Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think redundancy crisis is not getting enough media coverage?

344 replies

aliboob44 · 06/08/2026 13:22

To think there is not anywhere near enough media coverage about the redundancies across the country? I spent a long time reading a chat on here a few days ago, which I can’t for the life of me find, with post after post of stories of recent redundancy and job searches, either personally or of spouse / child. The same on other popular forums, this seems to be affecting thousands and thousands of people yet I don’t see it being talked about anywhere near enough! I appreciate the bbc did a short bit recently on young people and the job market but this is different. This is a huge disaster - losing jobs at a stage of life when you’ve got multiple responsibilities with limited, if any, options to go into. What can we do to get this into media, perhaps there is someone on here who could help get it the coverage it needs? I’m terrified frankly.

OP posts:
magpie2907 · Yesterday 19:16

aliboob44 · 06/08/2026 13:22

To think there is not anywhere near enough media coverage about the redundancies across the country? I spent a long time reading a chat on here a few days ago, which I can’t for the life of me find, with post after post of stories of recent redundancy and job searches, either personally or of spouse / child. The same on other popular forums, this seems to be affecting thousands and thousands of people yet I don’t see it being talked about anywhere near enough! I appreciate the bbc did a short bit recently on young people and the job market but this is different. This is a huge disaster - losing jobs at a stage of life when you’ve got multiple responsibilities with limited, if any, options to go into. What can we do to get this into media, perhaps there is someone on here who could help get it the coverage it needs? I’m terrified frankly.

I was made redundant 2 months ago. 50 people were let go from a company of 100. Funnily enough all the c-suite remained on their £1m salaries and seemingly bear no responsibility for the strategic failings. Job market is dead as well. Only roles are AI engineers in my World (finance). Terrifying

GinaandGin · Yesterday 19:00

OnlyMabelInTheBuilding · 06/08/2026 13:47

If they’re troublesome, what’s the issue?

Troublesome?
Or calling out bad practice / calling out bullying or unfairnes
Instead of blindly going along "because that's that way it's always been done"
Would you call helene donnelly troublesome for the concerns she raised about mid staffs?

StMarie4me · Yesterday 18:58

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 06/08/2026 22:23

I don’t have a pension so I will be working until my seventies I expect.

Same. They were not common in the 70s and 80s. In the 90s and beyond in was a single parent for much of my working life, and had no money to divert to a pension. I will work till I drop.

StMarie4me · Yesterday 18:55

kwikfitt · 06/08/2026 19:50

Alright. I would hope not but I just have this feeling. Its like theres something in the air, theres so much more anger in the country.

Edited

The anger is generated by right wing media, both online and on the TB.

Take that away and the reality is very different.

Nicewoman · Yesterday 18:47

aliboob44 · 06/08/2026 13:22

To think there is not anywhere near enough media coverage about the redundancies across the country? I spent a long time reading a chat on here a few days ago, which I can’t for the life of me find, with post after post of stories of recent redundancy and job searches, either personally or of spouse / child. The same on other popular forums, this seems to be affecting thousands and thousands of people yet I don’t see it being talked about anywhere near enough! I appreciate the bbc did a short bit recently on young people and the job market but this is different. This is a huge disaster - losing jobs at a stage of life when you’ve got multiple responsibilities with limited, if any, options to go into. What can we do to get this into media, perhaps there is someone on here who could help get it the coverage it needs? I’m terrified frankly.

Knew a manager who insisted on travelling around our regional UK offices to give training. He racked up massive expenses on hotels, flights, meals, to give training, which easily the training could have been done on Teams/Zoom without the need for travel etc.

When I attended one of his training away days, the team went for a meal after work and he was absolutely racking up expensive cocktails etc like nobodies business.

I thought at the time, this won’t end nicely. Lo and behold, he was recently made redundant.

I agree with the poster who said companies are weeding out the deadwood. This guy was racking up easily a thousand or more a month on expenses alone.

People should realise you are monitored 24/7 at work, so any funny business, and you’re out - the employer will just pick the right time to give you the flick.

StMarie4me · Yesterday 18:43

DecisionTime123 · 06/08/2026 16:07

I'm definitely in a redundancy crisis, my very own personal disaster. Lost my job to redundancy last month, I have enough money till end of September. I'm 64. I can't find anything to apply for that would cover rent and bills. I'm not that fit, I am a carer and was previously entirely home based.

The "just take anything brigade" are very strong - I did hear of a job for 18 hours a week which wouldn't even cover my rent let alone anything else and required an additional unpaid 18 hours travel to undertake the work. Apparently I was mad not to apply ...

I’m so sorry to hear this.
have you looked at your benefit entitlement on Turn2Us?

envbeckyc · Yesterday 18:41

Cantquitebelievewhatitscometo · 06/08/2026 14:36

The harm to the economy this Labour government did under Starmer/Reeves is only going to grow under unfunded Andy. Sick pay from day one and all the rest mean that dismissing under capability is a hugely long and expensive process. Smaller firms without a dedicated HR department will look at the Byzantine employment law around capability, the weeks and weeks of meetings and adjustments and more meetings and appeals they must hold to terminate a poor worker and of course they will opt for redundancies.

The only positive thing that can be said about this lot is that they are ensuring we will not suffer a Labour government for a generation.

Are you ignoring the fact that under the last government the following happened:

State Pension age increased - resulting in less headroom for promotion and younger people in companies.

Brexit: The of the freedom of movement has prevented young people finding work in Europe, when I went to university I had friends that travelled across Europe for a couple of years doing grape picking and working in bars!

This opportunity has been lost to them.

It’s also resulted in less GDP and less investment in this country. It’s now harder to export goods to our nearest trade partner which will have had an impact on job creation.

Not to mention the loss of EU regeneration schemes will have also contributed to a loss of jobs in each region.

The public sector was gutted… local government, youth services, civil service all cut to the bone with many thousands of redundancies.

Wealth inequality increased, younger people are saddled with a lifetime of debt from student loans and mortgages.

These issues far outweigh the impact of 18 months of a Labour government which many people were frustrated with, the main reason for the disappointment is because rather than providing the change they promised continued with continuity Tory policies!

StMarie4me · Yesterday 18:32

Newgirls · 06/08/2026 14:46

I do know people in their late 50s being made redundant and getting pay offs. I think in previous generations they might have taken retirement by now.

In their 50s? Doubtful unless they had very good workplace pensions, which was generally only the Civil Service

StMarie4me · Yesterday 18:30

kwikfitt · 06/08/2026 14:00

All the staff in tesco and sainsburys are people who should be retired! Theres a huge problem.

How does that affect redundancies?
It’s a different conversation.

MyLemonPoet · Yesterday 18:30

margegunderson · 06/08/2026 16:17

Retirement age is 67. No state pension till then. Why would they stop work?

Because of how hard it is to find employment? A lot of people in that generation have good pensions so they might be able to use that until the age of the state pension...

NewYearSameMe16 · Yesterday 18:22

I’ve just been made redundant for the second time in a year and I wasn’t even shocked or upset this time, I’m almost numb to the situation now. Even though it took a few months to find my current role due to longer recruitment processes, I felt quite lucky in the end to receive three offers out of nine interview cycles. Not sure how it’ll pan out this time as pretty much all my friends have been made redundant over the past few months and I’m seeing more and more ‘I’ve been looking for XX months and I’m about to lose my house’ stories on LinkedIn.

Randallscandal · Yesterday 18:22

38thparallel · Yesterday 18:12

Who would be on each side? What would the war be about?

As I said upthread, it could be have-nots against haves, or sectarian war or maybe racial.

Nonsense

Never ever ever going to happen in the UK

Danikm151 · Yesterday 18:21

Cost cutting everywhere. Near impossible to find a job that actually pays what it’s worth.

38thparallel · Yesterday 18:12

Who would be on each side? What would the war be about?

As I said upthread, it could be have-nots against haves, or sectarian war or maybe racial.

ChocoChocoLatte · Yesterday 18:10

@KoiTetra

I’dd be interested to know more about who/what industries are looking for staff. From a recruiting perspective.

Randallscandal · Yesterday 18:08

38thparallel · Yesterday 18:06

So who would be on each side? What weaponry would be used?

I agree this is interesting. Maybe arms would be sent from abroad and the split military would seize what weapons they could.
Snipers and assassins would hunt down known leaders.
There would be spies and informers like in East Germany.
Plenty of people would flee abroad.

Who would be on each side? What would the war be about?

so weird

38thparallel · Yesterday 18:06

So who would be on each side? What weaponry would be used?

I agree this is interesting. Maybe arms would be sent from abroad and the split military would seize what weapons they could.
Snipers and assassins would hunt down known leaders.
There would be spies and informers like in East Germany.
Plenty of people would flee abroad.

Setters2020 · Yesterday 18:02

Well Labour at any opportunity say they are/want to help working people .
All these redundancies reduces the number of people they want to help!

Randallscandal · Yesterday 17:58

kwikfitt · 06/08/2026 19:40

I dont know, this is usually just a pre cursor to war isnt it.

I could see a civil war happening, against immigration

Do you understand that civil war means a war within a country.

So who would be on each side? What weaponry would be used? I am fascinated how you envisage a civil war panning out @kwikfitt !

38thparallel · Yesterday 17:15

I mean, by defintion, the army has to split for it to qualify as a civil war. Otherwise its a failed uprising or successful coup.
/pedantry

@iloveeverykindofcat no, not pedantry - excellent definition, thank you.

MyLemonPoet · Yesterday 17:08

theneighboureatmysalad · 06/08/2026 14:33

it' only part of the story, but I am amazed no-one was waiting for the consequences from Brexit. Companies have steadily relocated, business have moved, people have rushed to get European passports and use them, many businesses have simply refused to keep trading with the uk. It's just too complicated and not worth it they just stopped,, often it doesn't go any further than that. So overseas businesses may have lost clients here, obviously, but they have also closed markets.

What did people think was going to happen?

And that's only ONE of the reasons things come crashing.

Edited

I am sorry but this is not a consequence of Brexit necessarily. Plus unemployment is lower in the UK vs most European countries that remained in the EU
Some figures here:
Overall Unemployment ComparisonsUK Rate: The UK harmonised unemployment rate was 5.0% in early 2026.EU/Eurozone Rates: The broader Eurozone unemployment rate averaged 6.3%, with the wider EU average sitting around 5.9%.Lower European Countries: Nations like Germany (3.8%), Czechia, and Poland have lower unemployment rates than the UK.Higher European Countries: Nations like France (8.1%), Finland (10.4%), and Spain (10.3%) have significantly higher unemployment rates than the UK

MyLemonPoet · Yesterday 16:56

Yes. It's absolutely a crisis but not enough people are informed. Companies getting rid of staff presumably based on technology taking over but in reality the technology is not necessarily making things easier, the employees left are picking up the slack/burnt out, and the level of customer service/quality of products are suffering however companies do not care, they just care about profit. So many people out of work, at a time when people in full time jobs struggle to pay for necessities...I am so stressed in my job at the moment but powering through as really working in the background to make ourselves as self sufficient as possible in terms of energy and food needs (already mortgage free -early/mid 40's). I don't think people have a clue of what's to come...

TempestTost · Yesterday 16:48

Backedoffhackedoff · 06/08/2026 18:18

They don’t. A company can only sponser a visa (at great expense to them) for qualifying roles that pay more than £41k. No chicken shop or vape shop pays that.

I don't know. I am not in the UK but have a similar regulation, companies brining in skilled workers, which might mean a cook or fast food manager, have to provide a good wage. So you see them run an ad for $37 per hour for a cook, and then they don't find anyone, which if course is dodgy, and they get permission to hire from abroad.

What really happens is they write the requirements in a way that makes it unlikely anyone can fill them, and then the wages are a scam as well. The employee never sees that.

ResilientWallflower · Yesterday 16:33

Backedoffhackedoff · Yesterday 09:38

I’d be surprised if consultants were thick enough to think they’d been made redundant when their contract ends

It's not about being "thick" though. I think the OP's point is that there's a hidden crisis in the world of work that isn't necessarily apparent in the visible data. I've been laid off twice in the last couple of years at the end of fixed-term contracts that would have been renewed routinely back in the day. I was technically self-employed and continued to be for a while after the last one ended but have been under-employed for some time now as my field (in which I was highly skilled, experienced and connected for 30-odd years) is being trashed by a combination of AI and time-honoured belt-tightening. I didn't sign on as my (modest) savings meant it wouldn't do me any good. I'm in my 50s and not in a position to not earn so I'm taking a deep breath and retraining completely, despite health problems and generally feeling like I could do with packing it all in to be frank. There will be no sign of me in any statistics whatsoever, but that doesn't mean that I'm not on the shitty end of a stick that's walloping a lot more of us than in previous generations. I do also feel for the school leavers and new graduates but at least they still have some energy, unlike those of us who thought we might just about get to the finish line unscathed.

Backedoffhackedoff · Yesterday 14:20

Badbadbunny · Yesterday 14:07

There's a limit to how many trainees any business can take on at the same time. Not only is there the cost of wages, training courses, etc., but also the cost of lost productivity of the other staff having to train/supervise/manage them. As I said, all the firms I talked to do already take on school leavers and graduates and can't take on any more. But it's not enough to replace the more experienced staff who retire, change careers or reduce to part time working (or leave) due to having children.

A better option would be for Unis to actually do specific courses for, say, Chartered Accountancy where their courses/modules are specific to professional exams to gain exemptions, etc. That way, the period of further studying/exams after leaving Uni would be reduced, costs of training courses would be reduced, and the graduates would be better places (in terms of training) to hit the ground running. A degree in accountancy does make someone an accountant, not even close, and such graduates usually do exactly the same "on the job" training as school leavers!!

Unis need to do fewer "general" degrees and more job/career/profession specific courses. That would really make a massive difference to employers who could then take on graduates ready to hit the ground running, whether in engineering, accountancy, law, or any other number of professions.

I don’t think this contributes at all (fellow accountant here) the majority of finance and business degrees do indeed offer exemptions from chartered qualifications, but the degrees are only mildly helpful in actually working in accountancy.
And as you will be aware, the more elite accountancy training firms far prefer more academically rigorous degrees than accountancy /business /finance

Swipe left for the next trending thread