Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

AIBU to think SAHMs are lazy?

439 replies

Fluffyscrubberdo · 29/07/2026 07:18

As a stay at home mum how often do you get this judgement online vs real life?
It seems no one really says it in real life but there seems to be so much vitriol on here that there must be a fair amount of people who think it.
Has anyone made a rude comment to you in person?
Or are you a person who think sahm’s are lazy?

AIBU to think sometimes a sahm is in a family’s best interest?

OP posts:
StormGazing · 29/07/2026 15:18

Hollowvoice · 29/07/2026 14:51

I'm currently a SAHM
I worked for pretty much 30 years barring maternity and redundancies.
I have 2 DC with SEN and related low school attendance. It got too hard to manage both of us working with at least one of them home every single day so I had to leave my job.
I dream of the "6 hours to yourself while they are at school" - that has happened just ONE day in this calendar year.
So yeah. If I have a slow day as I am today (3 loads of washing done and put away, multiple meals made, charity donations and food shopping top up done, tidying and cleaning bathrooms) maybe I am lazy. Or maybe I'm just resting a bit while I can.

i also do this now, although I’ve retired now due to ill health. Are you able to apply for carers allowance? If you don’t, it may be worth it for your NI payments towards a full state pension if you’ve not yet reached the minimum for a full state pension

Boomer55 · 29/07/2026 14:54

Fluffyscrubberdo · 29/07/2026 07:18

As a stay at home mum how often do you get this judgement online vs real life?
It seems no one really says it in real life but there seems to be so much vitriol on here that there must be a fair amount of people who think it.
Has anyone made a rude comment to you in person?
Or are you a person who think sahm’s are lazy?

AIBU to think sometimes a sahm is in a family’s best interest?

If a couple can afford it, and they both want it, then great.

I was bored at home, not enough to do, and wanted adult company more, so chose to work through the child rearing years, in the 80’s .

Other people feel differently. 🤷‍♀️

Hollowvoice · 29/07/2026 14:51

I'm currently a SAHM
I worked for pretty much 30 years barring maternity and redundancies.
I have 2 DC with SEN and related low school attendance. It got too hard to manage both of us working with at least one of them home every single day so I had to leave my job.
I dream of the "6 hours to yourself while they are at school" - that has happened just ONE day in this calendar year.
So yeah. If I have a slow day as I am today (3 loads of washing done and put away, multiple meals made, charity donations and food shopping top up done, tidying and cleaning bathrooms) maybe I am lazy. Or maybe I'm just resting a bit while I can.

SerenaCat93 · 29/07/2026 14:40

IronEverything · 29/07/2026 09:16

The research doesn't line up with your experience though

Rubbish. Research shows that daughters raised my working mothers do better for themselves in employment and sons raised by working mothers are more equal partners when they have their own children because they grow up seeing the parenting and providing roles shared. Multiple studies have found that children of working mothers outperform the children of SAHM's because it demonstrates the ability to balance work and home responsibilities and models a strong work ethic. They also tend to be more respected by their children when they are adults too.

Anecdotally, I only know two SAHMs, both are lazy with school aged children but still refuse to work. Both are also poorly educated and both families struggle financially. They are perpetuating that cycle because the adult son of one treats his wife like a maid as he's never done anything for himself and he thinks laundry etc. is women's work and the school aged daughter has no ambition because she thinks work is optional and she doesn't want a job. She'll just have babies like her mum. And find some poor fucker to finance that I assume.

allthiscarryon · 29/07/2026 14:15

Fluffyscrubberdo · 29/07/2026 07:18

As a stay at home mum how often do you get this judgement online vs real life?
It seems no one really says it in real life but there seems to be so much vitriol on here that there must be a fair amount of people who think it.
Has anyone made a rude comment to you in person?
Or are you a person who think sahm’s are lazy?

AIBU to think sometimes a sahm is in a family’s best interest?

I think they’re naive and foolish to financial rely on another person. Of all my divorced friends the SAHMs are the ones who have really struggled financially and been stuck with a lifestyle much worse than anything they had a a single woman or married woman.

Organi5edbrood · 29/07/2026 14:10

ClawsandEffect · 29/07/2026 11:14

And if he'd had an affair in year 10? And the house had to be sold, not enough to buy your own place, the hell of trying to find rented (either local authority or private (even worse!) ) and you had to scrabble around and find a minimum wage job, with never enough money to live on? You certainly wouldn't have been able to afford to go back to uni and retrain.

You absolutely WERE betting both yours and your childrens lives on the goodwill of one person. And if he'd left you would have been in a hell of a mess. Very very luckily, that didn't happen to you. But it happens to thousands of women. A man isn't a solution.

You are making a lot of assumptions. I would have been financially sound if my husband had left. Thankfully.

2boyzNosleep · 29/07/2026 13:31

Lazy? No.

However, I personally associate being a SAHM as also choosing to be a housewife, and do wonder why so many SAHM are shocked that they have no time for themselves, left with the household chores and "mental load" and may struggle to find employment years later. Yes the DH or partner should do 50/50 when they are home from work/days off, but in reality that doesnt happen. Even if you have a proactive DH, the kids mostly want mum (in the early years) or the mum is too exhausted to do anything for themselves in the evening.

I'm talking about people who are SAHM through choice, not those who may have children with SEND, job loss or their salary does not cover childcare costs.

G5000 · 29/07/2026 13:31

IHaveQuestionsLotsOfQuestions · 29/07/2026 13:05

Getting divorced is not lethal!

Your question is really, would you quit your job if there was a 42% chance you might have to go back to work at some point?

unfortunately of course it's often not as simple as just going back

Watchoutfortheslowaraf · 29/07/2026 13:17

Depends on the situation. 3 kids under 5, no you’re definitely not lazy as a stay at home parent- you’re probably exhausted!

2 teens in full time school with no additional needs? Yeah it’s probably easier being at home than at school because you’re on your own in a peaceful house for minimum 6 hours a day.

also depends on your job. You could be in a really stressful, exhausting job and think that being at home would be easier or a chilled low stress job which would definitely be easier than being home.

there are too many variables.

Anonymouse22 · 29/07/2026 13:12

on SAHM threads I always see the same line about 'just look at all the posts on here from SAHM who's husbands and left and now they are buggered...'
but you know what I also see loads of posts about?
Married woman working full time and having husbands who still don't take on equal childcare / housework. Or they've been left and do work however still in trouble and have to make life changes because they can't afford to house or their lifestyle on their own.

I guess life comes with risks whatever we do!

IHaveQuestionsLotsOfQuestions · 29/07/2026 13:05

ClawsandEffect · 29/07/2026 12:01

Would you fire a gun at your head if it had a 42% chance of killing you?

42% of marriages end in divorce.

Getting divorced is not lethal!

Your question is really, would you quit your job if there was a 42% chance you might have to go back to work at some point?

lightseeker · 29/07/2026 12:56

This thread is so obviously AI.

Whenever things get a bit quiet on AIBU ..... quick, bang out a title with 'SAHM' in it. Literally anything will do.

Then watch it go to 1000 posts with the same old tropes and insecurities, rehashed over and over and over. It's just to get user figures up.

5128gap · 29/07/2026 12:53

If they have pre schoolers and are doing all childcare in an active way plus the rest of the domestics, I'd say they work very hard indeed . If their children are in school, less so. If they also have help, I'd say their lives are very easy indeed. That doesn't necessarily make them lazy though. Some fill the time with activities, excercise, community stuff etc.
I have met some very lazy people who work full time tbf. Always delegating, dodging and working at half pace. This is far worse as it impacts their colleagues. Whereas if a SAHP is lazy it only effects the partner who's keeping them, and that's their business.

Unexpectedlysinglemum · 29/07/2026 12:51

ThingsCouldBeEasier · 29/07/2026 12:40

In my social circle it was quite common to be a SAHM for a while at least, so everyone else knew how hard it was.

But do you really think it was harder than if you were doing a job and had pressure to bring in income on top of the household duties?

Unexpectedlysinglemum · 29/07/2026 12:50

Some sahp are quite lazy, some working parents are lazy too. Some humans are lazy.

a sahp could spend all day cleaning cooking meal prepping kin keeping etc for their family . Or they could sit on the sofa watching loose women and going on their phone. Most probably do a bit of both.
the sad thing is lots of working mums still have similar home workload to full time sahp so of course they are working harder and will feel resentful.

theneighbourstolemyteacup · 29/07/2026 12:46

villadicance · 29/07/2026 12:16

I think this is what causes so much debate.

In real life, I know no SAHMs at all. A handful of my friends work 4 days a week or 5 days compressed into 5. Otherwise everyone works full time.

I am on the PTA committee and every single volunteer we have works too.

I am sure there are some areas of the country that are as you described too - but for me the sahm thing is an 'only on Mumsnet thing'

In real life, I know a few women who are SAH wives I guess, if that's even a description.

Never worked, never wanted to, never wanted children either 😂

Good for them, couples seem to be a hell of a lot happier than so many of the bitter posters on MN. (honestly, some of the posters on here are scary they are so angry and bitter)

Smallestshadow · 29/07/2026 12:44

I think once the kids are at high school, they’re more of a housewife/house husband. Looking after kids of school age is obviously a lot easier than pre school age. It’s a choice I would never make for myself but I don’t really care if they’re lazy or not, it doesn’t affect me.

Netcurtainnelly · 29/07/2026 12:43

Fluffyscrubberdo · 29/07/2026 07:18

As a stay at home mum how often do you get this judgement online vs real life?
It seems no one really says it in real life but there seems to be so much vitriol on here that there must be a fair amount of people who think it.
Has anyone made a rude comment to you in person?
Or are you a person who think sahm’s are lazy?

AIBU to think sometimes a sahm is in a family’s best interest?

Awful Post. Why?

ThingsCouldBeEasier · 29/07/2026 12:40

In my social circle it was quite common to be a SAHM for a while at least, so everyone else knew how hard it was.

frozendaisy · 29/07/2026 12:37

Isn’t this discussion about whether it’s unreasonable to think stay at home parents are lazy?

I don’t have to work, I bring in money but can do it on my terms, our whole household prefers this arrangement, I have lazy days, as does H, no amount of judgement from others is going to inspire me to drag my carcass out, get 5 weeks holiday a year for at most a tenth of what H earns.

Both H and I have a better lifestyle with our arrangement we absolutely are a team and both of us would be lost without the other. We both work hard to maintain this.

I know we are lucky in this day and age to have this choice. Or it may seem like luck from the outside, it isn’t entirely luck.

frozendaisy · 29/07/2026 12:26

ClawsandEffect · 29/07/2026 12:01

Would you fire a gun at your head if it had a 42% chance of killing you?

42% of marriages end in divorce.

Well yes but you need to break down the numbers further

This includes second marriages (which are more likely to end in divorce as are 3rd, 4th ……)

If you marry younger more likely

If you have financial stresses more likely

Most things are a bit of a gamble. But a happy marriage and family, with no money worries, married a bit later to make sure, stay at home a decision both adults decide and respect, no where near 42%.

SummerPeonies2026 · 29/07/2026 12:21

I am yet to meet a lazy mother or woman for that matter, I am sure they exist somewhere. All of my friends - working or not are flat out, so I don’t buy this at all in the real world!!

villadicance · 29/07/2026 12:16

theneighbourstolemyteacup · 29/07/2026 11:57

On MN, everyone is busy with full time jobs, children, life and busy busy busy
but they seem to have an awful amount of time to spend on social media 😂

In real life, more than half the mums I know are SAHM, and most of the other half works part-time. I can think of a handful of mums who work full time, and they have LOTS of family help.

No one is calling anyone "lazy", everybody seems happy that the SAHM are available to take the kids when school randomly has to close (water leak, elections days etc), and that SAHM are the volunteers at school!

It's just jealousy. If someone is happy with their own set-up, why would they even care what others are doing.

I think this is what causes so much debate.

In real life, I know no SAHMs at all. A handful of my friends work 4 days a week or 5 days compressed into 5. Otherwise everyone works full time.

I am on the PTA committee and every single volunteer we have works too.

I am sure there are some areas of the country that are as you described too - but for me the sahm thing is an 'only on Mumsnet thing'

theneighbourstolemyteacup · 29/07/2026 12:15

ClawsandEffect · 29/07/2026 12:01

Would you fire a gun at your head if it had a 42% chance of killing you?

42% of marriages end in divorce.

it doesn't mean it's 42% of married man who ask for a divorce for a start.

NototerrorismIntheUK · 29/07/2026 12:12

OnlyMabelInTheBuilding · 29/07/2026 07:21

Title doesn’t match the post and voting

This. Title is different to what you think.

However, no I don't think SAHM's are lazy. Someone needs to look after the children and so paying for another person/nursery to do it so a person can go to work isn't lazy.

Perhaps, it's easier to offload the children to another and go to work. Children can be very hard work, much harder than some of the management roles I've had.

Swipe left for the next trending thread