Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think Andy Burnham is doing a decent job so far?

439 replies

spiceupyourlives · 29/07/2026 08:33

I’m really impressed by him working with the tories and Lib Dems on social care. It’s what we’ve needed more of in this country for so long, and a solution to the crisis will only come about if the next party to take charge is also committed to the solution.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
BIossomtoes · 02/08/2026 07:46

It must be so annoying for his detractors to see the cut through Burnham’s achieving with the disillusioned who have been crying out for hope for a long time. He’s very serious about getting young people into work, sorting out the mess that’s social care, re prioritising government expenditure and funding defence to make the country safe.

Zonder · 02/08/2026 07:38

NewGirlInTown · 02/08/2026 04:32

Of course, if the metric of measuring political success is the number of Tik Tok videos produced…
🙄
He is an unserious character when the nation needs the opposite.

And yet Starmer was too serious and didn't show enough personality for some people.

NewGirlInTown · 02/08/2026 04:32

Of course, if the metric of measuring political success is the number of Tik Tok videos produced…
🙄
He is an unserious character when the nation needs the opposite.

123H · 02/08/2026 00:34

NarnianQueen · 29/07/2026 08:59

He seems to have spent most of his time so far making videos for social media?

Yep!

He’s more like an influencer / content creator than a PM. This is going to get very annoying very soon!

Zonder · 01/08/2026 23:57

BIossomtoes · 01/08/2026 14:58

Because there was a general election and he was in opposition. It’s going to take years to sort out.

Surely being in opposition was a feeble excuse! He should have solved all the country's ills.

TemperanceWest · 01/08/2026 21:08

BIossomtoes · 01/08/2026 20:33

He was in the DoH for a year. Barely long enough to even make a start. And, yes, I heard some of the spiteful, nasty things that were said about him by people working in the department at the time too. I thought they should have been ashamed of themselves.

Some of them still hadn't got over the Tories being given the boot. It is a myth that Whitehall is packed to the rafters with left wingers.

BIossomtoes · 01/08/2026 20:33

InveterateWineDrinker · 01/08/2026 15:29

No, he was in Government. He was Gordon Brown's last Health Secretary. He might have had a fighting chance of getting something done if he hadn't been so busy promising everything to anyone who'd listen or launching his own leadership campaign (between which there was a great deal of overlap).

I was in the Department of Health at the time. There are very few of us in my team then who think he's even tangentially suited to being PM.

He was in the DoH for a year. Barely long enough to even make a start. And, yes, I heard some of the spiteful, nasty things that were said about him by people working in the department at the time too. I thought they should have been ashamed of themselves.

Visiblyabove25 · 01/08/2026 19:14

InveterateWineDrinker · 01/08/2026 15:29

No, he was in Government. He was Gordon Brown's last Health Secretary. He might have had a fighting chance of getting something done if he hadn't been so busy promising everything to anyone who'd listen or launching his own leadership campaign (between which there was a great deal of overlap).

I was in the Department of Health at the time. There are very few of us in my team then who think he's even tangentially suited to being PM.

I completely understand your wariness if it’s based on direct, personal experience of working with him.

But what I would say, is Andy Burnham has publicly acknowledged the mistakes he made as Health Secretary on social care - and spoken specifically about what a mistake it was to attempt to introduce social care reform too close to a general election, when it could be so easily weaponised by his political opponents. That’s his whole argument for getting cross party talks underway so early in the process.

2010 is a long time ago, and especially seeing as “shape-shifting” is one of the things Andy Burnham is frequently accused of, I do think there’s a good chance his process has evolved since then.

LightningTree · 01/08/2026 18:55

Well, so far he has floated some good aspirations but without any detail of how they will be achieved or funded. Too early to call.

Loopylalalou · 01/08/2026 18:52

The less men think, the more they talk. — Montesquieu

or maybe

Actions speak louder than words - anon

Northernlassie123 · 01/08/2026 18:30

InveterateWineDrinker · 01/08/2026 14:38

He was going to fix it when he was Secretary of State for Health and Social Care.

Spoiler alert: he didn't.

At least it’s being talked sbout! Would you rather it wasn’t?

BrandiedAromatics · 01/08/2026 15:38

Are you referring to the fact that Burnham did not do anything about continuing the private sector contracts, in the NHS, when he was Health Secretary? Please @InveterateWineDrinker ?

InveterateWineDrinker · 01/08/2026 15:29

BIossomtoes · 01/08/2026 14:58

Because there was a general election and he was in opposition. It’s going to take years to sort out.

No, he was in Government. He was Gordon Brown's last Health Secretary. He might have had a fighting chance of getting something done if he hadn't been so busy promising everything to anyone who'd listen or launching his own leadership campaign (between which there was a great deal of overlap).

I was in the Department of Health at the time. There are very few of us in my team then who think he's even tangentially suited to being PM.

Wowzel · 01/08/2026 15:16

If he can fix social care then he'll fix the corridor care and overcrowding in the acute hospitals - we've got over 200 patients waiting to be discharged to social care in ours!

BIossomtoes · 01/08/2026 14:58

InveterateWineDrinker · 01/08/2026 14:38

He was going to fix it when he was Secretary of State for Health and Social Care.

Spoiler alert: he didn't.

Because there was a general election and he was in opposition. It’s going to take years to sort out.

InveterateWineDrinker · 01/08/2026 14:38

Northernlassie123 · 01/08/2026 14:35

Give him chance ,at least he is bringing social care to the forefront . It’s been kicked into the long grass for so long and it’s affecting far too many people for it to be ignored much longer

He was going to fix it when he was Secretary of State for Health and Social Care.

Spoiler alert: he didn't.

BIossomtoes · 01/08/2026 14:37

pastadish · 01/08/2026 09:24

Had he actually done anything yet? Talking about what he wants to do is not a good job done

He’s been PM for less than two weeks and parliament is in recess. The expectations of some people are insane.

Northernlassie123 · 01/08/2026 14:35

pastadish · 01/08/2026 09:24

Had he actually done anything yet? Talking about what he wants to do is not a good job done

Give him chance ,at least he is bringing social care to the forefront . It’s been kicked into the long grass for so long and it’s affecting far too many people for it to be ignored much longer

pastadish · 01/08/2026 09:24

Had he actually done anything yet? Talking about what he wants to do is not a good job done

Northernlassie123 · 01/08/2026 08:59

spiceupyourlives · 29/07/2026 08:33

I’m really impressed by him working with the tories and Lib Dems on social care. It’s what we’ve needed more of in this country for so long, and a solution to the crisis will only come about if the next party to take charge is also committed to the solution.

The only issue Ihave is the time it’s going to take. It’s not AB’s fault but social care is so so urgent. It’s depressing to think it’s going to be talks for months etc and that it could take years or just never happen

Loopylalalou · 31/07/2026 17:18

BrandiedAromatics · 31/07/2026 11:31

Well, let's hear Andy. One of his projects turned out not to be costed. The other one was cancelling a grant for climate change projects in developing countries, and making them take out loans instead:

'This phase of government is about reprioritising' - Burnham - BBC News

When he does this downward mouth face he brings to mind the muppets.

Visiblyabove25 · 31/07/2026 16:01

InveterateWineDrinker · 31/07/2026 15:19

Absolutely right. But more than that, he says all the right things to absolutely everyone, whether it's pre-ordained in a speech or off-the-cuff when he's being 'authentic' (or, less charitably, when he's thinking out loud but manages to make it sound like a policy decision.)

And the problem then is that everything becomes contradictory to one extent or another. I was working in the Commercial Directorate at the Department of Health in 2010-11 when he was coming out with off-the-cuff remarks which, when turned into action by people in the NHS, were simply unlawful. And the way he tied himself in knots with Greater Manchester's ULEZ by promising contradictory things to different groups showed that he hasn't learned. So yes, he's remarkably consistent in his shapeshifting and his poverty of critical thinking.

He has made promises since becoming PM that by some measures run up to £96bn, all of which is unfunded.

I don't care about his accent, or about his dress sense. I care that he's a fraud, a chronic people-pleaser who cannot afford the promises he's making.

But what is interesting is the majority of people actually living in Manchester don’t see what happened over ULEZ as him tying himself in knots, or promising contradictory things. The original Clean Air Zone was designed before the pandemic or the cost of living crisis. It was no longer fit for purpose by the time it was due to be rolled out, and a vast majority of people in Manchester were grateful to have a political leader who listened to and responded to their concerns and ultimately chose pragmatism over ideology. We got the Bee network and Manchester is still going to achieve the goals on air pollution by the end of this year, without the charge.

I do understand it’s about perspective though: one person’s shape shifting is another person’s political agility 🤷‍♀️

But of course it’s absolutely true that the budget will be the real test of all his plans.

InveterateWineDrinker · 31/07/2026 15:19

nearlylovemyusername · 31/07/2026 13:58

This all makes sense with one caveat.

He's saying all right things, but at this stage it's unclear how he's going to fund it.

So the real thing will come in Nov budget and then we'll be able to judge if he's just another one for redistribution. If he's going to hit SE/middle classes with yet another tax raid then he's goner.

Absolutely right. But more than that, he says all the right things to absolutely everyone, whether it's pre-ordained in a speech or off-the-cuff when he's being 'authentic' (or, less charitably, when he's thinking out loud but manages to make it sound like a policy decision.)

And the problem then is that everything becomes contradictory to one extent or another. I was working in the Commercial Directorate at the Department of Health in 2010-11 when he was coming out with off-the-cuff remarks which, when turned into action by people in the NHS, were simply unlawful. And the way he tied himself in knots with Greater Manchester's ULEZ by promising contradictory things to different groups showed that he hasn't learned. So yes, he's remarkably consistent in his shapeshifting and his poverty of critical thinking.

He has made promises since becoming PM that by some measures run up to £96bn, all of which is unfunded.

I don't care about his accent, or about his dress sense. I care that he's a fraud, a chronic people-pleaser who cannot afford the promises he's making.

nearlylovemyusername · 31/07/2026 13:58

Visiblyabove25 · 31/07/2026 10:55

Well, for one thing the attacks on Andy Burnham are - from what I’ve seen - all very petty, very personal and in many cases entirely hypothetical, which I think is what shows how rattled his opponents are. They’re scrambling to find an attack line that’ll stick. And so far, they’re failing.

I’ve genuinely seen his accent mocked by very posh broadcasters as if that passes for scrutiny. It’s just so pathetic and so off putting to the millions of people up and down the country who speak with a regional accent. I’ve seen it said he’s provisional/ parochial and all he did as Manchester Mayor was look after buses - that’s just clearly untrue, as well as unbelievably patronising. Then there is the screeching hysteria about tax raises he has not even announced. Not to mention the classist attacks on his education and his clothes - as if a working class person being bright and hardworking enough to get Cambridge, and then earning enough to buy nice clothes is somehow hypocritical. It’s just so desperate.

And the thing is, these hysterical attacks are just so completely at odds with public opinion. Unfortunately - because I do think he did some good things in office - Keir Starmer did not have the personal qualities a modern Prime Minister needs to bring the general public with him. Andy Burnham patently does. He is soaring in the polls, and all the evidence suggests the more people see of him, the more they like him.

He has a lot of political good will right now, I really hope he can live up to it. My personal - admittedly optimistic - opinion is that he will.

Edited

This all makes sense with one caveat.

He's saying all right things, but at this stage it's unclear how he's going to fund it.

So the real thing will come in Nov budget and then we'll be able to judge if he's just another one for redistribution. If he's going to hit SE/middle classes with yet another tax raid then he's goner.

peakyblenders · 31/07/2026 13:47

Zonder · 31/07/2026 12:26

I agree. And look where David Cameron's oratory skills got us.

Totally. The biggest political fart-and-leave-the-room in at least a century.

Swipe left for the next trending thread