Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To not pay their air fare

283 replies

rookiemere · 30/07/2026 07:28

Please if you recognise me don’t out me.

I am an only DC, after a tough year of hard decline from dementia, both DPs are now in a care home close to me. It costs a lot, but thankfully DPs have amassed a lot of savings so I worked out the other day that they can afford it for around 8 years for both of them - they’re 92 and 87 respectively in poor physical health as well, so this should be enough.

The dilemma is this. DF is from another country originally. He is very generous to his nieces my cousins, because their DF died early under unpleasant circumstances. He has offered to pay their fares, 2 of my cousins have declined but one has made it into an annual trip with DPs covering the air fares, bringing along her DH and staying for too long periods at our house. They aren’t ideal house guests so DH put his foot down and said they couldn’t stay for an extended trip again. Accommodation where we live is expensive.

So anyway last night I got an email saying they were thinking of coming over and when would be convenient and what B&B could I recommend. No mention of air fares, so I thought maybe I should say that as the care fees are so expensive DPs can no longer cover the air fare. TBH I don’t think they should even be asking, but I suspect the trip will be unaffordable for them if they have to pay for somewhere to sleep and flights.

I know DF would get some joy from seeing them, and to be fair to my cousin she is very fond of him and he’s almost like a substitute DF in her mind. Technically DPs could afford the flights, but I need to be responsible with their money. I thought I could maybe suggest a contribution of £1k which would help with the fares, but not fully cover them.

DF thinks I shouldn’t mention it and make them ask if they want it. I think that’s coloured by the fact he finds the DH very difficult to get on with and feels they are grabby - as do I to be fair. He says it’s my money, but it’s not at the minute it’s very much still DPs and I am just enacting their wishes.

So AIBU not to offer the money when it’s been paid for in the past ?

Apologies if I respond periodically as going into work shortly.

OP posts:
Cheese55 · 30/07/2026 12:48

OnGoldenPond · 30/07/2026 08:18

The 7 year rule relates to inheritance tax and is nothing to do with local authority care home funding and deprivation of assets. If the parents run down their savings and need contributions from the LA a financial assessment will be carried out and they will go back over years where the parents would have knowledge that they would need residential care. So they will be scrutinising expenditure certainly for all the years they have been in care irrespective of how long that has been. It is likely they will go back to the dates they received diagnoses of dementia as at that point they would have become aware there was a very high chance of them needing residential care.

This is true, you can't just spend his money like this and yes older people can live many years in a care home.

OhJacintaWhatNow · 30/07/2026 12:48

Barethe · 30/07/2026 12:42

legally it isn't. You either have capacity or you don't.

Capacity is decision specific. People with dementia can still make decisions on some things with support.

Legally once power to handle financial affairs is handed over to a POA or Deputy if no POA is in place, they make the decisions. However - for example - someone without capacity still has the right to make some decisions; under the Care Act they can make deciding about where they live - this went to the Court of Protection for us, where my father's wishes were upheld, even when the Court of Protection had themselves removed mental capacity.

It's more nuanced than just no capacity, no decision making whatsoever

Chalotte · 30/07/2026 12:46

rookiemere · 30/07/2026 10:24

He forgets to wash, dress and toilet. When I visit I always start with Hello Dad just in case he has forgotten who I am. When they were still at home DH and I had to do everything. A consultant has said he hasn’t got capacity so I am unsure why you think he still has it ?
Sorry if this is pointed am genuinely curious.

Sorry if I didn't read the thread carefully enough, but it sounded from what you said about discussing this with DF that has sufficient capacity to state that he'd like to see these relatives. Since the consult says he lacks capacity, I guess that as Attorneys you have to decide what he would have wanted in this situation. Tricky because his money may run out too quickly, but it sounds to me that he would want to continue to pay for the fares at least. Whether you think the relatives are CF is another question. They do sound pretty entitled especially expecting to stay with you and not behaving like respectful guests.

Ginnyweasleyswand · 30/07/2026 12:45

Jellycatspyjamas · 30/07/2026 08:14

I know in Scotland the principle is that if you have an adult who lacks capacity it’s your responsibility to make decisions that are consistent with with their wishes, if you know what their wishes were and it’s possible to do so. I’d check the position in whichever nation you live in.

On that basis I’d continue paying for flights because you know the parents did so for many years. It’s not deprivation of assets if you can show a pattern consistent with their wishes. It would fall under the same principle that continues to pay your DC an allowance. I think you’d find it hard to argue that funds to your DC was ok but funds to another relative given over a period of time for a particular purpose isn’t.

I think this is probably the correct advice however OP I would strongly suggest you use some of your DP's money to get a legal opinion from a lawyer who is a specialist in this area. Then you can act on their advice. This is assuming you have POA which I would suspect is the case with them both in a care home (there's literally no-one with capacity in any care home I've been in, sadly, over the past 5 years)

If your DP pays for flights, you don't have to put them up though, sounds like you have enough to deal with. It may be if they have to pay for their own accommodation they won't come or it will be a very short visit simply to visit your DF.

Barethe · 30/07/2026 12:42

OhJacintaWhatNow · 30/07/2026 12:40

@rookiemere just to say - mental capacity is decision specific. Even with loss of capacity to manage financial affairs etc, he can ask make some decisions, which is important to support him in doing.

I had a very similar scenario with my dad, right up to the refusal to acknowledge declining abilities, and I just want to say that you sound to be doing really well with supporting them 💐

legally it isn't. You either have capacity or you don't.

Francestein · 30/07/2026 12:41

I would send a bland “Let me know when you’re coming and where you’re staying and we’ll make sure we make time to catch up.’

singthing · 30/07/2026 12:40

rookiemere · 30/07/2026 10:26

Based on this thread I am going to offer the current price of the flights which is around £1200.

I agree it’s wrong to take money for DS and refuse something DF funded before.

I do think they are egregious entitled CFs though and won’t offer them any accommodation.

Make sure you document this somewhere, along with your reasoning.

If you think there is capacity for your dad to understand, you could even record you telling him this. Or if there is some other responsible party who could act as an independent witness?

Basically, set a timed/dated record that you are making a thought-through decision + reasons why for now and future, not a hasty or emotional one.

OhJacintaWhatNow · 30/07/2026 12:40

@rookiemere just to say - mental capacity is decision specific. Even with loss of capacity to manage financial affairs etc, he can ask make some decisions, which is important to support him in doing.

I had a very similar scenario with my dad, right up to the refusal to acknowledge declining abilities, and I just want to say that you sound to be doing really well with supporting them 💐

lljkk · 30/07/2026 12:30

I think I would decline to pay bcz of the need to pay CH fees, also this generosity has to stop one day, I'd want to get this awkwardness over with. I don't think the other decision is wrong, though, it's not an easy one.

BIossomtoes · 30/07/2026 12:29

CandidLurker · 30/07/2026 12:25

Just because something has been done in the past doesn’t necessarily mean it has to continue into the future. People with mental capacity change their spending priorities all the time. Who’s to say that the parents, if they had capacity, might agree that the priority for their funds is now their care first and foremost?

Precedent is one of the guiding principles of PoA. As an attorney you have to constantly ask yourself what decision the owner of the money would make.

CandidLurker · 30/07/2026 12:25

BIossomtoes · 30/07/2026 12:02

PoA includes “nice to do stuff” if the owner of the money has set a precedent. The onus is on the attorney to spend the money in the way that it has been spent in the past, not as the attorney personally wishes.

Just because something has been done in the past doesn’t necessarily mean it has to continue into the future. People with mental capacity change their spending priorities all the time. Who’s to say that the parents, if they had capacity, might agree that the priority for their funds is now their care first and foremost?

RockinCara · 30/07/2026 12:20

TerfOnATrain · 30/07/2026 10:58

You need to come on more often then as most of us regulars are fluent in MN now and read acronyms as pure English 😂

I’ve been here for over a decade and still hate the D….s! So twee and unnecessary. But everyone else seems to love it!

OP if your mother and father would get pleasure from the visit, I’d use their money to pay for the flights as usual. I would tell them that it’s quite likely to be the last time they have the trip funded for them as care costs are taking so much of their income. I’d also say that you are exhausted from everything and won’t be able to host them as guests - they must find somewhere else to stay. That way you are being upfront and fair about everything.

BIossomtoes · 30/07/2026 12:18

StopGo · 30/07/2026 12:15

As a (PO) Attorney I've dealt with my parents' finances. Your parents both lack capacity and you MUST act in their best interest, Therefore, you can't pay the cousins' air fares or accommodation, it could be seen as deprivation of assets. You also need to be very careful around the support for their DGS, the rules are incredibly strict.

I have too and was scrupulous about it to the point of meticulous recording of every expenditure. Their solicitor was clear with me that I was responsible for making the same choices about their money that they did when they still had capacity.

StopGo · 30/07/2026 12:15

As a (PO) Attorney I've dealt with my parents' finances. Your parents both lack capacity and you MUST act in their best interest, Therefore, you can't pay the cousins' air fares or accommodation, it could be seen as deprivation of assets. You also need to be very careful around the support for their DGS, the rules are incredibly strict.

Redburnett · 30/07/2026 12:14

Being an attorney has strict legal implications, it is not about compromises. Many people without a friend or relative attorney use a solicitor. It may be useful to ask what a solicitor attorney would decide in this situation.
It is definitely not a question of OP 'looking for a compromise'.

MeridianB · 30/07/2026 12:13

Perfect response from @Barethe

They've shown they don't respect the gift - even to the point of costing your DP more by delaying the flight booking. Just pull the plug.

MyMilchick · 30/07/2026 12:12

BIossomtoes · 30/07/2026 11:57

No she won’t. The state takes over when a resident’s money runs out.

OK, I'm not in the UK so different rules I guess, either way I don't think she should be using the money for expensive airfares when it should be used for her parents care, tax payers paying the bill is even worse

Barethe · 30/07/2026 12:05

I don't think you should pay anything at all. You are legally obliged to look after that money in the interests of your parents. You don't know realistically how long their finances will last because you don't know how long they will live.

I'd say

"Hi Bertha, so lovely to hear you are wanting to come and see my mum and dad. I have attached details of some B&Bs local to their care homes. Unfortunately, their assets are now all ring-fenced for their care and since they legally no longer have capacity, it is not possible to send any of their money to you for flights or for accommodation. It would be necessary for you to finance the trip yourself. Perhaps if you come on your own it will be more affordable. Do keep me updated regarding your plans since it would be good to meet up if you manage to get over to see them. Otherwise I will of course keep you posted and updated as to how they are doing and we can perhaps arrange a FaceTime call next time I'm with them.

Much love,

Rookiemere"

Seeingadistance · 30/07/2026 12:03

GingerAndTheBiscuits · 30/07/2026 07:43

If there is an historical pattern of paying for this flight, it should not be seen as deprivation of assets. I wouldn’t suggest it though and would wait to see if they ask and broach the subject then. A contribution is a reasonable suggestion. The niece is presumably now an independent adult who can save and budget for flights.

I agree. There is a pattern of spending, so that isn't a problem. What is a problem is that your DP's living costs have soared! and will continue to increase. I would make them aware of this - and suggest as your DP's living and financial circumstances have changed, then the annual visits as previously enjoyed and funded can no longer continue.

Given that your DF would enjoy their visit - I might be willing to have a conversation with them about making some financial contribution to their costs, but that sadly, this is the last time this will be possible. I know you from the Elderly Parents board, and this might be the time gently to suggest that this could be a last visit.

QuaintBeaker · 30/07/2026 12:03

dontmalbeconme · 30/07/2026 08:24

Payments to your son and payments to your cousin need to be treated the same. Either they're both OK or neither of them are OK.

Given that you seem fine to dip your hand into your DPs money for your son, you should fully fund your cousins annual trip as your DF always did when he was able to make the decision/payments himself.

If you are limiting/stopping payments to your cousin, your should also limit/stop payments to your DS.

You seem to be making decisions in your own best interests, rather than "what dad would want". If you have POA, this is not allowed.

I totally agree with this.

You can't argue that one thing needs to stop because you need to be careful with the money and then continue letting your son take advantage of their generosity.

They aren't going to ask about the air fare, because it's always been paid for. So if you aren't going to pay it you'll need to let them know.

I would say it's perfectly reasonable to let them know that this will be the last time you're able to do that as money needs to now go on care costs.
But you also need to stop your son's allowance at the same time.

BIossomtoes · 30/07/2026 12:02

CandidLurker · 30/07/2026 11:59

When the money runs out, the state - other taxpayers will be paying the care home bills. This is why “deprivation of assets” exist. I think as your parents need money for care then some of this “nice to do stuff” should probably stop including gifts to your own children. Maybe say that given the funds are needed for care this will be the last trip that will be supported.

PoA includes “nice to do stuff” if the owner of the money has set a precedent. The onus is on the attorney to spend the money in the way that it has been spent in the past, not as the attorney personally wishes.

CandidLurker · 30/07/2026 11:59

MyMilchick · 30/07/2026 11:55

I think you should pay none of it. You need to keep that money for your parents care, if it runs out you will be the one paying the care home bills

When the money runs out, the state - other taxpayers will be paying the care home bills. This is why “deprivation of assets” exist. I think as your parents need money for care then some of this “nice to do stuff” should probably stop including gifts to your own children. Maybe say that given the funds are needed for care this will be the last trip that will be supported.

semideponent · 30/07/2026 11:57

I'd stay silent on the money front. Offer nothing. See what happens. Easier said than done, especially when your focus is on DF. But it sounds like he has a good grasp of the situation.

BIossomtoes · 30/07/2026 11:57

MyMilchick · 30/07/2026 11:55

I think you should pay none of it. You need to keep that money for your parents care, if it runs out you will be the one paying the care home bills

No she won’t. The state takes over when a resident’s money runs out.

HeyMoonPie · 30/07/2026 11:57

Once here how much time does the niece actually spend with your parents ? do they bother the rest of the year keeping in contact ? Do they just visit your parents once or twice then bog off on 'holiday' for the rest of the time ? Really hate to sound cynical but I honestly would be checking parents wills and any codicil's that may have slipped in !!! 🙄

Swipe left for the next trending thread