Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To almost feel a shred of sympathy for Tommy Robinson

456 replies

lazyahzydaysofsummer · 02/08/2026 10:55

He did a debate against Oxford university students recently.

His entire argument was destroyed. Every single point. Even Jacob Rees Mogg had to comment on how stupid he was.

It’s exposed what he really is - an ignorant, uneducated man who is so gripped by fear caused by a misunderstanding of the world around him, and it’s almost made me feel sorry for him. People like him have been failed - by society, by the education system, and by the people around them.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Imanexcellentdrivercharliebabbit · 02/08/2026 22:59

FredBares · 02/08/2026 11:38

Lots of people don’t know how to debate, it’s very very common.

i agree
we will be made short thrift of on here tho

Persephonia1966 · 02/08/2026 22:54

LeavingAtLast · 02/08/2026 16:38

In the UK, divorce is a matter for civil courts. Religious groups can have their own beliefs about marriage, but the legal status of a marriage should not depend on which religion someone belongs to.

The legal status of a marriage depends on whether you are legally married though.
If you are legally married you can turn to laws around dissolving a marriage in the UK (division of assets etc)

If you are not legally married, either because you are cohabiting or because you had a religious ceremony that wasn't legally registered then UK law on divorce doesn't apply. Instead you have to decide how to end your relationship based on prior agreementa or, if you had a religious ceremony, by turning to a religious tribune"court". Those courts aren't legally binding though so it is possible for one party to go "nah not doing that".

If a Muslim is legally and religiously married then the law of the land on divorce supercedes religious law. If they are only religiously married then it doesn't apply. The same way if I cohabit with someone I'm not married to I can't claim anything as a common law wife under UK marriage law.

Shedmistress · 02/08/2026 22:53

TicklishReader · 02/08/2026 22:45

Because one source is Tommy Robinson and the other is THE NEWS.

Do you mean The BBC? The organisation littered with paedoes and dodgy as fuckers who hired a misinformation expert who lied on her CV?

Hugh Edwards used to read THE NEWS. Why is his news so true and TRs news so bad?

Shedmistress · 02/08/2026 22:48

chocoluv · 02/08/2026 22:43

One source is a news outlet that provides facts, the other source is a criminal desperate for attention, manipulates vulnerable people for money and has been proven to have lied about things on multiple occasions.

Are you still confused?

Who is confused, I said 'fascinating'. Not confused.

But these facts as you call them, are the same facts?

TicklishReader · 02/08/2026 22:45

Shedmistress · 02/08/2026 22:40

Someone said that TR is a source, someone else said they already heard about the same thing via a different source so why is one source 'frightening' and one not?

Why is he a boogie man to so many people? It really is fascinating.

Because one source is Tommy Robinson and the other is THE NEWS.

Persephonia1966 · 02/08/2026 22:44

Backedoffhackedoff · 02/08/2026 12:54

Can you share a clip of the panic when a picture was about the be revealed? Sounds interesting

People screamed "you can't do that" several ladies fainted, the Muslims in the room started foaming at the mouths etc.

None of that actually happened but it would have been cool if it did. In reality maybe a slight stir of interest? That always happens when someone interiors a speech to say "and now I'm going to do it, I'm going to do the thing" and he was brandishing his envelope with a flourish. Noone tried to stop him that I could see though.

chocoluv · 02/08/2026 22:43

Shedmistress · 02/08/2026 22:40

Someone said that TR is a source, someone else said they already heard about the same thing via a different source so why is one source 'frightening' and one not?

Why is he a boogie man to so many people? It really is fascinating.

One source is a news outlet that provides facts, the other source is a criminal desperate for attention, manipulates vulnerable people for money and has been proven to have lied about things on multiple occasions.

Are you still confused?

Shedmistress · 02/08/2026 22:40

TicklishReader · 02/08/2026 22:35

TR may be that poster's only source.

What a frightening thought.

Someone said that TR is a source, someone else said they already heard about the same thing via a different source so why is one source 'frightening' and one not?

Why is he a boogie man to so many people? It really is fascinating.

TicklishReader · 02/08/2026 22:35

TR may be that poster's only source.

What a frightening thought.

BIossomtoes · 02/08/2026 22:32

I first heard about the grooming gangs in 2012. Long before I ever heard anything about Tommy Robinson.

TooBigForMyBoots · 02/08/2026 21:38

HollyhocksandPeons · 02/08/2026 19:54

I considered the source.

It was TR who first drew my attention to the grooming gangs. Not the BBC, not the ITV, a YouTube channel who interviewed him.

He was my original source for the grooming gangs.

That's a bit mad!🤯

Seriously, you missed the reporting in the news, in the newspapers, the documentaries and even the the dramatisations, going back over a decade?🤯🤯🤯

chocoluv · 02/08/2026 20:45

HollyhocksandPeons · 02/08/2026 19:54

I considered the source.

It was TR who first drew my attention to the grooming gangs. Not the BBC, not the ITV, a YouTube channel who interviewed him.

He was my original source for the grooming gangs.

That’s ridiculous.

You need to recognise what’s going on in your country more, without relying on a man known to spread lies.

I know about multiple grooming gangs because I read the news, you obviously don’t.

I don’t need people like TR to tell me it.

chocoluv · 02/08/2026 20:43

Brainworm · 02/08/2026 19:14

But he is raising issues that land/ connect/ detonate with people who do live in the UK and want to stay or have no voice but to stay.

Some countries, like Japan, have sought to limit immigration with the purpose of preserving their culture. I don’t think this means they are against other cultures, just that they don’t want diversity within their own.

Other countries, like Germany, have been open/ welcomed immigration, but have expected those from other countries to assimilate and adopt cultural norms of the country.

There are people in the UK for whom a monoculture appeals and either oppose immigration or support it so long as assimilation/ conformity is followed. Then there are racists, who are scared of, or dislike people from other cultures.

Those who fail to understand or acknowledge this do a lot of harm. They push people towards TR, through insisting they are racist. They also harm minority groups by inflating the amount of hate and racism that is present.

I think immigration should have limits and restrictions.

I think the UK is one of the best countries in the world and although I love the multiculturalism of it and it wouldn’t be Britain without it, it’s our underlying values that make it great and I would never want that to change.

But I cannot stand TR and he doesn’t not speak for me or represent me in any way.

I do not want to entertain a violent bully, who is a criminal, an alcoholic, drug addict who loves attention and preys on the vulnerable to fund his houses in Spain and the Canary Islands.

How can you say you want the best for this country and not even live in it?

How can you owe thousands in unpaid tax and take money from the people you’re claiming to represent but yet imply it’s the immigrants that are taking their jobs and money?

How can you claim that immigrants are an issue but be one yourself - it literally makes no sense.

Anyone who supports TR is an idiot.

TooBigForMyBoots · 02/08/2026 19:55

Shedmistress · 02/08/2026 18:57

I was about to respond to your post but you'd already edited it once so I guessed another was coming. I'm guessing you will add another on later.

For the record I'm currently answering:

Or the Catholic and other Christian dominations that do similar. Unfortunately there are loads of extremely intolerant atheists who would like to remove people's rights to practice their religion.
Are you one of those atheists ^?^

I don't give a shiny shit what religions people practice.

Until it starts affecting other people. Then I ask questions.

Why shouldn't I, do I not have that right? Why does everyone get so tetchy about answering questions about one in particular?

Edited

I was about to respond to your post but you'd already edited it once so I guessed another was coming. I'm guessing you will add another on later so I'll pick the bit of your post that I find relevant.

I don't give a shiny shit what religions people practice. Me neither. As long as they are lawful, I dont care what religion they are.🤷‍♀️

Why does everyone get so tetchy about answering questions about one in particular?

I'm not tetchy. I kind of understand people's relationship with their god and religion. But you seem to be a bit tetchy about Muslims.

HollyhocksandPeons · 02/08/2026 19:54

TicklishReader · 02/08/2026 17:52

He is the last person I would look to for truths, especially facts about a minority.

Consider the source.

I considered the source.

It was TR who first drew my attention to the grooming gangs. Not the BBC, not the ITV, a YouTube channel who interviewed him.

He was my original source for the grooming gangs.

BIossomtoes · 02/08/2026 19:25

That tells me how many people were born abroad. Those people include my stepson who can trace his British ancestry back to the 1700s.

likelysuspect · 02/08/2026 19:17

BIossomtoes · 02/08/2026 18:47

Do you have a verified source for that?

Its a generalised government estimate. It doesnt take account of how many came but then left later.

Strangely (given every time you fill out a form to even buy something like a bus pass for example), there are no data stats on exactly this.

NeedAnyHelpWithThatPaperBag · 02/08/2026 19:14

Despite what many on the Left seem to think ie. that engaging is enabling so must be avoided, I think not engaging can come across as convenient and give people the impression that there is a lack of confidence in counter arguments.

Brainworm · 02/08/2026 19:14

chocoluv · 02/08/2026 18:59

And how many British citizens have emigrated to other countries??

There has only been more of an imbalance since Covid (not sure if this was due to Covid or leaving the EU).

This thread is about Tommy Robinson though.

Immigration is not relevant considering he lives in a different country and is now an immigrant himself.

If he lived, worked and paid tax in this country then fair enough he can talk about the pros and cons of immigration but considering he’s suggesting that immigration is bad, whilst being one himself, is laughable.

But he is raising issues that land/ connect/ detonate with people who do live in the UK and want to stay or have no voice but to stay.

Some countries, like Japan, have sought to limit immigration with the purpose of preserving their culture. I don’t think this means they are against other cultures, just that they don’t want diversity within their own.

Other countries, like Germany, have been open/ welcomed immigration, but have expected those from other countries to assimilate and adopt cultural norms of the country.

There are people in the UK for whom a monoculture appeals and either oppose immigration or support it so long as assimilation/ conformity is followed. Then there are racists, who are scared of, or dislike people from other cultures.

Those who fail to understand or acknowledge this do a lot of harm. They push people towards TR, through insisting they are racist. They also harm minority groups by inflating the amount of hate and racism that is present.

Limecar · 02/08/2026 19:09

BIossomtoes · 02/08/2026 18:47

Do you have a verified source for that?

https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn06077/

chocoluv · 02/08/2026 18:59

Limecar · 02/08/2026 18:42

15 million have arrived in 30 years.

And how many British citizens have emigrated to other countries??

There has only been more of an imbalance since Covid (not sure if this was due to Covid or leaving the EU).

This thread is about Tommy Robinson though.

Immigration is not relevant considering he lives in a different country and is now an immigrant himself.

If he lived, worked and paid tax in this country then fair enough he can talk about the pros and cons of immigration but considering he’s suggesting that immigration is bad, whilst being one himself, is laughable.

Shedmistress · 02/08/2026 18:57

TooBigForMyBoots · 02/08/2026 18:47

Or the Catholic and other Christian dominations that do similar. Unfortunately there are loads of extremely intolerant atheists who would like to remove people's rights to practice their religion.

Are you one of those atheists @Shedmistress?

Edited

I was about to respond to your post but you'd already edited it once so I guessed another was coming. I'm guessing you will add another on later.

For the record I'm currently answering:

Or the Catholic and other Christian dominations that do similar. Unfortunately there are loads of extremely intolerant atheists who would like to remove people's rights to practice their religion.
Are you one of those atheists ^?^

I don't give a shiny shit what religions people practice.

Until it starts affecting other people. Then I ask questions.

Why shouldn't I, do I not have that right? Why does everyone get so tetchy about answering questions about one in particular?

Clavinova · 02/08/2026 18:55

nomas
Because many Muslims have both a civil ceremony and a religious ceremony

Apparently, around 60% do not have a legally recognised ceremony. Survey from 2017;

Six in 10 women in the UK who have had a traditional Muslim wedding ceremony are not in legally recognised marriages, depriving them of rights and protection, according to a survey.

It found that nearly all married Muslim women have had a nikah, a religious marriage ceremony, but 61% had not gone through a separate civil ceremony which would make the marriage legal under UK law.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/nov/20/women-uk-islamic-wedding-legal-rights-civil-ceremony-marriage

JesseDavisGonnaHangOnInThereNSoul · 02/08/2026 18:52

Shloopie · 02/08/2026 11:09

YABU

Fuck him

And he's a cunt to boot
Coke addled fuckwit..here's hoping one toot too many ..as in a Madness song
Cardiac arrest .❤️⚰️🪦

nomas · 02/08/2026 18:51

Shedmistress · 02/08/2026 18:15

There are loads of things I dont agree with and if on those threads id happily bring them up. This isnt about me.

Weird non answer.

Swipe left for the next trending thread