Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to think a lot of men will not marry if they already get everything?

491 replies

Pinkshocks · 28/07/2026 18:33

If he is already getting everything on a plate, a committed partner, a sexual relationship, children, someone to split the bills with, emotional support and a family life, all without making any legal or lifelong commitment, why would he change anything?

I know this does NOT apply to every couple or to ALL men. Some people genuinely do not want to marry and both are happy with that. But if one person wants marriage and the other keeps putting it off year after year, are they really going to change when they are already getting everything they want?

Why would someone buy the ticket when they are already getting the whole show for free?

OP posts:
OneLimePombear · 28/07/2026 20:21

Pinkshocks · 28/07/2026 18:51

So he will have sometimes several kids with a woman he doesn’t love?

Yes I think so.

Melarus · 28/07/2026 20:21

OP: it is not an assumption - many women have been posting as long as I have been on mumsnet that they want to marry but their partner refuses. I know women myself in this position too.

In other words, "you see it all the time". This, though, is pure perception bias.

You see women posting about their relationship woes on here much more than men, because it's primarily a women's site and most of the posters are female. (I'd bet most of your friends who are close enough to discuss these issues with you are female, too.)

Also, you're much more likely to hear from the women who want to get married and feel blocked, than the women who are happily cohabiting - because the former have a problem, and the latter don't.

It's easy to think something is a huge problem when you keep running into people complaining about it. The thing is, you don't hear from all the people who are perfectly happy.

Pinkshocks · 28/07/2026 20:18

MissFancyDay · 28/07/2026 20:07

Maybe some men are like that but most men would not consider sex and children "everything"

A lot of men want what a lot of women want, marriage, a family, a wider family network, all the milestones of a life shared, like anniversaries.

A lot of men and women want all that without marriage and are on the same page. I only got married three years ago after thirty years together.

Your scenario of many men enjoying all the benefits of marriage without the paperwork and their women yearning for marriage is not as common as you make out. Imo.

Nobody said men only want sex and children or that most couples are mismatched about marriage.

The post is specifically about women who do want marriage and are repeatedly told it will happen while their partner is content with the existing arrangement. Couples who mutually choose not to marry are irrelevant to that point.

Your own thirty year relationship worked because you were apparently on the same page. That does not mean the other scenario is rare or insignificant.

OP posts:
Pinkshocks · 28/07/2026 20:16

WhatAMarvelousTune · 28/07/2026 20:13

I can’t bear the whole premise of “why buy the ticket if you get the show for free”. It is based on the idea that all women want marriage, whereas for men it’s something they put up with.
Men aren’t buying women when they marry. Women aren’t manipulating men by withholding certain things to get what they want. If those things are happening, it’s a bad relationship.

But I’d agree with your point that if someone wants to get married and the other person say yes but keeps putting it off, they are unlikely to change.

The phrase is about incentives, not ownership or manipulation. Nobody is suggesting men are buying women or that women should withhold sex or children to secure a proposal.

The point is much simpler. If someone already has the relationship they want, the family life they want and the commitment they want from their partner, but knows their partner wants marriage more than they do, what motivates them to change the status quo?

It is also not based on the idea that all women want marriage. It is about the situations where one partner clearly does and the other is happy to benefit from the relationship without giving them the commitment they have asked for.

OP posts:
WhatAMarvelousTune · 28/07/2026 20:13

I can’t bear the whole premise of “why buy the ticket if you get the show for free”. It is based on the idea that all women want marriage, whereas for men it’s something they put up with.
Men aren’t buying women when they marry. Women aren’t manipulating men by withholding certain things to get what they want. If those things are happening, it’s a bad relationship.

But I’d agree with your point that if someone wants to get married and the other person say yes but keeps putting it off, they are unlikely to change.

Bringemout · 28/07/2026 20:13

Meadowfinch · 28/07/2026 20:07

You seem to ignore the fact that some women want to avoid marriage. The choice to walk away works both ways.

I watched my dm raise 6 dcs and be treated as a domestic skivy for 40 years so I was naturally wary despite being with ex for years. I have a degree and a career, and had a child only when I was ready.

My ex wanted to marry but immediately after ds was born he started treating me with contempt and became controlling. It was much easier and faster for me to leave.

I see a relationship as two adults willingly entering an intimate relationship. Two adults can choose to marry. Or not. They are equal.

But do women want marriage more than men? I'm not sure that is true any more.

Edited

I don’t think it’s worth the risk for a lot of women anymore tbh.

Pinkshocks · 28/07/2026 20:12

Jellybunny98 · 28/07/2026 20:04

But how clear is the person that wants to marry about how much it matters if they to have gone along with a house, a shared life, shared children, before getting that commitment? You prioritise what is important to you, that’s just life, if you’ve done all of those other things first you could just as easily argue that actually marriage clearly wasn’t that important to either of them because they’ve both just gone ahead with doing other things.

That assumes the person was not repeatedly reassured that marriage would happen later. People often agree to a house or children because their partner says engagement or marriage is coming.

Going ahead with a shared life does not prove marriage was unimportant. It may simply show they trusted promises that were never kept. The responsibility is not only on the person who waited but also on the person who kept benefiting from that hope.

OP posts:
Acommonreader · 28/07/2026 20:12

Pinkshocks · 28/07/2026 18:41

So these men don’t love the women they are with even if they have DC with them?

1 Lots of men treat their partners and children abominably so no , procreation does not mean love.
2 Not if they have to be persuaded ( bribed) to marry them. If one person has to withhold parts of a relationship ( eg sex) in order to convince the other to marry , it’s probably not a good relationship or real love for either person.

Bringemout · 28/07/2026 20:11

I think of the people I know who delayed marriage and mainly they were just young when they got together and wanted to save for homes etc. the men who took ages despite having money etc were basically waiting for someone better and then just gave up. I do think when a man loves you he will just propose. I do also think more women should if they want to.

I think the problem for a lot of women who are higher earners is that often men often still don’t carry their fair share with home and children. Men gain from marriage in numerous ways that women often don’t so I do think it’s different for women. Usually if a man is the higher earner with kids and the marriage breaks down the mother becomes the primary carer, if a woman is a higher earner and the marriage breaks down often she is still the primary carer. The risks never seem entirely equal for women, especially when children come into the picture.

I also think if marriage is important to you just get it done before you agree to kids. Seen it too many times on here, someone claiming to be traditional and wanting to be married but already has three kids, name isn’t on anything and so on.

ofcolitas · 28/07/2026 20:11

Firstly, a woman who doesn't work, has kids and no money isn't really a suitable marriage candidate for someone with assets. I mean, why WOULD you marry her?

Secondly, people think men having children means they are in a committed relationship are wrong. Men like sex, they'll have sex with pretty much anyone who consents, hell, they'll even fuck us when we're unconscious or dead. Getting a woman pregnant is the price they're willing to pay for the sex.

Disturbia81 · 28/07/2026 20:08

I’m a woman and feel like that

MissFancyDay · 28/07/2026 20:07

Pinkshocks · 28/07/2026 19:52

It is sad but he gets everything without marrying her. Sex, children - he doesn’t need to bother to commit to her.

Maybe some men are like that but most men would not consider sex and children "everything"

A lot of men want what a lot of women want, marriage, a family, a wider family network, all the milestones of a life shared, like anniversaries.

A lot of men and women want all that without marriage and are on the same page. I only got married three years ago after thirty years together.

Your scenario of many men enjoying all the benefits of marriage without the paperwork and their women yearning for marriage is not as common as you make out. Imo.

Meadowfinch · 28/07/2026 20:07

You seem to ignore the fact that some women want to avoid marriage. The choice to walk away works both ways.

I watched my dm raise 6 dcs and be treated as a domestic skivy for 40 years so I was naturally wary despite being with ex for years. I have a degree and a career, and had a child only when I was ready.

My ex wanted to marry but immediately after ds was born he started treating me with contempt and became controlling. It was much easier and faster for me to leave.

I see a relationship as two adults willingly entering an intimate relationship. Two adults can choose to marry. Or not. They are equal.

But do women want marriage more than men? I'm not sure that is true any more.

likelysuspect · 28/07/2026 20:07

Elsvieta · 28/07/2026 19:55

Yep, "why buy the cow when you get the milk for free" is a very old expression.

Women were sold a pup with "sexual liberation", basically. Give it away (sex, plus cohabitation and wifework and domestic comforts and all the rest), AND work FT and pay half the bills, and you end up working the double shift and also very vulnerable financially.

Cue lots of women shrieking that they love sex too. Yeah, but not as much as men do. (You love children more; you'll put up with pretty much anything to have them and keep them). When men couldn't get it without marrying, they married. And lots more women shrieking that they make money too. Yes, but usually less of it, once the childrearing years are factored in. Any woman who had kids (or buys property with a man, or gets otherwise financially entangled with him) without marriage is a fool, who's thinking more about being a Cool Girl - or just her desperation for kids - than she is about what's actually good for her (and the kids).

Yes, lots of men have kids with women they don't love. Lots of men who don't really want them are bounced into it by women who do. Women want them more, and feel more of a commitment to them once they're born. Men can walk away and be happy; women can't.

Find a man who's worth marrying first, and act like you're married only when you are.

What are you saying on the ground here though?

No sex before marriage?

Give it away? Its not something to withhold or to 'give'. Sex is for you isnt it?

Its a wierd thing I see on here a lot, the implication that sex is for the man.

PurpleCoo · 28/07/2026 20:06

Pinkshocks · 28/07/2026 20:00

That only makes the point outdated if it claims all women want marriage and all men avoid it, which it does not. It is about relationships where one person clearly wants marriage and the other keeps delaying it while accepting the benefits of a shared life.

Of course people can choose not to marry, protect their assets and live separately. That is completely different from stringing along a partner who has made it clear that marriage matters to them.

Divorce does not make marriage meaningless. The fact that a commitment can end does not mean it was never a commitment in the first place.

But your OP clearly talks about women who want to marry and men who don't. If it was about one person's wants over another, why have you made it gender based?

Who says they are stringing a person along as well? If someone has been clear they don't want to marry, and the other person keeps saying they do, both are being clear. No one's opinion or wants has more weight than the other. The person who isn't getting what they want can leave as their partner has been clear they won't marry.

If however a person is saying one day we will marry and that day never arrives... Then fair enough, that is stringing them along.

DontSayItsOver · 28/07/2026 20:06

Pinkshocks · 28/07/2026 19:57

That is deliberately taking the phrase too literally. Nobody is describing women as a ticketed show or as a collection of bonus features. The point is about incentives and unequal expectations within some relationships.

Your husband proposed because he wanted you to be his wife. That is exactly the difference. He valued marriage itself. The discussion is about people who know their partner wants marriage, repeatedly suggest it may happen one day, but continue accepting the full practical and emotional commitment of family life while avoiding the commitment that matters to the other person.

It is also not true that marriage changes nothing simply because you have never used a particular tax allowance. Marriage creates legal rights and responsibilities around inheritance, pensions, property, next of kin status and separation. Many unmarried partners only discover how significant that is when someone dies or the relationship ends.

Lack of confidence in the relationship may well be the reason someone refuses to marry. But that makes it worse, not better, if they are still willing to have children, buy a home and build a life with someone they apparently do not trust enough to marry.

The assumption that women demanding marriage would reject a simple register office ceremony rather undermines the argument. For many, it is the commitment and legal protection they want, not an expensive wedding.

The title of the post is “to think a lot of men will not marry if they already get everything?”

In other replies you said “It is sad but he gets everything without marrying her. Sex, children”

I think a woman is more than a baby creating sex doll. I don’t think a relationship is about what the other person “gets”.

I don’t think these men would’ve suddenly wanted to marry these women if they weren’t getting “sex and children”. I don’t think withholding sex and children will get them a ring because I don’t think sex and children are incentives to marriage. The only incentive to marriage is legal protections after a spouse’s death. Not getting sex and kids until marriage will not make a man more eager to marry a woman unless they’re 14 years old or religious.

Jellybunny98 · 28/07/2026 20:04

Pinkshocks · 28/07/2026 20:00

That only makes the point outdated if it claims all women want marriage and all men avoid it, which it does not. It is about relationships where one person clearly wants marriage and the other keeps delaying it while accepting the benefits of a shared life.

Of course people can choose not to marry, protect their assets and live separately. That is completely different from stringing along a partner who has made it clear that marriage matters to them.

Divorce does not make marriage meaningless. The fact that a commitment can end does not mean it was never a commitment in the first place.

But how clear is the person that wants to marry about how much it matters if they to have gone along with a house, a shared life, shared children, before getting that commitment? You prioritise what is important to you, that’s just life, if you’ve done all of those other things first you could just as easily argue that actually marriage clearly wasn’t that important to either of them because they’ve both just gone ahead with doing other things.

Sherararara · 28/07/2026 20:03

This can apply to anyone, men or women.

Jellybunny98 · 28/07/2026 20:02

I do take your point OP and I don’t totally disagree but I would add that for me this is an actions speak louder than words thing. If a person, man or woman, is serious about marriage being important to them then really the time to state that clearly and stand by it is before you do anything else because if marriage really is important to you then you wouldn’t choose to buy a house, have children with someone who hasn’t entered into that commitment with you.

I would also say there are some people for whom maybe life just gets in the way. I can see where if we hadn’t gotten married before we had our children we would never have found the time now to sort that out, it was important to us so we did that first, if my husband hadn’t been on the same page about marriage then he wouldn’t have been the one for me and that’s okay, but I don’t think any healthy marriage starts with one person just doing the other a favour by marrying really.

Pinkshocks · 28/07/2026 20:00

PurpleCoo · 28/07/2026 19:58

I think this is a really outdated and sexist view. It could be men or women equally who don't want to marry I think.

I know lots of situations where the men want to marry and the women don't. These days, women are far more likely to have successful careers and own property in their own right. It makes perfect sense not to marry in this situation. Why gamble your house and savings for love? Older men in particular seem to want a wife... Older women tend to be quite content living separately, staying dating long term and protecting their assets, especially if they have children.

It's perfectly possible to be in a loving relationship without marriage as well. You can also be commited to someone without marriage. Marriage is pretty meaningless anyway nowadays. It's not a lifelong commitment is it when so many divorce.

That only makes the point outdated if it claims all women want marriage and all men avoid it, which it does not. It is about relationships where one person clearly wants marriage and the other keeps delaying it while accepting the benefits of a shared life.

Of course people can choose not to marry, protect their assets and live separately. That is completely different from stringing along a partner who has made it clear that marriage matters to them.

Divorce does not make marriage meaningless. The fact that a commitment can end does not mean it was never a commitment in the first place.

OP posts:
Pinkshocks · 28/07/2026 19:58

Rachelshair · 28/07/2026 19:54

Why do you view marriage as a reward for a woman, that she'd only get by withholding sex, money or kids from a man?
Weird.

The point is that if one partner wants that commitment and the other is already getting everything they want from the relationship without making it, they have little incentive to change the status quo. That is about incentives, not withholding sex, money or children.

You clearly didn’t understand.

Weird.

OP posts:
PurpleCoo · 28/07/2026 19:58

I think this is a really outdated and sexist view. It could be men or women equally who don't want to marry I think.

I know lots of situations where the men want to marry and the women don't. These days, women are far more likely to have successful careers and own property in their own right. It makes perfect sense not to marry in this situation. Why gamble your house and savings for love? Older men in particular seem to want a wife... Older women tend to be quite content living separately, staying dating long term and protecting their assets, especially if they have children.

It's perfectly possible to be in a loving relationship without marriage as well. You can also be commited to someone without marriage. Marriage is pretty meaningless anyway nowadays. It's not a lifelong commitment is it when so many divorce.

Pinkshocks · 28/07/2026 19:57

DontSayItsOver · 28/07/2026 19:52

I think the fact you consider women to be some kind of ticketed show is the more problematic thing here. My husband proposed because he wanted to call me his wife, not to unlock some paywalled bonus features.

If me and DH weren’t married it would change nothing. In almost 20 years I’ve never once used marriage tax allowance or asset transfership.

If someone is refusing to get married to a partner after years and years of being asked, it’s nothing to do with “already getting everything” which is a pathetic way to consider a partner’s contribution to a relationship, and more to do with the fact that they don’t have confidence in the relationship.

I also suspect many of these people insisting on a marriage wouldn’t be satisfied with a £62 quicky at the council.

That is deliberately taking the phrase too literally. Nobody is describing women as a ticketed show or as a collection of bonus features. The point is about incentives and unequal expectations within some relationships.

Your husband proposed because he wanted you to be his wife. That is exactly the difference. He valued marriage itself. The discussion is about people who know their partner wants marriage, repeatedly suggest it may happen one day, but continue accepting the full practical and emotional commitment of family life while avoiding the commitment that matters to the other person.

It is also not true that marriage changes nothing simply because you have never used a particular tax allowance. Marriage creates legal rights and responsibilities around inheritance, pensions, property, next of kin status and separation. Many unmarried partners only discover how significant that is when someone dies or the relationship ends.

Lack of confidence in the relationship may well be the reason someone refuses to marry. But that makes it worse, not better, if they are still willing to have children, buy a home and build a life with someone they apparently do not trust enough to marry.

The assumption that women demanding marriage would reject a simple register office ceremony rather undermines the argument. For many, it is the commitment and legal protection they want, not an expensive wedding.

OP posts:
HappiestSleeping · 28/07/2026 19:56

ChickenBananaBanana · 28/07/2026 18:35

Imo they will marry you if they actually love you. If not, they don't.

I married my wife because I loved her. I wanted her to know she was the most important person to me. I was happy to share everything I had with her. For better, for worse and all that.

As it turns out, the sickness bit of the vows resulted in death parting us, and I only hope she knew the way I felt about her.

Elsvieta · 28/07/2026 19:55

Yep, "why buy the cow when you get the milk for free" is a very old expression.

Women were sold a pup with "sexual liberation", basically. Give it away (sex, plus cohabitation and wifework and domestic comforts and all the rest), AND work FT and pay half the bills, and you end up working the double shift and also very vulnerable financially.

Cue lots of women shrieking that they love sex too. Yeah, but not as much as men do. (You love children more; you'll put up with pretty much anything to have them and keep them). When men couldn't get it without marrying, they married. And lots more women shrieking that they make money too. Yes, but usually less of it, once the childrearing years are factored in. Any woman who had kids (or buys property with a man, or gets otherwise financially entangled with him) without marriage is a fool, who's thinking more about being a Cool Girl - or just her desperation for kids - than she is about what's actually good for her (and the kids).

Yes, lots of men have kids with women they don't love. Lots of men who don't really want them are bounced into it by women who do. Women want them more, and feel more of a commitment to them once they're born. Men can walk away and be happy; women can't.

Find a man who's worth marrying first, and act like you're married only when you are.