Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think "not wanting to ruin your body" is a perfectly valid reason not to have biological children?

139 replies

DeepSnail · 04/08/2026 14:16

DH and I decided to adopt in 2021 and we were matched in August 2022. DS was just about to turn 2 at the time, and honestly he has been the absolute joy of our lives. We love him so much and he is our son in every way that matters.
We'd always talked about adoption. DH was adopted himself, so it's something he'd always wanted to do, and I genuinely never had any desire to be pregnant. We're both in our mid to late 30s. We used to own a flat in London but sold it to buy a house outside London and now commute in once or twice a week.
The reason for this post is that I was out for dinner with a friend recently and she said she wished she'd "just adopted" because, in her words, having children had ruined her body. I said I completely understood where she was coming from because I never wanted to go through pregnancy or birth either.

Even when I was 18, adoption was always what I imagined for myself, I grew up with 4 cousins who were adopted so this has definitely affected my views on wanting to adopt. I have a sister 10 years older than me and all I she ever did was complain about pregnancy, labour and how she never "snapped back" afterwards even to this day and her children are well into their early teens now. That definitely influenced me.

DH is a doctor (not in obstetrics and gynaecology) but he hears plenty from colleagues about difficult pregnancies and births, and he's always said he'd never want me to have to go through some of what they see.
I'm also someone who enjoys looking after myself. I'm still roughly the same weight I was in my 20s. I eat well, exercise, don't drink much and generally make an effort to stay healthy because I feel better that way. I don't think there's anything wrong with wanting to take care of your body or wanting to feel comfortable in it.

Before anyone jumps on me, I know not everyone who has children gains weight or is unhappy with their body, and equally people can gain weight without ever being pregnant. But a lot of my university friends who've had children openly say they struggle with how their bodies have changed. Pregnancy is the obvious difference between us, and several of them have said if they'd known how much it would affect them physically they might have made different choices.
I don't think it's shallow to decide you simply don't want to put your body through pregnancy and childbirth. Surely that's as valid a reason as any other?

OP posts:
Lexy2345 · 04/08/2026 14:23

Adoption is fine. Lovely for looked after children to have a family of their own. Surrogacy is not.

LambriniBobInIsleworthISeesYa · 04/08/2026 14:22

I mean, yeah sure, any reason is totally valid to not put your body through pregnancy. It’s a lot and my two pregnancies have changed my body forever. But there’s no other way that science has come up with than for someone to have to be pregnant in order to continue the species. So whilst you’re not BU, it’s not something everybody can do.

TheRealMagic · 04/08/2026 14:22

It doesn't sound like anyone in the conversation you recount does/did say it is unreasonable?

I think adoption is an amazing choice, particularly when it's an active first choice. I don't think you need to justify it at all, nor are your reasons for doing so up for scrutiny by anyone not involved in the selection process.

NotHisLastName · 04/08/2026 14:22

Isittimeformynapyet · 04/08/2026 14:20

But adopting? That's what we're actually talking about here.

Have edited to clarify.

No kids or adoption, fine. Outsourcing for cash, not fine.

muddyford · 04/08/2026 14:22

In 1970s we had horrific sex education. Of my group of four close friends only one had children. I never wanted them, so seeing the whole rigmarole of them coming out the same way they went in just confirmed that.

OneAmberFinch · 04/08/2026 14:22

It's your life but I hope your attitude doesn't spread, because it doesn't scale well at a societal level.

If I had a friend who had adopted I would probably say something similar to your friend but it would just be something to say, and I'd think you were shallow if you took me seriously.

Isittimeformynapyet · 04/08/2026 14:20

NotHisLastName · 04/08/2026 14:19

Disagree brcause i fundamentally reject any ideology that women's bodies can be bought and sold.

Whether that's prostitution or paid surrogacy.

Edited to clarify: by all means choose no children or adoption. But outsourcing a risk to another woman for money isn't on IMO

Edited

But adopting? That's what we're actually talking about here.

Whattheflock · 04/08/2026 14:20

Not unreasonable not to want to be pregnant for any reason. But if you want children and assume someone else will carry the child for you adopted, surrogate, whatever - then yes, YABU.

ScrambledEggs12 · 04/08/2026 14:20

Perfectly reasonable reason. Being pregnant and having 2 children was what I always dreamed of, and very grateful it worked out for me. I found pregnancy fine but giving birth awful and the newborn days with my firstborn were some of the worst of my life. Absolutely no regrets though.

I'm glad everything worked out how you wanted it to!

maslinpan · 04/08/2026 14:19

You are probably quite unusual in that you have lots of first and second hand experience of adoption in your family, but I wouldn't say that it is automatically an easy option.

NotHisLastName · 04/08/2026 14:19

Disagree brcause i fundamentally reject any ideology that women's bodies can be bought and sold.

Whether that's prostitution or paid surrogacy.

Edited to clarify: by all means choose no children or adoption. But outsourcing a risk to another woman for money isn't on IMO

Octavia64 · 04/08/2026 14:18

Pregnancy absolutely fucked my body over. I was left with injuries from the birth.

many women are.

these days few women die in childbirth (although it still happens) but many have serious injuries.

Oscillating · 04/08/2026 14:18

Who said it isn't a valid reason?

JHound · 04/08/2026 14:18

Any reason you don’t want to have children is a valid reason. And not wanting to risk the impact of pregnancy is perfectly valid.

A friend of mine is childfree for this very reason.

Swipe left for the next trending thread