Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think public racist / anti immigrant / anti trans posts can justify dismissal?

516 replies

Slightyamusedandsilly · 30/07/2026 18:39

Read a couple of accounts this week of racist, public supporters of the far-right being sacked for spouting race / immigrant / trans hate on their personal social media accounts.

One was a doctors receptionist.
The other a school learning support assistant.

Both roles where they are likely to work with people in the groups they're publicly trashing online. One was recorded at a far-right rally, speaking about the amount of immigrants she was forced to support in her line of work.

What is your opinion on this?

YABU - People should be able to express their opinion without fear of losing their job. Freedom of speech.

YANBU - Anyone with any kind of public facing role/a role where their employer is likely disapprove of this should not publicly post this way and needs to understand that being sacked is their own fault.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Gwenhwyfar · 31/07/2026 10:17

Slightyamusedandsilly · 31/07/2026 10:08

Every employee in an organisation represents their employer. The policies around this will be standard at all levels.

They really should NOT be. We should be allowed to express political opinions, for example, unless in some kind of restricted role. The Head Teacher of the school represents the school in a way a learning assistant does not.

grassmonkeys · 31/07/2026 10:15

OnlyUsername · 31/07/2026 10:01

On the last bit - yes, probably, but being part of a protest is less likely to link back to your place of employment than an open social media page where you openly state your place of work amongst the bile. Unless of course you do a smiley selfie with said placard...

true.

can you give me an example of anti trans though.

Gwenhwyfar · 31/07/2026 10:15

"But the muslim religion is far more dangerous to women and girls than Christianity or Catholicism."

Catholicism is part of Christianity.
And surely, with all those religions it depends on the interpretation. The Christianity found in Gilead is very dangerous to women and girls, for example and that's based on an extreme and perverted form of fundamentalist Protestantism.

In any case, no culture or religion should be used as an excuse to disobey the law of the country you live in.

Hoardasurass · 31/07/2026 10:09

Switchnow · 31/07/2026 09:22

At least you’re honest. But you’ll be kidding yourself if you think your extreme views won’t be, or become, obvious in your practice. And that makes you a poor social worker. Don’t worry though, you’re in good company there.

Her expressed
views aren't extreme.
There are legitimate concerns about the way women are treated and considered by Islam, you just have to look at the treatment of women in Afghanistan to see how harmful and dangerous for women and girls the religion can become, then theres the way homosexualality is treated by both the religion and most Islamic states in which being gay can get you the death penalty.
Thats not islamaphobia or racism thats the cold hard and for some uncomfortable truth about the religion.
It shouldn't be considered hate or extreme to call any ideology that actively calls for women to be beaten or killed for disobedience, for gays and those born into the religion/ideology who convert or just dont belive it to be killed and an ideology or religion that says 9 year olds are of marriagable age as dangerous. Its legitimate criticism.

Holding gender critical or sex realists beliefs is protected in UK law so is simply not believing in gender ideology and are beliefs held by most of the country and align with science and the equality act so again not extreme.

Slightyamusedandsilly · 31/07/2026 10:08

Gwenhwyfar · 31/07/2026 10:06

But these people aren't social workers. They're in low level jobs and should not be considered official representatives of their school/GP.

Every employee in an organisation represents their employer. The policies around this will be standard at all levels.

OP posts:
Traybed · 31/07/2026 10:06

People who do this are just so so stupid. Whether it’s an MP, teaching assistant, lecturer, receptionist etc, if you put this stuff up, your job may be at risk. For that idiocy alone, they should lose their jobs, even if I agree with their opinion (which I probably won’t).

Gwenhwyfar · 31/07/2026 10:06

HolyHannah · 30/07/2026 23:14

When I was a social worker, we had to abide by social work values and ethics and racist, anti immigrant, homophobic, sexist, xenophobic, anti-Semitic etc views expressed in a public forum such as social media was grounds for dismissal.

I believe it is still the case. Such views do not belong in caring professions. As a manager it was my job to police this sort of thing.

People were able to hold views, but expressing them in certain ways (e.g. glad of people drowning in the channel, saying muslims should go home, homosexuals should go to prison etc) was not tolerated. Neither was behaviour which demonstrated different treatment of people in those groups.

I would be surprised if school workers have to abode by similar rules.

But these people aren't social workers. They're in low level jobs and should not be considered official representatives of their school/GP.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 31/07/2026 10:04

5128gap · 31/07/2026 09:45

What does 'balancing that with respect for culture' actually translate to though? Are you suggesting you would be expected to overlook the abuse of Muslim girls in a way you wouldn't with white girls (completely unacceptable if so)? Or are you saying that you're encouraged to avoid criticising religion and keep your focus on behavioural changes? Because showing respect to parents, meeting them where they are and focusing on positive change rather than judgement and criticism underpins the SW approach regardless of ethnicity and culture.

Does it? It didn’t when I worked closely with social workers. Seems quite a romanticised view of how it often works in practice, and is ignoring the culture of SWE that multiple people have talked about. My experiences are nearer to the pp, and you can advance search my posts, I’ve talked about elsewhere. Not going into it now, just suffice to say I recognise what she is talking about regards social work.

OnlyUsername · 31/07/2026 10:01

grassmonkeys · 31/07/2026 09:51

Racism is clear and unacceptable in all circumstances. There is literally no reason to judge or treat someone badly because of skin tone or country of birth.

Anti-immigration - if being anti immigration is based upon racism, see above. If it’s genuine concern for negative local/country impact of mass immigration, it’s worth a discussion to find solutions.

Anti-trans - please could you give an example.

Could we also add anti-terf to
this debate, such as placards paraded and photographed in newspapers saying “decapitate TERFs” or “JK is a witch”
Should people carrying these banners lose their jobs due to inciting hatred?

On the last bit - yes, probably, but being part of a protest is less likely to link back to your place of employment than an open social media page where you openly state your place of work amongst the bile. Unless of course you do a smiley selfie with said placard...

grassmonkeys · 31/07/2026 09:51

Slightyamusedandsilly · 30/07/2026 18:39

Read a couple of accounts this week of racist, public supporters of the far-right being sacked for spouting race / immigrant / trans hate on their personal social media accounts.

One was a doctors receptionist.
The other a school learning support assistant.

Both roles where they are likely to work with people in the groups they're publicly trashing online. One was recorded at a far-right rally, speaking about the amount of immigrants she was forced to support in her line of work.

What is your opinion on this?

YABU - People should be able to express their opinion without fear of losing their job. Freedom of speech.

YANBU - Anyone with any kind of public facing role/a role where their employer is likely disapprove of this should not publicly post this way and needs to understand that being sacked is their own fault.

Racism is clear and unacceptable in all circumstances. There is literally no reason to judge or treat someone badly because of skin tone or country of birth.

Anti-immigration - if being anti immigration is based upon racism, see above. If it’s genuine concern for negative local/country impact of mass immigration, it’s worth a discussion to find solutions.

Anti-trans - please could you give an example.

Could we also add anti-terf to
this debate, such as placards paraded and photographed in newspapers saying “decapitate TERFs” or “JK is a witch”
Should people carrying these banners lose their jobs due to inciting hatred?

5128gap · 31/07/2026 09:45

seanconneryseyebrow · 31/07/2026 08:59

Ok I will give some real life examples. And these are very common. Any SW working in childrens will attest to this. You have a non-white muslim family you are assessing and you can see clear signs that the girls are being treated differently to the boys - less freedoms, doing housework, not allowed to play as much, signs of physical punishment (regular smacking no bruises, and threats of it - mental abuse such as the boogie man (there can be a lot of that), regular verbal chastisement, no body autonomy, no choice over clothing, lack of toys. Just obvious the girls are more subdued, more compliant, more fearful than the boys and often are looking after the boys - even when they are younger than them.

We would talk to the family about how these things aren't acceptable here but you are also expected to balance that with 'respecting the culture'. The same in a white working class family and we'd be far more on it I think. I think its reverse racism. Children are children and deserve protection.

In more extreme cases, we, teachers, doctors can sometimes get a whiff an FGM might be about to happen - the signs are young girl becomes subdued and there are talks of a imminent holiday alone with a female relative overseas. To step in and stop that without being called racist is incredibly hard.

What does 'balancing that with respect for culture' actually translate to though? Are you suggesting you would be expected to overlook the abuse of Muslim girls in a way you wouldn't with white girls (completely unacceptable if so)? Or are you saying that you're encouraged to avoid criticising religion and keep your focus on behavioural changes? Because showing respect to parents, meeting them where they are and focusing on positive change rather than judgement and criticism underpins the SW approach regardless of ethnicity and culture.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 31/07/2026 09:37

seanconneryseyebrow · 31/07/2026 09:29

I disagree. I see my role as protecting vulnerable people. I wont let fear of being accused of racism/transphobia/islamophobia etc be a barrier to that. I think Im pretty brave actually and hold my head above the paraphet a lot. Its not easy in social work to do that.

I appreciate you.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 31/07/2026 09:34

Switchnow · 31/07/2026 09:23

‘Fear of being accused of racism’ is a convenient lie for people in authority who fail to do their jobs with the necessary courage and rigour.

Well yes it is, but that doesn’t stop it being an issue, it just means people can hide behind it.

OneKookyCoralRaven · 31/07/2026 09:32

It entirely depends on what was posted. Facts are facts can be perceived by others as racist/transphobic/homophobic/sexist.

seanconneryseyebrow · 31/07/2026 09:29

Switchnow · 31/07/2026 09:22

At least you’re honest. But you’ll be kidding yourself if you think your extreme views won’t be, or become, obvious in your practice. And that makes you a poor social worker. Don’t worry though, you’re in good company there.

I disagree. I see my role as protecting vulnerable people. I wont let fear of being accused of racism/transphobia/islamophobia etc be a barrier to that. I think Im pretty brave actually and hold my head above the paraphet a lot. Its not easy in social work to do that.

seanconneryseyebrow · 31/07/2026 09:24

Whats your job @Switchnow ?

Switchnow · 31/07/2026 09:23

porridgecake · 31/07/2026 09:18

Fear of being accused of racism is why the grooming gangs are still operating and we continue to go round in circles with inquiries.
There is another thread in progress this morning about Tower Hamlets, male intimidation and family voting in which nobody dares identify the men responsible.

‘Fear of being accused of racism’ is a convenient lie for people in authority who fail to do their jobs with the necessary courage and rigour.

seanconneryseyebrow · 31/07/2026 09:23

I dont like any religion really. But the muslim religion is far more dangerous to women and girls than Christianity or Catholicism. None are great, granted, but they are nothing compared to the Islam.

I often wonder how people would feel if they spent time working in social work on the ground. Probably very differently.

Switchnow · 31/07/2026 09:22

seanconneryseyebrow · 31/07/2026 09:18

Ok. I dont like the muslim religion one bit. I dont deny it. It probably doesnt align with social work values. Nor do my GC views. Dont care. I stand by it.

At least you’re honest. But you’ll be kidding yourself if you think your extreme views won’t be, or become, obvious in your practice. And that makes you a poor social worker. Don’t worry though, you’re in good company there.

seanconneryseyebrow · 31/07/2026 09:18

Switchnow · 31/07/2026 09:14

We’ve only got your word for that though - the word of someone who has decided the Muslim religion is dangerous. I can comfortably say I don’t like any religion - they all have the propensity to allow poor treatment of women, as does secular society. But you’ve singled out a religion you don’t like. I don’t think that aligns with social work values.

Ok. I dont like the muslim religion one bit. I dont deny it. It probably doesnt align with social work values. Nor do my GC views. Dont care. I stand by it.

porridgecake · 31/07/2026 09:18

Fear of being accused of racism is why the grooming gangs are still operating and we continue to go round in circles with inquiries.
There is another thread in progress this morning about Tower Hamlets, male intimidation and family voting in which nobody dares identify the men responsible.

seanconneryseyebrow · 31/07/2026 09:17

Switchnow · 31/07/2026 09:11

You went on to say when you meet a person of colour you wonder about their background. Which implies you don’t do the same for people who are white.

If we think of some of the high profile murders of children over the last few years, most are of white children killed by white men and women. Clearly those adults had different beliefs - about behaviour, about childcare, about violence - but your focus is on culture. Most Muslim people are not killing their children, but you’re somewhat fixated on the religion as ‘dangerous’. If you have data to show Muslim parents are more dangerous than atheists or white people, please share it.

When I have a case I have to look at the background of every service user. No matter what their skin colour. Background, culture, religion all matter and are all considered no matter what the skin colour.

And depending on your definition of 'dangerous' I would say it is categorically more dangerous in every way conceivable for girls and women in a muslim household than an non-muslim household. I dont need data for that. Its blindingly obvious.

Switchnow · 31/07/2026 09:14

seanconneryseyebrow · 31/07/2026 09:11

What? I just said the complete opposite. I said I worry that we are too scared of being accused of being racist when the same behaviours in a white family we would be all over.

We dont assume every black or brown person is going to mistreat their child. We are trained heavily to always 'respect the culture' - so I then think that some child abuse gets swept under the carpet in those homes because SW, teachers, doctors are terrified about being accused of racism. The same behaviours in a white family would be treated differently. I dont think thats right.

We’ve only got your word for that though - the word of someone who has decided the Muslim religion is dangerous. I can comfortably say I don’t like any religion - they all have the propensity to allow poor treatment of women, as does secular society. But you’ve singled out a religion you don’t like. I don’t think that aligns with social work values.

seanconneryseyebrow · 31/07/2026 09:11

Switchnow · 31/07/2026 09:06

Surely you deal with the behaviours? You can be alert to signs without assuming every black or brown person is going to mistreat their child - and by extension that white people will have the same cultural beliefs as you. Maybe that’s why we have so many cases where white children die in their family’s care, because SW overlook behaviours they’d be alert to in black or brown families.

What? I just said the complete opposite. I said I worry that we are too scared of being accused of being racist when the same behaviours in a white family we would be all over.

We dont assume every black or brown person is going to mistreat their child. We are trained heavily to always 'respect the culture' - so I then think that some child abuse gets swept under the carpet in those homes because SW, teachers, doctors are terrified about being accused of racism. The same behaviours in a white family would be treated differently. I dont think thats right.

Switchnow · 31/07/2026 09:11

seanconneryseyebrow · 31/07/2026 09:05

I said I dont look at a persons skin colour and make assumptions. When I find out the persons background and culture then it will impact how I deal with the case. But almost all muslim people are people of colour. Once I know the culture of a service user that must help inform my practice as it should. Its important. Just as it would if I was working with the gypsy community. Culture matters.

If I am working with a gypsy family me knowing about their culture helps me to support and assess them better.

You went on to say when you meet a person of colour you wonder about their background. Which implies you don’t do the same for people who are white.

If we think of some of the high profile murders of children over the last few years, most are of white children killed by white men and women. Clearly those adults had different beliefs - about behaviour, about childcare, about violence - but your focus is on culture. Most Muslim people are not killing their children, but you’re somewhat fixated on the religion as ‘dangerous’. If you have data to show Muslim parents are more dangerous than atheists or white people, please share it.

Swipe left for the next trending thread