Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Inheritance with grandchildren and step grandchildren

363 replies

DogsInThePaddlingPool · 14/08/2026 12:01

My mum has recently told us she has updated her will. She has decided not to leave anything to me or my siblings but to leave it to our children instead. She has explained that as we are all settled and financially stable, she wants to help the younger ones who it will be harder for.

I have 2 children, my brother has 3 children and my sister has 2 children and 2 step children. My mum is leaving equal amounts to her 7 biological grandchildren and then a much smaller amount to my sisters step children. The step children have been in our family since they were 4 and 5 and are now 19 and 20.

My sister has had a row with my mum because she feels her step children should get the same as the rest of the grandchildren. My mum isn’t budging.

My sister wants me and my brother to tell our mum that she is being unfair. We don’t want to get involved and have said it’s her money and her decision.

My sister hasn’t made any contact with any of us for the last month since we said we wouldn’t side with her.

Are we being unreasonable? Is my mum being unreasonable?

OP posts:
QueenietheGreat · 14/08/2026 13:56

@DogsInThePaddlingPool
Sorry last line of message should've read:-
You're all lucky your mum didn't spend it on wine, gigolos and song and waste the rest!

Iyamnotayam · 14/08/2026 13:56

Your sister is being unreasonable.
You are not being unreasonable. You've taken the stance it's not your money and not your business.
Your mum isn't being unreasonable, she can do what she wants with her money.

I disagree with my mum and step dads inheritance plans. But it's not something I feel a particular sense of injustice about, and it's certainly not something I would request they reassess or change. It's not my money, not my decision and the reality is it may all get spent on care home fees down the line. I would just personally divide it differently if I was in their position.

Coconutter24 · 14/08/2026 13:56

SandyHappyPerson · 14/08/2026 13:49

Yes, I would be disgusted that my mum chose that for her legacy, not born out of fairness or actually caring that children/grandchildren are treated equally within a family, but of exclusion and control to make sure some are purposely excluded.

My mum tried to treat one of my siblings differently in her will before she died, I understood why but I talked to her about it from a human point of view to say that the only one that would have problems is the ones left behind, she wouldn't see the hurt or resentment that decision would cause, I was the executor so knew it would be me being the bearer of bad news.. IMO at a time when siblings need to be close and pull together as a family, something like this can really blow them apart, forever sometimes.. My mum hadn't even thought about it.

OPs mum has not only thought about it, she has done it on purpose knowing it will cause upset.. skipping a generation only because you don't want your daughter to treat her kids equally is pretty ruthless to be honest.. but it is her decision at the end of the day.

Is it really worth it though?

How do you know she has done it to cause upset? You don’t know her or what she’s like as a person to make that assumption. How do you know she has given more to her biological grandchildren because they are from her bloodline (some people do care about that) and she’s given a smaller amount to the step children because she may know or think they will also inherit from another set of grandparents also?
Her reasoning for why she skipped her own children wasn’t because she wanted to spite anyone it was because they are all financially secure and wanted to help the grandchildren because they likely need it more.

DogsInThePaddlingPool · 14/08/2026 13:55

WhyDoPeople · 14/08/2026 13:50

No, it's just what a decent parent would do.

My mum has always been a great mum to us and a lovely grandmother too. I don5 think her leaving less to the step children takes anything away from that.

OP posts:
WonderfulSmith · 14/08/2026 13:54

PeachMelbaYoghurt · 14/08/2026 13:13

Wow! Leaving people in that situation is really shitty!

It's much better to have open discussions before writing Wills, so that there is no resentment & fighting left after the death.

I’ll do what I like with my money thanks. I don’t have children, or any family, to leave it to so anyone who does get anything can consider themselves lucky.

Grendel7 · 14/08/2026 13:54

DogsInThePaddlingPool · 14/08/2026 12:01

My mum has recently told us she has updated her will. She has decided not to leave anything to me or my siblings but to leave it to our children instead. She has explained that as we are all settled and financially stable, she wants to help the younger ones who it will be harder for.

I have 2 children, my brother has 3 children and my sister has 2 children and 2 step children. My mum is leaving equal amounts to her 7 biological grandchildren and then a much smaller amount to my sisters step children. The step children have been in our family since they were 4 and 5 and are now 19 and 20.

My sister has had a row with my mum because she feels her step children should get the same as the rest of the grandchildren. My mum isn’t budging.

My sister wants me and my brother to tell our mum that she is being unfair. We don’t want to get involved and have said it’s her money and her decision.

My sister hasn’t made any contact with any of us for the last month since we said we wouldn’t side with her.

Are we being unreasonable? Is my mum being unreasonable?

OP I feel for you. My parents did the same except that I had children and my brother did not. So when my parents passed,my brother got half plus their house and my kids got the other half. I got nothing. It is unfair but thats the way they wanted it so...

Another2Cats · 14/08/2026 13:54

PeterRabbitsWhiskers · 14/08/2026 13:25

That is not how IHT works. It is based on the size of the estate of the deceased person, not who or how many they leave it to.

What I believe the PP was alluding to was that if an elderly parent, say in their late 80s or early 90s, left their estate to their children then those children would themselves be in their 60s at least.

It is likely that any of these children might then have an estate (from their own wealth plus their inheritance) on which IHT is due.

So there would be a second payout of IHT when the child dies a few years later.

In contrast, if the estate passes to the grandchildren instead then the amount passed to each grandchild will be smaller (presuming that there are more grandchildren than children) and there will be a much longer time period before the grandchildren pass away.

AnonyMumAuDHD · 14/08/2026 13:53

Sorry, but if step grandchildren have other family that they will inherit from - and her bio grandchildren obviously won’t - then the step grandchildren are hugely advantaged by receiving anything at all, surely? Because they will inherit via their own mother?

If that person is absent and there is no family, then maybe things will seem unfair but ultimately is it the GMs responsibility to address the inequities of the life decision of the sgc’s parent’s decisions? I mean, where does that stop?

stillavid · 14/08/2026 13:53

The skipping a generation only works if they children are vvv secure financially really and not that many people are as divorce, bereavement can change things a lot.

Personally I would be happy for it to go straight to my children as would save me giving them house deposits etc so would even out really but not everyone is in that situation.

SandyHappyPerson · 14/08/2026 13:52

DogsInThePaddlingPool · 14/08/2026 13:46

No I said ‘if’.

It’s not our business and we can’t tell our mum what to do with her money. I wouldn’t care if she left the same to the step children but she hasn’t.

I get you don't want to tell her what to do, but how do you feel about it?

Skipping the generation to ensure certain grandchildren are left out would bother me in all honesty.

OnlyMabelInTheBuilding · 14/08/2026 13:51

She’s clearly done it so your DS can’t split her shares between the DSC equally.

Its your DM’s choice; you are correct to stay out of it,

People who bring kids/marry someone with kids really need to sort this stuff in their own minds before the get together, instead of losing the plot at family members who are never consulted

QueenietheGreat · 14/08/2026 13:51

@DogsInThePaddlingPool
Sorry slight correction to my message
Last line should read:-
You're all

Darkenmydarkness · 14/08/2026 13:51

fundamentallyauthentic · 14/08/2026 13:30

But that scenario means that the partners of the children who received inheritances could effectively take some of the inheritance in the event of divorce / divorces.

Same goes for the grandchildren.

WhyDoPeople · 14/08/2026 13:50

Millytante · 14/08/2026 13:50

A slap in the face? Is inheriting money from one’s parents a human right, then?

No, it's just what a decent parent would do.

DogsInThePaddlingPool · 14/08/2026 13:50

WhyDoPeople · 14/08/2026 13:47

What a slap in the face, skipping a generation. Hope she enjoyed her inheritance from her own parents.

She didn’t inherit anything from her parents and her wealth is entirely self made from owning her own business. I don’t interpret it as a slap in the face. I think it’s nice that my she is helping our children.

OP posts:
Millytante · 14/08/2026 13:50

WhyDoPeople · 14/08/2026 13:47

What a slap in the face, skipping a generation. Hope she enjoyed her inheritance from her own parents.

A slap in the face? Is inheriting money from one’s parents a human right, then?

WorthyMintKoala · 14/08/2026 13:49

If your mum is set on skipping her children then I agree with how she’s done it, and I agree you should stay out of it.

I think your sister is out of order on many counts.

i think ideally it would be left to the 3 children and they then divvy up how they want. Or whatever the lower amount is that has been left to the step children, give the same amount to all grand children too then whatever is left split between the 3 children and they can divide up how they wish within their own family.

SandyHappyPerson · 14/08/2026 13:49

Coconutter24 · 14/08/2026 13:35

Disgusted, really? It’s not about her caring about the money after she dies, it’s about caring that her biological grandchildren have the money after she dies. She is still leaving some to the step children just a smaller amount.

Yes, I would be disgusted that my mum chose that for her legacy, not born out of fairness or actually caring that children/grandchildren are treated equally within a family, but of exclusion and control to make sure some are purposely excluded.

My mum tried to treat one of my siblings differently in her will before she died, I understood why but I talked to her about it from a human point of view to say that the only one that would have problems is the ones left behind, she wouldn't see the hurt or resentment that decision would cause, I was the executor so knew it would be me being the bearer of bad news.. IMO at a time when siblings need to be close and pull together as a family, something like this can really blow them apart, forever sometimes.. My mum hadn't even thought about it.

OPs mum has not only thought about it, she has done it on purpose knowing it will cause upset.. skipping a generation only because you don't want your daughter to treat her kids equally is pretty ruthless to be honest.. but it is her decision at the end of the day.

Is it really worth it though?

eatreadsleeprepeat · 14/08/2026 13:48

SandyHappyPerson · 14/08/2026 13:16

Wow.. If this was my mum I'd be disgusted with her and I'd tell her. People who care so much about what happens to their money after they have gone have got control issues IMO, she WANTS you all to know now, knowing full well it is going to cause issues with your sister feeling like some of her children as being treated as lesser beings.

Out of interest does she not like the step children? Because if what you posted above is actually true, that problem would be solved by leaving it nine ways instead of 7, no one would be getting 'less' then, completely fair all around for everyone.. so why not do that if she is so concerned about sisters kids having less than their cousins?..

100% she is doing this to make a point.

A will is called a will for a very good reason. It is you expressing you will about what happens to your possessions after your death. Legally and socially we expect people to do this so I don’t think we should criticise anyone for wanting to determine what happens after their death. It isn’t being a control freak, it is good planning.
If I am still around when my gc reach young adulthood then I might decide to do the same and skip a generation (obviously apart from the third I need to leave to my children). We have helped our children financially already and I feel sorry for young people today as they face an uphill struggle.

WhyDoPeople · 14/08/2026 13:47

What a slap in the face, skipping a generation. Hope she enjoyed her inheritance from her own parents.

Seeingadistance · 14/08/2026 13:47

Morepositivemum · 14/08/2026 12:37

Why do people tell their family what they’ll do with wills.?!

Why do people tell their extended family to treat unrelated children, with whom they did not choose to have a relationship, as if they are related?

DogsInThePaddlingPool · 14/08/2026 13:46

SandyHappyPerson · 14/08/2026 13:40

If she is doing it to make point, then it’s still nothing to do with us.

So you acknowledge she is doing it this way just to make a point then.. you know full well that your mum has only done her will this way to stop your sister from being able to treat her own 4 children as equals.. wouldn't you feel singled out if this was you? I couldn't be so cold towards my sister as to shrug and say 'not my problem' .. it is your mum's decision at the end of the day, but she has done it this way to exert control, nothing more nothing less.

I think people need to re-read this part, it's important:

If she leaves it equally to us, my sisters biological children would get less as she would share it with her step children. My mum doesn’t want that as she would have done her will differently.

No I said ‘if’.

It’s not our business and we can’t tell our mum what to do with her money. I wouldn’t care if she left the same to the step children but she hasn’t.

OP posts:
QueenietheGreat · 14/08/2026 13:44

@DogsInThePaddlingPool
Its your mother's money, so she can do whatever she darn well likes!
Your sister is being unreasonable
And is she a great conversationalist anyway?
So tough titty to that
Youre all lucky your mum didn't waste it on wine, gigolos and song then waste the rest!!

hattie43 · 14/08/2026 13:41

Step children are not blood and will have relatives of their own possibly to received inheritance from . The other thing is the more people the money is split between the lesser value so between 7 it could be deposits on a home and 9 it could be just a second hand small car .

Paganpentacle · 14/08/2026 13:41

Move22 · 14/08/2026 12:43

Wow! Those posters saying ‘all children have four grandparents!’ Seriously?!

Yes?