WIBU to call out a man for using ladies loo?

Really?

Never seen that happen and I am 61 years old with DH with IBS

Does it matter?

No adult male makes that mistake. But you know that

A) i am a man b). To go into any disabled loo in the circumstances the op described you have to pass a large fuck off sign of a woman. My dad was illiterate but never once used the ladies

Why are you defending the dirty perv...there are similar disabled loos clearly signposted in the men's?

I think there is something strange about a man walking past the “Women’s“ signage to enter the toilet area designated for women.

If he was on his own and walking unaided he probably had the mobility to use a cubicle on the men’s side. It seems unlikely that the male disabled cubicle and all the male standard cubicles were occupied.

Also, when challenged he only argued that the women’s disabled cubicle was separate from the main women’s section. If he genuinely had been forced into the woman’s side because there was no cubicle available to him a more normal response would be to apologise to the several women he had clearly made uncomfortable.

He may have needed to use the loo urgently, maybe had an invisible disability and the gents loos were all busy. If this was the case, no wonder the poor chap was embarassed.

He wasn't a woman and didn't have a baby so he must have had a disability. If the equivalent facility in the men's side was in use I wouldn't have a problem with him using the one on the ladies side, as it was completely separate to the main block of loos.

They were in the men’s as well. He chose to use the women’s, walking past the women’s sign to do it.

No you don’t know that. He saw where the disabled toilets where and went in. He didn’t go into the ladies at all

So within the ladies area (past the ladies sign) there was a separate disabled and baby change area, and the same on the men's side?
This is an unusual set up, not one that I have ever seen. It doubles the cost of providing these facilities.
Most baby change areas and accessible toilets are unisex and found in between the men's and women's.

For baby changing, I think a unisex, family friendly set up is the way to go, so any parents and children combination of any sex can use them.

I imagine disabled women would quite like having an accessible toilet just for women - but again they might need helpers who could be of either sex, so it should be in a unisex area.

To answer your question - you were right to challenge him.

Do you mean to say there was also a disabled access loo for men? If not, and he needed such a facility, he had little choice but to find his way to the Ladies’ one.
Baby changing rooms should not be within the Ladies’ area anyway. Men do cart infants around, and need to change nappies when out and about.

Not that I’m an apologist of men being within our loo spaces, not at all. But in this case, as it stands, any ill intentions have not been established by OP. .

This.

It’s an entirely separate and self contained cubicle so what’s the issue? He didn’t actually go into or pass anything except the ladies sign - he didn’t see any women using the toilets and seems to just have used the toilet and then left… your OP makes no mention of pervy behaviour, lingering, looking or comments.

If it was roles reversed and a woman used the disabled toilet technically in the gents nobody would care.

Was he pretending to be a woman?

Good for you. You know he's trying to catch a glimpse into the actual ladies and this is a way of doing it.

Sick cunt