives, antioxidants, artificial colours and flavours.

Fast food is mostly "junk food", but may or may not be UPF. Most supermarket "food" is UPF, with a limited amount fresh or frozen, and much of it is processed. Processed food - a tin of baked beans eg - is not the problem. It's the ultra-processing, all the ingredients that if you read a packet whose names make no sense and the list goes on and on and on, that indicates UPF.

CandiedPrincess · 24/08/2026 19:39

Blued0t · 24/08/2026 09:03

When their entire diet is UP heavy(when you start honestly looking you realise how UP heavy many diets are)and then treats are even higher UP foods it is the business of others as our taxes fund the NHS.

If we're going to go down that road...there's a very long list of things our taxes fund for that I am disgruntled with. Obesity is further down the list than most.

BleedinglyObvious · 24/08/2026 19:36

The home made junk would probably be lower in additives.

OonaStubbs · 24/08/2026 19:19

Even if people did start making it illegally it'd be better that having it for sale in supermarkets ready to eat. Having to put the time and effort in to make it would dissuade people from eating so much of it.

ThatBliddyWoman · 24/08/2026 19:05

OonaStubbs · 24/08/2026 17:42

Why can't we just ban junk food? Can anyone give me one good reason why not?

I do agree overall but it just wouldn't work. People would start making it illegally for one. And then there's people like me who have one day off every 3 weeks or so(I low carb/high protein most of the time as I am always at the gym) who deserve some 'junk' now and again. Noting inverted commas, is there a full definition of junk food? I know there is of UPFs. But really what is 'junk'? Is UPF junk but other things junk too? Sugar and fat aren't UPFs on their own nor are all foods heavy in them. Lard isn't a UPF but wouldn't be banned if we banned UPFs. Lard isn't even a junk food on its own IMO (although I am vegan so obviously do wish it didn't even exist).

OonaStubbs · 24/08/2026 17:42

Why can't we just ban junk food? Can anyone give me one good reason why not?

2026letsgo · 24/08/2026 10:16

And it’s the normalisation of treat foods as staple foods.
I see lunchboxes for kids that are literally just crisps, sweets, processed cakes, string “cheese” or processed ham and crackers.
No veg, fruit, salad or even a slightly less processed sandwich.

Blued0t · 24/08/2026 09:03

CandiedPrincess · 23/08/2026 18:53

Nobody is saying don’t have treats( that said treats don’t need to be UP food).

But if people want their treats to be UPF that's their own call. And really nobody else's business.

When their entire diet is UP heavy(when you start honestly looking you realise how UP heavy many diets are)and then treats are even higher UP foods it is the business of others as our taxes fund the NHS.

2026letsgo · 24/08/2026 09:02

timtamsarebetterthanpenguins · 23/08/2026 19:21

But of course they sell a lot of it, because that's what they sell...it's a bit like saying Waterstones sells a lot of books, or Costa sells a lot of coffee.

But they also sell unprocessed food, people just buy proportionably less.

As mentioned before even food is UPF now wasn’t so much previously. Chocolate and bread being obvious ones. Emulsifiers are relatively new, palm oil in everything in new. That’s before the E numbers.

mulberrymilk · 24/08/2026 02:40

This simple little article spells it out.

The Lancet report is great news in that there are concrete steps you can take to reduce dementia risk.

It really is about the individual working on what is in their control.

Targeting 14 lifestyle factors may prevent up to 45% of dementia cases | Cognitive Vitality | Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation

mulberrymilk · 24/08/2026 02:37

HauntedBungalow · 24/08/2026 02:25

You didn't read your own link.

From it :
It’s important to note that this doesn’t mean that individual cases can be attributed to either ‘lifestyle’ or ‘non-lifestyle’ factors.

They look at global statistics, not actual traceable causation. From those statistics, they extrapolate around health and environmental factors associated with the disease. None of the activities or environmental factors cause the disease, as far as they know, just potentially increase the risk. And of the factors listed just three - obesity, smoking and excess drinking - are individual life choices. These combined increase risk by potentially 4%. Obesity taken alone potentially increases risk by 1%. The absolute biggest risk factor by far is age.

Edited

That is not what all the research I have read says.

You could google "the Lancet" and "dementia" to see their findings on the risk factors, or do your own reading if you want.

Alzheimer's is now referred to by many in the field as "type 3 diabetes", and linked to the increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes as a diet and lifestyle induced disease. But by all means dig your own grave with your fork or fingers.

HauntedBungalow · 24/08/2026 02:25

You didn't read your own link.

From it :
It’s important to note that this doesn’t mean that individual cases can be attributed to either ‘lifestyle’ or ‘non-lifestyle’ factors.

They look at global statistics, not actual traceable causation. From those statistics, they extrapolate around health and environmental factors associated with the disease. None of the activities or environmental factors cause the disease, as far as they know, just potentially increase the risk. And of the factors listed just three - obesity, smoking and excess drinking - are individual life choices. These combined increase risk by potentially 4%. Obesity taken alone potentially increases risk by 1%. The absolute biggest risk factor by far is age.

mulberrymilk · 24/08/2026 01:50

HauntedBungalow · 24/08/2026 00:52

Dementia isn't a lifestyle related disease.

Yes, it is. Substantially so, for the most part; particularly vascular dementia. Even if you have the APOE gene variants linked to Alzheimer's there is a marked reduction in risk with focus on diet and lifestyle factors under your control.

This was shown in the Lancet years ago, and updated in 2024 to 14 risk factors involving diet and lifestyle. It's common knowledge now.

Addressing 14 health and lifestyle factors could prevent nearly half of global dementia cases - Alzheimer's Research UK

Many dementia researchers think it is more like 60% and some say 90% preventable through diet and lifestyle, though there are lifestyle factors (pollution etc) beyond people's control.

Addressing 14 health and lifestyle factors could prevent nearly half of global dementia cases - Alzheimer's Research UK

New research reveals addressing 14 health and lifestyle factors throughout our lives could prevent or delay nearly half (45%) of dementia cases.

https://www.alzheimersresearchuk.org/news/nearly-half-of-global-dementia-cases-could-be-prevented-or-delayed-by-addressing-14-health-and-lifestyle-factors-says-new-report/

HauntedBungalow · 24/08/2026 00:52

Dementia isn't a lifestyle related disease.

mulberrymilk · 23/08/2026 23:34

Toenailz · 23/08/2026 03:51

Oh and before anyone else says it, no I am not afraid of serious illness either. Having lived the vast majority of my life since a teenager with a severe, debilitating illness (that no, is NOT cured OR managed by diet) and having suffered so badly I've cried in my bed wanting to it to end and that I can just 'go now' at various points in life. Actually, I quite enjoy a good chocolate bar, coke, and whatever else I fancy. If it brings me some enjoyment, amongst other non-diet related things in life, I'll do it. There aint much of that in this world for a lot of people.

I'm not getting out alive, and I'm not getting out without some suffering, and neither are most people.

(Waiting with amusement to be told by the clean diet freaks that have no idea what my illness is, that actually yes, it is improved by diet because all things are..). Nope.

Nothing helps improve a serious chronic illness like courting another half dozen of them through downplaying the role of UPFs and diet in general creating serious chronic illnesses that are lifestyle related - like fatty liver, type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, dementia, etc etc etc etc.

SquirrelGG · 23/08/2026 21:26

BleedinglyObvious · 23/08/2026 12:16

I meant you can get a better breakfast than McDonalds. I'd go to the 'greasy spoon' up the road or the 'Spoon.

It sounds a lot like 'My uncle smoked 80 Woodbines a day and lived to be 89'.

I don't live in the UK, in fact I live in a country where the healthy life expectancy is apparently a decade higher. There is no 'greasy spoon' up the road from me.

Incidentally two of my grandparents did smoke and lived until their mid 80s, my GM was a chain smoker. Not that I am advocating smoking.

BleedinglyObvious · 23/08/2026 20:38

@timtamsarebetterthanpenguins , It's more like saying that a bookshop stocks a lot of magazines and trashy novels but not much classical fiction.