Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Who peeked?

341 replies

youalright · 12/08/2026 19:17

Admit it who peeked, can't of just been me 🤣🤣🤣

OP posts:
Thread gallery
35
youalright · 13/08/2026 18:03

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 16:34

Good luck to you

I'd respond but I can't read your comment as im blind from looking at the sun for 2 seconds 👩‍🦯

OP posts:
Janecat23 · 13/08/2026 18:03

Yes. Kept wondering if I’d wake up blind. Then discovered DS no2 used to do dares with his friend to see who could stare at the sun the longest 🙄. Thankfully he isn’t blind either but honestly there are some things you don’t want to know 🤦🏽‍♀️.

BagsyTimBradford · 13/08/2026 18:02

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 14:09

BBC

"After the previous total eclipse of the sun that was visible in the UK in 1999, around 70 people were left with damaged sight.

"Many of them had spent less than a minute looking at the spectacle, without realising they were harming their eyes."

Presumably those 70 people had immediate issues for the numbers to be attributed to watching the eclipse. What won't be known is how it contributed in those that went on to develop sight loss due to macula degeneration,
of which sun damage is a big factor.

Protect your peepers peeps, wear decent sunglasses when in the sun going forward. 😎

youalright · 13/08/2026 18:00

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 14:19

She started a thread about looking at the eclipse punctuated with many laughing emojis. I don't think she's all there.

Excuse me. I would rather be bad at English then be nasty. Mumsnet is for everyone people who english isn't their first language. People like me who missed a lot of education due to disability, people with dyslexia. Maybe be a little bit mindful that not everyone had the same life and upbringing as you and check your privelage.

OP posts:
Hohumbrumbrum · 13/08/2026 17:32

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 16:38

Actually less than that, milliseconds too, but I don't think some of you 'peekers' are quite ready for that level

Of course it technically does.
But use a bit of logic here. Most of the cases involved more than a minute, and I don't think there's any doubt that risk is correlated to length of exposure.

So yes it is theoretically possible the all 28 people who viewed it for less than a minute, got damaged from one second of viewing or less, then nothing for the other 59 seconds, and then all the other injuries take place at more than the minute mark. But surely you realise that makes no sense

Out of curiosity, for those of us who peaked, should we have stared at it for a minute instead? Is the risk the same?

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 16:38

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 16:36

Less than a minute is inclusive of 1 second, 2 seconds, 3 seconds... It includes seconds 1 to 59

Edited

Actually less than that, milliseconds too, but I don't think some of you 'peekers' are quite ready for that level

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 16:36

Hohumbrumbrum · 13/08/2026 14:45

Yes, this is what I mean. It was 70 people, 28 of which looked for less than a minute (which is quite a long time).

Less than a minute is inclusive of 1 second, 2 seconds, 3 seconds... It includes seconds 1 to 59

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 16:34

nomas · 13/08/2026 14:21

It’s not that deep. Lots of people have said they looked.

Good luck to you

ManipulativeLiar · 13/08/2026 16:17

Allseeingallknowing · 13/08/2026 14:21

Considering all the information and publicity about this, I can only conclude the idiots who peeked belonged to the “ it won’t happen to me club!”

Exactly. They seem to think they are daring rebels rather than ignorant idiots

Hohumbrumbrum · 13/08/2026 14:45

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 14:09

BBC

"After the previous total eclipse of the sun that was visible in the UK in 1999, around 70 people were left with damaged sight.

"Many of them had spent less than a minute looking at the spectacle, without realising they were harming their eyes."

Yes, this is what I mean. It was 70 people, 28 of which looked for less than a minute (which is quite a long time).

Sahara123 · 13/08/2026 14:36

No, because I value my eyesight

Allseeingallknowing · 13/08/2026 14:21

Considering all the information and publicity about this, I can only conclude the idiots who peeked belonged to the “ it won’t happen to me club!”

nomas · 13/08/2026 14:21

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 14:19

She started a thread about looking at the eclipse punctuated with many laughing emojis. I don't think she's all there.

It’s not that deep. Lots of people have said they looked.

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 14:19

iloveanearlynight · 13/08/2026 13:47

*Can't HAVE! Not 'of', OP!

She started a thread about looking at the eclipse punctuated with many laughing emojis. I don't think she's all there.

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 14:09

Hohumbrumbrum · 13/08/2026 12:00

You're right you can, but it's unlikely, at least at a level which causes symptoms.

Of the approximately 40 million people who watched the 1999 eclipse, 28 had reported injuries from staring at the eclipse for less than a minute.

There was no recorded case of someone having damaged after an eclipse were they only glimpsed for a second or less.

BBC

"After the previous total eclipse of the sun that was visible in the UK in 1999, around 70 people were left with damaged sight.

"Many of them had spent less than a minute looking at the spectacle, without realising they were harming their eyes."

Two happy-looking women are outdoors under a clear blue sky, wearing cardboard eclipse-viewing glasses. The person in the foreground is holding the glasses up with both hands and wearing a green-and-white striped top, several necklaces, bracelets and a...

Eclipse warning: All the key signs you may have damaged your eyes

Symptoms after looking at the sun without eclipse glasses can include blurred vision

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4gk0dq81j2o

diddl · 13/08/2026 14:09

It was a lovely night last night & the sun stayed too bright to look at at any point.

If you didn't have glasses you wouldn't have known that anything was happening I don't think.

Perhaps that's why some people were underwhelmed?

I thought it was fabulous!

Hohumbrumbrum · 13/08/2026 14:03

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 13:19

The normal brightness of the sun means that you naturally can't look directly at the sun long for a sustained period. In an eclipse, that instinct to look away is absent, even though the magnitude of the rays is still present, and people therefore can look directly for a longer period (though still seconds) and unknowingly cause damage. The damage isn't immediately obvious. It can develop over time.

As someone who peaked, the instinct to look away was still there, just as strong. No one could look for long even if they wanted to. It might be more of an issue with a higher % covered. Without the glasses (or stacked sunglasses or something that reduces the light) if just looked like the normal sub anyway, just slightly odd shaped.

LBFseBrom · 13/08/2026 13:58

iloveanearlynight · 13/08/2026 13:47

*Can't HAVE! Not 'of', OP!

Very well said!

fivepenny · 13/08/2026 13:49

Well checking back in to say I can still see normally this morning!

iloveanearlynight · 13/08/2026 13:47

youalright · 12/08/2026 19:17

Admit it who peeked, can't of just been me 🤣🤣🤣

*Can't HAVE! Not 'of', OP!

namechange62 · 13/08/2026 13:41

Even with glasses I accidentally peeked! Twice.. whilst adjusting them.(I'm a spectacle wearer anyway and was trying to get a tighter fit and they slipped... I had spots for a few minutes..
I watched it from a beach in North Cornwall and it was amazing! It was a lovely atmosphere. Of course it wasn't as dark as 1999 but it was only a partial eclipse. It went noticeably cooler and darker and the seagulls started heading home..

Who peeked?
APurpleSquirrel · 13/08/2026 13:41

We watched it from Sidmouth seafront using my digital telescope - got some great photos, could even see some sun spots. I peeked a couple of times, mainly when repositioning the telescope.

Who peeked?
Who peeked?
Who peeked?
nomas · 13/08/2026 13:21

I peeked a couple of times. I did see blobs in my eyes for quite a while after.

I am prescribed glasses but never wear them, maybe the sun beams will act like laser beams and fix my eyes.

ChristinaPaigeDoesNotApprove · 13/08/2026 13:19

arethereanyleftatall · 13/08/2026 12:06

But if you can damage your eyes permanent in seconds, doesn’t that mean we’re all very often at risk? I think look at it by accident fairly frequently, for example when driving and it’s right in your eyes or when I try and wash my roof lantern. Or kids playing at the beach looking for their patents.

The normal brightness of the sun means that you naturally can't look directly at the sun long for a sustained period. In an eclipse, that instinct to look away is absent, even though the magnitude of the rays is still present, and people therefore can look directly for a longer period (though still seconds) and unknowingly cause damage. The damage isn't immediately obvious. It can develop over time.

Hohumbrumbrum · 13/08/2026 13:03

arethereanyleftatall · 13/08/2026 12:53

Thank you for this. Very reassuring.
does it count cumulatively or only in a row? Eg look at it for 10 seconds, away for a couple of minutes on and on for an hour.

I'm not sure. Sorry. But if you find out please let me know.