Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

The Jason Arday scandal

895 replies

Ilikesundays · 06/08/2026 21:55

To think that Cambridge University’s reputation has been shot to pieces by the revelations about ex-professor Jason Arday?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
22
BellaNope · 07/08/2026 10:11

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Persephonia1966 · 07/08/2026 10:10

35965a · 07/08/2026 09:33

Pathological liars are fascinating, how anyone ever believed any of the crap he came out with is baffling. The lies are so obvious. Therefore, his thesis being plagiarised was probably very obvious and it’s shocking he got as far as he did in his career without being challenged.

We actually are naturally inclined to assume people are telling the truth. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth-default_theory

That works well most of the time but it also means pathological liars can go a lot further than you would think. Add to that a tendency to trust the judgement of others (other people believe this guy so I will) and a natural default to authority and it's possible for them to climb very high before being noticed. As they progress their authority increases and it becomes less believable they could have got that far by lying. Eventually when it does all come tumbling down the fall is greater of course

Truth-default theory - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth-default_theory

Shedmistress · 07/08/2026 10:08

His boss was so so happy to hire his as he really is the best in his field. Well, if the field is 'pulling the wool over your eyes love' then yes. He was great at that.

LemonTT · 07/08/2026 10:03

IDasIX · 07/08/2026 09:23

No, not saying any or all of them are racist. I can’t know that. But it wasn’t his students complaining that led to the thesis and publications being scrutinised and this becoming a national news story. It was right-wingers who believe black people are less intelligent than white people targetting him. As I said, there was stuff to find and he’s bang to rights.

It is very well known that students consistently rate women and people of colour lower than men and white people in their student satisfaction surveys.

There is a miss held belief that he was initially targeted by a right wing figure. He wasn’t. It is true that right wing people did add to the accusations but it was later.

The simple explanation is he was investigated. The journalist who investigated him was bona fide. JA used high powered lawyers and the police to try to silence the journalist. The police should never have interfered with a legitimate journalist doing his job. This is a pilar of our democracy. The ability to have a press that can call out the elite. Be it this journalist or the sky news and Farage.

JA and whoever backed him used bullying tactics to silence critics. He built a career on his identity- one he defined which was as an obvious charade. Cambridge wanted in on that identity and knew what he was claiming. They trumpeted his appointment. When people asked questions they went into denial and JA bullied and threatened anyone who challenged him. This is the disgrace.

Gloriia · 07/08/2026 10:03

It is staggering that the reporter uncovering this was investigated for harassment. Arday's delusion and arrogance knows no bounds!

So he's retreated with a 'poor me' speech. Will there be formal charges of fraud, surely being paid as a professor is fraud?

NoisyUmberBalonz · 07/08/2026 09:59

A total fantasist who has helpfully lifted the veil to (once more) show the rot in modern progressivism, but as usual people will simply take whatever side they think will get them into the least trouble with their in group.

Heads should roll at Cambridge, minority academics who deserve better will be harmed because of the selfish actions of a modern day baron Munchausen who was too willing the play on race and disability to excuse his terrible behaviour, and dangerous morons Jolyon Maugham and Zack Polanski are in the middle of it, looking forward to their reverse ferret (which Jolly will probably beat to death in a kimono).

Only good for showing bad actors (anyone who employed him, signed letters of support to him without knowing the facts, and his publishers).

Paganpentacle · 07/08/2026 09:58

NarnianQueen · 07/08/2026 09:12

People being scared of being labelled “racist” is how he got away with it for so long!

Indeed.
A pattern isn't just 'emerging'... its kicking the front door door down and coming out playing a trumpet.

MySneakyLion · 07/08/2026 09:57

Backedoffhackedoff · 07/08/2026 08:50

lol. Cambridge’s reputation is completely untouched. This will be forgotten about in 6 months.

Hardly untouched. That’s batshit to think they haven’t been affected by the world wide interest in this.

HollyhocksandPeons · 07/08/2026 09:57

The Emperor has no clothes was written when? This is not the first and not the last time people were defrauded, happens in every walk of life. Cringeworthy, but not lethal this time.

LuckyHazelFox · 07/08/2026 09:54

IDasIX · 07/08/2026 09:48

Because the two factors exist, and posters are excusing the racists because they found plagiarism?

There were a raft of other lies Arday had made up to complement plagiarism. Had he stopped at plagiarism, he might have got away with it, if people were hesitant to speak up. He did it, so now he's paid the price, the same as every other plagiarist. He just made his discovery a lot easier.

Iwantanothergo · 07/08/2026 09:54

Gloriia · 07/08/2026 09:52

Didn't that student get in with crap grades <for Oxford> so a DEI/contextual admission?

I have no idea what his A-level grades were, and neither do you.

Paganpentacle · 07/08/2026 09:53

kwikfitt · 06/08/2026 22:00

No theyre fine

Jason, imo, took 'exaggerate on your cv' far too literally bless him.

Hes done right by resigning and ive no doubt he was targeted due to racism. That said, the response should've been to properly check the claims a lot sooner.

Targeted due to racism?
Or the fact he's a blatant liar who fabricated pretty much ... everything?

Gloriia · 07/08/2026 09:52

Iwantanothergo · 07/08/2026 09:49

It was a student, not a "DEI hiring".

Didn't that student get in with crap grades <for Oxford> so a DEI/contextual admission?

Shedmistress · 07/08/2026 09:51

InterestedDad37 · 07/08/2026 09:49

I agreed with you until your last two sentences:
"Still not on the BBC though I'm guessing. I don't watch it so I could be wrong..."

Of course it's "on the BBC" - it's being widely reported and discussed. It's absurd to think the BBC wouldn't discuss this story 😂😂

So you disagreed that I could be wrong?

I'm don't watch the BBC as I live in France and rarely watch TV anyway.

I am genuinely surprised that they are covering this.

Gloriia · 07/08/2026 09:51

Utterly ridiculous. If they can't check out a CV how on earth are they assessing student's work and awarding degrees.

Whoever appointed him needs sacking.

Iwantanothergo · 07/08/2026 09:49

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

It was a student, not a "DEI hiring".

InterestedDad37 · 07/08/2026 09:49

Shedmistress · 07/08/2026 09:26

There has been plagiarism and what we might call 'making shit up' ism in universities for decades now. Who knew AI could assist so readily in proving the cases that esteemed professors 'investigating' couldn't? I suppose when your funding relies on results you have to keep a roof over your head...

Including reproducing photos of actual science effects and cropping the photos and reproducing them to pretend 'shit happened plenty times' in the sciences. I've been following this for at least 5 years. And that's on you tube and it included people from a range of races. The Peer Review Debacle by Boghossian/Lindsay/Pluckrose is a good place to start if this is news to you.

This one just happened to be SO bonkers at such a highly thought of university that it is making news. Still not on the BBC though I'm guessing. I don't watch it so I could be wrong...

I agreed with you until your last two sentences:
"Still not on the BBC though I'm guessing. I don't watch it so I could be wrong..."

Of course it's "on the BBC" - it's being widely reported and discussed. It's absurd to think the BBC wouldn't discuss this story 😂😂

TidyRose · 07/08/2026 09:48

The "admiral" who dressed in a uniform to lay a wreath was prosecuted for far less of an offence.
Well, he was white and middle class.

IDasIX · 07/08/2026 09:48

LuckyHazelFox · 07/08/2026 09:44

Why are you even comparing the two factors?

Because the two factors exist, and posters are excusing the racists because they found plagiarism?

IDasIX · 07/08/2026 09:46

LuckyHazelFox · 07/08/2026 09:34

It's not just spelling mistakes in his thesis.

I’m aware. That why is said ‘if all they found was spelling mistakes’. My comment was in response to a post suggesting he was brought down by spelling mistakes.

RheneasAndSkarloey · 07/08/2026 09:44

allthingsinmoderation · 07/08/2026 09:34

Why do you think due diligence wasn't done in this case?

Because there was a failure of supervision in his doctorate, and the plagiarism wasn't spotted at his first uni.

He reportedly claimed to have been a visiting professor at Ohio and Glasgow unis, which is apparently not the case.

His other claims such as brain tumour, stroke, running 600 miles etc - surely they stretch credibility? Why didn't anyone look into it before hiring him?

AInightingale · 07/08/2026 09:44

RheneasAndSkarloey · 07/08/2026 09:29

I work in autism and confabulation can be a thing. Something about understanding fantasy Vs reality and understanding the unspoken contract that generally speaking, one talks reasonably truthfully in conversation.

I think he was used by both left and right wingers in a racist way. He was held up as a poster boy by one and now a whipping boy by the other. In fact he sounds rather vulnerable, his lies are very transparent and he should never have been exposed in this way had people done the slightest modicum of due diligence.

There isn't really any evidence that this guy is autistic. The diagnosis may be part of his fantasy too. Will be interesting if people from his past come forward to describe him in his younger life. A former classmate seems to have spoken out already, though that's unverified, but this person described him as a 'chatty' child. Anyway, I'm sure all will become clearer in time.

LuckyHazelFox · 07/08/2026 09:44

IDasIX · 07/08/2026 09:43

If you think plagiarism in a PhD thesis or journal article is worse than believing that black people are less intelligent than white people, the moral high ground isn’t yours to allocate.

I have thought about the academics who had their work plagiarised. It’s wrong, of course it’s wrong, but the academic who had her PhD plagiarised by Arday also has a very successful career. She wouldn’t be doing any better if he had cited her properly.

Why are you even comparing the two factors?

Shedmistress · 07/08/2026 09:44

dayslikethese1 · 07/08/2026 09:33

I don't understand how LJM found the PhD not to be plagiarism tbh given ppl are saying there were 200 instances of same wording as someone else's; this would have counted as plagiarism when I was at uni or is this just allowed now?

The team of people called in to look at this, are we saying none of them found anything, they found them all but were too scared to say otherwise or did the head of the team overrule the others?

It is a scandal in itself.

But none of it is a one off.

IDasIX · 07/08/2026 09:43

LuckyHazelFox · 07/08/2026 09:32

So you're continuing to make this about race. You can be as self-righteous as you want, when your minimise plagiarism to promote your own virtue, you don't have the moral high ground. Have you thought about the authors, whose work he stole?

If you think plagiarism in a PhD thesis or journal article is worse than believing that black people are less intelligent than white people, the moral high ground isn’t yours to allocate.

I have thought about the academics who had their work plagiarised. It’s wrong, of course it’s wrong, but the academic who had her PhD plagiarised by Arday also has a very successful career. She wouldn’t be doing any better if he had cited her properly.

Swipe left for the next trending thread